Biodiv Sci ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 21484. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021484
• Original Papers: Animal Diversity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yuanfang Hu1, Binqiang Li1,2, Dan Liang3, Xingquan Li4, Lanxiang Liu4, Jiawei Yang4, Xu Luo1,*()
Received:
2021-11-25
Accepted:
2022-06-06
Online:
2022-08-20
Published:
2022-08-31
Contact:
Xu Luo
Yuanfang Hu, Binqiang Li, Dan Liang, Xingquan Li, Lanxiang Liu, Jiawei Yang, Xu Luo. Effect of anthropogenic disturbance on Lady Amherst’s pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae) activity[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(8): 21484.
Fig. 1 Maps of infrared camera locations and the three habitat types in the Weishan Qinghua Green Peafowl Nature Reserve. A, Different habitats; B, Different altitudes; C, Arboreal land; D, Shrub land; E1 and E2, Other habitats.
Fig. 2 Classification of camera sites with different levels (high and low) of anthropogenic disturbance during the entire year (a), the breeding (b) and non-breeding (c) seasons. indicates sites with low anthropogenic disturbance; indicates sites with high anthropogenic disturbance.
季节 Season/变量 Variable | Beta系数 Beta coefficient | 标准误 SE | T | P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总体人为干扰 All anthropogenic disturbance | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.095 | 0.280 | 0.339 | 0.737 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.071 | 0.191 | 0.371 | 0.713 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.098 | 0.225 | -0.437 | 0.665 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.179 | 0.415 | -0.432 | 0.669 | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.059 | 0.272 | 0.216 | 0.830 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.197 | 0.182 | -1.082 | 0.288 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.135 | 0.215 | -0.630 | 0.533 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.111 | 0.405 | -0.275 | 0.785 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.024 | 0.262 | 0.092 | 0.928 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.340 | 0.170 | 2.003 | 0.054 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | 0.025 | 0.200 | 0.123 | 0.903 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.045 | 0.387 | -0.117 | 0.907 | ||||
人为干扰(人类活动) Anthropogenic disturbance: human activities | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.105 | 0.277 | 0.381 | 0.706 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.158 | 0.189 | 0.834 | 0.411 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.137 | 0.223 | -0.614 | 0.544 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.200 | 0.410 | -0.487 | 0.630 | ||||
季节 Season/变量 Variable | Beta系数 Beta coefficient | 标准误 SE | T | P | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.073 | 0.275 | 0.267 | 0.791 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.128 | 0.186 | -0.689 | 0.496 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.159 | 0.220 | -0.722 | 0.475 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.139 | 0.409 | -0.340 | 0.736 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.025 | 0.238 | 0.104 | 0.918 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.525 | 0.154 | 3.402 | 0.002* | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.018 | 0.182 | -0.100 | 0.921 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.047 | 0.352 | -0.133 | 0.895 | ||||
人为干扰(放牧) Anthropogenic disturbance: grazing | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.075 | 0.278 | 0.272 | 0.788 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.082 | 0.181 | -0.453 | 0.653 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.045 | 0.213 | -0.210 | 0.835 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.143 | 0.411 | -0.348 | 0.730 | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.090 | 0.271 | 0.331 | 0.743 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.167 | 0.181 | -0.923 | 0.363 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.157 | 0.212 | -0.740 | 0.465 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.170 | 0.401 | -0.424 | 0.674 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | -0.003 | 0.277 | -0.011 | 0.991 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.022 | 0.178 | -0.122 | 0.904 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | 0.114 | 0.210 | 0.544 | 0.590 | ||||
生境 Habitat | 0.006 | 0.410 | 0.014 | 0.989 | ||||
人为干扰(家养动物) Anthropogenic disturbance: domestic animals | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.085 | 0.279 | 0.307 | 0.761 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.033 | 0.178 | -0.185 | 0.854 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.072 | 0.210 | -0.342 | 0.734 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.162 | 0.412 | -0.392 | 0.697 | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.097 | 0.273 | 0.354 | 0.725 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.077 | 0.176 | -0.436 | 0.666 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.229 | 0.207 | -1.105 | 0.277 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.184 | 0.404 | -0.454 | 0.653 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | -0.019 | 0.278 | -0.070 | 0.945 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.095 | 0.177 | 0.536 | 0.596 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | 0.121 | 0.208 | 0.581 | 0.566 | ||||
生境 Habitat | 0.037 | 0.413 | 0.089 | 0.929 |
Table 1 The relationship between the activity intensity of Lady Amherst’s pheasant and the intensity of anthropogenic disturbance (overall and three types of disturbance) throughout the year and in different seasons (breeding and non-breeding).
季节 Season/变量 Variable | Beta系数 Beta coefficient | 标准误 SE | T | P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总体人为干扰 All anthropogenic disturbance | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.095 | 0.280 | 0.339 | 0.737 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.071 | 0.191 | 0.371 | 0.713 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.098 | 0.225 | -0.437 | 0.665 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.179 | 0.415 | -0.432 | 0.669 | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.059 | 0.272 | 0.216 | 0.830 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.197 | 0.182 | -1.082 | 0.288 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.135 | 0.215 | -0.630 | 0.533 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.111 | 0.405 | -0.275 | 0.785 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.024 | 0.262 | 0.092 | 0.928 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.340 | 0.170 | 2.003 | 0.054 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | 0.025 | 0.200 | 0.123 | 0.903 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.045 | 0.387 | -0.117 | 0.907 | ||||
人为干扰(人类活动) Anthropogenic disturbance: human activities | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.105 | 0.277 | 0.381 | 0.706 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.158 | 0.189 | 0.834 | 0.411 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.137 | 0.223 | -0.614 | 0.544 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.200 | 0.410 | -0.487 | 0.630 | ||||
季节 Season/变量 Variable | Beta系数 Beta coefficient | 标准误 SE | T | P | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.073 | 0.275 | 0.267 | 0.791 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.128 | 0.186 | -0.689 | 0.496 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.159 | 0.220 | -0.722 | 0.475 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.139 | 0.409 | -0.340 | 0.736 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.025 | 0.238 | 0.104 | 0.918 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.525 | 0.154 | 3.402 | 0.002* | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.018 | 0.182 | -0.100 | 0.921 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.047 | 0.352 | -0.133 | 0.895 | ||||
人为干扰(放牧) Anthropogenic disturbance: grazing | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.075 | 0.278 | 0.272 | 0.788 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.082 | 0.181 | -0.453 | 0.653 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.045 | 0.213 | -0.210 | 0.835 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.143 | 0.411 | -0.348 | 0.730 | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.090 | 0.271 | 0.331 | 0.743 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.167 | 0.181 | -0.923 | 0.363 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.157 | 0.212 | -0.740 | 0.465 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.170 | 0.401 | -0.424 | 0.674 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | -0.003 | 0.277 | -0.011 | 0.991 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.022 | 0.178 | -0.122 | 0.904 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | 0.114 | 0.210 | 0.544 | 0.590 | ||||
生境 Habitat | 0.006 | 0.410 | 0.014 | 0.989 | ||||
人为干扰(家养动物) Anthropogenic disturbance: domestic animals | ||||||||
全年 Whole year | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.085 | 0.279 | 0.307 | 0.761 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.033 | 0.178 | -0.185 | 0.854 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.072 | 0.210 | -0.342 | 0.734 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.162 | 0.412 | -0.392 | 0.697 | ||||
繁殖季节 Breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | 0.097 | 0.273 | 0.354 | 0.725 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | -0.077 | 0.176 | -0.436 | 0.666 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | -0.229 | 0.207 | -1.105 | 0.277 | ||||
生境 Habitat | -0.184 | 0.404 | -0.454 | 0.653 | ||||
非繁殖季节 Non-breeding season | ||||||||
截距 Intercept | -0.019 | 0.278 | -0.070 | 0.945 | ||||
干扰强度 Disturbance intensity | 0.095 | 0.177 | 0.536 | 0.596 | ||||
海拔 Elevation | 0.121 | 0.208 | 0.581 | 0.566 | ||||
生境 Habitat | 0.037 | 0.413 | 0.089 | 0.929 |
繁殖季节 In breeding seasons | 非繁殖季节 In non-breeding seasons | 差异 Differences in activity levels | Wald值 Wald value | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
白腹锦鸡 Lady Amherst’s pheasants | 0.503 ± 0.019 | 0.314 ± 0.019 | 0.188 ± 0.028 | 45.542 | < 0.001 |
总体人为干扰 Overall anthropogenic disturbance | 0.326 ± 0.015 | 0.320 ± 0.015 | 0.006 ± 0.022 | 0.089 | 0.756 |
人为干扰(人类活动) Anthropogenic disturbance: human activities | 0.374 ± 0.020 | 0.352 ± 0.020 | 0.022 ± 0.028 | 0.633 | 0.426 |
人为干扰(放牧) Anthropogenic disturbance: grazing | 0.222 ± 0.018 | 0.239 ± 0.019 | -0.018 ± 0.026 | 0.455 | 0.500 |
人为干扰(家养动物) Anthropogenic disturbance: domestic animals | 0.267 ± 0.063 | 0.250 ± 0.053 | 0.018 ± 0.083 | 0.045 | 0.832 |
Table 2 Activity levels differences of Lady Amherst’s pheasant and anthropogenic disturbance between breeding and non-breeding seasons
繁殖季节 In breeding seasons | 非繁殖季节 In non-breeding seasons | 差异 Differences in activity levels | Wald值 Wald value | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
白腹锦鸡 Lady Amherst’s pheasants | 0.503 ± 0.019 | 0.314 ± 0.019 | 0.188 ± 0.028 | 45.542 | < 0.001 |
总体人为干扰 Overall anthropogenic disturbance | 0.326 ± 0.015 | 0.320 ± 0.015 | 0.006 ± 0.022 | 0.089 | 0.756 |
人为干扰(人类活动) Anthropogenic disturbance: human activities | 0.374 ± 0.020 | 0.352 ± 0.020 | 0.022 ± 0.028 | 0.633 | 0.426 |
人为干扰(放牧) Anthropogenic disturbance: grazing | 0.222 ± 0.018 | 0.239 ± 0.019 | -0.018 ± 0.026 | 0.455 | 0.500 |
人为干扰(家养动物) Anthropogenic disturbance: domestic animals | 0.267 ± 0.063 | 0.250 ± 0.053 | 0.018 ± 0.083 | 0.045 | 0.832 |
平均重叠系数 Mean overlap coefficient (△) | 平均零重叠度指数 Mean null overlap index | 零重叠度标准误 Standard error of the null distribution | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
总体人为干扰 Overall anthropogenic disturbance | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.826 | 0.968 | 0.008 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.879 | 0.956 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.786 | 0.958 | 0.011 | <0.001 |
人为干扰(人类活动) Anthropogenic disturbance: human activities | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.860 | 0.964 | 0.009 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.835 | 0.960 | 0.011 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.788 | 0.950 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
人为干扰(放牧) Anthropogenic disturbance: grazing | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.660 | 0.951 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.630 | 0.937 | 0.017 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.684 | 0.938 | 0.016 | <0.001 |
人为干扰(家养动物) Anthropogenic disturbance: domestic animals | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.749 | 0.896 | 0.025 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.757 | 0.868 | 0.035 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.679 | 0.858 | 0.036 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Overlap coefficient between Lady Amherst’s pheasant and anthropogenic disturbance annually and in each season
平均重叠系数 Mean overlap coefficient (△) | 平均零重叠度指数 Mean null overlap index | 零重叠度标准误 Standard error of the null distribution | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
总体人为干扰 Overall anthropogenic disturbance | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.826 | 0.968 | 0.008 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.879 | 0.956 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.786 | 0.958 | 0.011 | <0.001 |
人为干扰(人类活动) Anthropogenic disturbance: human activities | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.860 | 0.964 | 0.009 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.835 | 0.960 | 0.011 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.788 | 0.950 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
人为干扰(放牧) Anthropogenic disturbance: grazing | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.660 | 0.951 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.630 | 0.937 | 0.017 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.684 | 0.938 | 0.016 | <0.001 |
人为干扰(家养动物) Anthropogenic disturbance: domestic animals | ||||
全年 Whole year | 0.749 | 0.896 | 0.025 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season | 0.757 | 0.868 | 0.035 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season | 0.679 | 0.858 | 0.036 | <0.001 |
Fig. 3 The activity patterns and overlaps of anthropogenic disturbance and Lady Amherst’s pheasants. The comparisons of daily activities between the Lady Amherst’s pheasant (LA) and the overall anthropogenic disturbance and the three types of anthropogenic disturbance throughout the year (a and b), as well as in the breeding (c and d) and non-breeding (e and f) seasons. Anthropogenic disturbance were classified into human activities (AD (Human)), grazing (AD (Grazing)), and domestic animals (AD (domestic)). See Table 2 and 3 for details.
位点 Sites/季节 Season | 平均重叠系数 Mean overlap coefficient (△) | 平均零重叠度指数 Mean null overlap index | 零重叠度标准误 Standard error of the null distribution | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
低人为干扰位点Camera sites with low anthropogenic disturbance | ||||
全年 Whole year (N = 20 sites) | 0.858 | 0.957 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season (N = 32 sites) | 0.842 | 0.954 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season (N = 18 sites) | 0.855 | 0.941 | 0.018 | <0.001 |
高人为干扰位点 Camera sites with high anthropogenic disturbance | ||||
全年 Whole year (N = 16 sites) | 0.741 | 0.956 | 0.011 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season (N = 4 sites) | 0.647 | 0.809 | 0.074 | 0.024 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season (N = 18 sites) | 0.783 | 0.951 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Coefficient of overlap between Lady Amherst’s pheasant and anthropogenic disturbance between low and high anthropogenic disturbance in the whole year and in both breeding and non-breeding seasons
位点 Sites/季节 Season | 平均重叠系数 Mean overlap coefficient (△) | 平均零重叠度指数 Mean null overlap index | 零重叠度标准误 Standard error of the null distribution | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
低人为干扰位点Camera sites with low anthropogenic disturbance | ||||
全年 Whole year (N = 20 sites) | 0.858 | 0.957 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season (N = 32 sites) | 0.842 | 0.954 | 0.012 | <0.001 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season (N = 18 sites) | 0.855 | 0.941 | 0.018 | <0.001 |
高人为干扰位点 Camera sites with high anthropogenic disturbance | ||||
全年 Whole year (N = 16 sites) | 0.741 | 0.956 | 0.011 | <0.001 |
繁殖季 Breeding season (N = 4 sites) | 0.647 | 0.809 | 0.074 | 0.024 |
非繁殖季 Non-breeding season (N = 18 sites) | 0.783 | 0.951 | 0.013 | <0.001 |
Fig. 4 The activity patterns and overlaps of anthropogenic disturbance and Lady Amherst’s pheasants. The comparisons of daily activities between the Lady Amherst’s pheasant (LA) and the overall anthropogenic disturbance (AD) throughout the year (a and b), as well as in the breeding (c and d), and non-breeding (e and f) seasons. See Fig. 2 for the classifications of sites.
[1] |
Benítez-López A, Alkemade R, Verweij PA (2010) The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: A meta-analysis. Biological Conservation, 143, 1307-1316.
DOI URL |
[2] |
Chen LJ, Shu ZF, Xiao ZS (2019) Application of camera-trapping data to study daily activity patterns of Galliformes in Guangdong Chebaling National Nature Reserve. Biodiversity Science, 27, 266-272. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[陈立军, 束祖飞, 肖治术 (2019) 应用红外相机数据研究动物活动节律——以广东车八岭保护区鸡形目鸟类为例. 生物多样性, 27, 266-272.]
DOI |
|
[3] |
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T, McClean C, Osborne PE, Reineking B, Schröder B, Skidmore AK, Zurell D, Lautenbach S (2013) Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36, 27-46.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Gaynor KM, Brown JS, Middleton AD, Power ME, Brashares JS (2019) Landscapes of fear: Spatial patterns of risk perception and response. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 34, 355-368.
DOI URL |
[5] |
Gaynor KM, Hojnowski CE, Carter NH, Brashares JS (2018) The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science, 360, 1232-1235.
DOI |
[6] | Han LX, Shun Y (2017) Tracking the Lady Amherst’s pheasant. Forest & Humankind, (2), 98-105. (in Chinese) |
[韩联宪, 舜尧 (2017) 追踪白腹锦鸡. 森林与人类, (2), 98-105.] | |
[7] | Han LX, Yang L, Zheng BL (1988) The sound spectrogrhic analyses on the calls of Lady Amherst’s pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae). Zoological Research, 9, 127-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[韩联宪, 杨岚, 郑宝赉 (1988) 白腹锦鸡鸣声的声谱分析. 动物学研究, 9, 127-132.] | |
[8] | Han LX, Yang L, Zheng BL (1989) Observation on breeding ecology of Lady Amherst’s pheasant. Zoological Research, 10, 285-294. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[韩联宪, 杨岚, 郑宝赉 (1989) 白腹锦鸡繁殖生态观察. 动物学研究, 10, 285-294.] | |
[9] | Kang MJ (2007) Studies on Ecology of Lady Amherst’s Pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae). PhD dissertation, Beijing Normal University, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[康明江 (2007) 白腹锦鸡(Chrysolophus amherstiae)生态学研究. 博士学位论文, 北京师范大学, 北京.] | |
[10] | Kang MJ, Zheng GM (2007a) Roost-site selection of Lady Amherst’s pheasant. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27, 2929-2934. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[康明江, 郑光美 (2007a) 白腹锦鸡(Chrysolophus amherstiae)的夜栖地选择. 生态学报, 27, 2929-2934.] | |
[11] | Kang MJ, Zheng GM (2007b) Home range and habitat selection of female Lady Amherst’s pheasant during breeding period. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 43, 558-562. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[康明江, 郑光美 (2007b) 白腹锦鸡雌鸟繁殖期的活动区和栖息地选择. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 43, 558-562.] | |
[12] |
Kitchen AM, Gese EM, Schauster ER (2000) Changes in coyote activity patterns due to reduced exposure to human persecution. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 853-857.
DOI URL |
[13] |
Li BQ, Li PY, Yang JW, Zi HJ, Li XQ, Duan XH, Luo X (2018) Wildlife monitoring in Weishan Qinghua Green Peafowl Nature Reserve using infrared cameras, Yunnan Province. Biodiversity Science, 26, 1343-1347. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[李斌强, 李鹏映, 杨家伟, 字红军, 李兴权, 段锡焕, 罗旭 (2018) 运用红外相机调查云南巍山青华绿孔雀自然保护区的鸟兽多样性. 生物多样性, 26, 1343-1347.]
DOI |
|
[14] |
Li BV, Jiang BK (2021) Responses of forest structure, functions, and biodiversity to livestock disturbances: A global meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 27, 4745-4757.
DOI URL |
[15] | Li XY, Hu WQ, Bleisch WV, Li Q, Wang HJ, Lu W, Sun J, Zhang FY, Ti B, Jiang XL (2021) Functional diversity loss and change in nocturnal behavior of mammals under anthropogenic disturbance. Conservation Biology, 36, e13839. |
[16] |
Li YH, Wan Y, Shen H, Loss SR, Marra PP, Li ZQ (2021) Estimates of wildlife killed by free-ranging cats in China. Biological Conservation, 253, 108929.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Liang D, Pan XY, Luo X, Cheng WD, Zhao YY, Hu YM, Robinson SK, Liu Y (2021) Seasonal variation in community composition and distributional ranges of birds along a subtropical elevation gradient in China. Diversity and Distributions, 27, 2527-2541.
DOI URL |
[18] | Liu XB, Wei W, Zheng XG, Zhao KH, He SW, Zhou WL (2017) Activity rhythms of golden pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus) and Satyr Tragopan (Tragopan temminckii) revealed by infrared-triggered cameras. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 52, 194-202. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[刘小斌, 韦伟, 郑筱光, 赵凯辉, 何少文, 周文良 (2017) 红腹锦鸡和红腹角雉活动节律——基于红外相机监测数据. 动物学杂志, 52, 194-202.] | |
[19] | Long S, Zhou CQ, Wang WK, Pan L, Hu JC (2009) Diurnal behavioral rhythm, time budgets and group behavior of dwarf blue sheep in summer. Zoological Research, 30, 687-693. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[龙帅, 周材权, 王维奎, 潘立, 胡锦矗 (2009) 矮岩羊夏季活动节律、时间分配和集群行为. 动物学研究, 30, 687-693.] | |
[20] |
Maeda T, Nakashita R, Shionosaki K, Yamada F, Watari Y (2019) Predation on endangered species by human-subsidized domestic cats on Tokunoshima Island. Scientific Reports, 9, 16200.
DOI URL |
[21] |
Norris D, Michalski F, Peres CA (2010) Habitat patch size modulates terrestrial mammal activity patterns in Amazonian forest fragments. Journal of Mammalogy, 91, 551-560.
DOI URL |
[22] |
O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF, Wibisono HT (2003) Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation, 6, 131-139.
DOI URL |
[23] | R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. (accessed on 2022-01-22) |
[24] |
Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14, 322-337.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Rowcliffe JM, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Carbone C, Jansen PA (2014) Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 1170-1179.
DOI URL |
[26] |
Shi JB, Dunbar RIM, Buckland D, Miller D (2003) Daytime activity budgets of feral goats (Capra hircus) on the Isle of Rum: Influence of season, age, and sex. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81, 803-815.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Shi JY, Yang H, Hua JQ, Zhao YZ, Li JQ, Xu JL (2020) The relationship between the diurnal activity rhythm of Reeves’s pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii) and human disturbance revealed by camera trapping. Biodiversity Science, 28, 796-805. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[石江艳, 杨海, 华俊钦, 赵玉泽, 李建强, 徐基良 (2020) 利用红外相机研究白冠长尾雉日活动节律与人为干扰的关系. 生物多样性, 28, 796-805.]
DOI |
|
[28] |
Stillfried M, Belant JL, Svoboda NJ, Beyer DE, Kramer-Schadt S (2015) When top predators become prey: Black bears alter movement behaviour in response to hunting pressure. Behavioural Processes, 120, 30-39.
DOI PMID |
[29] | Wang KF, Zhang JR, Lei FM (2010) Geographical distribution pattern and its temporal and spatial variation of birds breeding in zoogeographical subregion of China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 35, 145-157. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王开锋, 张继荣, 雷富民 (2010) 中国动物地理亚区繁殖鸟类地理分布格局与时空变化. 动物分类学报, 35, 145-157.] | |
[30] |
Xiao ZS, Li XH, Jiang GS (2014) Applications of camera trapping to wildlife surveys in China. Biodiversity Science, 22, 683-684. (in Chinese)
DOI URL |
[肖治术, 李欣海, 姜广顺 (2014) 红外相机技术在我国野生动物监测研究中的应用. 生物多样性, 22, 683-684.]
DOI |
|
[31] |
Xu JL, Zhang ZW, Liu WJ, McGowan PJK (2012) A review and assessment of nature reserve policy in China: Advances, challenges and opportunities. Oryx, 46, 554-562.
DOI URL |
[32] | Xu WY, Gong Y, Wang HT (2021) Alert time reflects the negative impacts of human disturbance on an endangered bird species in Changbai Mountain, China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 28, e01709. |
[33] | Xue L (1993) Weishan Yi and Hui Autonomous County Annals. Yunnan People’s Publishing House, Kunming. (in Chinese) |
[薛琳 (1993) 巍山彝族回族自治县志. 云南人民出版社, 昆明.] | |
[34] | Yang JL, Wu ZK, Lin QW (1981) Preliminary remarks on the breeding behaviour and feeding habits of the Chinese copper pheasant. Zoological Research, 2, 243-246. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杨炯蠡, 吴至康, 林齐维 (1981) 白腹锦鸡繁殖及食性的初步观察. 动物学研究, 2, 243-246.] | |
[35] | Yang L (1992) Pheasants in China:Lady Amherst’s Pheasant. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[杨岚 (1992) 中国雉类: 白腹锦鸡. 中国林业出版社, 北京.] | |
[36] | Yang XJ, Wen XJ, Yang L (1994) Feeding activity of Lady Amherst’s pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae) in captivity. Zoological Research, 15, 49-54. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杨晓君, 文贤继, 杨岚 (1994) 笼养白腹锦鸡觅食活动的观察. 动物学研究, 15, 49-54.] | |
[37] | Yang XJ, Wen XJ, Yang L (1995) Time budgets of captive Lady Amherst’s pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae) in breeding season. Zoological Research, 16, 178-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杨晓君, 文贤继, 杨岚 (1995) 笼养白腹锦鸡繁殖季节的时间分配. 动物学研究, 16, 178-184.] | |
[38] | Zhang SS, Bao YX, Wang YN, Fang PF, Ye B (2012) Comparisons of different camera trap placement patterns in monitoring mammal resources in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31, 2016-2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[章书声, 鲍毅新, 王艳妮, 方平福, 叶彬 (2012) 不同相机布放模式在古田山兽类资源监测中的比较. 生态学杂志, 31, 2016-2022.] | |
[39] | Zhang YY, Zheng GM (2021) China’s Red List of Biodiversity•Vertebrates (Volume Ⅱ): Bird. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[张雁云, 郑光美 (2021) 中国生物多样性红色名录•脊椎动物(第二卷):鸟类. 科学出版社, 北京.] | |
[40] |
Zhang ZW, Ding CQ, Ding P, Zheng GM (2003) The current status and a conservation strategy for species of Galliformes in China. Biodiversity Science, 11, 414-421. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[张正旺, 丁长青, 丁平, 郑光美 (2003) 中国鸡形目鸟类的现状与保护对策. 生物多样性, 11, 414-421.]
DOI |
|
[41] | Zhao CG, Chen F, Yan ZK, Liu XY, Liu LM, Li WW, Duan YB (2021) Behaviors and interspecific association of sympatric Lady Amherst’s pheasant and Temminck’s tragopan in the Yaoshan Mountains. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 40, 4008-4014. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[赵晨光, 陈飞, 颜再奎, 刘兴元, 刘鲁明, 李维薇, 段玉宝 (2021) 同域分布的白腹锦鸡和红腹角雉的活动节律及种间联结关系. 生态学杂志, 40, 4008-4014.] | |
[42] | Zhao YL, Wang SY, Duan CC, Jiang WX, Xu ZG (2018) Behavioral rhythm of captive Chrysolophus amherstiae in summer and autumn. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37, 2995-3000. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[赵运林, 王双业, 段酬苍, 姜卫星, 徐正刚 (2018) 笼养白腹锦鸡(Chrysolophus amherstiae)夏、秋季行为节律. 生态学杂志, 37, 2995-3000.] | |
[43] |
Zhao YZ, Wang ZC, Xu JL, Luo X, An LD (2013) Activity rhythm and behavioral time budgets of wild Reeves’s Pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii) using infrared camera. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 6021-6027. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[赵玉泽, 王志臣, 徐基良, 罗旭, 安丽丹 (2013) 利用红外照相技术分析野生白冠长尾雉活动节律及时间分配. 生态学报, 33, 6021-6027.] | |
[44] | Zheng GM (2015) Pheasants in China. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[郑光美 (2015) 中国雉类. 高等教育出版社, 北京.] |
[1] | Ren Jialong, Wang Yongzhen, Feng Yilin, Zhao Wenzhi, Yan Qihan, Qin Chang, Fang Jing, Xin Weidong, Liu Jiliang. Beetle data set collected by pitfall trapping in the gobi desert of the Hexi Corridor [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(2): 23375-. |
[2] | Kunming Zhao, Shengbin Chen, Xifu Yang. Investigation of the diversity of mammals and birds and the activity rhythm of dominant species using camera trapping in a fragmented forest in the Dujiangyan region, Sichuan Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(6): 22529-. |
[3] | Qiujie Zhao, Huijun Guo, Guangtao Meng, Mingchuan Zhong, Jun Yin, Zhuocheng Liu, Pinrong Li, Li Chen, Yi Tao, Sheng Qiu, Hong Wang, Yanhui Zhao. Effects of grazing on bees and suggestions for its ecological restoration [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(5): 23037-. |
[4] | Yiqing Wang, Ziyu Ma, Gang Wang, Yanlin Liu, Dazhao Song, Beibei Liu, Lu Li, Xinguo Fan, Qiaowen Huang, Sheng Li. Spatiotemporal patterns of cattle depredation by the North Chinese leopard in Taihang Mountains and its management strategy: A case study in Heshun, Shanxi Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(9): 21510-. |
[5] | Xueqin Deng, Tong Liu, Tianshi Liu, Kai Xu, Song Yao, Xiaoqun Huang, Zhishu Xiao. Seasonal variation of daily activity rhythm of leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) and their potential prey in Neixiang Baotianman National Nature Reserve of Henan Province, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(9): 22263-. |
[6] | Tianxiang Zhou, Hualin Yang, Guiquan Zhang, Jian Yang, Xi Feng, Qiang Hu, Yuehong Cheng, Jindong Zhang, Bin Wang, Caiquan Zhou. Temporal and spatial niche differentiation among three alpine Galliformes with sympatric distribution in the Wolong National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(6): 22026-. |
[7] | Bochi Wang, Wen Pei, Jucai Yang, Yongjun Se, Xuezhu Li, Hairong Yang. Nesting habitat preference of the black-necked crane and influence of anthropogenic disturbance in Yanchiwan, Gansu [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2022, 30(1): 21241-. |
[8] | Yunjia Wu, Yun Cheng, Lei Yuan, Shi Zhang, Shuo Zhang, Shaochuang Liu. Quantitative study on the activity rhythm and home range of wild camels (Camelus ferus) in the Kumtag Desert [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(9): 1206-1214. |
[9] | Zhenghua Xie, Youqiong Wang, Jun Cao, Jianmin Wang, Jiandong An. Ecological resilience of pollination in the face of pollinator decline: Content, mechanism and perspective [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(7): 980-994. |
[10] | Jiayun He, Dong Zhang, Ling Chu, Yunzhi Yan. Anthropogenic disturbances affect the functional diversity of stream fishes and its longitudinal patterns in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(7): 927-937. |
[11] | Yu Zhang, Luyu Wang, Changlin Xiang, Meichun Duan, Zhisheng Zhang. Effects of different grazing intensities on spider diversity in Saihanwula Grassland [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(4): 467-476. |
[12] | Siqi Chen, Yujun Zhang. Research progress on biodiversity in the rural landscape [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(10): 1411-1424. |
[13] | Jiangyan Shi, Hai Yang, Junqin Hua, Yuze Zhao, Jianqiang Li, Jiliang Xu. The relationship between the diurnal activity rhythm of Reeves’s pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii) and human disturbance revealed by camera trapping [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(7): 796-805. |
[14] | Yang Xiongwei,Wu Ankang,Zou Qixian,Li Guangrong,Zhang Mingming,Hu Canshi,Su Haijun. Field monitoring of mammals and birds using infrared cameras in Mayanghe National Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(2): 219-225. |
[15] | Wang Xinting, Chai Jing, Jiang Chao, Tai Yang, Chi Yanyan, Zhang Weihua, Liu Fang, Li Suying. Population spatial pattern of Stipa grandis and its response to long-term overgrazing [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(2): 128-134. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn