Biodiv Sci ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 314-322. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019091
• Original Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Qiuhong Feng1,2,*(),Dengfeng Li1,4,Tao Yu3,Junqing Li3,Wenbao Ma1,2,Lei Zhang5
Received:
2019-03-28
Accepted:
2019-09-05
Online:
2020-03-20
Published:
2020-05-08
Contact:
Qiuhong Feng
Qiuhong Feng, Dengfeng Li, Tao Yu, Junqing Li, Wenbao Ma, Lei Zhang. Phenotypic fruit and seed variations of Acer catalpifolium, a Wild Plant with Extremely Small Populations in China[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(3): 314-322.
研究地点 Site | 经纬度 Latitude and longitude | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 年平均气温 Mean annual temperature (℃) | 年平均降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
都江堰 Dujiangyan | 103°31′28″-103°32′50″ E, 30°51′22″-30°53′27″ N | 823 | 14.28 | 1,155 |
平武 Pingwu | 104°23′41″E, 32°14′14″ N | 1,120 | 15.20 | 957 |
雷波 Leibo | 103°39′50″-103°39′56″ E, 28°31′13″-28°31′24″ N | 995 | 14.50 | 1,099 |
大邑 Dayi | 103°15′36″-103°22′28″ E, 30°36′08″-30°42′02″ N | 1,960 | 15.35 | 1,223 |
峨眉山 Emeishan | 103°24′04″-103°26′18″ E, 29°33′45″-29°35′02″ N | 718 | 16.07 | 1,376 |
Table 1 Geographical and environmental information of the five natural small populations of Acer catalpifolium
研究地点 Site | 经纬度 Latitude and longitude | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 年平均气温 Mean annual temperature (℃) | 年平均降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
都江堰 Dujiangyan | 103°31′28″-103°32′50″ E, 30°51′22″-30°53′27″ N | 823 | 14.28 | 1,155 |
平武 Pingwu | 104°23′41″E, 32°14′14″ N | 1,120 | 15.20 | 957 |
雷波 Leibo | 103°39′50″-103°39′56″ E, 28°31′13″-28°31′24″ N | 995 | 14.50 | 1,099 |
大邑 Dayi | 103°15′36″-103°22′28″ E, 30°36′08″-30°42′02″ N | 1,960 | 15.35 | 1,223 |
峨眉山 Emeishan | 103°24′04″-103°26′18″ E, 29°33′45″-29°35′02″ N | 718 | 16.07 | 1,376 |
种群 Population | 坡度 Slope (°) | 坡向 Aspect | 地貌类型 Geomorphic type | 调查母树 Mother tree investigated | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
调查数量 Number | 平均树高 Mean height (m) | 平均胸径 Mean DBH (cm) | 平均冠幅 Mean crown | ||||
都江堰 Dujiangyan | 15 | 南、东南、东北、西北 South, southeast, northeast, northwest | 山地 Mountain | 16 | 14 | 15 | 7 m × 7 m |
平武 Pingwu | 40 | 西南/北 Southwest, north | 沟边山地 Valley side mountain | 6 | 15.5 | 34 | 7 m × 7 m |
雷波 Leibo | 20 | 东南 Southeast | 山地 Mountain | 9 | 7 | 12 | 5 m × 4 m |
大邑 Dayi | 38 | 南、北 South, north | 山地 Mountain | 6 | 9.5 | 20 | 6 m × 7 m |
峨眉山 Emeishan | 15 | 北、西南、南 North, southwest, south | 山地 Mountain | 10 | 13 | 23 | 12 m × 12 m |
Table 2 Geomorphic information of sites and investigated mother trees for the five natural small populations of Acer catalpifolium
种群 Population | 坡度 Slope (°) | 坡向 Aspect | 地貌类型 Geomorphic type | 调查母树 Mother tree investigated | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
调查数量 Number | 平均树高 Mean height (m) | 平均胸径 Mean DBH (cm) | 平均冠幅 Mean crown | ||||
都江堰 Dujiangyan | 15 | 南、东南、东北、西北 South, southeast, northeast, northwest | 山地 Mountain | 16 | 14 | 15 | 7 m × 7 m |
平武 Pingwu | 40 | 西南/北 Southwest, north | 沟边山地 Valley side mountain | 6 | 15.5 | 34 | 7 m × 7 m |
雷波 Leibo | 20 | 东南 Southeast | 山地 Mountain | 9 | 7 | 12 | 5 m × 4 m |
大邑 Dayi | 38 | 南、北 South, north | 山地 Mountain | 6 | 9.5 | 20 | 6 m × 7 m |
峨眉山 Emeishan | 15 | 北、西南、南 North, southwest, south | 山地 Mountain | 10 | 13 | 23 | 12 m × 12 m |
种群 Population | 样本 量Sample size | 平均值±标准差 Mean±SD | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果长 KFL (cm) | 翅果宽 KFW (cm) | 着生痕 BM (cm) | 种子长 SL (cm) | 种子宽 SW (cm) | 种子厚度 ST (cm) | 果柄长 FSL (cm) | 翅果 长宽比 KFLW | 种子 长宽比 SLW | 翅果 千粒重 TFW (g) | 种子 千粒重 TSW (g) | ||
都江堰 Dujiangyan | 320 | 3.24±0.35c | 1.11±0.15c | 0.54±0.05b | 0.77±0.12d | 0.46±0.06e | 0.11±0.04c | 1.42±0.39d | 2.93±0.32ab | 1.71±0.23b | 2.21±0.03c | 0.84±0.03c |
平武 Pingwu | 120 | 3.38±0.27b | 1.10±0.09c | 0.68±0.05a | 0.92±0.12a | 0.56±0.05a | 0.13±0.09a | 2.10±0.49b | 3.07±0.21ab | 1.63±0.17c | 3.03±0.03a | 1.40±0.05a |
雷波 Leibo | 180 | 3.71±0.26a | 1.22±0.10a | 0.49±0.04c | 0.89±0.12ab | 0.52±0.06b | 0.13±0.03a | 1.24±0.29e | 3.06±0.27a | 1.76±0.41b | 3.41±0.05a | 1.38±0.02a |
大邑 Dayi | 120 | 3.21±0.32d | 1.11±0.15c | 0.48±0.06d | 0.86±0.14b | 0.49±0.05d | 0.11±0.03c | 2.21±0.65a | 3.01±1.11ab | 1.78±0.27a | 2.73±0.07b | 1.08±0.05b |
峨眉山 Emeishan | 200 | 3.41±0.32b | 1.16±0.11b | 0.54±0.04b | 0.84±0.1c | 0.50±0.05c | 0.12±0.02b | 1.59±0.40c | 2.93±0.25b | 1.71±0.23b | 2.86±0.04b | 1.01±0.03b |
Table 3 Means and standard deviations of 11 fruit traits in the five natural small populations of Acer catalpifolium
种群 Population | 样本 量Sample size | 平均值±标准差 Mean±SD | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果长 KFL (cm) | 翅果宽 KFW (cm) | 着生痕 BM (cm) | 种子长 SL (cm) | 种子宽 SW (cm) | 种子厚度 ST (cm) | 果柄长 FSL (cm) | 翅果 长宽比 KFLW | 种子 长宽比 SLW | 翅果 千粒重 TFW (g) | 种子 千粒重 TSW (g) | ||
都江堰 Dujiangyan | 320 | 3.24±0.35c | 1.11±0.15c | 0.54±0.05b | 0.77±0.12d | 0.46±0.06e | 0.11±0.04c | 1.42±0.39d | 2.93±0.32ab | 1.71±0.23b | 2.21±0.03c | 0.84±0.03c |
平武 Pingwu | 120 | 3.38±0.27b | 1.10±0.09c | 0.68±0.05a | 0.92±0.12a | 0.56±0.05a | 0.13±0.09a | 2.10±0.49b | 3.07±0.21ab | 1.63±0.17c | 3.03±0.03a | 1.40±0.05a |
雷波 Leibo | 180 | 3.71±0.26a | 1.22±0.10a | 0.49±0.04c | 0.89±0.12ab | 0.52±0.06b | 0.13±0.03a | 1.24±0.29e | 3.06±0.27a | 1.76±0.41b | 3.41±0.05a | 1.38±0.02a |
大邑 Dayi | 120 | 3.21±0.32d | 1.11±0.15c | 0.48±0.06d | 0.86±0.14b | 0.49±0.05d | 0.11±0.03c | 2.21±0.65a | 3.01±1.11ab | 1.78±0.27a | 2.73±0.07b | 1.08±0.05b |
峨眉山 Emeishan | 200 | 3.41±0.32b | 1.16±0.11b | 0.54±0.04b | 0.84±0.1c | 0.50±0.05c | 0.12±0.02b | 1.59±0.40c | 2.93±0.25b | 1.71±0.23b | 2.86±0.04b | 1.01±0.03b |
表型状性 Phenotypic trait | 变异系数 Variation coefficients (%) | 平均值 Mean (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
都江堰种群 Dujiangyan | 平武种群 Pingwu | 雷波种群 Leibo | 大邑种群 Dayi | 峨眉山种群 Emeishan | ||
翅果长 KFL | 14.68 | 7.87 | 6.84 | 11.18 | 17.09 | 11.53 |
翅果宽 KFW | 14.8 | 8.00 | 8.77 | 11.1 | 11.87 | 10.91 |
着生痕 BM | 9.98 | 6.63 | 13.68 | 22.14 | 8.31 | 12.15 |
种子长 SL | 16.76 | 13.17 | 15.7 | 16.21 | 21.12 | 16.59 |
种子宽 SW | 14.99 | 8.35 | 10.91 | 11.09 | 14.69 | 12.01 |
种子厚度 ST | 46.16 | 67.73 | 39.74 | 22.7 | 26.86 | 40.64 |
果柄长 FSL | 28.9 | 23.57 | 25.88 | 30.13 | 34.16 | 28.53 |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 13.71 | 6.86 | 9.95 | 10.89 | 11.59 | 10.6 |
种子长宽比 SLW | 13.84 | 10.34 | 28.61 | 19.31 | 15.93 | 17.61 |
翅果千粒重 TFW | 1.44 | 0.88 | 1.37 | 2.63 | 1.53 | 1.57 |
种子千粒重 TSW | 3.28 | 3.78 | 1.57 | 4.61 | 2.88 | 3.22 |
平均值 Mean | 16.23 | 14.29 | 14.82 | 14.73 | 15.09 | 15.03 |
Table 4 Variation coefficients of phenotypic traits in Acer catalpifolium natural small populations. The phenotypic traits are the same as Table 3.
表型状性 Phenotypic trait | 变异系数 Variation coefficients (%) | 平均值 Mean (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
都江堰种群 Dujiangyan | 平武种群 Pingwu | 雷波种群 Leibo | 大邑种群 Dayi | 峨眉山种群 Emeishan | ||
翅果长 KFL | 14.68 | 7.87 | 6.84 | 11.18 | 17.09 | 11.53 |
翅果宽 KFW | 14.8 | 8.00 | 8.77 | 11.1 | 11.87 | 10.91 |
着生痕 BM | 9.98 | 6.63 | 13.68 | 22.14 | 8.31 | 12.15 |
种子长 SL | 16.76 | 13.17 | 15.7 | 16.21 | 21.12 | 16.59 |
种子宽 SW | 14.99 | 8.35 | 10.91 | 11.09 | 14.69 | 12.01 |
种子厚度 ST | 46.16 | 67.73 | 39.74 | 22.7 | 26.86 | 40.64 |
果柄长 FSL | 28.9 | 23.57 | 25.88 | 30.13 | 34.16 | 28.53 |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 13.71 | 6.86 | 9.95 | 10.89 | 11.59 | 10.6 |
种子长宽比 SLW | 13.84 | 10.34 | 28.61 | 19.31 | 15.93 | 17.61 |
翅果千粒重 TFW | 1.44 | 0.88 | 1.37 | 2.63 | 1.53 | 1.57 |
种子千粒重 TSW | 3.28 | 3.78 | 1.57 | 4.61 | 2.88 | 3.22 |
平均值 Mean | 16.23 | 14.29 | 14.82 | 14.73 | 15.09 | 15.03 |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | 随机误差 Random error | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | |
翅果长 KFL | 8.7860 | 0.2010 | 0.0058 | 43.7730** | 34.3670** |
翅果宽 KFW | 0.5060 | 0.0190 | 0.0023 | 25.9540** | 8.3510** |
着生痕 BM | 0.9340 | 0.0040 | 0.0001 | 245.7320** | 53.2950** |
种子长 SL | 0.6890 | 0.0220 | 0.0012 | 31.8010** | 18.6870** |
种子宽 SW | 0.2660 | 0.0040 | 0.0002 | 65.3130** | 20.2830** |
种子厚度 ST | 0.0220 | 0.0020 | 0.0003 | 9.0660** | 7.7230** |
果柄长 FSL | 31.9300 | 0.2440 | 0.0107 | 130.8680** | 22.7050** |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.7130 | 0.4630 | 0.1254 | 1.5420** | 3.6910** |
种子长宽比 SLW | 1.0790 | 0.1050 | 0.0178 | 10.2480** | 5.9060** |
Table 5 Variance of phenotypic traits among and within populations of Acer catalpifolium. The phenotypic traits are the same as Table 3.
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 均方 Mean square | F值 F value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | 随机误差 Random error | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | |
翅果长 KFL | 8.7860 | 0.2010 | 0.0058 | 43.7730** | 34.3670** |
翅果宽 KFW | 0.5060 | 0.0190 | 0.0023 | 25.9540** | 8.3510** |
着生痕 BM | 0.9340 | 0.0040 | 0.0001 | 245.7320** | 53.2950** |
种子长 SL | 0.6890 | 0.0220 | 0.0012 | 31.8010** | 18.6870** |
种子宽 SW | 0.2660 | 0.0040 | 0.0002 | 65.3130** | 20.2830** |
种子厚度 ST | 0.0220 | 0.0020 | 0.0003 | 9.0660** | 7.7230** |
果柄长 FSL | 31.9300 | 0.2440 | 0.0107 | 130.8680** | 22.7050** |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.7130 | 0.4630 | 0.1254 | 1.5420** | 3.6910** |
种子长宽比 SLW | 1.0790 | 0.1050 | 0.0178 | 10.2480** | 5.9060** |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 方差分量 Variance component | 方差分量百分比 Percentage of variance portion (%) | 表型分化系数 Phenotypic differentiation coefficient | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | 随机误差 Random errors | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | 随机误差 Random errors | ||
翅果长 KFL | 0.0418 | 0.1413 | 0.0066 | 22.06 | 74.48 | 3.46 | 22.85 |
翅果宽 KFW | 0.0024 | 0.0053 | 0.0013 | 26.47 | 58.86 | 14.68 | 31.02 |
着生痕 BM | 0.0045 | 0.0052 | 0.0013 | 41.28 | 47.29 | 11.43 | 46.60 |
种子长 SL | 0.0033 | 0.0108 | 0.0018 | 20.61 | 67.85 | 11.54 | 23.30 |
种子宽 SW | 0.0013 | 0.0024 | 0.0009 | 28.54 | 52.43 | 19.03 | 35.25 |
种子厚度 ST | 0.0001 | 0.0006 | 0.0004 | 8.23 | 52.10 | 39.67 | 13.64 |
果柄长 FSL | 0.1608 | 0.1852 | 0.0078 | 45.46 | 52.35 | 2.20 | 46.48 |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.0012 | 0.0495 | 0.0043 | 2.22 | 89.93 | 7.86 | 2.41 |
种子长宽比 SLW | 0.0048 | 0.0197 | 0.0026 | 17.68 | 72.71 | 9.61 | 19.56 |
平均值 Mean | — | — | — | 23.61 | 63.11 | 13.27 | 27.23 |
Table 6 Variance component and differentiation coefficient of phenotypic traits among and within Acer catalpifolium natural small populations. The phenotypic traits are the same as Table 3.
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 方差分量 Variance component | 方差分量百分比 Percentage of variance portion (%) | 表型分化系数 Phenotypic differentiation coefficient | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | 随机误差 Random errors | 种群间 Among populations | 种群内 Within population | 随机误差 Random errors | ||
翅果长 KFL | 0.0418 | 0.1413 | 0.0066 | 22.06 | 74.48 | 3.46 | 22.85 |
翅果宽 KFW | 0.0024 | 0.0053 | 0.0013 | 26.47 | 58.86 | 14.68 | 31.02 |
着生痕 BM | 0.0045 | 0.0052 | 0.0013 | 41.28 | 47.29 | 11.43 | 46.60 |
种子长 SL | 0.0033 | 0.0108 | 0.0018 | 20.61 | 67.85 | 11.54 | 23.30 |
种子宽 SW | 0.0013 | 0.0024 | 0.0009 | 28.54 | 52.43 | 19.03 | 35.25 |
种子厚度 ST | 0.0001 | 0.0006 | 0.0004 | 8.23 | 52.10 | 39.67 | 13.64 |
果柄长 FSL | 0.1608 | 0.1852 | 0.0078 | 45.46 | 52.35 | 2.20 | 46.48 |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.0012 | 0.0495 | 0.0043 | 2.22 | 89.93 | 7.86 | 2.41 |
种子长宽比 SLW | 0.0048 | 0.0197 | 0.0026 | 17.68 | 72.71 | 9.61 | 19.56 |
平均值 Mean | — | — | — | 23.61 | 63.11 | 13.27 | 27.23 |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 翅果长 KFL (cm) | 翅果宽 KFW (cm) | 着生痕 BM (cm) | 种子长 SL (cm) | 种子宽 SW (cm) | 种子厚度 ST (cm) | 果柄长 FSL (cm) | 翅果长宽比 KFLW | 种子长宽比 SLW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果长 KFL | 1 | ||||||||
翅果宽 KFW | 0.572** | 1 | |||||||
着生痕 BM | 0.217** | 0.102** | 1 | ||||||
种子长 SL | 0.318** | 0.292** | 0.06 | 1 | |||||
种子宽 SW | 0.417** | 0.372** | 0.151** | 0.541** | 1 | ||||
种子厚度 ST | 0.121** | 0.089** | 0.116** | 0.418** | 0.251** | 1 | |||
果柄长 FSL | ?0.160** | ?0.084* | ?0.179** | 0.154** | 0.040 | 0.063 | 1 | ||
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.271** | ?0.310** | 0.042 | 0.053 | 0.020 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 1 | |
种子长宽比 SLW | ?0.016 | 0.000 | ?0.124** | 0.581** | ?0.263** | 0.216** | 0.147** | 0.036 | 1 |
Table 7 Correlation of 9 fruit traits in Acer catalpifolium natural small populations. The phenotypic traits are same as Table 3.
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 翅果长 KFL (cm) | 翅果宽 KFW (cm) | 着生痕 BM (cm) | 种子长 SL (cm) | 种子宽 SW (cm) | 种子厚度 ST (cm) | 果柄长 FSL (cm) | 翅果长宽比 KFLW | 种子长宽比 SLW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果长 KFL | 1 | ||||||||
翅果宽 KFW | 0.572** | 1 | |||||||
着生痕 BM | 0.217** | 0.102** | 1 | ||||||
种子长 SL | 0.318** | 0.292** | 0.06 | 1 | |||||
种子宽 SW | 0.417** | 0.372** | 0.151** | 0.541** | 1 | ||||
种子厚度 ST | 0.121** | 0.089** | 0.116** | 0.418** | 0.251** | 1 | |||
果柄长 FSL | ?0.160** | ?0.084* | ?0.179** | 0.154** | 0.040 | 0.063 | 1 | ||
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.271** | ?0.310** | 0.042 | 0.053 | 0.020 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 1 | |
种子长宽比 SLW | ?0.016 | 0.000 | ?0.124** | 0.581** | ?0.263** | 0.216** | 0.147** | 0.036 | 1 |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 翅果长 KFL | 翅果宽 KFW | 着生痕 BM | 种子长 SL | 种子宽 SW | 种子厚度 ST | 果柄长 FSL | 翅果长宽比 KFLW | 种子长宽比 SLW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果千粒重 TFW | 0.715** | 0.679* | 0.040 | 0.924** | 0.797** | 0.713** | 0.214 | 0.444 | 0.398 |
种子千粒重 TSW | 0.627* | 0.478 | 0.145 | 0.919** | 0.766** | 0.796** | 0.270 | 0.494 | 0.434 |
Table 8 Correlation of nine fruit traits and thousand-fruit weigh, thousand-seed weight in the natural small populations of Acer catalpifolium. The phenotypic traits are the same as Table 3.
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 翅果长 KFL | 翅果宽 KFW | 着生痕 BM | 种子长 SL | 种子宽 SW | 种子厚度 ST | 果柄长 FSL | 翅果长宽比 KFLW | 种子长宽比 SLW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果千粒重 TFW | 0.715** | 0.679* | 0.040 | 0.924** | 0.797** | 0.713** | 0.214 | 0.444 | 0.398 |
种子千粒重 TSW | 0.627* | 0.478 | 0.145 | 0.919** | 0.766** | 0.796** | 0.270 | 0.494 | 0.434 |
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 年平均温度 Mean annual temperature (℃) | 年平均最暖月温度 Mean annual temperature in the warmest month (℃) | 年平均最冷月温度 Mean annual temperature in the coldest month (℃) | 年平均降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm) | 年平均生长季(5?9月) 降水量 Mean annual precipitation between May and September (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果长 KFL | 0.124 | 0.184 | 0.099 | 0.266 | 0.124 | ?0.019 |
翅果宽 KFW | 0.145 | 0.182 | 0.101 | 0.226 | 0.384 | 0.191 |
着生痕 BM | ?0.26 | 0.278 | 0.234 | 0.374 | ?0.216 | ?0.194 |
种子长 SL | 0.147 | 0.134 | 0.017 | 0.249 | ?0.018 | ?0.12 |
种子宽 SW | 0.187 | 0.153 | ?0.002 | 0.29 | 0.068 | ?0.059 |
种子厚度 ST | 0.302 | ?0.059 | ?0.166 | 0.108 | ?0.392 | ?0.263 |
果柄长 FSL | ?0.265 | 0.165 | 0.161 | 0.174 | ?0.04 | ?0.016 |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.013 | 0.138 | 0.098 | 0.192 | ?0.122 | ?0.208 |
种子长宽比 SLW | 0.041 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.007 | ?0.149 | ?0.142 |
翅果千粒重 TFW | 0.264 | 0.145 | 0.000 | 0.289 | ?0.003 | ?0.082 |
种子千粒重 TSW | 0.388 | ?0.025 | ?0.168 | 0.139 | ?0.289 | ?0.341 |
Table 9 Correlation between phenotypic traits and meteorological factors in Acer catalpifolium natural small populations. The phenotypic traits are same as Table 3.
表型性状 Phenotypic trait | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 年平均温度 Mean annual temperature (℃) | 年平均最暖月温度 Mean annual temperature in the warmest month (℃) | 年平均最冷月温度 Mean annual temperature in the coldest month (℃) | 年平均降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm) | 年平均生长季(5?9月) 降水量 Mean annual precipitation between May and September (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
翅果长 KFL | 0.124 | 0.184 | 0.099 | 0.266 | 0.124 | ?0.019 |
翅果宽 KFW | 0.145 | 0.182 | 0.101 | 0.226 | 0.384 | 0.191 |
着生痕 BM | ?0.26 | 0.278 | 0.234 | 0.374 | ?0.216 | ?0.194 |
种子长 SL | 0.147 | 0.134 | 0.017 | 0.249 | ?0.018 | ?0.12 |
种子宽 SW | 0.187 | 0.153 | ?0.002 | 0.29 | 0.068 | ?0.059 |
种子厚度 ST | 0.302 | ?0.059 | ?0.166 | 0.108 | ?0.392 | ?0.263 |
果柄长 FSL | ?0.265 | 0.165 | 0.161 | 0.174 | ?0.04 | ?0.016 |
翅果长宽比 KFLW | 0.013 | 0.138 | 0.098 | 0.192 | ?0.122 | ?0.208 |
种子长宽比 SLW | 0.041 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.007 | ?0.149 | ?0.142 |
翅果千粒重 TFW | 0.264 | 0.145 | 0.000 | 0.289 | ?0.003 | ?0.082 |
种子千粒重 TSW | 0.388 | ?0.025 | ?0.168 | 0.139 | ?0.289 | ?0.341 |
12 |
[ 李帅锋, 苏建荣, 刘万德, 郎学东, 张志钧, 苏磊, 贾呈鑫卓, 杨华景 ( 2013) 思茅松天然群体种实表型变异. 植物生态学报, 37, 998-1009.]
DOI URL |
13 |
Loveless MP, Hamrick JL ( 1984) Ecological determinant of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 65-95.
DOI URL |
14 | Ma WB, Xu G, Ji HJ, Liu XL ( 2014) Preliminary study on germination characteristics of the rare plant Acer catalpifolium. Seed, 33(12), 87-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 马文宝, 许戈, 姬慧娟, 刘兴良 ( 2014) 珍稀植物梓叶槭种子萌发特性初步研究. 种子, 33(12), 87-90.] | |
15 | Mao JF, Li Y, Liu YJ, Li H, Wang XR ( 2007) Cone and seed characteristic of Pinus densata and their adaptive fitness implications. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 31, 291‒299. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 毛建丰, 李悦, 刘玉军, 刘灏, 王晓茹 ( 2007) 高山松种实性状与生殖适应性. 植物生态学报, 31, 291‒299.] | |
16 | Meng C, Zheng X, Ji ZF, Lin LL, Zhang CQ, Wang YL ( 2013) Phenotypic diversity of natural populations of Acer grosseri in Shanxi. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 33, 2232-2240. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 孟超, 郑昕, 姬志峰, 林丽丽, 张翠琴, 王祎玲 ( 2013) 山西葛萝槭天然种群表型多样性研究. 西北植物学报, 33, 2232-2240.] | |
17 |
Ren H, Zhang QM, Lu HF, Liu HX, Guo QF, Wang J, Jian SG, Bao HO ( 2012) Wild plant species with extremely small populations require conservation and reintroduction in China. Ambio, 41, 913-917.
DOI URL |
18 | Sichuan Vegetation Coordination Group(1980) Sichuan Vegetation. Sichuan People’s Publishing House, Chengdu.(in Chinese) |
[ 四川植被协作组(1980) 四川植被. 四川人民出版社, 成都.] | |
19 |
Sørensen FC, Miles RS (1978) Cone and seed weight relationship in Douglas-fir from western and central Oregon. Ecology, 59, 641-644.
DOI URL |
20 |
Wang D, Pang CH, Gao YH, Hao XJ, Wang YL ( 2010) Phenotypic diversity of Acer ginnala (Aceraceae) populations at different altitude. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 32, 117-125. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 王丹, 庞春华, 高亚卉, 郝晓杰, 王祎玲 ( 2010) 茶条槭不同海拔种群的表型多样性. 云南植物研究, 32, 117-125.]
DOI URL |
|
21 | Xu H, Liu YH ( 2018) Relationship between diameter class structure and intraspecific and interspecific competitions of precious and endangering plant Acer catalpifolium. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 38, 1160-1170. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 许恒, 刘艳红 ( 2018) 珍稀濒危植物梓叶槭种群径级结构与种内种间竞争关系. 西北植物学报, 38, 1160-1170.] | |
22 | Yu DP, Peng QX, Li CH, Xie KP, Zhang GZ, Li SL ( 2008) Research on the biological characters of the seeds of Acer catalpifolium Rehd. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 27(6), 30-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 余道平, 彭启新, 李策宏, 谢孔平, 张国珍, 李世丽 ( 2008) 梓叶槭种子生物学特性研究. 中国野生植物资源, 27(6), 30-64.] | |
23 |
Yu SL, Fang WW ( 2012) New advances in seed geography. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 918-922. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 于顺利, 方伟伟 ( 2012) 种子地理学研究的新进展. 植物生态学报, 36, 918-922.]
DOI URL |
|
24 |
Zhang L, Liu SR, Sun PS, Wang TL ( 2011) Comparative evaluation of multiple models of the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Pinus massoniana. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 1091-1105. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 张雷, 刘世荣, 孙鹏森, 王同立 ( 2011) 气候变化对马尾松潜在分布影响预估的多模型比较. 植物生态学报, 35, 1091-1105.]
DOI URL |
|
25 | Zhang YY, Ma WB, Yu T, Ji HJ, Gao J, Li JQ, Gao S ( 2018) Study on population structure and community characteristics of Acer catalpifolium Rehd. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 24(4), 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 张宇阳, 马文宝, 于涛, 姬慧娟, 高健, 李俊清, 高尚 ( 2018) 梓叶槭种群结构和群落特征研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 24(4), 1-9.] | |
1 |
Chen TY, Liu ZH, Lou AR ( 2013) Phenotypic variation in populations of Solanum rostratum in different distribution areas in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 344‒353. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 陈天翌, 刘增辉, 娄安如 ( 2013) 刺萼龙葵种群在中国不同分布地区的表型变异. 植物生态学报, 37, 344‒353.]
DOI URL |
|
2 |
Daly C, Gibson WP, Taylor GH, Johnson GL, Pasteris P ( 2002) A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate. Climate Research, 22, 99-113.
DOI URL |
3 | Fang WP ( 1981) Flora Reipbublicae Popularis Sinicae, Tomus 46. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese) |
[ 方文培 ( 1981) 中国植物志(46卷). 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
4 | Feng QH, Shi ZM, Xu ZJR, Miao N, Tang JC, Liu XL, Zhang L ( 2017) The study on phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Cupressus chengiana populations in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 748‒756. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 冯秋红, 史作民, 徐峥静茹, 缪宁, 唐敬超, 刘兴良, 张雷 ( 2017) 岷江柏天然种群种实表型变异特征. 应用生态学报, 28, 748‒756.] | |
5 | Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA ( 2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
6 | Ge S, Wang MX, Chen YW ( 1988) Study on genetic structure of Pinus massoniana populations with isozyme. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 24, 399-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 葛颂, 王明庥, 陈岳武 ( 1988) 用同工酶研究马尾松群体的遗传结构. 林业科学, 24, 399‒409.] | |
7 |
Gu YJ, Lou JX, Wu YW Cao XJ ( 2009) Phenotypic diversity in natural populations of Picea balfouriana in Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 291‒301. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 辜云杰, 罗建勋, 吴远伟, 曹小军 ( 2009) 川西云杉天然种群表型多样性. 植物生态学报, 33, 291‒301.]
DOI URL |
|
8 |
Guo Z, Zang RG ( 2013) Evaluation index system of endangered levels of the wild plants with tiny population in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 49, 10-17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 国政, 臧润国 ( 2013) 中国极小种群野生植物濒危程度评价指标体系. 林业科学, 49, 10-17.]
DOI URL |
|
9 | Hamrick JL, Godt MJW ( 1990) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources (eds Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Wier BS), pp. 43-63. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. |
10 | Li B, Gu WC, Lu BM ( 2002) A study on phenotypic diversity of seeds and cones characteristics in Pinus bungeana. Biodiversity Science, 10, 181-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李斌, 顾万春, 卢宝明 ( 2002) 白皮松天然群体种实性状表型多样性研究. 生物多样性, 10, 181-188.] | |
11 | Li S, Cai YL, Xu L, Zhao GF ( 2003) Morphological differentiation of samaras and seeds of Dipteronia dyeriana (Aceraceae). Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 25, 589-595. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李珊, 蔡宇良, 徐莉, 赵桂仿 ( 2003) 云南金钱槭果实、种子形态分化研究. 云南植物研究, 25, 589-595.] | |
12 |
Li SF, Su JR, Liu WD, Lang XD, Zhang ZJ, Su L, Jiang CXZ, Yang HJ ( 2013) Phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis populations in Yunnan Province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 998-1009. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn