Assessment of human–nature relationship in China’s World Biosphere Reserves

doi:10.17520/biods.2025248

Biodiv Sci ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 25248. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025248 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2025248

Special Issue: 世界生物圈保护区专题

• Special Feature: World Biosphere Reserves • Previous Articles Next Articles

Assessment of human–nature relationship in China’s World Biosphere Reserves

Chunting Feng^1,2, Chen Wu^1,2, Xiqing Sun^1,2, Wei Wang^1,2*

1 Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-process and Function Assessment of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

2 Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

Received:2025-06-30 Revised:2025-10-05 Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-10-29
Contact: Wei Wang
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32171664)

Abstract

Abstract:

Background & Aims: World Biosphere Reserves are designated demonstration areas to promote a balanced relationship between humans and the biosphere, exploring pathways for harmonious coexistence between human societies and natural ecosystems. China currently has 34 World Biosphere Reserves. However, there remains a lack of comprehensive and systematic research at the national level regarding how these reserves can effectively drive the coordinated development of human society and ecological conservation. Additionally, it is unclear whether the logistic support functions of protected areas contribute meaningfully to fostering sustainable human–nature relationships within these reserves.

Methods: This study integrated comprehensive spatial data from all 34 World Biosphere Reserves in China and their associated protected areas. By combining human footprint indicators, ecological remote sensing datasets to calculate ecosystem quality index, as well as trend detection methods including Theil-Sen Median slope estimation and Mann-Kendall analysis, we evaluated the relationship between human social development and natural ecological protection at a 1 km × 1 km pixel resolution within these reserves.

Results: Linear regression results indicated that ecosystem quality across China’s 34 World Biosphere Reserves increased from 2010 to 2020, although the trend was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In contrast, human footprint exhibited a statistically significant upward trend during the same period (P < 0.05). Within these reserves, 10% of the pixel units demonstrated significant changes in human–nature relationships, with coordination interactions accounting for the largest proportion (72.2%), particularly evident in seven reserves including Jinggangshan and Bogda, etc. Furthermore, a lower coverage ratio of protected areas within a World Biosphere Reserve, a larger total area of the World Biosphere Reserve, and a longer duration since its designation as a World Biosphere Reserve are all associated with enhanced coordination between human development and ecological conservation.

Conclusion: With the upcoming Fifth World Congress of Biosphere Reserves to be held in Hangzhou, China in September 2025, this study offers robust scientific support for understanding the role of China’s World Biosphere Reserves in advancing harmonious development between human society and nature. Furthermore, it provides valuable insights and references for future global research and sustainable management of World Biosphere Reserves.

Key words: Man and the Biosphere Programme (MAB), human footprint, ecosystem quality index, coordinated development of human and nature, protected areas

Chunting Feng, Chen Wu, Xiqing Sun, Wei Wang. Assessment of human–nature relationship in China’s World Biosphere Reserves[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(9): 25248.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/10.17520/biods.2025248

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/EN/Y2025/V33/I9/25248

[1]	Hui Wu, Le Yu, Jianqiao Zhao, Shijun Zheng, Tao Liu, Wenchao Qi, Qiang Zhao, Li Zhu, Xiaoli Shen, Keping Ma. Global South-North differences in ecological representativeness and conservation performance of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(9): 25267-.
[2]	Yihui Jiang, Yue Liu, Xu Zeng, Zheying Lin, Nan Wang, Jihao Peng, Ling Cao, Cong Zeng. Fish diversity and connectivity in six national marine protected areas in the East China Sea [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(6): 24128-.
[3]	Yijia Geng, Ziyuan Li, Yu Tian. Convention on Biological Diversity: The current status, ongoing challenges, and future prospects of marine biodiversity conservation [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(4): 22645-.
[4]	Muqing Lin, Yingming Zhang, Fang Ouyang, Zufei Shu, Chaodong Zhu, Zhishu Xiao. Spatial distribution of species diversity of solitary wasps (Vespidae) and its responses to environmental factors in the Chebaling National Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(2): 22310-.
[5]	Zhishu Xiao, Wenhong Xiao, Tianming Wang, Sheng Li, Xinming Lian, Dazhao Song, Xueqin Deng, Qihai Zhou. Wildlife monitoring and research using camera-trapping technology across China: The current status and future issues [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(10): 22451-.
[6]	Xing Chen, Tianpei Guan, Wenle Jiang, Dandan Li, Kong Yang, Sheng Li. Distribution and population status of bovine species in China based on bibliometric analysis [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(5): 668-679.
[7]	Wei Wang, Junsheng Li. In-situ conservation of biodiversity in China: Advances and prospects [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(2): 133-149.
[8]	Rui Yang,Qinyi Peng,Yue Cao,Le Zhong,Shuyu Hou,Zhicong Zhao,Cheng Huang. Transformative changes and paths toward biodiversity conservation in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(9): 1032-1040.
[9]	Lü Zhongmei. Systematic legislation for nature conservation with national parks as the main body [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(2): 128-136.
[10]	Jianji Liao, Hao Huang, Weiwen Li, Lei Wang, Lina An. A new perspective on marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ): Making use of area-based management tools (ABMTs), including marine protected areas (MPAs) [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(10): 1153-1161.
[11]	Wang Yufei,Su Hongqiao,Zhao Xinrui,Su Yang,Luo Min. Conservation easement-inspired adaptive management methods for natural protected areas: A case study on Qianjiangyuan National Park pilot [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(1): 88-96.
[12]	Zhigang Jiang. On classification of protected areas and the construction of China’s Protected Area System with national parks as a leading part [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(7): 775-779.
[13]	Senlu Yin, Miaozhuang Zheng, Jing Xu, Yan Liu, Wenjing Liu. Negotiation focus, impacts, and China’s implementation strategies of Marine and Coastal Biodiversity in the Convention on Biological Diversity [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24(7): 855-860.
[14]	Wei Wang, Lijuan Xin, Jinhong Du, Bing Chen, Fangzheng Liu, Libo Zhang, Junsheng Li. Evaluating conservation effectiveness of protected areas: advances and new perspectives [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24(10): 1177-1188.
[15]	Bian Fan, Keming Ma. Analysis of change in the distances between global terrestrial protected areas and urban areas [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2015, 23(6): 802-814.

Assessment of human–nature relationship in China’s World Biosphere Reserves

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments