生物多样性

• • 上一篇    

中国蚂蚁系统分类与物种多样性:现状、挑战及转型路径

王国兵, 刘宏毅, 祝艳, 廖家辉, 李媛媛, 王邵军, 阮宏华   

  1. 南京林业大学生态与环境学院/南方现代林业协同创新中心, 210037
    南京林业大学生命科学学院, 210037
    南京晓庄学院食品科学学院, 211171
    西南林业大学生态与环境学院/国家高原湿地研究中心, 650224
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-28 修回日期:2026-09-16
  • 通讯作者: 王邵军

Ant taxonomy and species diversity in China: current status, challenges, and transformation pathways

Guobing Wang, Hongyi Liu, Yan Zhu, Jiahui Liao, Yuanyuan Li, Shaojun Wang, Honghua Ruan   

  1. , Nanjing Forestry University 210037,
    , Nanjing Xiaozhuang University 211171,
    , Southwest Forestry University 650224,
  • Received:2026-07-28 Revised:2026-09-16
  • Contact: Shaojun Wang

摘要: 蚂蚁作为土壤动物中具有突出生态优势的社会性昆虫,既是生态系统结构与功能的重要调控者,也是生物多样性监测与保护的关键指示生物,在分类学研究中占据重要地位。然而,全球及中国蚂蚁分类与物种多样性认知, 仍存在巨大缺口;传统形态分类学方法已难以满足快速评估与精准鉴定的现实需求,学科亟待从理论框架、技术手段到应用路径的系统性革新。为此,本文系统梳理了全球蚂蚁分类学300余年的发展历程,表明了其从“形态描述”到“整合系统学”的范式演进。这一转变体现为研究维度的系统性拓展:(1)在数据源上,突破了传统形态性状的局限,通过DNA条形码与基因组学数据将遗传信息纳入分类基准,能有效揭示传统方法难以区分的隐存种;(2)在表征手段上,显微CT与三维形态数字化技术可实现形态特征的无损提取、高通量获取与定量化分析,为辨析传统形态学中因趋同进化导致的同源性误判提供新的技术路径;(3)在分析框架上,多源数据的融合分析,有助于推动蚂蚁分类体系向整合系统学的方向演进,使分类证据更趋多元、系统发育分辨率进一步提高。截至2026年6月,全球已记录现生蚂蚁14,452种,中国已记录有效种1,315种,但实际物种多样性远超当前认知。在此背景下,本文回顾了中国蚂蚁分类历程,以及属内物种修订、区系组成研究和热点区域物种多样性调查等方面的代表性进展。针对当前制约分类学科发展的核心瓶颈,包括DNA条形码数据库覆盖率不足、馆藏标本数字化程度低、分类人才结构性断层、整合分类学方法应用不足等,提出分阶段推进的发展路径:(1)在40余年我国蚁科分类积累的基础上,扩大各类生态系统的蚂蚁形态分类研究,并参照AntWeb标准推进标本图像信息库建设;拓展全国蚂蚁区系研究,力争在未来50-60年内基本完成我国蚂蚁多样性本底清查;(2)推进形态测量学和显微CT等显微形态学的应用,整合COI条形码、基因组学等分子手段,以隐存种甄别为切入点开展多层次系统发育研究,探索“标本–形态–分子–地理—生态位”多维度整合的研究路径,以补充和修正形态分类与区系研究的不足;(3)在人才培养方面,在传统分类学训练基础上,融入分子生物学、生物信息学与生态位建模等跨学科技能,培养适应现代学术生态的新型分类学家,缓解分类学人才结构性断层困境;(4)推动分类学成果在生物多样性监测与生态修复评估中的应用,探索将蚂蚁监测纳入国家生态质量监测网络的可行路径,打通从基础分类到保护实践的转化通道。总之,本文在系统梳理国内外蚂蚁分类与多样性研究现状及瓶颈的基础上,提出面向整合系统学的转型路径,以期为蚂蚁乃至整个土壤动物分类学研究与生物多样性保护实践提供新的理论视角与方法框架。

关键词: 蚁科, 分类学, 生物多样性, DNA条形码, 土壤动物

Abstract

Backgrounds & Aims: Ants, as ecologically dominant social insects among soil fauna, are not only key regulators of ecosystem structure and function but also crucial bioindicators for biodiversity monitoring and conservation; they thus occupy an important position in taxonomic research. However, significant knowledge gaps persist in ant taxonomy and species diversity understanding both globally and in China. Traditional morphological taxonomic methods are increasingly inadequate for meeting the demands of rapid assessment and precise identification, necessitating a systemic renewal of the discipline, from theoretical frameworks and technical approaches to application pathways. To this end, this paper systematically reviews the 300-year development history of global ant taxonomy. 

Results: Our analysis indicates that ant taxonomy has undergone a paradigm shift from "morphological description" to "integrative systematics." This shift represents a systematic expansion across multiple research dimensions: (1) In data sources, it has transcended the limitations of traditional morphological characters by incorporating genetic information via DNA barcoding and genomic data into taxonomic baselines, effectively revealing a large number of cryptic species previously indistinguishable by conventional methods; (2) In characterization techniques, micro-CT and 3D morphological digitization enable the non-destructive extraction, high-throughput acquisition, and quantitative analysis of morphological traits, offering a new technical avenue for resolving homology misjudgments arising from convergent evolution in traditional morphology; (3) In analytical frameworks, the integration of multi-source data is expected to move ant classification toward a fully integrative systematics framework, broadening the evidence base for taxonomy and improving the resolution of phylogenetic inferences. As of June 2026, 14,452 extant ant species have been recorded globally, with 1,315 validly named species recorded in China, though actual species diversity far exceeds current estimates. In this context, we review the history of ant taxonomy in China, along with representative advances in species revisions within genera, studies of faunal composition, and species diversity surveys in hotspot regions. Concurrently, addressing core bottlenecks constraining disciplinary development—including insufficient DNA barcode database coverage, low digitization rates of specimen collections, structural taxonomic workforce shortages, and underutilization of integrative taxonomic methods, we propose a development path of phased advancement: (1) Build on the taxonomic foundation of Chinese Formicidae accumulated over the past 40 years by expanding morphological taxonomic surveys of ants across various ecosystem types, promoting the construction of a specimen image database following AntWeb standards, and extending faunal surveys nationwide, with the goal of largely completing a baseline inventory of ant diversity in China within the next 50-60 years; (2) Advance the application of morphometrics and micro-CT-based micromorphology, integrate molecular approaches including COI barcoding and genomics to conduct multi-level phylogenetic studies with a focus on cryptic species identification, and explore a multi-dimensional integrative research pathway linking specimens, morphology, molecules, geography, and ecological niches, to complement and rectify deficiencies in morphological taxonomy and faunal studies; (3) Integrate interdisciplinary skills such as molecular biology, bioinformatics, and ecological niche modeling into traditional taxonomic training, with the aim of cultivating a new generation of taxonomists capable of adapting to the modern academic ecosystem and alleviating the structural shortage of taxonomic workforce; and (4) Promote the application of taxonomic outputs in biodiversity monitoring and ecological restoration assessment, explore feasible pathways for incorporating ant monitoring into the national ecological quality monitoring network, and bridge the gap between fundamental taxonomy and conservation practice. 

Conclusion: In conclusion, based on a systematic review of the current status and bottlenecks in ant taxonomy and diversity research both domestically and internationally, this paper proposes a transition pathway towards integrative systematics, aiming to provide new theoretical perspectives and methodological frameworks for ant taxonomy and even soil fauna taxonomy research as a whole, as well as for biodiversity conservation practice.

Key words: Formicidae, Taxonomy, Biodiversity, DNA barcoding, Soil fauna