Biodiv Sci ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 21536. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021536
• Technology and Methodology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Wenxuan Xu1,2,3, Feng Xu1,2,3, Wei Ma4, Muyang Wang1,2,3, Jiancheng Wang1,*(), Weikang Yang1,2,3,*
Received:
2021-12-22
Accepted:
2022-06-12
Online:
2022-08-20
Published:
2022-08-31
Contact:
Jiancheng Wang,Weikang Yang
About author:
First author contact:#Co-first authors
Wenxuan Xu, Feng Xu, Wei Ma, Muyang Wang, Jiancheng Wang, Weikang Yang. Proposing a quantitative selection method for determining flagship species based on an analytic hierarchy process[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(8): 21536.
序号 No. | 要素名称(C) Selection factors | 赋值参考依据 Evaluation basis | 参考分值(S) Reference value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 目标物种在当地的保护等级 The protection level of the target species | 目标物种在所在国家或地区是否被列为国家重点(一级或二级)保护动物, 分为国家一级保护动物, 国家二级保护动物, 非保护动物3个级别。 Whether the target species is listed as national key (1st level or 2nd level) protected animal in the country or region; the species were classified into three levels: 1st class national protected animal, 2nd class national protected animal, and non-protected animal. | 1?3 |
2 | 所在国或地区目标物种的濒危等级* The endangered status of the target species | 依据IUCN评估标准, 物种濒危程度由高到低分为绝灭、野外绝灭、极危、濒危、易危、近危、无危7个级别 According to the IUCN evaluation criteria, the endangered species were classified into seven levels: extinct (EX), extinct in the wild (EW), critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), vulnerable (VU), near threatened (NT), and least concern (LC) | 1?8 |
3 | 目标物种是否为该国家或地区特有物种 Whether the target species is endemic to the country or region | 分为是特有物种和不是特有物种2个级别 Two levels: endemic species and non-endemic species | 1?2 |
4 | 目标物种的营养级 Trophic levels of the target species | 分为植食性动物、杂食性动物、肉食性动物3个级别 Three levels: herbivores, omnivores and carnivores | 1?3 |
5 | 目标物种栖息地生态位宽度 Niche breadth of target species’ habitat | 按照目标物种分布区域的生境类型分类, 分为单一栖息地类型和多种栖息地类型2个级别 According to the habitat type of the target species distribution area, it can be divided into two levels: single habitat type and multiple habitat types | 1?2 |
6 | 目标物种的家域面积 The home range size of the target species | 分为3个级别: 小于50 km2、50-100 km2和大于100 km2 Three levels: < 50 km2, 50-100 km2, and > 100 km2 | 1?3 |
7 | 目标物种在当在文化习俗或历史传说中是否具有特殊含义 Whether the target species has a particular meaning in the culture or historical lore | 分为是和否两个级别 Two levels: Yes and No | 1?2 |
8 | 目标物种是否为国际上有影响力的明星物种和受关注物种 Whether the target species is internationally influential and noteworthy | 分为是和否两个级别 Two levels: Yes and No | 1?2 |
Table 1 Evaluation basis and reference for flagship species selection factors
序号 No. | 要素名称(C) Selection factors | 赋值参考依据 Evaluation basis | 参考分值(S) Reference value |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 目标物种在当地的保护等级 The protection level of the target species | 目标物种在所在国家或地区是否被列为国家重点(一级或二级)保护动物, 分为国家一级保护动物, 国家二级保护动物, 非保护动物3个级别。 Whether the target species is listed as national key (1st level or 2nd level) protected animal in the country or region; the species were classified into three levels: 1st class national protected animal, 2nd class national protected animal, and non-protected animal. | 1?3 |
2 | 所在国或地区目标物种的濒危等级* The endangered status of the target species | 依据IUCN评估标准, 物种濒危程度由高到低分为绝灭、野外绝灭、极危、濒危、易危、近危、无危7个级别 According to the IUCN evaluation criteria, the endangered species were classified into seven levels: extinct (EX), extinct in the wild (EW), critically endangered (CR), endangered (EN), vulnerable (VU), near threatened (NT), and least concern (LC) | 1?8 |
3 | 目标物种是否为该国家或地区特有物种 Whether the target species is endemic to the country or region | 分为是特有物种和不是特有物种2个级别 Two levels: endemic species and non-endemic species | 1?2 |
4 | 目标物种的营养级 Trophic levels of the target species | 分为植食性动物、杂食性动物、肉食性动物3个级别 Three levels: herbivores, omnivores and carnivores | 1?3 |
5 | 目标物种栖息地生态位宽度 Niche breadth of target species’ habitat | 按照目标物种分布区域的生境类型分类, 分为单一栖息地类型和多种栖息地类型2个级别 According to the habitat type of the target species distribution area, it can be divided into two levels: single habitat type and multiple habitat types | 1?2 |
6 | 目标物种的家域面积 The home range size of the target species | 分为3个级别: 小于50 km2、50-100 km2和大于100 km2 Three levels: < 50 km2, 50-100 km2, and > 100 km2 | 1?3 |
7 | 目标物种在当在文化习俗或历史传说中是否具有特殊含义 Whether the target species has a particular meaning in the culture or historical lore | 分为是和否两个级别 Two levels: Yes and No | 1?2 |
8 | 目标物种是否为国际上有影响力的明星物种和受关注物种 Whether the target species is internationally influential and noteworthy | 分为是和否两个级别 Two levels: Yes and No | 1?2 |
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
C2 | 1/2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
C3 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
C4 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
C5 | 1/6 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
C6 | 1/7 | 1/6 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
C7 | 1/8 | 1/7 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 |
C8 | 1/9 | 1/8 | 1/6 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 |
Table 2 Pairwise comparison judgment matrix for flagship species selection
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
C2 | 1/2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
C3 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
C4 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
C5 | 1/6 | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
C6 | 1/7 | 1/6 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
C7 | 1/8 | 1/7 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 | 2 |
C8 | 1/9 | 1/8 | 1/6 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 | 1 |
中文名 Chinese name | 学名 Scientific name | 遴选标准 Selection criteria | 分值 Values | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | |||
赤羊 | Ovis orientalis | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.35 |
捻角山羊 | Capra falconeri | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.32 |
雪豹 | Panthera uncia | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.26 |
盘羊 | Ovis ammon | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.96 |
鹅喉羚 | Gazella subgutturosa | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.60 |
猞猁 | Lynx lynx | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.56 |
棕熊 | Ursus arctos | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.56 |
水獭 | Lutra lutra | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.47 |
北山羊 | Capra sibirica | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.42 |
狼 | Canis lupus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1.40 |
马鹿 | Cervus elaphus | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.37 |
豺 | Cuon alpinus | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.33 |
亚洲胡狼 | Canis aureus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.14 |
赤狐 | Vulpes vulpes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 |
Table 3 Selection of flagship species from large mammals of Tajikistan
中文名 Chinese name | 学名 Scientific name | 遴选标准 Selection criteria | 分值 Values | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C5 | C6 | C7 | C8 | |||
赤羊 | Ovis orientalis | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.35 |
捻角山羊 | Capra falconeri | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.32 |
雪豹 | Panthera uncia | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.26 |
盘羊 | Ovis ammon | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.96 |
鹅喉羚 | Gazella subgutturosa | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.60 |
猞猁 | Lynx lynx | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.56 |
棕熊 | Ursus arctos | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.56 |
水獭 | Lutra lutra | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.47 |
北山羊 | Capra sibirica | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.42 |
狼 | Canis lupus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1.40 |
马鹿 | Cervus elaphus | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1.37 |
豺 | Cuon alpinus | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.33 |
亚洲胡狼 | Canis aureus | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1.14 |
赤狐 | Vulpes vulpes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.12 |
[1] | Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: Efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 97, 5954-5959. |
[2] |
Barua M (2011) Mobilizing metaphors: The popular use of keystone, flagship and umbrella species concepts. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 1427-1440.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Bowen-Jones E, Entwistle A (2002) Identifying appropriate flagship species: The importance of culture and local contexts. Oryx, 36, 189-195.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Caro T, Engilis A, Fitzherbert E, Gardner T (2004) Preliminary assessment of the flagship species concept at a small scale. Animal Conservation, 7, 63-70.
DOI URL |
[5] | Caro TM, Girling S (2010) Conservation by Proxy: Indicator, Umbrella, Keystone, Flagship, and Other Surrogate Species. Island Press, Washington, DC. |
[6] |
Chen QQ, Li ML, Wang X, Qamer FM, Wang P, Yang JW, Wang MY, Yang WK (2019) Identification of potential ecological corridors for Marco Polo sheep in Taxkorgan Wildlife Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Biodiversity Science, 27, 186-199. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[陈强强, 李美玲, 王旭, Qamer FM, 王鹏, 杨建伟, 汪沐阳, 杨维康 (2019) 新疆塔什库尔干野生动物自然保护区马可波罗盘羊潜在生态廊道识别. 生物多样性, 27, 186-199.]
DOI |
|
[7] | Chen X, Hu RJ, Jiang FQ, Wang YJ, Zhang JM (2015) Physical Geography of Arid Land in China. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[陈曦, 胡汝骥, 姜逢清, 王亚俊, 张建明 (2015) 中国干旱区自然地理. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[8] | Clucas B, McHugh K, Caro T (2008) Flagship species on covers of US conservation and nature magazines. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 1517-1528. |
[9] |
Cruz J, Windels SK, Thogmartin WE, Crimmins SM, Grim LH, Larson JH, Zuckerberg B (2019) Top-down effects of repatriating bald eagles hinder jointly recovering competitors. Journal of Animal Ecology, 88, 1054-1065.
DOI URL |
[10] | Ducarme F, Luque G, Courchamp F (2013) What are “charismatic species” for conservation biologists? BioSciences Master Reviews, 10, 1-8. |
[11] |
Entwistle A (2000) Flagships for the future? Oryx, 34, 239-240.
DOI URL |
[12] | Entwistle AC, Dunstone N. (1997) Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity. Has the Panda Had Its Day? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[13] |
Fleishman E, Murphy DD, Brussard PF (2000) A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications, 10, 569-579.
DOI URL |
[14] | Garnett ST, Ainsworth GB, Zander KK (2018) Are we choosing the right flagships? The bird species and traits Australians find most attractive. PLoS ONE, 13, e0199253. |
[15] | Heywood VH, Watson RT (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[16] |
Home R, Keller C, Nagel P, Bauer N, Hunziker M (2009) Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations. Environmental Conservation, 36, 139-148.
DOI URL |
[17] | Jiang ZG, Jiang JP, Wang YZ, Zhang E, Zhang YY, Li LL, Xie F, Cai B, Cao L, Zheng GM, Dong L, Zhang ZW, Ding P, Luo ZH, Ding CQ, Ma ZJ, Tang SH, Cao WX, Li CW, Hu HJ, Ma Y, Wu Y, Wang YX, Zhou KY, Liu SY, Chen YY, Li JT, Feng ZJ, Wang Y, Wang B, Li C, Song XL, Cai L, Zang CX, Zeng Y, Meng ZB, Fang HX, Ping XG (2016) Red list of China’s vertebrates. Biodiversity Science, 24, 501-551. (in Chinese and in English) |
[蒋志刚, 江建平, 王跃招, 张鹗, 张雁云, 李立立, 谢锋, 蔡波, 曹亮, 郑光美, 董路, 张正旺, 丁平, 罗振华, 丁长青, 马志军, 汤宋华, 曹文宣, 李春旺, 胡慧建, 马勇, 吴毅, 王应祥, 周开亚, 刘少英, 陈跃英, 李家堂, 冯祚建, 王燕, 王斌, 李成, 宋雪琳, 蔡蕾, 臧春鑫, 曾岩, 孟智斌, 方红霞, 平晓鸽 (2016) 中国脊椎动物红色名录. 生物多样性, 24, 501-551.] | |
[18] |
Johnsingh AJT, Joshua J (1994) Conserving Rajaji and Corbett National Parks—The elephant as a flagship species. Oryx, 28, 135-140.
DOI URL |
[19] |
Joseph LN, Maloney RF, Watson JEM, Possingham HP (2011) Securing nonflagship species from extinction. Conservation Letters, 4, 324-325.
DOI URL |
[20] |
Kalinkat G, Cabral JS, Darwall W, Ficetola GF, Fisher JL, Giling DP, Gosselin MP, Grossart HP, Jähnig SC, Jeschke JM, Knopf K, Larsen S, Onandia G, Pätzig M, Saul WC, Singer G, Sperfeld E, Jarić I (2017) Flagship umbrella species needed for the conservation of overlooked aquatic biodiversity. Conservation Biology, 31, 481-485.
DOI PMID |
[21] |
Li BV, Pimm SL (2016) China’s endemic vertebrates sheltering under the protective umbrella of the giant panda. Conservation Biology, 30, 329-339.
DOI URL |
[22] | Li S, McShea WJ, Wang DJ, Gu XD, Zhang XF, Zhang L, Shen XL (2020) Retreat of large carnivores across the giant panda distribution range. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4, 1327-1331. |
[23] | Li WP, Bao H, Zhang MH (2017) Habitat analysis and design of potential ecological corridors for Amur tiger in Northeastern China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 37, 317-326. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李维平, 包衡, 张明海 (2017) 中国东北虎栖息地分析与潜在生态廊道构建. 兽类学报, 37, 317-326.] | |
[24] |
Li XY, Xiao LY, Liang XC, Cheng C, Feng C, Zhao X, Liu YL, Bian XX, He B, Zhang CZ, Alexander JS, Xing R, Huang YH, Awangjiumei, Xierannima, Song DZ, Huang QW, Zhaxisange, Peng K, Yin H, Lian XM, Yang X, Li S, Shi XG, Yang CM, Lü Z (2019) Ongoing threats and the current status of snow leopard conservation in China. Biodiversity Science, 27, 932-942. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[李小雨, 肖凌云, 梁旭昶, 程琛, 冯琛, 赵翔, 刘炎林, 卞晓星, 何兵, 张常智, Alexander JS, 邢睿, 黄亚慧, 阿旺久美, 谢然尼玛, 宋大昭, 黄巧雯, 扎西桑俄, 彭奎, 尹杭, 连新明, 杨欣, 李晟, 施小刚, 杨创明, 吕植 (2019) 中国雪豹的威胁与保护现状. 生物多样性, 27, 932-942.]
DOI |
|
[25] | Li YZ, Dong X, Liu XH (2016) Habitat pattern dynamics of the Golden snub-nosed monkey in Baihe Nature Reserve, Minshan Mountains, China, over the past 40 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 1803-1814. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[李艳忠, 董鑫, 刘雪华 (2016) 40年岷山地区白河自然保护区川金丝猴的生境格局动态. 生态学报, 36, 1803-1814.] | |
[26] | Ma JZ (2005) Flagship species and their functions. Man and Biosphare, (6), 1. (in Chinese) |
[马建章 (2005) 旗舰种及其作用. 人与生物圈, (6), 1.] | |
[27] |
MacDonald EA, Hinks A, Weiss DJ, Dickman A, Burnham D, Sandom CJ, Malhi Y, MacDonald DW (2017) Identifying ambassador species for conservation marketing. Global Ecology and Conservation, 12, 204-214.
DOI URL |
[28] |
McGowan J, Beaumont LJ, Smith RJ, Chauvenet alM, Harcourt R, Atkinson SC, Mittermeier JC, Esperon-Rodriguez M, Baumgartner JB, Beattie A, Dudaniec RY, Grenyer R, Nipperess DA, Stow A, Possingham HP (2020) Conservation prioritization can resolve the flagship species conundrum. Nature Communications, 11, 994.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Montesino Pouzols F, Toivonen T, di Minin E, Kukkala AS, Kullberg P, Kuusterä J, Lehtomäki J, Tenkanen H, Verburg PH, Moilanen A (2014) Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature, 516, 383-386.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Myers N (1983) A priority-ranking strategy for threatened species? The Environmentalist, 3, 97-120.
DOI URL |
[31] |
Pillon Y, Chase MW (2007) Taxonomic exaggeration and its effects on orchid conservation. Conservation Biology, 21, 263-265.
PMID |
[32] |
Qian J, Zhuang HF, Yang WK, Chen YF, Chen SL, Qu YH, Zhang YM, Yang YP, Wang YH (2021) Selecting flagship species to solve a biodiversity conservation conundrum. Plant Diversity, 42, 488-491.
DOI URL |
[33] |
Ripple WJ, Chapron G, López-Bao JV, Durant SM, MacDonald DW, Lindsey PA, Bennett EL, Beschta RL, Bruskotter JT, Campos-Arceiz A, Corlett RT, Darimont CT, Dickman AJ, Dirzo R, Dublin HT, Estes JA, Everatt KT, Galetti M, Goswami VR, Hayward MW, Hedges S, Hoffmann M, Hunter LTB, Kerley GIH, Letnic M, Levi T, Maisels F, Morrison JC, Nelson MP, Newsome TM, Painter L, Pringle RM, Sandom CJ, Terborgh J, Treves A, van Valkenburgh B, Vucetich JA, Wirsing AJ, Wallach AD, Wolf C, Woodroffe R, Young H, Zhang L (2016) Saving the world’s terrestrial megafauna. BioScience, 66, 807-812.
DOI URL |
[34] | Runge CA, Withey JC, Naugle DE, Fargione JE, Helmstedt KJ, Larsen AE, Martinuzzi S, Tack JD (2019) Single species conservation as an umbrella for management of landscape threats. PLoS ONE, 14, e0209619. |
[35] | Saaty TL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting. McGraw-Hill, New York. |
[36] | Samways MJ, Stork NE, Cracraft J, Eeley HAC, Foster M, Lund G, Hilton-Taylor C (1995) Scales, planning and approaches to inventorying and monitoring. In: Global Biodiversity Assessment (eds Heywood VH, Watson RT), pp. 475-517. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[37] |
Santarém F, Pereira P, Saarinen J, Brito JC (2019) New method to identify and map flagship fleets for promoting conservation and ecotourism. Biological Conservation, 229, 113-124.
DOI URL |
[38] |
Sergio F, Newton I, Marchesi L, Pedrini P (2006) Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 1049-1055.
DOI URL |
[39] |
Shen XL, Li S, McShea WJ, Wang DJ, Yu JP, Shi XG, Dong W, Mi XC, Ma KP (2020) Effectiveness of management zoning designed for flagship species in protecting sympatric species. Conservation Biology, 34, 158-167.
DOI URL |
[40] | Shrader-Frechette KS, McCoy ED (1993) Method in Ecology:Strategies for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[41] |
Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation, 83, 247-257.
DOI URL |
[42] |
Smith RJ, Veríssimo D, Isaac NJB, Jones KE (2012) Identifying Cinderella species: Uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal. Conservation Letters, 5, 205-212.
DOI URL |
[43] | Sun JH, Xie ZS, Chen H, Huang H, Li JY (2018) Assessment of geological environment carrying capacity of Beichuan County based on AHP. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 38, 125-128, 2. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[孙金辉, 谢忠胜, 陈欢, 黄海, 李金洋 (2018) 基于层次分析法的北川县环境地质承载力评价. 水土保持通报, 38, 125-128, 2.] | |
[44] |
Thomas-Walters L, Raihani JN (2017) Supporting conservation: The roles of flagship species and identifiable victims. Conservation Letters, 10, 581-587.
DOI URL |
[45] | Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group (1996) Testudo horsfieldii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1996. e.T21651A9306759. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.1996.RLTS.T21651A9306759.en. (accessed on 2019-05-10) |
[46] |
van Vuuren BJ, Woolaver L, Goodman SM (2012) Genetic population structure in the boky-boky (Carnivora: Eupleridae), a conservation flagship species in the dry deciduous forests of central western Madagascar. Animal Conservation, 15, 164-173.
DOI URL |
[47] | Vargas RV (2010) Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to select and prioritize projects in a portfolio. PMI Global Congress 2010-North America, Washington, DC. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. |
[48] |
Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Girão W, Campos AA, Smith RJ, MacMillan DC (2014a) Evaluating conservation flagships and flagship fleets. Conservation Letters, 7, 263-270.
DOI URL |
[49] |
Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Groombridge J, Bristol R, MacMillan DC (2009) Birds as tourism flagship species: A case study of tropical islands. Animal Conservation, 12, 549-558.
DOI URL |
[50] |
Verissimo D, MacMillan DC, Smith RJ (2011) Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships. Conservation Letters, 4, 1-8.
DOI URL |
[51] |
Veríssimo D, Pongiluppi T, Santos MCM, Develey PF, Fraser I, Smith RJ, Macmilan DC (2014b) Using a systematic approach to select flagship species for bird conservation. Conservation Biology, 28, 269-277.
DOI URL |
[52] |
Veríssimo D, Vaughan G, Ridout M, Waterman C, MacMillan D, Smith RJ (2017) Increased conservation marketing effort has major fundraising benefits for even the least popular species. Biological Conservation, 211, 95-101.
DOI URL |
[53] | Walpole MJ, Leader-Williams N (2002) Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiversity & Conservation, 11, 543-547. |
[54] |
Wei FW, Costanza R, Dai Q, Stoeckl N, Gu XD, Farber S, Nie YG, Kubiszewski I, Hu YB, Swaisgood R, Yang XY, Bruford M, Chen YP, Voinov A, Qi DW, Owen M, Yan L, Kenny DC, Zhang ZJ, Hou R, Jiang SW, Liu HB, Zhan XJ, Zhang L, Yang B, Zhao LJ, Zheng XG, Zhou WL, Wen YL, Gao HR, Zhang W (2018) The value of ecosystem services from giant panda reserves. Current Biology, 28, 2174-2180.
DOI URL |
[55] |
Western D (1987) Africa’s elephants and rhinos: Flagships in crisis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2, 343-346.
DOI URL |
[56] |
Williams PH, Burgess ND, Rahbek C (2000) Flagship species, ecological complementarity and conserving the diversity of mammals and birds in sub-Saharan Africa. Animal Conservation, 3, 249-260.
DOI URL |
[57] |
Xiang ZF, Yu Y, Yang M, Yang JY, Niao MY, Li M (2011) Does flagship species tourism benefit conservation? A case study of the golden snub-nosed monkey in Shennongjia National Nature Reserve. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56, 2553-2558.
DOI URL |
[58] | Xu SB (1988) Practical Decision-Making Method:Principle of Analytic Hierarchy Process. Tianjin University Press, Tianjin. (in Chinese) |
[许树柏 (1988) 实用决策方法: 层次分析法原理. 天津大学出版社, 天津.] | |
[59] | Zhao J (2000) Mathematical Modeling and Mathematical Experiments. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[赵静 (2000) 数学建模与数学实验. 高等教育出版社, 北京.] |
[1] | Jingzhou Liu, Yixin Qian, Yanxuedan Zhang, Feng Cui. Research progress and implications of flagship species paradigms based on latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(4): 23439-. |
[2] | Bojian Gu, Fang Wang. A review on the ecology and conservation biology of green peafowl (Pavo muticus) [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(11): 1554-1564. |
[3] | Wenying Zhuang,Yi Li,Huandi Zheng,Zhaoqing Zeng,Xincun Wang. Threat status of non-lichenized macro-ascomycetes in China and its threatening factors [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(1): 26-40. |
[4] | Zhangjian Shan,Lina Zhao,Yuchang Yang,Dan Xie,Haining Qin. An overview on assessment systems for threatened plants in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(12): 1352-1363. |
[5] | Shitao Xu,Xiqiang Song,Peng Ling,Yuanjun Chen,Mingxun Ren. The University Forests of Japan and implications for biodiversity conservation and national park development in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(1): 96-104. |
[6] | Hui Shang, Yuehong Yan. Natural hybridization and biodiversity conservation [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2017, 25(6): 683-688. |
[7] | Jian Zhang. Biodiversity science and macroecology in the era of big data [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2017, 25(4): 355-363. |
[8] | Xile Zhou, Xianchun Zhang, Jiuqiong Sun, Yuehong Yan. Diversity and distribution of lycophytes and ferns in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24(1): 102-107. |
[9] | Jian Zhang,Shengbin Chen,Bin Chen,Yanjun Du,Xiaolei Huang,Xubin Pan,Qiang Zhang. Citizen science: integrating scientific research, ecological conservation and public participation [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2013, 21(6): 738-749. |
[10] | Lisong Wang*, Lina Zhao, Haining Qin. A preliminary assessment of extinction risk from six species in the genus Pternopetalum based on herbarium specimen data [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2012, 20(6): 761-768. |
[11] | Jing Chen, Baowei Zhang, Keping Ma, Zhigang Jiang. Bibliometric analysis of status quo of conservation biology in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(4): 423-429. |
[12] | Chunwang Li, Zhigang Jiang, Enquan Zhang, Yuan Gu, , , . Conservation Behavioral Science, a new branch of Conservation Biology [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2007, 15(3): 312-318. |
[13] | Xin Leng, Zhongsheng Wang, Shuqing An, Jue Feng, Yuhong Liu, Guoming Wang. ISSR analysis of genetic diversity of Ilex integra, an insular endemic plant [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2005, 13(6): 546-554. |
[14] | LI Yi-Ming. Population viability analysis in conservation biology: precision and uses [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2003, 11(4): 340-350. |
[15] | ZHOU Shi-Liang, YE Wen-Guo. The genetic diversity and conservation of Sinocalycanthus chinensis [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2002, 10(1): 1-6. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn