Biodiv Sci ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (4): 427-436. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.10193
• Original Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xingfu Yan1,*(), Yangchun Yu2, Libiao Zhou1, Yunfeng Zhou1
Received:
2011-10-27
Accepted:
2012-03-20
Online:
2012-07-20
Published:
2012-09-12
Contact:
Xingfu Yan
Xingfu Yan, Yangchun Yu, Libiao Zhou, Yunfeng Zhou. Seed predation and removal of Quercus wutaishanica, Prunus salicina and Pinus armandii by rodents in the Liupan Mountains[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2012, 20(4): 427-436.
Fig. 1 Distribution diagram of releasing plots of different coverage treatments in sample transect. Each circle indicates a releasing plot of seeds. C, Control; LC, Litter coverage; SC, Soil coverage.
变量 Variable | 就地取食 Predation in situ | 搬运后取食 Predation after removal | 搬运后贮藏 Hoarding after removal | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
df | F | P | df | F | P | df | F | P | |||
S | 2 | 37.1 | 0.000 | 2 | 7.1 | 0.001 | 2 | 7.7 | 0.001 | ||
RM | 2 | 8.7 | 0.000 | 2 | 7.7 | 0.001 | 2 | 9 | 0.000 | ||
CT | 2 | 1.3 | 0.281 | 2 | 11.7 | 0.000 | 2 | 3.4 | 0.038 | ||
S×RM | 4 | 8.3 | 0.000 | 4 | 7.1 | 0.000 | 4 | 4.6 | 0.002 | ||
S×CT | 4 | 3.5 | 0.011 | 4 | 4.1 | 0.004 | 4 | 10.8 | 0.000 | ||
RM×CT | 4 | 1.1 | 0.358 | 4 | 2.1 | 0.095 | 4 | 5.6 | 0.001 | ||
S×RM×CT | 8 | 1.5 | 0.177 | 8 | 1.9 | 0.064 | 8 | 1.5 | 0.171 |
Table 1 Multi-way analysis of variance on effects of different species, releasing methods and coverage treatments on seed predation and removal of Quercus wutaishanica, Prunus salicina and Pinus armandii by rodents
变量 Variable | 就地取食 Predation in situ | 搬运后取食 Predation after removal | 搬运后贮藏 Hoarding after removal | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
df | F | P | df | F | P | df | F | P | |||
S | 2 | 37.1 | 0.000 | 2 | 7.1 | 0.001 | 2 | 7.7 | 0.001 | ||
RM | 2 | 8.7 | 0.000 | 2 | 7.7 | 0.001 | 2 | 9 | 0.000 | ||
CT | 2 | 1.3 | 0.281 | 2 | 11.7 | 0.000 | 2 | 3.4 | 0.038 | ||
S×RM | 4 | 8.3 | 0.000 | 4 | 7.1 | 0.000 | 4 | 4.6 | 0.002 | ||
S×CT | 4 | 3.5 | 0.011 | 4 | 4.1 | 0.004 | 4 | 10.8 | 0.000 | ||
RM×CT | 4 | 1.1 | 0.358 | 4 | 2.1 | 0.095 | 4 | 5.6 | 0.001 | ||
S×RM×CT | 8 | 1.5 | 0.177 | 8 | 1.9 | 0.064 | 8 | 1.5 | 0.171 |
投放方式 Releasing method | 覆盖处理 Coverage treatment | 辽东栎 Quercus wutaishanica | 野李 Prunus salicina | 华山松 Pinus armandii | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIS (%) | PAR (%) | HAR (%) | PIS (%) | PAR (%) | HAR (%) | PIS (%) | PAR (%) | HAR (%) | ||||
单独投放 Seperately releasing | 对照 Control | 15.7 ± 4.2 | 0 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 0 | 11.1 ± 7.3 | 29.6 ± 20.5 | 0 | 23.1 ± 4.2 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | ||
凋落物覆盖 Litter coverage | 5.6 ± 4.8 | 50.0 ± 17.3 | 5.6 ± 2.8 | 0 | 0 | 24.1 ± 14.0 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | 55.6 ± 9.6 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | |||
土壤覆盖 Soil coverage | 23.1 ± 3.2 | 25.0 ± 4.8 | 8.3 ±.8.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | 33.3 ± 15.5 | 0 | |||
组合投放 Assembly releasing | 对照 Control | 4.6 ± 4.1 | 0.9 ± 2.3 | 13.9 ± 10.4 | 0 | 0 | 34.3 ± 16.3 | 0 | 8.3 ± 11.5 | 13.9 ± 16.0 | ||
凋落物覆盖 Litter coverage | 0.9 ± 2.3 | 28.7 ± 24.4 | 9.3 ± 7.6 | 0 | 9.3 ± 12.5 | 25.9 ± 18.8 | 0.9 ± 2.7 | 17.6 ± 21.2 | 3.7 ± 6.7 | |||
土壤覆盖 Soil coverage | 4.6 ± 7.4 | 26.9 ± 28.4 | 4.6 ± 5.5 | 0 | 42.6 ± 47.4 | 5.6 ± 7.0 | 0 | 7.4 ± 10.9 | 1.9 ± 2.9 | |||
混合投放 Blend releasing | 对照 Control | 0 | 0 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 0 | 19.4 ± 9.6 | 25.0 ± 8.3 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 36.1 ± 4.8 | 30.6 ± 4.8 | ||
凋落物覆盖 Litter coverage | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 27.8 ± 12.7 | 13.9 ± 12.7 | 0 | 58.3 ± 25.0 | 16.7 ± 8.3 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 55.6 ± 9.6 | 5.6 ± 9.6 | |||
土壤覆盖 Soil coverage | 5.6 ± 4.8 | 8.3 ± 8.3 | 25.0 ± 16.7 | 0 | 11.1 ± 4.8 | 8.3 ± 8.3 | 0 | 25.0 ± 16.7 | 50.0 ± 8.3 |
Table 2 Fates of Quercus wutaishanica, Prunus salicina and Pinus armandii seeds in releasing plots of young Q. wutaishanica stands in Liupan Mountains under different coverage treatments and releasing methods
投放方式 Releasing method | 覆盖处理 Coverage treatment | 辽东栎 Quercus wutaishanica | 野李 Prunus salicina | 华山松 Pinus armandii | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIS (%) | PAR (%) | HAR (%) | PIS (%) | PAR (%) | HAR (%) | PIS (%) | PAR (%) | HAR (%) | ||||
单独投放 Seperately releasing | 对照 Control | 15.7 ± 4.2 | 0 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 0 | 11.1 ± 7.3 | 29.6 ± 20.5 | 0 | 23.1 ± 4.2 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | ||
凋落物覆盖 Litter coverage | 5.6 ± 4.8 | 50.0 ± 17.3 | 5.6 ± 2.8 | 0 | 0 | 24.1 ± 14.0 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | 55.6 ± 9.6 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | |||
土壤覆盖 Soil coverage | 23.1 ± 3.2 | 25.0 ± 4.8 | 8.3 ±.8.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | 33.3 ± 15.5 | 0 | |||
组合投放 Assembly releasing | 对照 Control | 4.6 ± 4.1 | 0.9 ± 2.3 | 13.9 ± 10.4 | 0 | 0 | 34.3 ± 16.3 | 0 | 8.3 ± 11.5 | 13.9 ± 16.0 | ||
凋落物覆盖 Litter coverage | 0.9 ± 2.3 | 28.7 ± 24.4 | 9.3 ± 7.6 | 0 | 9.3 ± 12.5 | 25.9 ± 18.8 | 0.9 ± 2.7 | 17.6 ± 21.2 | 3.7 ± 6.7 | |||
土壤覆盖 Soil coverage | 4.6 ± 7.4 | 26.9 ± 28.4 | 4.6 ± 5.5 | 0 | 42.6 ± 47.4 | 5.6 ± 7.0 | 0 | 7.4 ± 10.9 | 1.9 ± 2.9 | |||
混合投放 Blend releasing | 对照 Control | 0 | 0 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 0 | 19.4 ± 9.6 | 25.0 ± 8.3 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 36.1 ± 4.8 | 30.6 ± 4.8 | ||
凋落物覆盖 Litter coverage | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 27.8 ± 12.7 | 13.9 ± 12.7 | 0 | 58.3 ± 25.0 | 16.7 ± 8.3 | 2.8 ± 4.8 | 55.6 ± 9.6 | 5.6 ± 9.6 | |||
土壤覆盖 Soil coverage | 5.6 ± 4.8 | 8.3 ± 8.3 | 25.0 ± 16.7 | 0 | 11.1 ± 4.8 | 8.3 ± 8.3 | 0 | 25.0 ± 16.7 | 50.0 ± 8.3 |
Fig. 2 Seed predation and hoarding distances of Quercus wutaishanica(QW), Prunus salicina(PS) and Pinus armandii (PA) after removal by rodents in young Q. wutaishanica stands of Liupan Mountains. Different letters in different species within the same seed fate type indicate significant difference at P = 0.05 level.
Fig. 3 Distribution frequency of predation (A) and hoarding (B) distance of Quercus wutaishanica, Prunus salicina and Pinus armandii seeds after removal by rodents in young Q. wutaishanica stands of Liupan Mountains.
取食点/贮藏点大小 Size of predation site/ cache site | 取食点 Predation site | 贮藏点 Cache site | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
辽东栎 Quercus wutaishanica | 野李 Prunus salicina | 华山松 Pinus armandii | 辽东栎 Quercus wutaishanica | 野李 Prunus salicina | 华山松 Pinus armandii | ||
1 | 58 (82.9) | 3 (23.1) | 40 (62.5) | 53 (94.6) | 131 (94.2) | 39 (83.0) | |
2 | 2 (2.9) | 2 (15.4) | 7 (10.9) | 2 (3.6) | 4 (2.9) | 3 (6.4) | |
3 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | 3 (4.7) | 1 (1.8) | 1 (0.7) | 3 (6.4) | |
4 | 3 (4.3) | 2 (15.4) | 3 (4.7) | - | 2 (1.4) | 1 (0.7) | |
5 | 1 (1.4) | - | - | - | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.7) | |
6 | 1 (1.4) | - | - | - | - | - | |
7 | - | 1 (7.7) | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
9 | - | - | 2 (3.1) | - | - | - | |
10 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
11 | - | - | 2 (3.1) | - | - | - | |
12 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
15 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | - | - | - | - | |
19 | - | 1 (7.7) | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
23 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
25 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
40 | 1 (1.4) | - | - | - | - | - | |
46 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
72 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | - | - | - | - |
Table 3 Numbers of different size of seed predation site and cache site of Quercus wutaishanica, Prunus salicina and Pinus armandii after removal by rodents (The number in bracket is the percentage of total )
取食点/贮藏点大小 Size of predation site/ cache site | 取食点 Predation site | 贮藏点 Cache site | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
辽东栎 Quercus wutaishanica | 野李 Prunus salicina | 华山松 Pinus armandii | 辽东栎 Quercus wutaishanica | 野李 Prunus salicina | 华山松 Pinus armandii | ||
1 | 58 (82.9) | 3 (23.1) | 40 (62.5) | 53 (94.6) | 131 (94.2) | 39 (83.0) | |
2 | 2 (2.9) | 2 (15.4) | 7 (10.9) | 2 (3.6) | 4 (2.9) | 3 (6.4) | |
3 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | 3 (4.7) | 1 (1.8) | 1 (0.7) | 3 (6.4) | |
4 | 3 (4.3) | 2 (15.4) | 3 (4.7) | - | 2 (1.4) | 1 (0.7) | |
5 | 1 (1.4) | - | - | - | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.7) | |
6 | 1 (1.4) | - | - | - | - | - | |
7 | - | 1 (7.7) | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
9 | - | - | 2 (3.1) | - | - | - | |
10 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
11 | - | - | 2 (3.1) | - | - | - | |
12 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
15 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | - | - | - | - | |
19 | - | 1 (7.7) | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
23 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
25 | - | - | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
40 | 1 (1.4) | - | - | - | - | - | |
46 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | 1 (1.6) | - | - | - | |
72 | 1 (1.4) | 1 (7.7) | - | - | - | - |
Fig. 4 Seeds proportion of different hoarding / discarding types of Quercus wutaishanica (QW), Prunus salicina (PS) and Pinus armandii (PA) after removal by rodents in young Q. wutaishanica stands of Liupan Mountains. Different letters in different species within the same hoarding / discarding types indicate significant difference at P = 0.05 level.
[1] | Chang G, Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB (2009) Hoarding decisions by Edward’s long-tailed rats (Leopoldamys edwardsi) and South China field mice( Apodemus draco): the responses to seed size and germination schedule in acorns. Behavioral Processes, 82, 7-11. |
[2] |
Chen F (陈帆), Chen J (陈进) (2011) Effects of Pinus armandii seed size on rodents caching behavior and its spatio-temporal variations. Zoological Research (动物学研究), 32, 435-441. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL PMID |
[3] | Cheng JR (程瑾瑞), Xiao ZS (肖治术), Zhang ZB (张知彬) (2007) Effects of burial and coating on acorn survival of Quercus variabilis and Q. serrata under rodent predation. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 26, 668-672. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Dally JM, Clayton NS, Emery NJ (2006) The behaviour and evolution of cache protection and pilferage. Animal Behaviour, 72, 13-23. |
[5] | Fedriani JM, Manzaneda AJ (2005) Pre- and post-dispersal seed predation by rodents: balance of food and safety. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 1018-1024. |
[6] |
Gómez JM, Puerta-Piñero C, Schupp EW (2008) Effectiveness of rodents as local seed dispersers of Holm oaks. Oecologia, 155, 529-537.
URL PMID |
[7] | Grubb PJ (1977) The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews, 52, 107-145. |
[8] | Howe HF, Brown JS (2001) The ghost of granivory past. Ecology Letters, 4, 371-378. |
[9] | Hulme PE (2002) Seed-eaters: seed dispersal, destruction and demography. In: Seed Dispersal and Frugivory: Ecology, Evolution and Conservation (eds Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M), pp. 257-273. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford. |
[10] |
Jansen PA, Bongers F, Hemerik L (2004) Seed mass and mast seeding enhance dispersal by a neotropical scatter-hoarding rodent. Ecological Monographs, 74, 569-589.
DOI URL |
[11] | Jennifer FH, Karen EF (2009) Postdispersal sugar maple (Acer saccharum) seed predation by small mammals in a northern hardwood forest. The American Midland Naturalist, 162, 213-223. |
[12] | Li HJ, Zhang ZB (2003) Effect of rodents on acorn dispersal and survival of the Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis Koidz.). Forest Ecology and Management, 176, 387-396. |
[13] | Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decision made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 68, 619-640. |
[14] | Lu JQ (路纪琪), Zhang ZB (张知彬) (2004) Seed-hoarding behavior of wild apricot and Liaodong oak by small rodents. Acta Theriologica Sinica (兽类学报), 24, 132-138. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Lu JQ (路纪琪), Zhang ZB (张知彬) (2005) Effects of high and low shrubs on acorn hoarding and dispersal of Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis) by small rodents. Acta Zoologica Sinica (动物学报), 51, 195-204. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] |
Martínez I, González-Taboada F (2009) Seed dispersal patterns in a temperate forest during a mast event: performance of alternative dispersal kernels. Oecologia, 159, 389-400.
DOI URL PMID |
[17] |
Moore JE, McEuen AB, Swihart RK, Contreras TA, Steele MA (2007) Determinants of seed removal distance by scatter-hoarding rodents in deciduous forests. Ecology, 88, 2529-2540.
DOI URL PMID |
[18] | Purves DW, Zavala MA, Ogle K, Prieto F, Rey Benayas JM (2007) Environmental heterogeneity, birdmediated directed dispersal, and oak woodland dynamics in Mediterranean Spain. Ecological Monographs, 77, 77-97. |
[19] | Reed AW, Kaufman GA, Kaufman DW (2006) Effect of plant litter on seed predation in three prairie types. American Midland Naturalists, 15, 278-285. |
[20] | Sun MY (孙明洋), Ma QL (马庆亮), Tian SL (田澍辽), Wang JD (王建东), Lu JQ (路纪琪) (2011) Effects of seed productivity on dispersal of nuts of Quercus variabilis by rodents. Acta Theriologica Sinica (兽类学报), 31, 265-271. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Sun SC (孙书存), Chen LZ (陈灵芝) (2001) The effects of animal removal and groundcover on the fate of seeds of Quercus liaotungensis. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 21, 80-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[22] | Tamura N, Katsuki T, Hayashi F (2005) Walnut seed dispersal: mixed effects of tree squirrels and field mice with different hoarding ability. In: Seed Fate: Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment (eds Forget PM, Lambert JE, Hulme PE, Vander Wall SB), pp. 241-252. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford. |
[23] | Tong L (仝磊), Lu JQ (路纪琪) (2010) Community structure and its seasonal variation of small mammals in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 29, 1770-1776. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[24] | Vander Wall SB (1990) Food Hoarding in Animals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. |
[25] | Vander Wall SB (1995) The effects of seed value on the caching behavior of yellow pine chipmunks. Oikos, 74, 533-537. |
[26] | Vander Wall SB, Longland WS (2005) Diplochory and the evolution of seed dispersal. In: Seed Fate: Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment (eds Forget PM, Lambert JE, Hulme PE, Vander Wall SB), pp. 297-314. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford. |
[27] |
Wang B, Chen J (2009) Seed size, more than nutrient or tannin content, affects seed caching behavior of a common genus of Old World rodents. Ecology, 90, 3023-3032.
DOI URL PMID |
[28] | Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Wang YS, Cheng JR (2004) Acorn predation and removal of Quercus serratain in a shrubland in Dujiangyan Region, China. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 50, 536-540. |
[29] | Xiao ZS, Wang YS, Harris M, Zhang ZB (2006) Spatial and temporal variation of seed predation and removal of sympatric large-seeded species in relation to innate seed traits in a subtropical forest, Southwest China. Forest Ecology and Management, 222, 46-54. |
[30] | Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB, Wang YS (2005) Effect of seed size on dispersal distance in five rodents-dispersed Fagaceous species. Acta Oecologica, 28, 221-229. |
[31] | Xiao ZS (肖治术), Zhang ZB (张知彬), Wang YS (王玉山) (2003) Observations on tree seed selection and caching by Edward’s long-tailed rat (Leopoldamys edwardsi). Acta Theriologica Sinica (兽类学报), 23, 208-213. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] | Yi XF, Yang YQ (2011) Scatterhoarding of Manchurian walnut Juglans mandshurica by small mammals: response to seed familiarity and seed size. Acta Theriologica, 56, 141-147. |
[33] | Yu F (于飞), Niu KK (牛可坤), Jiao GQ (焦广强), Lü HQ (吕浩秋), Yi XF (易现峰) (2011) Effect of small rodents on seed dispersal of five tree species in Xiaoxing’an Mountains. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 39(1), 11-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[34] | Zhang HM, Chen Y, Zhang ZB (2008a) Differences of disper-sal fitness of large and small acorns of Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis) before and after seed caching by small rodents in a warm temperate forest, China. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1243-1250. |
[35] |
Zhang HM, Cheng JR, Xiao ZS, Zhang ZB (2008b) Effects of seed abundance on seed scatter-hoarding of Edward’s rat (Leopoldamys edwardsi Muridae) at the individual level. Oecologia, 158, 57-63.
DOI URL PMID |
[36] | Zhang ZB (张知彬), Wang FS (王福生) (2001) Effect of burial on acorn survival and seedling recruitment of Liaodong oak (Quercus liaotungensis) under rodent predation. Acta Theriologica Sinica (兽类学报), 21, 35-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[37] | Zhang ZB, Xiao ZS, Li HJ (2005) Impact of small rodents on tree seeds in temperate and subtropical forests, China. In: Seed Fate: Predation, Dispersal and Seedling Establishment (eds Forget PM, Lambert JE, Hulme PE, Vander Wall SB), pp. 269-282. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford. |
[38] | Zong C, Wauters LA, Van Dongen S, Mari V, Romeo C, Martinoli A, Preatoni D, Tosi G (2010) Annual variation in predation and dispersal of Arolla pine (Pinus cembra L.) seeds by Eurasian red squirrels and other seed-eaters. Forest Ecology and Management, 260, 587-594. |
[1] | Xifu Yang, Hongmao Zhang, Zhibin Zhang. Mast seeding and its relationship to animal hoarding behaviour [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(7): 821-832. |
[2] | Xiang Hou, Tuo Feng, Ning Han, Jing Wang, Xiaoning Chen, Xiaolei An, Lei Xu, Qiyong Liu, Gang Chang. Effect of climate change and economic development on hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(10): 1229-1237. |
[3] | Yuan Chen, Zheng Wang, Zuofu Xiang. Seed dispersal by primates [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2017, 25(3): 325-331. |
[4] | Juan Li,Cong Guo,Zhishu Xiao. Fruit composition and seed dispersal strategies of woody plants in a Dujiangyan subtropical forest, Southwest China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2013, 21(5): 572-581. |
[5] | Yik Fui Philip Lo,Aiwu Jiang,Bosco Pui Lok Chan,Sai Chit Ng,Naiwen Xie,Tengcheng Que,Fei Li. Population number and distribution of oriental pied hornbill in Guangxi, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2013, 21(3): 352-358. |
[6] | Yanjun Du, Keping Ma. Advancements and prospects in forest seed rain studies [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2012, 20(1): 94-107. |
[7] | Yan Zhu, Fan Bai, Haifeng Liu, Wenchao Li, Liang Li, Guangqi Li, Shunzhong Wang, Weiguo Sang. Population distribution patterns and interspecific spatial associations in warm temperate secondary forests, Beijing [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2011, 19(2): 252-259. |
[8] | Kai Song, Xiangcheng Mi, Qi Jia, Haibao Ren, Dan Bebber, Keping Ma. Variation in phylogenetic structure of forest communities along a human disturbance gradient in Gutianshan forest, China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2011, 19(2): 190-196. |
[9] | Xin Liu, Zhengkun Wang, Zhishu Xiao. Patterns of seed predation and dispersal of an endangered rare plant Ormosia hosiei by Edward’s long-tailed rats and Chinese white-bellied rats [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2011, 19(1): 93-96. |
[10] | Jin Zhao, Jin Chen, Shaobin Ma. Seed predation and dispersal of Ardisia solanacea in habitats with different degree of disturbance [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2008, 16(1): 34-43. |
[11] | Lingying Shuai, Yanling Song, Junsheng Li, Zhigao Zeng, Jianquan Liu. Rodent community structure of desert-oasis landscape in the middle reaches of the Heihe River [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2006, 14(6): 525-533. |
[12] | Zhishu Xiao, Zhibin Zhang, Yushan Wang. Effects of enclosure protection and seed burial on direct seeding of nut-bearing trees [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2005, 13(6): 520-526. |
[13] | XIAO Zhi-Shu, ZHANG Zhi-Bin. How to trace seeds and fruits dispersed by frugivorous animals: a review [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2003, 11(3): 248-255. |
[14] | SONG Yan-Ling, LI Jun-Sheng, ZENG Zhi-Gao, ZHANG Jin-Sheng. Diversity of rodents communities in different habitats in Hexi Corridor, Gansu Province [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2002, 10(4): 386-392. |
[15] | LIU Yong, CHEN Jin . Frugivores and their food plants: have they coevolved? [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2002, 10(2): 213-218. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn