Biodiv Sci ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 448-457. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08343
• Editorial • Previous Articles Next Articles
Daqing Zhou, Chunfa Zhou, Wenhong Deng()
Received:
2008-12-23
Accepted:
2009-05-23
Online:
2009-09-20
Published:
2009-09-20
Contact:
Wenhong Deng
Daqing Zhou, Chunfa Zhou, Wenhong Deng. Influence of potential cavity resources on secondary cavity-nesters and breeding bird community composition[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(5): 448-457.
样地 Plots | 啄洞密度 Cavity (inds./ha) | 巢箱密度 Nest box (inds./ha) | 洞巢资源总密度 Total cavities (inds./ha) | 样地平均面积 Average area of plots (ha) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.25 ± 0.16 | 3.49 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | 9.57 ± 0.19 | ||||
高密度区 HDP | 6.48 ± 0.21 | - | 6.48 ± 0.21 | 6.90 ± 0.21 | ||||
低密度区 LDP | 2.10 ± 0.24 | - | 2.10 ± 0.24 | 8.57 ± 0.71 |
Table 1 Major characteristics for the three kinds of plots with different density of potential cavity resources in Dagang Forestry Farm
样地 Plots | 啄洞密度 Cavity (inds./ha) | 巢箱密度 Nest box (inds./ha) | 洞巢资源总密度 Total cavities (inds./ha) | 样地平均面积 Average area of plots (ha) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.25 ± 0.16 | 3.49 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | 9.57 ± 0.19 | ||||
高密度区 HDP | 6.48 ± 0.21 | - | 6.48 ± 0.21 | 6.90 ± 0.21 | ||||
低密度区 LDP | 2.10 ± 0.24 | - | 2.10 ± 0.24 | 8.57 ± 0.71 |
Fig. 1 Utilization of cavity resources in NBP, HDP and LDP. NBT, NBB, and NBZ were the utilization of total cavity resources, nest boxes and cavities in NBP respectively; HDZ and LDZ were the utilization of cavities in HDP and LDP respectively. Refer to Table 1 for definitions of NBP, HDP and LDP.
样地 Plots | 多样性指数 Species diversity index | 均匀度指数 Evenness index | 物种丰富度指数 Species richness index | 种间相遇率 PIE |
---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.694 ± 0.245 a | 0.903 ± 0.048 | 1.821 ± 0.418 | 0.838 ± 0.068 |
高密度区 HDP | 1.791 ± 0.309 a | 0.908 ± 0.039 | 1.998 ± 0.562 | 0.852 ± 0.068 |
低密度区 LDP | 1.376 ± 0.304 b | 0.884 ± 0.065 | 1.660 ± 0.495 | 0.793 ± 0.112 |
Table 2 Pairwise comparisons of bird community diversity in NBP, HDP and LDP
样地 Plots | 多样性指数 Species diversity index | 均匀度指数 Evenness index | 物种丰富度指数 Species richness index | 种间相遇率 PIE |
---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.694 ± 0.245 a | 0.903 ± 0.048 | 1.821 ± 0.418 | 0.838 ± 0.068 |
高密度区 HDP | 1.791 ± 0.309 a | 0.908 ± 0.039 | 1.998 ± 0.562 | 0.852 ± 0.068 |
低密度区 LDP | 1.376 ± 0.304 b | 0.884 ± 0.065 | 1.660 ± 0.495 | 0.793 ± 0.112 |
Fig. 2 Guild structure of breeding bird community in HDP and LDP. Refer to Table 1 for definitions of HDP and LDP and Appendix I for scientific names of bird species. MD, Mean Euclidean distance between all species pairs.
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
隼形目 Falconiformes | 鹰科 Accipitridae | 日本松雀鹰 Accipiter gularis* | - | 0.08 ± 0.37 | - |
苍鹰 A. gentilis* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
灰脸鵟鹰 Butastur indicus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
鸡形目 Galliformes | 松鸡科 Tetraonidae | 花尾榛鸡 Bonasa bonasia* | 0.14 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.46 | 0.28 ± 0.96 |
雉科 Phasianidae | 环颈雉 Phasianus colchicus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - | |
鸽形目 Columbiformes | 鸠鸽科 Columbidae | 山斑鸠 Streptopelia orientalis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.32 | - |
鹃形目 Cuculiformes | 杜鹃科 Cuculidae | 大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 |
鸮形目 Strigiformes | 鸱鸮科 Strigidae | 长尾林鸮 Strix uralensis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
鴷形目 Piciformes | 啄木鸟科 Picidae | 星头啄木鸟 Picoides canicapillus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - |
小斑啄木鸟 P. minor* | - | 0.10 ± 0.35 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
白背啄木鸟 P. leucotos* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.21 ± 0.80 | ||
大斑啄木鸟 P. major* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.29 ± 0.56 | 0.14 ± 0.38 | ||
灰头绿啄木鸟 Picus canus* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
雀形目 Passeriformes | 鹡鸰科 Motacillidae | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni* | - | 0.12 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.70 |
山椒鸟科 Campephagidae | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus* | - | 0.07 ± 0.22 | - | |
鸦科 Corvidae | 松鸦 Garrulus glandarius* | 0.20 ± 0.75 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | |
灰喜鹊 Cyanopica cyana* | 0.21 ± 0.80 | - | - | ||
鸫科 Turdidae | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus* | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
虎斑地鸫 Zoothera dauma* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
斑鸫 Turdus eunomus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.48 | ||
灰背鸫 T. hortulorum* | 0.89 ± 0.96 | 1.43 ± 1.23 | 0.42 ± 0.78 | ||
鹟科 Muscicapidae | 乌鹟 Muscicapa sibirica* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.12 ± 0.40 | 0.17 ± 0.45 | |
北灰鹟 M. dauurica* | 0.18 ± 0.33 | 0.38 ± 0.59 | 0.14 ± 0.37 | ||
白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia* | 0.66 ± 0.62 | 0.88 ± 1.06 | 0.10 ± 0.26 | ||
莺科 Sylviidae | 巨嘴柳莺 Phylloscopus schwarzi* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | - | |
黄腰柳莺 P. proregulus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | 0.43 ± 1.03 | 0.42 ± 1.06 | 0.69 ± 1.59 | ||
极北柳莺 P. borealis | 0.08 ± 0.26 | - | - | ||
冕柳莺 P. coronatus | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
冠纹柳莺 P. reguloides | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.26 ± 0.61 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | ||
长尾山雀科 Aegithalidae | 银喉长尾山雀 Aegithalos caudatus* | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.15 ± 0.42 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
山雀科 Paridae | 大山雀 Parus major* | 2.11 ± 1.81 | 1.90 ± 1.94 | 0.73 ± 0.92 | |
沼泽山雀 P. palustris* | 1.11 ±1.27 | 1.39 ± 1.86 | 0.66 ± 0.72 | ||
鳾科 Sittidae | 普通鳾 Sitta europaea* | 2.55 ± 1.30 | 2.69 ± 1.45 | 2.08 ± 1.31 | |
燕雀科 Fringillidae | 锡嘴雀 Coccothraustes coccothraustes* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
长尾雀 Uragus sibiricus* | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.35 | - | ||
鹀科 Emberizidae | 白眉鹀 Emberiza tristrami | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
黄喉鹀 E. elegans | 3.34 ± 1.97 | 3.53 ± 2.23 | 2.32 ± 1.27 | ||
栗鹀 E. rutila | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | ||
芦鹀 E. schoeniclus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
Appendix Ι The checklist and densities (inds./ha) of birds in NBP, HDP and LDP
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
隼形目 Falconiformes | 鹰科 Accipitridae | 日本松雀鹰 Accipiter gularis* | - | 0.08 ± 0.37 | - |
苍鹰 A. gentilis* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
灰脸鵟鹰 Butastur indicus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
鸡形目 Galliformes | 松鸡科 Tetraonidae | 花尾榛鸡 Bonasa bonasia* | 0.14 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.46 | 0.28 ± 0.96 |
雉科 Phasianidae | 环颈雉 Phasianus colchicus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - | |
鸽形目 Columbiformes | 鸠鸽科 Columbidae | 山斑鸠 Streptopelia orientalis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.32 | - |
鹃形目 Cuculiformes | 杜鹃科 Cuculidae | 大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 |
鸮形目 Strigiformes | 鸱鸮科 Strigidae | 长尾林鸮 Strix uralensis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
鴷形目 Piciformes | 啄木鸟科 Picidae | 星头啄木鸟 Picoides canicapillus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - |
小斑啄木鸟 P. minor* | - | 0.10 ± 0.35 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
白背啄木鸟 P. leucotos* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.21 ± 0.80 | ||
大斑啄木鸟 P. major* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.29 ± 0.56 | 0.14 ± 0.38 | ||
灰头绿啄木鸟 Picus canus* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
雀形目 Passeriformes | 鹡鸰科 Motacillidae | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni* | - | 0.12 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.70 |
山椒鸟科 Campephagidae | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus* | - | 0.07 ± 0.22 | - | |
鸦科 Corvidae | 松鸦 Garrulus glandarius* | 0.20 ± 0.75 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | |
灰喜鹊 Cyanopica cyana* | 0.21 ± 0.80 | - | - | ||
鸫科 Turdidae | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus* | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
虎斑地鸫 Zoothera dauma* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
斑鸫 Turdus eunomus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.48 | ||
灰背鸫 T. hortulorum* | 0.89 ± 0.96 | 1.43 ± 1.23 | 0.42 ± 0.78 | ||
鹟科 Muscicapidae | 乌鹟 Muscicapa sibirica* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.12 ± 0.40 | 0.17 ± 0.45 | |
北灰鹟 M. dauurica* | 0.18 ± 0.33 | 0.38 ± 0.59 | 0.14 ± 0.37 | ||
白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia* | 0.66 ± 0.62 | 0.88 ± 1.06 | 0.10 ± 0.26 | ||
莺科 Sylviidae | 巨嘴柳莺 Phylloscopus schwarzi* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | - | |
黄腰柳莺 P. proregulus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | 0.43 ± 1.03 | 0.42 ± 1.06 | 0.69 ± 1.59 | ||
极北柳莺 P. borealis | 0.08 ± 0.26 | - | - | ||
冕柳莺 P. coronatus | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
冠纹柳莺 P. reguloides | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.26 ± 0.61 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | ||
长尾山雀科 Aegithalidae | 银喉长尾山雀 Aegithalos caudatus* | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.15 ± 0.42 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
山雀科 Paridae | 大山雀 Parus major* | 2.11 ± 1.81 | 1.90 ± 1.94 | 0.73 ± 0.92 | |
沼泽山雀 P. palustris* | 1.11 ±1.27 | 1.39 ± 1.86 | 0.66 ± 0.72 | ||
鳾科 Sittidae | 普通鳾 Sitta europaea* | 2.55 ± 1.30 | 2.69 ± 1.45 | 2.08 ± 1.31 | |
燕雀科 Fringillidae | 锡嘴雀 Coccothraustes coccothraustes* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
长尾雀 Uragus sibiricus* | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.35 | - | ||
鹀科 Emberizidae | 白眉鹀 Emberiza tristrami | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
黄喉鹀 E. elegans | 3.34 ± 1.97 | 3.53 ± 2.23 | 2.32 ± 1.27 | ||
栗鹀 E. rutila | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | ||
芦鹀 E. schoeniclus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
[1] | Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London. |
[2] | Bock CE, Fleck DC (1995) Avian response to nest box addition in two forests of the Colorado Front Range. Journal of Field Ornithology, 66,352-362. |
[3] | Brawn JD, Balda RP (1988) Population biology of cavity nesters in northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor, 90,61-71. |
[4] | Brush T (1983) Cavity use by secondary cavity-nesting birds and response to manipulations. Condor, 85,461-466. |
[5] | Cody ML (1985) An Introduction to Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando. |
[6] | Cornelius C, Cockle K, Politi N, Berkunsky I, Sandoval L, Ojeda V, Rivera L, Hunter M, Martin K (2008) Cavity-nesting birds in Neotropical forests: cavities as a potentially limiting resource. Ornitologia Neotropical, 19,253-268. |
[7] | Cui P (崔鹏), Deng WH (邓文洪) (2007) Review on the status and development of bird community research. Chinese Journal of Zoology (动物学杂志), 42(4),149-158. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Deng QX (邓秋香), Zhou T (周彤), Gao W (高玮) (2006) Function of primary cavity-nesting birds on bird community structure in deciduous broad-leaved forest. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 34(6),58-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] |
Holmes RT, Bonney RE, Pacala SW (1979) Guild structure of the Hubbard Brook bird community: a multivariate approach. Ecology, 60,512-520.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Holmes RT, Recher HF (1986) Determinants of guild structure in forest bird communities: an intercontinental comparison. Condor, 88,427-439.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52,577-586.
DOI URL PMID |
[12] |
Li Z (李臻), Yang LY (杨丽媛), Liu W (刘文), Deng WH (邓文洪) (2008) Effect of artificial nestboxes on the diversity of secondary cavity-nesting birds and the stability of breeding bird community. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 16,601-606. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[13] |
Loman J (2006) Does nest sites availability limit the density of hole nesting birds in small woodland patches? Web Ecology, 6,37-43.
DOI URL |
[14] | Margalef R (1958) Information theory in ecology. International Journal of General Systems, 3,36-71. |
[15] | McAleece N, Lambshead J, Patterson G, Gage J (1997) BioDiversity pro, version 2. The Natural History Museum, London, and The Scottish Association of Marine Science, Oban, Scotland. |
[16] |
Morrison ML (1984) Influence of sample size and sampling design on analysis of avian foraging behavior. Condor, 86,146-150.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Newton I (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biological Conservation, 70,265-276.
DOI URL |
[18] | Newton I (1998) Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press, San Diego. |
[19] |
Pearson SM (1993) The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations. Landscape Ecology, 8,3-18.
DOI URL |
[20] | Pielou EC (1969) An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York. |
[21] |
Purcell KL, Verner J, Oring LW (1997) A comparison of the breeding ecology of birds nesting in boxes and tree cavities. Auk, 114,646-656.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Root RB (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecological Monographs, 37,317-350.
DOI URL |
[23] | Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. |
[24] | SPSS Inc. (2008) SPSS Statistics 17. 0, Release 17.0.0. Chicago, IL. |
[25] |
von Haartman L (1957) Adaptation in hole-nesting birds. Evolution, 11,339-347.
DOI URL |
[26] | Walankiewicz W (1991) Do secondary cavity-nesting birds suffer more from competition for cavities or from predation in a primeval deciduous forest? Natural Areas Journal, 11,203-212. |
[27] | Wang HT (王海涛), Gao W (高玮) (2002) Utilization of natural cavities by secondary cavity-nesting birds in secondary forest. Zoological Research (动物学研究), 23,136-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] |
Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21,213-251.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Wiktander U, Olsson O, Nilsson SG (2001) Seasonal variation in home-range size, and habitat area requirement of the lesser spotted woodpecker ( Dendrocopos minor) in southern Sweden. Biological Conservation, 100,387-395.
DOI URL |
[30] | Zar JH (1999) Multisample hypothesis:the analysis of variance. In: Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. (ed. Zar JH), pp.178-189. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. |
[31] | Zheng GM (郑光美) (2002) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China (中国鸟类分类与分布名录). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[32] | Zhou F (周放) (1987) Guild structure of the forest bird community in Dinghushan. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 7,176-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Zhu TC (祝廷成), Yan ZK (严仲铠), Zhou SB (周守标) (2003) The Plants on the Changbaishan Massif of China (中国长白山植物). Beijing Science and Technology Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[1] | Xiaofeng Yang, Xiaomeng Li, Wanjin Liao. Advances in the genetic regulating pathways of plant flowering time [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(6): 825-842. |
[2] | Hui Zhang, Qian Liu, Xiaolei Huang. Mechanisms regulating caste and behavior differentiation in social insects [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(4): 507-516. |
[3] | Zhihua Zhou, Xiaohua Jin. Analysis and suggestions on policies and regulations on conservation and management of wild plants in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(12): 1583-1590. |
[4] | Xiangcheng Mi, Jing Guo, Zhanqing Hao, Zongqiang Xie, Ke Guo, Keping Ma. Chinese forest biodiversity monitoring: scientific foundations and strategic planning [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24(11): 1203-1219. |
[5] | Meng Zhang, Jiji Sun, Yanping Wang, Pingping Jiang, Ping Ding, Gaofu Xu. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the use of nest site resources by great tits in Thousand Island Lake, Zhejiang Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2010, 18(4): 383-389. |
[6] | Zhen Li, Liyuan Yang, Wen Liu, Wenhong Deng. Effect of artificial nestboxes on the diversity of secondary cavity-nesting birds and the stability of breeding bird community [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2008, 16(6): 601-606. |
[7] | SANG Wei-Guo, MA Ke-Ping, WEI Wei. Management mechanism of biotechnology safety in China and abroad [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2000, 08(4): 413-421. |
[8] | Ding Yingchun, Ping Wenxiang, Sun Jianqiu, Zhou Dongpo. Diversity of the Microorganisms in the small habitat of the Human Oral Cavity [J]. Biodiv Sci, 1996, 04(2): 103-108. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn