Biodiv Sci ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 448-457. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08343 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2009.08343
• Editorial • Previous Articles Next Articles
Daqing Zhou, Chunfa Zhou, Wenhong Deng()
Received:
2008-12-23
Accepted:
2009-05-23
Online:
2009-09-20
Published:
2009-09-20
Contact:
Wenhong Deng
Daqing Zhou, Chunfa Zhou, Wenhong Deng. Influence of potential cavity resources on secondary cavity-nesters and breeding bird community composition[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(5): 448-457.
样地 Plots | 啄洞密度 Cavity (inds./ha) | 巢箱密度 Nest box (inds./ha) | 洞巢资源总密度 Total cavities (inds./ha) | 样地平均面积 Average area of plots (ha) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.25 ± 0.16 | 3.49 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | 9.57 ± 0.19 | ||||
高密度区 HDP | 6.48 ± 0.21 | - | 6.48 ± 0.21 | 6.90 ± 0.21 | ||||
低密度区 LDP | 2.10 ± 0.24 | - | 2.10 ± 0.24 | 8.57 ± 0.71 |
Table 1 Major characteristics for the three kinds of plots with different density of potential cavity resources in Dagang Forestry Farm
样地 Plots | 啄洞密度 Cavity (inds./ha) | 巢箱密度 Nest box (inds./ha) | 洞巢资源总密度 Total cavities (inds./ha) | 样地平均面积 Average area of plots (ha) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.25 ± 0.16 | 3.49 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | 9.57 ± 0.19 | ||||
高密度区 HDP | 6.48 ± 0.21 | - | 6.48 ± 0.21 | 6.90 ± 0.21 | ||||
低密度区 LDP | 2.10 ± 0.24 | - | 2.10 ± 0.24 | 8.57 ± 0.71 |
Fig. 1 Utilization of cavity resources in NBP, HDP and LDP. NBT, NBB, and NBZ were the utilization of total cavity resources, nest boxes and cavities in NBP respectively; HDZ and LDZ were the utilization of cavities in HDP and LDP respectively. Refer to Table 1 for definitions of NBP, HDP and LDP.
样地 Plots | 多样性指数 Species diversity index | 均匀度指数 Evenness index | 物种丰富度指数 Species richness index | 种间相遇率 PIE |
---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.694 ± 0.245 a | 0.903 ± 0.048 | 1.821 ± 0.418 | 0.838 ± 0.068 |
高密度区 HDP | 1.791 ± 0.309 a | 0.908 ± 0.039 | 1.998 ± 0.562 | 0.852 ± 0.068 |
低密度区 LDP | 1.376 ± 0.304 b | 0.884 ± 0.065 | 1.660 ± 0.495 | 0.793 ± 0.112 |
Table 2 Pairwise comparisons of bird community diversity in NBP, HDP and LDP
样地 Plots | 多样性指数 Species diversity index | 均匀度指数 Evenness index | 物种丰富度指数 Species richness index | 种间相遇率 PIE |
---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.694 ± 0.245 a | 0.903 ± 0.048 | 1.821 ± 0.418 | 0.838 ± 0.068 |
高密度区 HDP | 1.791 ± 0.309 a | 0.908 ± 0.039 | 1.998 ± 0.562 | 0.852 ± 0.068 |
低密度区 LDP | 1.376 ± 0.304 b | 0.884 ± 0.065 | 1.660 ± 0.495 | 0.793 ± 0.112 |
Fig. 2 Guild structure of breeding bird community in HDP and LDP. Refer to Table 1 for definitions of HDP and LDP and Appendix I for scientific names of bird species. MD, Mean Euclidean distance between all species pairs.
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
隼形目 Falconiformes | 鹰科 Accipitridae | 日本松雀鹰 Accipiter gularis* | - | 0.08 ± 0.37 | - |
苍鹰 A. gentilis* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
灰脸鵟鹰 Butastur indicus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
鸡形目 Galliformes | 松鸡科 Tetraonidae | 花尾榛鸡 Bonasa bonasia* | 0.14 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.46 | 0.28 ± 0.96 |
雉科 Phasianidae | 环颈雉 Phasianus colchicus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - | |
鸽形目 Columbiformes | 鸠鸽科 Columbidae | 山斑鸠 Streptopelia orientalis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.32 | - |
鹃形目 Cuculiformes | 杜鹃科 Cuculidae | 大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 |
鸮形目 Strigiformes | 鸱鸮科 Strigidae | 长尾林鸮 Strix uralensis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
鴷形目 Piciformes | 啄木鸟科 Picidae | 星头啄木鸟 Picoides canicapillus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - |
小斑啄木鸟 P. minor* | - | 0.10 ± 0.35 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
白背啄木鸟 P. leucotos* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.21 ± 0.80 | ||
大斑啄木鸟 P. major* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.29 ± 0.56 | 0.14 ± 0.38 | ||
灰头绿啄木鸟 Picus canus* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
雀形目 Passeriformes | 鹡鸰科 Motacillidae | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni* | - | 0.12 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.70 |
山椒鸟科 Campephagidae | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus* | - | 0.07 ± 0.22 | - | |
鸦科 Corvidae | 松鸦 Garrulus glandarius* | 0.20 ± 0.75 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | |
灰喜鹊 Cyanopica cyana* | 0.21 ± 0.80 | - | - | ||
鸫科 Turdidae | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus* | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
虎斑地鸫 Zoothera dauma* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
斑鸫 Turdus eunomus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.48 | ||
灰背鸫 T. hortulorum* | 0.89 ± 0.96 | 1.43 ± 1.23 | 0.42 ± 0.78 | ||
鹟科 Muscicapidae | 乌鹟 Muscicapa sibirica* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.12 ± 0.40 | 0.17 ± 0.45 | |
北灰鹟 M. dauurica* | 0.18 ± 0.33 | 0.38 ± 0.59 | 0.14 ± 0.37 | ||
白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia* | 0.66 ± 0.62 | 0.88 ± 1.06 | 0.10 ± 0.26 | ||
莺科 Sylviidae | 巨嘴柳莺 Phylloscopus schwarzi* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | - | |
黄腰柳莺 P. proregulus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | 0.43 ± 1.03 | 0.42 ± 1.06 | 0.69 ± 1.59 | ||
极北柳莺 P. borealis | 0.08 ± 0.26 | - | - | ||
冕柳莺 P. coronatus | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
冠纹柳莺 P. reguloides | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.26 ± 0.61 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | ||
长尾山雀科 Aegithalidae | 银喉长尾山雀 Aegithalos caudatus* | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.15 ± 0.42 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
山雀科 Paridae | 大山雀 Parus major* | 2.11 ± 1.81 | 1.90 ± 1.94 | 0.73 ± 0.92 | |
沼泽山雀 P. palustris* | 1.11 ±1.27 | 1.39 ± 1.86 | 0.66 ± 0.72 | ||
鳾科 Sittidae | 普通鳾 Sitta europaea* | 2.55 ± 1.30 | 2.69 ± 1.45 | 2.08 ± 1.31 | |
燕雀科 Fringillidae | 锡嘴雀 Coccothraustes coccothraustes* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
长尾雀 Uragus sibiricus* | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.35 | - | ||
鹀科 Emberizidae | 白眉鹀 Emberiza tristrami | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
黄喉鹀 E. elegans | 3.34 ± 1.97 | 3.53 ± 2.23 | 2.32 ± 1.27 | ||
栗鹀 E. rutila | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | ||
芦鹀 E. schoeniclus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
Appendix Ι The checklist and densities (inds./ha) of birds in NBP, HDP and LDP
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
隼形目 Falconiformes | 鹰科 Accipitridae | 日本松雀鹰 Accipiter gularis* | - | 0.08 ± 0.37 | - |
苍鹰 A. gentilis* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
灰脸鵟鹰 Butastur indicus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
鸡形目 Galliformes | 松鸡科 Tetraonidae | 花尾榛鸡 Bonasa bonasia* | 0.14 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.46 | 0.28 ± 0.96 |
雉科 Phasianidae | 环颈雉 Phasianus colchicus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - | |
鸽形目 Columbiformes | 鸠鸽科 Columbidae | 山斑鸠 Streptopelia orientalis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.32 | - |
鹃形目 Cuculiformes | 杜鹃科 Cuculidae | 大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 |
鸮形目 Strigiformes | 鸱鸮科 Strigidae | 长尾林鸮 Strix uralensis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
鴷形目 Piciformes | 啄木鸟科 Picidae | 星头啄木鸟 Picoides canicapillus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - |
小斑啄木鸟 P. minor* | - | 0.10 ± 0.35 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
白背啄木鸟 P. leucotos* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.21 ± 0.80 | ||
大斑啄木鸟 P. major* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.29 ± 0.56 | 0.14 ± 0.38 | ||
灰头绿啄木鸟 Picus canus* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
雀形目 Passeriformes | 鹡鸰科 Motacillidae | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni* | - | 0.12 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.70 |
山椒鸟科 Campephagidae | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus* | - | 0.07 ± 0.22 | - | |
鸦科 Corvidae | 松鸦 Garrulus glandarius* | 0.20 ± 0.75 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | |
灰喜鹊 Cyanopica cyana* | 0.21 ± 0.80 | - | - | ||
鸫科 Turdidae | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus* | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
虎斑地鸫 Zoothera dauma* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
斑鸫 Turdus eunomus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.48 | ||
灰背鸫 T. hortulorum* | 0.89 ± 0.96 | 1.43 ± 1.23 | 0.42 ± 0.78 | ||
鹟科 Muscicapidae | 乌鹟 Muscicapa sibirica* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.12 ± 0.40 | 0.17 ± 0.45 | |
北灰鹟 M. dauurica* | 0.18 ± 0.33 | 0.38 ± 0.59 | 0.14 ± 0.37 | ||
白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia* | 0.66 ± 0.62 | 0.88 ± 1.06 | 0.10 ± 0.26 | ||
莺科 Sylviidae | 巨嘴柳莺 Phylloscopus schwarzi* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | - | |
黄腰柳莺 P. proregulus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | 0.43 ± 1.03 | 0.42 ± 1.06 | 0.69 ± 1.59 | ||
极北柳莺 P. borealis | 0.08 ± 0.26 | - | - | ||
冕柳莺 P. coronatus | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
冠纹柳莺 P. reguloides | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.26 ± 0.61 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | ||
长尾山雀科 Aegithalidae | 银喉长尾山雀 Aegithalos caudatus* | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.15 ± 0.42 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
山雀科 Paridae | 大山雀 Parus major* | 2.11 ± 1.81 | 1.90 ± 1.94 | 0.73 ± 0.92 | |
沼泽山雀 P. palustris* | 1.11 ±1.27 | 1.39 ± 1.86 | 0.66 ± 0.72 | ||
鳾科 Sittidae | 普通鳾 Sitta europaea* | 2.55 ± 1.30 | 2.69 ± 1.45 | 2.08 ± 1.31 | |
燕雀科 Fringillidae | 锡嘴雀 Coccothraustes coccothraustes* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
长尾雀 Uragus sibiricus* | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.35 | - | ||
鹀科 Emberizidae | 白眉鹀 Emberiza tristrami | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
黄喉鹀 E. elegans | 3.34 ± 1.97 | 3.53 ± 2.23 | 2.32 ± 1.27 | ||
栗鹀 E. rutila | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | ||
芦鹀 E. schoeniclus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
[1] | Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London. |
[2] | Bock CE, Fleck DC (1995) Avian response to nest box addition in two forests of the Colorado Front Range. Journal of Field Ornithology, 66,352-362. |
[3] | Brawn JD, Balda RP (1988) Population biology of cavity nesters in northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor, 90,61-71. |
[4] | Brush T (1983) Cavity use by secondary cavity-nesting birds and response to manipulations. Condor, 85,461-466. |
[5] | Cody ML (1985) An Introduction to Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando. |
[6] | Cornelius C, Cockle K, Politi N, Berkunsky I, Sandoval L, Ojeda V, Rivera L, Hunter M, Martin K (2008) Cavity-nesting birds in Neotropical forests: cavities as a potentially limiting resource. Ornitologia Neotropical, 19,253-268. |
[7] | Cui P (崔鹏), Deng WH (邓文洪) (2007) Review on the status and development of bird community research. Chinese Journal of Zoology (动物学杂志), 42(4),149-158. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Deng QX (邓秋香), Zhou T (周彤), Gao W (高玮) (2006) Function of primary cavity-nesting birds on bird community structure in deciduous broad-leaved forest. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 34(6),58-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] |
Holmes RT, Bonney RE, Pacala SW (1979) Guild structure of the Hubbard Brook bird community: a multivariate approach. Ecology, 60,512-520.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Holmes RT, Recher HF (1986) Determinants of guild structure in forest bird communities: an intercontinental comparison. Condor, 88,427-439.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52,577-586.
DOI URL PMID |
[12] |
Li Z (李臻), Yang LY (杨丽媛), Liu W (刘文), Deng WH (邓文洪) (2008) Effect of artificial nestboxes on the diversity of secondary cavity-nesting birds and the stability of breeding bird community. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 16,601-606. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[13] |
Loman J (2006) Does nest sites availability limit the density of hole nesting birds in small woodland patches? Web Ecology, 6,37-43.
DOI URL |
[14] | Margalef R (1958) Information theory in ecology. International Journal of General Systems, 3,36-71. |
[15] | McAleece N, Lambshead J, Patterson G, Gage J (1997) BioDiversity pro, version 2. The Natural History Museum, London, and The Scottish Association of Marine Science, Oban, Scotland. |
[16] |
Morrison ML (1984) Influence of sample size and sampling design on analysis of avian foraging behavior. Condor, 86,146-150.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Newton I (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biological Conservation, 70,265-276.
DOI URL |
[18] | Newton I (1998) Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press, San Diego. |
[19] |
Pearson SM (1993) The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations. Landscape Ecology, 8,3-18.
DOI URL |
[20] | Pielou EC (1969) An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York. |
[21] |
Purcell KL, Verner J, Oring LW (1997) A comparison of the breeding ecology of birds nesting in boxes and tree cavities. Auk, 114,646-656.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Root RB (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecological Monographs, 37,317-350.
DOI URL |
[23] | Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. |
[24] | SPSS Inc. (2008) SPSS Statistics 17. 0, Release 17.0.0. Chicago, IL. |
[25] |
von Haartman L (1957) Adaptation in hole-nesting birds. Evolution, 11,339-347.
DOI URL |
[26] | Walankiewicz W (1991) Do secondary cavity-nesting birds suffer more from competition for cavities or from predation in a primeval deciduous forest? Natural Areas Journal, 11,203-212. |
[27] | Wang HT (王海涛), Gao W (高玮) (2002) Utilization of natural cavities by secondary cavity-nesting birds in secondary forest. Zoological Research (动物学研究), 23,136-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] |
Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21,213-251.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Wiktander U, Olsson O, Nilsson SG (2001) Seasonal variation in home-range size, and habitat area requirement of the lesser spotted woodpecker ( Dendrocopos minor) in southern Sweden. Biological Conservation, 100,387-395.
DOI URL |
[30] | Zar JH (1999) Multisample hypothesis:the analysis of variance. In: Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. (ed. Zar JH), pp.178-189. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. |
[31] | Zheng GM (郑光美) (2002) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China (中国鸟类分类与分布名录). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[32] | Zhou F (周放) (1987) Guild structure of the forest bird community in Dinghushan. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 7,176-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Zhu TC (祝廷成), Yan ZK (严仲铠), Zhou SB (周守标) (2003) The Plants on the Changbaishan Massif of China (中国长白山植物). Beijing Science and Technology Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn