Biodiv Sci ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 30-42. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08161
Special Issue: 昆虫多样性与生态功能
• Paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yu Wang1, Guangcai Gao1, Biqian Fu1,*(), Zhuan Wu2
Received:
2008-07-16
Accepted:
2008-12-31
Online:
2009-01-20
Published:
2009-01-20
Contact:
Biqian Fu
Yu Wang, Guangcai Gao, Biqian Fu, Zhuan Wu. Composition and spatial distribution pattern of ground-dwelling beetle communities in Yeyahu Wetland, Beijing[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(1): 30-42.
Fig. 1 The distribution of sampling transects for ground- dwelling beetles investigation in Yeyahu Wetland. A, Cyperus glomeratus transect; B, C, Salsola collina transects; D, Degradated Phragmites communis transect; E, F, Hemarthria altissima transects; G, H, Well-conserved Phragmites communis transects
科 Family | 甲虫个体数 Individual number | 总个体数 Total | 百分比 (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的芦苇带 (WPCT) | |||
步甲科 Carabidae | 943 | 282 | 50 | 134 | 1,132 | 2,541 | 21.50 |
隐翅虫科 Staphylinidae | 554 | 533 | 183 | 546 | 585 | 2,401 | 20.31 |
蚁形甲科 Anthicidae | 71 | 680 | 17 | 530 | 66 | 1,364 | 11.54 |
肖叶甲科 Eumolpidae | 61 | 46 | 1 | 15 | 977 | 1,100 | 9.31 |
薪甲科 Lathridiidae | 191 | 40 | 49 | 86 | 595 | 961 | 8.13 |
象甲科 Curculionidae | 240 | 119 | 18 | 27 | 73 | 477 | 4.04 |
蜉金龟科 Aphodiidae | 50 | 48 | 6 | 82 | 197 | 383 | 3.24 |
叩甲科 Elateridae | 50 | 44 | 2 | 0 | 280 | 376 | 3.18 |
拟步甲科 Tenebrionidae | 5 | 247 | 15 | 2 | 48 | 317 | 2.68 |
金龟科 Scarabaeidae | 8 | 201 | 20 | 53 | 10 | 292 | 2.47 |
叶甲科 Chrysomelidae | 62 | 37 | 2 | 4 | 159 | 264 | 2.23 |
埋葬甲科 Silphidae | 67 | 64 | 20 | 31 | 18 | 200 | 1.69 |
隐食甲科 Cryptophagidae | 28 | 108 | 7 | 19 | 28 | 190 | 1.61 |
丽金龟科 Rutelidae | 2 | 100 | 49 | 3 | 2 | 156 | 1.32 |
虎甲科 Cicindelidae | 14 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 135 | 1.14 |
阎甲科 Histeridae | 4 | 77 | 12 | 26 | 5 | 124 | 1.05 |
粪金龟科 Geotrupidae | 1 | 25 | 14 | 57 | 9 | 106 | 0.90 |
小蕈甲科 Mycetophagidae | 46 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 79 | 0.67 |
鳃金龟科 Melolonthidae | 12 | 22 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 55 | 0.47 |
瓢甲科 Coccinellidae | 6 | 14 | 9 | 16 | 4 | 49 | 0.41 |
苔甲科 Scydmaenidae | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 25 | 38 | 0.32 |
犀金龟科 Dynastidae | 11 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 38 | 0.32 |
蕈坚甲科 Merycidae | 1 | 2 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 30 | 0.25 |
花萤科 Cantharidae | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 | 0.21 |
露尾甲科 Nitidulidae | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 22 | 0.19 |
缨甲科 Ptiliidae | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 0.18 |
平唇水龟科 Hydraenidae | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0.10 |
蚁甲科 Pselaphidae | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 0.09 |
圆泥甲科 Georyssidae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 0.07 |
锹甲科 Lucanidae | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0.07 |
花蚤科 Mordellidae | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0.06 |
长蠹科 Bostrychidae | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.05 |
球蕈甲科 Leiodidae | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0.04 |
水龟甲科 Hydrophilidae | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0.03 |
小丸甲科 Nosodendridae | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0.03 |
铁甲科 Hispidae | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.03 |
水缨甲科 Hydroscaphidae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 |
花金龟科 Cetoniidae | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.02 |
天牛科 Cerambycidae | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 |
皮蠹科 Dermestidae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 |
拟花萤科 Melyridae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 |
窃蠹科 Anobiidae | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 |
总计 Total | 2,476 | 2,805 | 504 | 1,691 | 4,344 | 11,820 |
Table 1 The family composition and spatial distribution of ground-dwelling beetle communities in Yeyahu Wetland (collected from April to October 2007)
科 Family | 甲虫个体数 Individual number | 总个体数 Total | 百分比 (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的芦苇带 (WPCT) | |||
步甲科 Carabidae | 943 | 282 | 50 | 134 | 1,132 | 2,541 | 21.50 |
隐翅虫科 Staphylinidae | 554 | 533 | 183 | 546 | 585 | 2,401 | 20.31 |
蚁形甲科 Anthicidae | 71 | 680 | 17 | 530 | 66 | 1,364 | 11.54 |
肖叶甲科 Eumolpidae | 61 | 46 | 1 | 15 | 977 | 1,100 | 9.31 |
薪甲科 Lathridiidae | 191 | 40 | 49 | 86 | 595 | 961 | 8.13 |
象甲科 Curculionidae | 240 | 119 | 18 | 27 | 73 | 477 | 4.04 |
蜉金龟科 Aphodiidae | 50 | 48 | 6 | 82 | 197 | 383 | 3.24 |
叩甲科 Elateridae | 50 | 44 | 2 | 0 | 280 | 376 | 3.18 |
拟步甲科 Tenebrionidae | 5 | 247 | 15 | 2 | 48 | 317 | 2.68 |
金龟科 Scarabaeidae | 8 | 201 | 20 | 53 | 10 | 292 | 2.47 |
叶甲科 Chrysomelidae | 62 | 37 | 2 | 4 | 159 | 264 | 2.23 |
埋葬甲科 Silphidae | 67 | 64 | 20 | 31 | 18 | 200 | 1.69 |
隐食甲科 Cryptophagidae | 28 | 108 | 7 | 19 | 28 | 190 | 1.61 |
丽金龟科 Rutelidae | 2 | 100 | 49 | 3 | 2 | 156 | 1.32 |
虎甲科 Cicindelidae | 14 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 135 | 1.14 |
阎甲科 Histeridae | 4 | 77 | 12 | 26 | 5 | 124 | 1.05 |
粪金龟科 Geotrupidae | 1 | 25 | 14 | 57 | 9 | 106 | 0.90 |
小蕈甲科 Mycetophagidae | 46 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 79 | 0.67 |
鳃金龟科 Melolonthidae | 12 | 22 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 55 | 0.47 |
瓢甲科 Coccinellidae | 6 | 14 | 9 | 16 | 4 | 49 | 0.41 |
苔甲科 Scydmaenidae | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 25 | 38 | 0.32 |
犀金龟科 Dynastidae | 11 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 38 | 0.32 |
蕈坚甲科 Merycidae | 1 | 2 | 6 | 21 | 0 | 30 | 0.25 |
花萤科 Cantharidae | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 25 | 0.21 |
露尾甲科 Nitidulidae | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 22 | 0.19 |
缨甲科 Ptiliidae | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 0.18 |
平唇水龟科 Hydraenidae | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0.10 |
蚁甲科 Pselaphidae | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 0.09 |
圆泥甲科 Georyssidae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 0.07 |
锹甲科 Lucanidae | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0.07 |
花蚤科 Mordellidae | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0.06 |
长蠹科 Bostrychidae | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0.05 |
球蕈甲科 Leiodidae | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0.04 |
水龟甲科 Hydrophilidae | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0.03 |
小丸甲科 Nosodendridae | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0.03 |
铁甲科 Hispidae | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.03 |
水缨甲科 Hydroscaphidae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.02 |
花金龟科 Cetoniidae | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.02 |
天牛科 Cerambycidae | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 |
皮蠹科 Dermestidae | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 |
拟花萤科 Melyridae | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 |
窃蠹科 Anobiidae | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 |
总计 Total | 2,476 | 2,805 | 504 | 1,691 | 4,344 | 11,820 |
球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的 芦苇带 (WPCT) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
活动密度 Activity density (AD) | 619.0 ± 50.2d | 350.6 ± 26.4c | 126.0 ± 8.7a | 211.4 ± 20.1b | 543.0 ± 67.1d |
科丰富度 Family richness (R) | 23.5 ± 1.0c | 20.8 ± 0.9b | 19.0 ± 0.4b | 15.8 ± 0.7a | 21.1 ± 0.7bc |
丰富度指数 Margalef richness index (D) | 3.51 ± 0.19bc | 3.38 ± 0.14bc | 3.73 ± 0.13c | 2.77 ± 0.11a | 3.23 ± 0.10b |
多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') | 2.01 ± 0.11ab | 2.35 ± 0.08c | 2.22 ± 0.02bc | 1.82 ± 0.09a | 2.02 ± 0.06ab |
均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index (E) | 0.64 ± 0.03a | 0.78 ± 0.02b | 0.75 ± 0.01b | 0.66 ± 0.03a | 0.66 ± 0.02a |
优势度指数 Simpson dominance index (C) | 0.22 ± 0.03ab | 0.15 ± 0.02a | 0.18 ± 0.01ab | 0.26 ± 0.03b | 0.20 ± 0.02ab |
Table 2 Activity density, family richness and diversity indices of ground-dwelling beetle communities in different vegetation types in Yeyahu Wetland (Mean±SE)
球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的 芦苇带 (WPCT) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
活动密度 Activity density (AD) | 619.0 ± 50.2d | 350.6 ± 26.4c | 126.0 ± 8.7a | 211.4 ± 20.1b | 543.0 ± 67.1d |
科丰富度 Family richness (R) | 23.5 ± 1.0c | 20.8 ± 0.9b | 19.0 ± 0.4b | 15.8 ± 0.7a | 21.1 ± 0.7bc |
丰富度指数 Margalef richness index (D) | 3.51 ± 0.19bc | 3.38 ± 0.14bc | 3.73 ± 0.13c | 2.77 ± 0.11a | 3.23 ± 0.10b |
多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') | 2.01 ± 0.11ab | 2.35 ± 0.08c | 2.22 ± 0.02bc | 1.82 ± 0.09a | 2.02 ± 0.06ab |
均匀度指数 Pielou evenness index (E) | 0.64 ± 0.03a | 0.78 ± 0.02b | 0.75 ± 0.01b | 0.66 ± 0.03a | 0.66 ± 0.02a |
优势度指数 Simpson dominance index (C) | 0.22 ± 0.03ab | 0.15 ± 0.02a | 0.18 ± 0.01ab | 0.26 ± 0.03b | 0.20 ± 0.02ab |
类群 Family | 球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的芦苇带 (WPCT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
步甲科 Carabidae | 235.8 ± 53.1**, b | 35.3 ± 3.4*, a | 12.5 ± 4.2*, a | 16.8 ± 5.8*, a | 141.5 ± 25.6**, b |
隐翅虫科 Staphylinidae | 138.5 ± 9.9**, b | 66.6 ± 2.6*, a | 45.8 ± 3.8**, a | 68.3 ± 11.8**, a | 73.1 ± 13.8*, a |
蚁形甲科 Anthicidae | 17.8 ± 4.5b | 85.0 ± 24.5**, c | 4.3 ± 0.8a | 66.3 ± 17.1**,c | 8.3 ± 4.0a |
肖叶甲科 Eumolpidae | 15.3 ± 7.2c | 5.8 ± 1.1bc | 0.3 ± 0.3a | 1.9 ± 1.1ab | 122.1 ± 41.5**, d |
薪甲科 Lathridiidae | 47.8 ± 4.2*, b | 5.0 ± 1.3a | 12.3 ± 4.0*, a | 10.8 ± 2.7*, a | 74.4 ± 16.7*, b |
象甲科 Curculionidae | 60.0 ± 8.6*, d | 14.9 ± 1.9c | 4.5 ± 0.9ab | 3.4 ± 1.3a | 9.1 ± 1.9bc |
叩甲科 Elateridae | 12.5 ± 1.7c | 5.5 ± 1.9bc | 0.5 ± 0.3b | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 35.0 ± 4.8*, d |
拟步甲科 Tenebrionidae | 1.3 ± 0.6ab | 30.9 ± 5.8*, d | 3.8 ± 0.6c | 0.3 ± 0.3a | 6.0 ± 2.1bc |
金龟科 Scarabaeidae | 2.0 ± 1.1ab | 25.1 ± 2.3*, c | 5.0 ± 1.2b | 6.6 ± 2.3b | 1.3 ± 0.8a |
丽金龟科 Rutelidae | 0.5 ± 0.3a | 12.5 ± 4.3b | 12.3 ± 3.5*b | 0.4 ± 0.3a | 0.3 ± 0.3a |
Table 3 Activity density of dominant and subdominant families of ground-dwelling beetle communities in different vegetation types in Yeyahu Wetland (Mean±SE)
类群 Family | 球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的芦苇带 (WPCT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
步甲科 Carabidae | 235.8 ± 53.1**, b | 35.3 ± 3.4*, a | 12.5 ± 4.2*, a | 16.8 ± 5.8*, a | 141.5 ± 25.6**, b |
隐翅虫科 Staphylinidae | 138.5 ± 9.9**, b | 66.6 ± 2.6*, a | 45.8 ± 3.8**, a | 68.3 ± 11.8**, a | 73.1 ± 13.8*, a |
蚁形甲科 Anthicidae | 17.8 ± 4.5b | 85.0 ± 24.5**, c | 4.3 ± 0.8a | 66.3 ± 17.1**,c | 8.3 ± 4.0a |
肖叶甲科 Eumolpidae | 15.3 ± 7.2c | 5.8 ± 1.1bc | 0.3 ± 0.3a | 1.9 ± 1.1ab | 122.1 ± 41.5**, d |
薪甲科 Lathridiidae | 47.8 ± 4.2*, b | 5.0 ± 1.3a | 12.3 ± 4.0*, a | 10.8 ± 2.7*, a | 74.4 ± 16.7*, b |
象甲科 Curculionidae | 60.0 ± 8.6*, d | 14.9 ± 1.9c | 4.5 ± 0.9ab | 3.4 ± 1.3a | 9.1 ± 1.9bc |
叩甲科 Elateridae | 12.5 ± 1.7c | 5.5 ± 1.9bc | 0.5 ± 0.3b | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 35.0 ± 4.8*, d |
拟步甲科 Tenebrionidae | 1.3 ± 0.6ab | 30.9 ± 5.8*, d | 3.8 ± 0.6c | 0.3 ± 0.3a | 6.0 ± 2.1bc |
金龟科 Scarabaeidae | 2.0 ± 1.1ab | 25.1 ± 2.3*, c | 5.0 ± 1.2b | 6.6 ± 2.3b | 1.3 ± 0.8a |
丽金龟科 Rutelidae | 0.5 ± 0.3a | 12.5 ± 4.3b | 12.3 ± 3.5*b | 0.4 ± 0.3a | 0.3 ± 0.3a |
环境因子 Environmental factors | 球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的 芦苇带 (WPCT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
植物物种数 Plant species number (SP) | 14.5 ± 1.9 ab | 13.9 ± 0.7 ab | 15.5 ± 0.9 b | 11.4 ± 0.8 a | 12.0±1.5 ab |
植物群落多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index of plant community (HP) | 1.12 ± 0.29 ab | 1.46 ± 0.11 ab | 1.45 ± 0.05 b | 1.36 ± 0.06 a | 1.52 ± 0.12 ab |
植物密度 Plant density (DP, ind. /m2) | 2,668 ± 1,600 ab | 1,268 ± 144 b | 1,088 ± 467 ab | 888 ± 56 ab | 484 ± 113 a |
植物盖度 Plant coverage (CP, %) | 80.0 ± 5.8 c | 48.8 ± 4.0 a | 60.0 ± 4.0 ab | 68.8 ± 4.0 bc | 95.6 ± 1.5 d |
植物生物量 Plant biomass (BP, g/m2) | 593.2 ± 77.5 b | 206.2 ± 17.9 a | 252.9 ± 34.2 a | 209.1 ± 15.4 a | 539.0 ± 73.6 b |
枯落物盖度 Coverage of litter (CL, %) | 13.8 ± 6.9 a | 35.6 ± 2.9 a | 65.0 ± 2.9 b | 76.3 ± 5.6 b | 82.5 ± 7.7 b |
枯落物厚度 Thickness of litter (TL, cm) | 0.2 ± 0.1 a | 0.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.1 ± 0.2 b | 1.3 ± 0.3 b | 1.3 ± 0.3 b |
枯落物干重 Dry weight of litter (WL, g/m2) | 50.8 ± 21.5 a | 90.7 ± 16.5 a | 222.2 ± 35.1 bc | 170.2 ± 19.3 b | 292.3 ± 47.5c |
土壤含水量 Soil water content (SW, %) | 25.7 ± 3.3 b | 8.1 ± 1.0 a | 7.1 ± 0.4 a | 8.0 ± 0.7 a | 27.8 ± 1.9 b |
Table 4 Nine environmental factors of different vegetation types in Yeyahu Wetland (Mean±SE)
环境因子 Environmental factors | 球穗莎草带 (CGT) | 猪毛菜带 (SCT) | 退化芦苇带 (DPCT) | 牛鞭草带 (HAT) | 保存较好的 芦苇带 (WPCT) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
植物物种数 Plant species number (SP) | 14.5 ± 1.9 ab | 13.9 ± 0.7 ab | 15.5 ± 0.9 b | 11.4 ± 0.8 a | 12.0±1.5 ab |
植物群落多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index of plant community (HP) | 1.12 ± 0.29 ab | 1.46 ± 0.11 ab | 1.45 ± 0.05 b | 1.36 ± 0.06 a | 1.52 ± 0.12 ab |
植物密度 Plant density (DP, ind. /m2) | 2,668 ± 1,600 ab | 1,268 ± 144 b | 1,088 ± 467 ab | 888 ± 56 ab | 484 ± 113 a |
植物盖度 Plant coverage (CP, %) | 80.0 ± 5.8 c | 48.8 ± 4.0 a | 60.0 ± 4.0 ab | 68.8 ± 4.0 bc | 95.6 ± 1.5 d |
植物生物量 Plant biomass (BP, g/m2) | 593.2 ± 77.5 b | 206.2 ± 17.9 a | 252.9 ± 34.2 a | 209.1 ± 15.4 a | 539.0 ± 73.6 b |
枯落物盖度 Coverage of litter (CL, %) | 13.8 ± 6.9 a | 35.6 ± 2.9 a | 65.0 ± 2.9 b | 76.3 ± 5.6 b | 82.5 ± 7.7 b |
枯落物厚度 Thickness of litter (TL, cm) | 0.2 ± 0.1 a | 0.4 ± 0.1 a | 1.1 ± 0.2 b | 1.3 ± 0.3 b | 1.3 ± 0.3 b |
枯落物干重 Dry weight of litter (WL, g/m2) | 50.8 ± 21.5 a | 90.7 ± 16.5 a | 222.2 ± 35.1 bc | 170.2 ± 19.3 b | 292.3 ± 47.5c |
土壤含水量 Soil water content (SW, %) | 25.7 ± 3.3 b | 8.1 ± 1.0 a | 7.1 ± 0.4 a | 8.0 ± 0.7 a | 27.8 ± 1.9 b |
Fig. 3 Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination performed on ground-dwelling beetles communities and nine environmental factors in 32 sampling sites in Yeyahu Wetland. 1-4, Cyperus glomeratus sites; 5-12, Salsola collina sites; 13-16, Degradated Phragmites communis sites; 17-24, Hemarthria altissima sites; 25-32, Well-conserved Phragmites communis sites. The meanings of environmental factors are the same as those in Table 4.
环境因子 Environmental factor | 主成分 Component | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
TL | 0.911 | -0.035 | -0.018 |
CL | 0.900 | -0.020 | 0.103 |
WL | 0.859 | 0.215 | 0.195 |
SP | -0.553 | -0.074 | 0.432 |
SW | 0.023 | 0.934 | -0.006 |
BP | -0.153 | 0.917 | -0.118 |
CP | 0.411 | 0.825 | 0.103 |
HP | -0.062 | -0.025 | 0.946 |
DP | -0.473 | -0.013 | -0.674 |
Table 5 Rotated component matrix of principal component analysis (PCA) for nine environmental factors
环境因子 Environmental factor | 主成分 Component | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
TL | 0.911 | -0.035 | -0.018 |
CL | 0.900 | -0.020 | 0.103 |
WL | 0.859 | 0.215 | 0.195 |
SP | -0.553 | -0.074 | 0.432 |
SW | 0.023 | 0.934 | -0.006 |
BP | -0.153 | 0.917 | -0.118 |
CP | 0.411 | 0.825 | 0.103 |
HP | -0.062 | -0.025 | 0.946 |
DP | -0.473 | -0.013 | -0.674 |
Fig. 5 The relationship between activity density, family richness and diversity index of ground-dwelling beetle communities and the synthetic environmental variable (WBC) in Yeyahu Wetland. The variable WBC (Water-Biomass-Coverage), which reflects the situation of soil water content, plant biomass and coverage, is the second component obtained by PCA of nine environmental factors. The labels of sampling sites are the same as those in Fig.3.
[1] | Bates AJ, Sadler JP, Fowles AP (2006) Condition-dependent dispersal of a patchily distributed riparian ground beetle in response to disturbance. Oecologia, 150, 50-60. |
[2] | Boscaini A, Franceschini A, Maiolini B (2000) River ecotones: carabid beetles as a tool for quality assessment. Hydrobiologia, 422, 173-181. |
[3] |
Brose U (2003) Bottom-up control of carabid beetle communities in early successional wetlands: mediated by vegetation structure or plant diversity? Oecologia, 135, 407-413.
DOI URL |
[4] | Butterfield J (1997) Carabid community succession during the forestry cycle in conifer plantations. Ecography, 20, 614-625. |
[5] | Dennis P, Young MR, Gordon IJ (1998) Distribution and abundance of small insects and arachnids in relation to structural heterogeneity of grazed, indigenous grasslands. Ecological Entomology, 23, 253-264. |
[6] | Du RQ (杜荣骞) (1999) Biostatistics (生物统计学). China Higher Education Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[7] | Epstein ME, Kulman HM (1990) Habitat distribution and seasonal occurrence of carabid beetles in East-central Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist, 123, 209-225. |
[8] | Evans WG (1983) Habitat selection in the Carabidae. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 37, 164-167. |
[9] | Gormley LHL, Furley PA, Watt AD (2007) Distribution of ground-dwelling beetles in fragmented tropical habitats. Journal of Insect Conservation, 11, 131-139. |
[10] | Irmler U (2000) Environmental characteristics of ground beetle assemblages in northern German forests as basis for an expert system. Zeitschrift fuer Oekologie und Naturschutz, 8, 227-237. |
[11] | Irmler U, Hoernes U (2003) Assignment and evaluation of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages to sites on different scales in a grassland landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1405-1419. |
[12] | Jennings DT, Housewear MW, Dunn GA (1986) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) associated with strip clearcut and dense spruce-fir forests of Maine. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 40, 251-263. |
[13] | Koivula M, Punttila P, Haila Y, Niemela J (1999) Leaf litter and the small-scale distribution of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the boreal forest. Ecography, 22, 424-435. |
[14] | Larsen KJ, Work TW (2003) Differences in ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of original and reconstructed tallgrass prairies in northeastern Iowa, USA, and impact of 3-year spring burn cycles. Journal of Insect Conservation, 7, 153-166. |
[15] | Li HX (李鸿兴), Sui JZ (隋敬之), Zhou SX (周士秀), Zhou Q (周勤), Sun HG (孙洪国) (1987) Key to Insects (昆虫分类检索). China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[16] | Li Q (李巧), Chen YQ (陈又清), Guo X (郭萧), Chen YL (陈彦林) (2006) Arthropod used as bio-indicator to assess the success of ecological restoration. Journal of Central South Forestry University (中南林学院学报), 26(3), 117-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[17] | Liu YH (刘云慧), Yu ZR (宇振荣), Liu Y (刘云) (2004) Temporal and spatial structure of carabid community in agricultural landscape of Dongbeiwang, Beijing. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 15, 85-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Liu YJ (刘玉金) (2007) Wild Duck Wetland (北京野鸭湖湿地). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[19] | Lövei GL, Sunderland KD (1996) Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 41, 231-256. |
[20] | Luff ML, Eyre MD, Rushton SP (1989) Classification and ordination of habitats of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in north-east England. Journal of Biogeography, 16, 121-130. |
[21] | Magagula CN (2003) Changes in carabid beetle diversity within a fragmented agricultural landscape. African Journal of Ecology, 41, 23-30. |
[22] | Magura T, Tóthmérész B, Molnár T (2004) Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in the city of Debrecen, Hungary. Landscape Ecology, 19, 747-759. |
[23] | Negro M, Casale A, Migliore L, Palestrini C, Rolando A (2007) The effect of local anthropogenic habitat heterogeneity on assemblages of carabids (Coleoptera, Caraboidea) endemic to the Alps. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 3919-3932. |
[24] | Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 487-506. |
[25] | Rieske LK, Buss LJ (2001) Influence of site on diversity and abundance of ground- and litter-dwelling coleoptera in Appalachian oak-hickory forests. Environmental Entomology, 30, 484-494. |
[26] | Sanways MJ (1993) Insects in biodiversity conservation: some perspectives and directives. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 258-282. |
[27] |
Siemann E, Tilman D, Haarstad J, Ritchie M (1998) Experimental tests of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. The American Naturalist, 152, 738-750.
DOI URL PMID |
[28] | Topp W, Kappes H, Kulfan J, Zach P (2006) Litter-dwelling beetles in primeval forests of Central Europe: does deadwood matter? Journal of Insect Conservation, 10, 229-239. |
[29] | Tumur A (艾尼瓦尔∙吐米尔), Halik M (马合木提∙哈力克), Frank T (2005) Beetles communities structure differences between farmland and ecological compensation area. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 25, 2284-2290. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[30] | Yaacobi G, Ziv Y, Rosenzweig ML (2007) Effects of interactive scale-dependent variables on beetle diversity patterns in a semi-arid agricultural landscape. Landscape Ecology, 22, 687-703. |
[31] | Yu XD (于晓东), Luo TH (罗天宏), Yang J (杨建), Zhou HZ (周红章) (2006) Diversity of ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera) in larch plantation with different stages of reforestation in Wolong Natural Reserve, Southwestern China. Zoological Research (动物学研究), 27, 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] | Yu XD (于晓东), Luo TH (罗天宏), Zhou HZ (周红章) (2002) Composition and seasonal dynamics of litter-layer beetle community in the Dongling Mountain region, North China. Acta Entomologica Sinica (昆虫学报), 45, 785-793. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Yu XD (于晓东), Zhou HZ (周红章), Luo TH (罗天宏) (2001) Species diversity of insects on the Ordos Plateau, Northwest China. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 9, 329-335. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[34] | Zhang JT (张金屯) (2004) Quantitative Ecology (数量生态学). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[35] | Zhang Q (张倩), Zheng FK (郑发科), Zhong ZY (钟志宇) (2008) Diversity of litter-layer beetles in Wuyishan Nature Reserve, Jiangxi Province. Sichuan Journal of Zoology (四川动物), 27, 3-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Zhao ZM (赵志模), Guo YQ (郭依泉) (1990) Principle and Methods of Community Ecology (群落生态学原理与方法). Publishing House of Scientific and Technical Documentation, Chongqing Branch, Chongqing. (in Chinese) |
[37] | Zheng LY (郑乐怡), Gui H (归鸿) (1999) Insect Classification (昆虫分类). Nanjing Normal University Press, Nanjing. (in Chinese) |
[38] | Zhou HZ (周红章), Yu XD (于晓东), Luo TH (罗天宏), He JJ (何君舰), Zhou HS (周海生), Ye CJ (叶婵娟) (2000) Insect abundance and environmental effects in Shennongjia Natural Reserve, Hubei Province. Chinese Biodiversity (生物多样性), 8, 262-270. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | Mengyao Zheng, Yuan Li, Xuerong Wang, Yue Zhang, Tong Jia. Soil protozoa community assembly mechanism in different vegetation types of Luya Mountain [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23419-. |
[2] | Wu Xiangzhang, Lei Fumin, Shan Yiyi, Yu Jing. Distribution pattern of bryophyte diversity and environmental impact factors in urban parks of Shanghai [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23364-. |
[3] | Zhang Naipeng, Liang Hongru, Zhang Yan, Sun Chao, Chen Yong, Wang Lulu, Xia Jiangbao, Gao FangLei. Effects of soil type and groundwater depth on spatial differentiation of typical salt marsh plant communities in the Yellow River Delta [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23370-. |
[4] | Shuhan Yang, He Wang, Lei Chen, Yingfei Liao, Guang Yan, Yining Wu, Hongfei Zou. Effects of heterogeneous habitat on soil nematode community characteristics in the Songnen Plain [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(1): 23295-. |
[5] | Jiawen Sang, Chuangye Song, Ningxia Jia, Yuan Jia, Changcheng Liu, Xianguo Qiao, Lin Zhang, Weiying Yuan, Dongxiu Wu, Linghao Li, Ke Guo. Vegetation survey and mapping on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(3): 22430-. |
[6] | Yufei Huang, Chunyan Lu, Mingming Jia, Zili Wang, Yue Su, Yanlin Su. Plant species classification of coastal wetlands based on UAV images and object- oriented deep learning [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(3): 22411-. |
[7] | Ting Wang, Lizhi Zhou. The spatial-temporal patterns of bird diversity and its determinants in the small wetlands in Hefei City [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(7): 21445-. |
[8] | Zhengfei Li, Xiaoming Jiang, Jun Wang, Xingliang Meng, Junqian Zhang, Zhicai Xie. Species diversity and driving factors of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in the middle and lower reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(6): 21431-. |
[9] | Jie Gao, Dehao Li, Haibo Jiang, Guangyi Deng, Chaofan Zhang, Chunguang He, Peng Sun. Analyzing the relative habitat use by Siberian cranes on migratory stopover sites: A traditional wetland species switching to croplands for food resources [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(11): 22093-. |
[10] | Yue Huang, Yiyun Gu, Wenrui Yang, Cheng Wen. How to best preserve the irreplaceable habitats of threatened birds in Beijing? [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(3): 340-350. |
[11] | Jing Zhang, Yu Bai, Ziqiang Huang, Zhengwang Zhang, Donglai Li. Community composition and behavioral differences of migrating shorebirds between two habitats within a Suaeda salsa saltmarsh-mudflat wetland mosaics [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(3): 351-360. |
[12] | Fangyuan Qu, Shuyun Li, Linlin Zhao, Chungwing Yeung, Mingyang Wan, Lyutong Cai, Zhaohui Zhang. Conservation gap analysis for the Yellow Sea Ecoregion [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(3): 385-393. |
[13] | Junwei Ye, Bin Tian. Genetic structure and its causes of an important woody oil plant in Southwest China, Prinsepia utilis (Rosaceae) [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(12): 1629-1637. |
[14] | Li Xia, Zhu Wanze, Sun Shouqin, Shu Shumiao, Sheng Zheliang, Zhang Jun, Liu Ting, Zhang Zhicai. Influence of habitat on the distribution pattern and diversity of plant community in dry and warm valleys of the middle reaches of the Dadu River, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(2): 117-127. |
[15] | Baoquan Li, Shaoyu Jiang, Juanzhang Lü, Linlin Chen, Lang Yan, Chunyun Liu, Xiaojing Li, Bo Song, Xinzheng Li. Species composition and long-term variation of macrobenthos in intertidal zone and offshore areas of the Yellow River Delta [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(12): 1511-1522. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn