Biodiv Sci ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 725-732. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015147
Special Issue: 生态保护红线专题
• Special Feature: Ecological Protection Redlines • Previous Articles Next Articles
Junhui Liu1, Changxin Zou2,*(), Jixi Gao2, Su Ma1, Wenjie Wang1, Kun Wu3, Yang Liu1
Received:
2015-06-01
Accepted:
2015-08-17
Online:
2015-11-20
Published:
2015-12-02
Contact:
Zou Changxin
Junhui Liu, Changxin Zou, Jixi Gao, Su Ma, Wenjie Wang, Kun Wu, Yang Liu. Location determination of ecologically vulnerable regions in China[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2015, 23(6): 725-732.
指标 Index | 不敏感 Insensitive | 轻度敏感 Lightly sensitive | 中度敏感 Moderate sensitive | 高度敏感 Highly sensitive | 极敏感 Extremely sensitive | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土地沙化 Land desertification | 干燥度指数 Aridity index | ≤ 1.0 | 1.0-1.5 | 1.5-4.0 | 4.0-16.0 | ≥ 16.0 |
≥ 6 m/s起沙风天数 Days with wind speed ≥ 6 m/s (d) | ≤ 5 | 5-10 | 10-20 | 20-30 | ≥ 30 | |
土壤质地 Soil texture | 基岩 Bedrock | 粘质 Clay | 砾质 Gravel | 壤质 Loam | 砂质 Sandy | |
植被覆盖度 Vegetation coverage (%) | ≥ 80 | 60-80 | 40-60 | 20-40 | ≤ 20 | |
水土流失 Soil erosion | 降雨侵蚀力 Rainfall erosivity | < 25 | 25-100 | 100-400 | 400-600 | > 600 |
土壤可蚀性 Soil erodibility | < 0.27 | 0.27-0.42 | 0.42-0.52 | 0.52-0.62 | > 0.62 | |
坡度 Slope (°) | 0-8 | 8-15 | 15-25 | 25-35 | > 35 | |
植被覆盖度 Vegetation coverage (%) | ≥ 80 | 60-80 | 40-60 | 20-40 | ≤ 20 | |
石漠化 Rocky desertification | 碳酸盐出露面积百分比 Rate of carbonate rock outcropping areas (%) | ≤ 10 | 10-30 | 30-50 | 50-70 | ≥ 70 |
坡度 Slope (°) | ≤ 5 | 5-8 | 8-15 | 15-25 | ≥ 25 | |
植被覆盖度 Vegetation coverage (%) | ≥ 80 | 60-80 | 40-60 | 20-40 | ≤ 20 | |
赋值 Grade | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
Table 1 Evaluation indices and classification of ecological environmental sensitivity
指标 Index | 不敏感 Insensitive | 轻度敏感 Lightly sensitive | 中度敏感 Moderate sensitive | 高度敏感 Highly sensitive | 极敏感 Extremely sensitive | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
土地沙化 Land desertification | 干燥度指数 Aridity index | ≤ 1.0 | 1.0-1.5 | 1.5-4.0 | 4.0-16.0 | ≥ 16.0 |
≥ 6 m/s起沙风天数 Days with wind speed ≥ 6 m/s (d) | ≤ 5 | 5-10 | 10-20 | 20-30 | ≥ 30 | |
土壤质地 Soil texture | 基岩 Bedrock | 粘质 Clay | 砾质 Gravel | 壤质 Loam | 砂质 Sandy | |
植被覆盖度 Vegetation coverage (%) | ≥ 80 | 60-80 | 40-60 | 20-40 | ≤ 20 | |
水土流失 Soil erosion | 降雨侵蚀力 Rainfall erosivity | < 25 | 25-100 | 100-400 | 400-600 | > 600 |
土壤可蚀性 Soil erodibility | < 0.27 | 0.27-0.42 | 0.42-0.52 | 0.52-0.62 | > 0.62 | |
坡度 Slope (°) | 0-8 | 8-15 | 15-25 | 25-35 | > 35 | |
植被覆盖度 Vegetation coverage (%) | ≥ 80 | 60-80 | 40-60 | 20-40 | ≤ 20 | |
石漠化 Rocky desertification | 碳酸盐出露面积百分比 Rate of carbonate rock outcropping areas (%) | ≤ 10 | 10-30 | 30-50 | 50-70 | ≥ 70 |
坡度 Slope (°) | ≤ 5 | 5-8 | 8-15 | 15-25 | ≥ 25 | |
植被覆盖度 Vegetation coverage (%) | ≥ 80 | 60-80 | 40-60 | 20-40 | ≤ 20 | |
赋值 Grade | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
敏感等级 Grade of sensitivity | 土地沙化敏感性 Land desertification Sensitivity | 水土流失敏感性 Soil erosion sensitivity | 石漠化敏感性 Rocky desertification | 综合生态敏感性 Comprehensive ecological Sensitivity |
---|---|---|---|---|
不敏感 Insensitive | 34.5 | 33.8 | 93.2 | 22.7 |
轻度敏感 Lightly sensitive | 41.3 | 37.7 | 1.5 | 27.1 |
中度敏感 Moderately sensitive | 11.7 | 13.7 | 3.4 | 22.0 |
高度敏感 Highly sensitive | 8.3 | 9.1 | 1.6 | 17.8 |
极敏感 Extremely sensitive | 4.3 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 10.4 |
Table 2 Area percentage of each ecological environmental sensitivity type in China
敏感等级 Grade of sensitivity | 土地沙化敏感性 Land desertification Sensitivity | 水土流失敏感性 Soil erosion sensitivity | 石漠化敏感性 Rocky desertification | 综合生态敏感性 Comprehensive ecological Sensitivity |
---|---|---|---|---|
不敏感 Insensitive | 34.5 | 33.8 | 93.2 | 22.7 |
轻度敏感 Lightly sensitive | 41.3 | 37.7 | 1.5 | 27.1 |
中度敏感 Moderately sensitive | 11.7 | 13.7 | 3.4 | 22.0 |
高度敏感 Highly sensitive | 8.3 | 9.1 | 1.6 | 17.8 |
极敏感 Extremely sensitive | 4.3 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 10.4 |
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of ecologically vulnerable regions in China. (1) Edge of Gurbantunggut Desert; (2) Edge of Taklimakan Desert; (3) Middle and lower reaches of Heihe River; (4) Edge of Tengger Desert and Wulanbuhe Desert; (5) Mu Us Sandy Land; (6) Northern region of the Yinshan Mountains-Hunshandak Sandy Land; (7) Horqin Sandy Land; (8) Hulun Buir Sandy Land; (9) the Hengduan Mountains; (10) Loess Hilly gully region; (11) Three Gorges Reservoir area; (12) Dabie Mountain; (13) Luoxiao Mountain; (14) Huangshan Mountain; (15) Xianxialing Mountain-Wuyi Mountain; (16) the Tianshan Mountains; (17) Karst Areas in southwestern China; (18) Western part of ChangTang Plateau.
1 | Committee of Physical Regionalization of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (中国科学院自然区划工作委员会) (1959) Synthetic Physical Regionalization of China (Draft) (《中国气候区划》(初稿)). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
2 | Cui SH (崔胜辉), Li FY (李方一), Huang J (黄静), Yu YX (于裕贤) (2009) Review of sensitivity research on the context of global change.Advances in Earth Science(地球科学进展), 24, 1033-1041. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
3 | Lan AJ (兰安军), Zhang BP (张百平), Kang KN (熊康宁), An YL (安裕伦) (2003) Spatial pattern of the fragile karst environment in southwest Guizhou province.Geographical Research(地理研究), 22, 733-741. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
4 | Liu LY (刘连友), Wang JH (王建华), Li XY (李小雁), Liu YZ (刘玉璋), Tuo WQ (拓万权), Peng HM (彭海梅) (1998) Simulating measurement on the erosive of soil.Chinese Science Bulletin(科学通报), 43, 1663-1666. (in Chinese) |
5 | Liu XF (刘宪锋), Ren ZY (任志远), Lin ZH (林志慧), Liu YX (刘炎序), Zhang DH (张东海) (2013) The spatial-temporal changes of vegetation coverage in the Three-River Headwater region in recent 12 years.Acta Geographica Sinica(地理学报), 68, 897-908. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
6 | Luo CP (罗承平), Xue JY (薛纪瑜) (1995) Ecologically vulnerable characteristics of the farming-pastoral zigzag zone in northern China.Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment(干旱区资源与环境), 9, 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
7 | Meng M (孟猛), Ni J (倪健), Zhang ZG (张治国) (2004) Aridity index and its application in geo-ecological study.Acta Phytoecologica Sinica(植物生态学报), 28, 853-861. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
8 | Niu WY (牛文元) (1989) The discriminatory index with regard to the weakness, overlapness, and breadth of ecotone.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 9, 97-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
9 | Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Wang XK (王效科), Miao H (苗鸿) (2000) China’s eco-environmental sensitivity and its spatial heterogeneity.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 20, 9-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
10 | Pan F (潘峰), Tian CY (田长彦), Shao F (邵峰), Zhou W (周伟), Chen F (陈飞) (2011) Evaluation of ecological sensitivity in Karamay, Xinjiang, Northwest China.Acta Geographica Sinica(地理学报), 66, 1497-1507. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
11 | Pan YZ, Shi PJ, Zhu WQ, Gu XH, Fan YD, Li J (2005) Measurement of ecological capital of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem based on remote sensing.Science in China: Series D, 48, 786-796. |
12 | Shi DM (史东梅), Chen ZF (陈正发), Jiang GY (蒋光毅), Jiang D (江东) (2012) Comparative study on estimation methods for soil erodibility K in purple hilly area.Journal of Beijing Forestry University(北京林业大学学报), 34(1), 32-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
13 | Su WC (苏维词), Yang HK (杨汉奎) (1994) Preliminary division of eco-environmental fragility types in Guizhou karst region.Research of Environmental Sciences(环境科学研究), 7, 35-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
14 | Tian YP (田亚平), Chang H (常昊) (2012) Bibliometric analysis of research progress on ecological vulnerability in China.Acta Geographica Sinica(地理学报), 67, 1515-1525. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
15 | Wang RH (王让会), Song YD (宋郁东), Fan ZL (攀自立), You XX (游先祥) (2001) Comprehensive assessment on environmental quality in vulnerable ecotone of Tarim River Basin.Environmental Science(环境科学), 22(2), 7-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
16 | Wang WZ (王万忠), Jiao JY (焦菊英) (1996) Quantitative evaluation on factors influencing soil erosion in China.Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation(水土保持通报), 16, 1-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
17 | Wang XD (王小丹), Zhong XH (钟祥浩), Fan JR (范建容) (2004) Assessment and spatial distribution of sensitivity of soil erosion in Tibet.Acta Geographica Sinica(地理学报), 59, 181-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
18 | Williams JR, Renard KG, Dyke PT (1983) EPIC: a new method for assessing erosion’s effect on soil productivity.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38, 381-383. |
19 | Xiao RB (肖荣波), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Wang XK (王效科), Zhao TQ (赵同谦) (2005) Sensitivity of rocky desertification and its spatial distribution in southwestern China.Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 24, 551-554. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
20 | Yu BH (于伯华), Lü CH (吕昌河) (2011) Assessment of ecological vulnerability on the Tibetan Plateau.Geographical Research(地理研究), 30, 2289-2295. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
21 | Zhang DF (张殿发), Wang SJ (王世杰), Li RL (李瑞玲), Zhou DQ (周德全) (2002) Eco-geo-environment of rocky desertification and its driving mechanism-a typical example in Karst mountainous areas of Guizhou Province.Rural Eco-Environment(农村生态环境), 18(1), 6-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
22 | Zhao YL (赵跃龙), Liu YH (刘燕华) (1994) The division of type and decision of range on fragile environment in China.Yunnan Geographic Environment Research(云南地理环境研究), 6(2), 34-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn