Biodiv Sci ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 24247.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024247  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024247

• Original Papers: Microbial Diversity • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Diversity and distribution of methanogen communities in the riparian wetlands of the Nam Co basin

Yuan Liu1,2, Jianqing Du3,4(), Liyuan Ma4, Gang Yang1,*()(), Jianqing Tian2,*()()   

  1. 1 School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China
    2 Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
    3 Beijing Yanshan Earth Critical Zone National Research Station, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
    4 College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2024-06-19 Accepted:2024-09-24 Online:2025-01-20 Published:2024-12-19
  • Contact: * E-mail: tianjq@ibcas.ac.cn; yanggang903@163.com.
  • Supported by:
    The Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition(2019QZKK0304)

Abstract:

Aims: Alpine riverine wetland ecosystems are significant sources of methane emissions. Methanogenic archaea, which act as the sole producers of methane in wetland environments, play a critical role in global carbon cycling. However, their community composition and distribution patterns in alpine riverine wetlands remain unclear. Here, our study aims to: (1) investigate the diversity and compositional changes of methanogen communities in a riverine wetland, and (2) elucidate the assembly mechanisms and sources that drive their community distribution.

Methods: Our study site was located in the riparian zones of the Niyaqu basin in the Nam Co basin of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Using mcrA gene amplicon sequencing, we analyzed methanogens in soils across two dimensions: Lateral dimension (riparian wetland, transitional zone, and alpine meadow) and longitudinal dimension (at four elevation gradients: 4,980 m, 4,843 m, 4,777 m, and 4,752 m).

Results: Methanogen community α diversity of methanogens was the highest in riparian wetland, followed by the transitional zone, and then to the alpine meadow ecosystem. With community composition, the riparian wetland was significantly different from that of the transitional zone and alpine meadow. Among all sampling sites, hydrogenotrophic methanogens were the most abundant and Methanobacterium was the most predominant. In particular, the average relative abundances of alpine meadows, transitional zone, and riparian wetland was 45.78%, 42.90% and 34.17%, respectively. Neutral community models also indicated that community assembly in the wetland was primarily driven by stochastic processes. However, these processes contributed less to the communities in the alpine meadow and transitional zone. Additionally, FEAST source tracking analysis indicated that in the lateral dimension, alpine meadow and transitional zone contributed 17.62% and 13.04%, respectively, to the methanogen communities in the riparian wetland. In the longitudinal dimension, methanogen communities in low elevation riparian wetlands (S4) were primarily sourced from upstream riparian wetlands (49.71%) and alpine meadows (21.45%).

Conclusions: This data suggests that the alpine meadows serve as a significant species reservoir for methanogens that funnel to the riparian wetland. Ultimately, our work described the diversity and distribution patterns of methanogen communities in alpine river basin soils, which holds significant importance to understand the functionality of alpine ecosystems.

Key words: riparian wetlands, methanogens, community assembly, microbiological sources