生物多样性 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 22520. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022520
蒋景龙1,*(), 颜文博1, 胡凤成3, 王琦1, 孙旺1, 李耘2, 王勇1
收稿日期:
2022-09-11
接受日期:
2022-12-06
出版日期:
2023-03-20
发布日期:
2023-03-20
通讯作者:
蒋景龙
作者简介:
* E-mail: jiangjinglong511@163.com基金资助:
Jinglong Jiang1,*(), Wenbo Yan1, Fengcheng Hu3, Qi Wang1, Wang Sun1, Yun Li2, Yong Wang1
Received:
2022-09-11
Accepted:
2022-12-06
Online:
2023-03-20
Published:
2023-03-20
Contact:
Jinglong Jiang
摘要:
秦岭石蝴蝶(Petrocosmea qinlingensis)是秦岭地区分布的国家II级重点保护野生植物, 具有重要的生态价值和观赏价值, 但其野外数量极其稀少, 处于濒危状态, 亟需加强保护和拯救。本文在成功进行人工繁育和野外驯化的基础上, 尝试开展野外回归实验。通过踏查法选择3个不同的野外回归地, 同时采用随机样方调查和观察拍照的方法, 定期记录野外回归的秦岭石蝴蝶生长情况并统计其存活率。结果表明: (1)野外回归地的海拔高度、空气湿度、土质结构和地表植被等环境因素的差异, 均可不同程度地影响野外回归的秦岭石蝴蝶的存活率, 其中海拔高度的影响达显著水平(P < 0.05)。(2)遭遇的严重干旱、暴雨和冻害, 均造成了3个野外回归地秦岭石蝴蝶不同程度的损失。(3)秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归12个月后, 叶柄和叶片会明显伸长, 而叶片数目和叶片宽度会明显下降。以上结果表明, 加强野外回归前的驯化和野外回归地的小气候调查和选择是决定秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归能否成功的关键因素。这些研究将为进一步深入开展秦岭石蝴蝶的野外回归和其他濒危极小种群野生植物的迁地保护提供一定依据。
蒋景龙, 颜文博, 胡凤成, 王琦, 孙旺, 李耘, 王勇 (2023) 濒危植物秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归早期探索. 生物多样性, 31, 22520. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022520.
Jinglong Jiang, Wenbo Yan, Fengcheng Hu, Qi Wang, Wang Sun, Yun Li, Yong Wang (2023) Preliminary examination of the reintroduction of the endangered plant Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22520. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022520.
编号No. | 回归地 Reintroduction sites | 经纬度 Longitude Latitude | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 土壤pH Soil pH | 年均温度Mean annual temperature | 空气湿度 Air humidity (%) | 光照强度 Light intensity (lux) | 地貌特征 Geomorphic characteristics | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 汉台区褒河森林公园 Baohe Forest Park in Hantai | 106.99° E, 33.26° N | 888-900 | 6.9 | 14.3℃ | 5月 May | 56 | 546 | 山体的小沟槽, 有溪水, 上部有小灌木遮挡, 土质疏松、植被丰富, 坡向朝北、坡度62.4°, 环境阴湿The mountain body has a small gully and its upper part has the small shrub’s shelter and the stream water. The reintroduction environment with the north facing and 62.4° slope has the loose soil, rich in vegetation, and high air humidity |
7月 July | 64 | 620 | |||||||
9月 Sept. | 72 | 670 | |||||||
11月 Nov. | 53 | 518 | |||||||
2 | 城固县三流水 Sanliushui in Chenggu County | 107.19° E, 33.38° N | 657?670 | 7.1 | 18.7℃ | 5月 May | 69 | 682 | 附近有河常年流水, 植被丰富、土质岩化, 坡向朝西、坡度72.1°, 环境阴湿, 上部有乔木遮挡 The adjoining river is always flowing. The reintroduction environment with the west facing and 72.1° slope has the hard rock soil, rich in vegetation, high air humidity, and rich in tall trees |
7月 July | 72 | 743 | |||||||
9月 Sept. | 76 | 782 | |||||||
11月 Nov. | 65 | 540 | |||||||
3 | 城固县兰家湾 Lanjiawan in Chenggu County | 107.10° E, 33.34° N | 1,000?1,123 | 6.8 | 13.5℃ | 5月 May | 48 | 461 | 夏季有溪水, 上部有乔木遮挡, 土质疏松、植被丰富, 坡向朝北、坡度44.8°, 环境阴湿, 弱光 There are streams in summer. The reintroduction environment with the north facing and 44.8° slope has loose and wet soil, weak light, and rich in tall trees |
7月 July | 55 | 532 | |||||||
9月 Sept. | 50 | 548 | |||||||
11月 Nov. | 34 | 481 |
表1 秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归地地貌特征
Table 1 Geomorphic characteristics of the reintroduction sites for Petrocosmea qinlingensis
编号No. | 回归地 Reintroduction sites | 经纬度 Longitude Latitude | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 土壤pH Soil pH | 年均温度Mean annual temperature | 空气湿度 Air humidity (%) | 光照强度 Light intensity (lux) | 地貌特征 Geomorphic characteristics | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 汉台区褒河森林公园 Baohe Forest Park in Hantai | 106.99° E, 33.26° N | 888-900 | 6.9 | 14.3℃ | 5月 May | 56 | 546 | 山体的小沟槽, 有溪水, 上部有小灌木遮挡, 土质疏松、植被丰富, 坡向朝北、坡度62.4°, 环境阴湿The mountain body has a small gully and its upper part has the small shrub’s shelter and the stream water. The reintroduction environment with the north facing and 62.4° slope has the loose soil, rich in vegetation, and high air humidity |
7月 July | 64 | 620 | |||||||
9月 Sept. | 72 | 670 | |||||||
11月 Nov. | 53 | 518 | |||||||
2 | 城固县三流水 Sanliushui in Chenggu County | 107.19° E, 33.38° N | 657?670 | 7.1 | 18.7℃ | 5月 May | 69 | 682 | 附近有河常年流水, 植被丰富、土质岩化, 坡向朝西、坡度72.1°, 环境阴湿, 上部有乔木遮挡 The adjoining river is always flowing. The reintroduction environment with the west facing and 72.1° slope has the hard rock soil, rich in vegetation, high air humidity, and rich in tall trees |
7月 July | 72 | 743 | |||||||
9月 Sept. | 76 | 782 | |||||||
11月 Nov. | 65 | 540 | |||||||
3 | 城固县兰家湾 Lanjiawan in Chenggu County | 107.10° E, 33.34° N | 1,000?1,123 | 6.8 | 13.5℃ | 5月 May | 48 | 461 | 夏季有溪水, 上部有乔木遮挡, 土质疏松、植被丰富, 坡向朝北、坡度44.8°, 环境阴湿, 弱光 There are streams in summer. The reintroduction environment with the north facing and 44.8° slope has loose and wet soil, weak light, and rich in tall trees |
7月 July | 55 | 532 | |||||||
9月 Sept. | 50 | 548 | |||||||
11月 Nov. | 34 | 481 |
编号 No. | 回归地 Reintroduction sites | 回归面积 Reintroduction area (m2) | 回归时间 Reintroduction time | 回归时温度 Temperature at reintroduction | 回归时湿度 Reintroduction humidity | 回归株数 Reintroduction no. | 小区数 Subarea no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 褒河森林公园 Baohe Forest Park | 150 | 2020年5月 May 2020 | 23-25℃ | 53%-55% | 1,000 | 4 |
2 | 三流水 Sanliushui | 280 | 2021年6月 June 2021 | 25-27℃ | 56%-58% | 1,000 | 4 |
3 | 兰家湾 Lanjiawan | 220 | 2021年6月 June 2021 | 25-26℃ | 56%-58% | 1,000 | 3 |
表2 秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归实施情况
Table 2 Summary of implementation for reintroduction of Petrocosmea qinlingensis
编号 No. | 回归地 Reintroduction sites | 回归面积 Reintroduction area (m2) | 回归时间 Reintroduction time | 回归时温度 Temperature at reintroduction | 回归时湿度 Reintroduction humidity | 回归株数 Reintroduction no. | 小区数 Subarea no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 褒河森林公园 Baohe Forest Park | 150 | 2020年5月 May 2020 | 23-25℃ | 53%-55% | 1,000 | 4 |
2 | 三流水 Sanliushui | 280 | 2021年6月 June 2021 | 25-27℃ | 56%-58% | 1,000 | 4 |
3 | 兰家湾 Lanjiawan | 220 | 2021年6月 June 2021 | 25-26℃ | 56%-58% | 1,000 | 3 |
编号 No. | 乔木 Trees | 灌木 Shrubs | 草本 Herbs |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 异叶天仙果 Ficus heteromorpha | 中华青夹叶、紫萁 Helwingia chinensis, Osmunda japonica | 山麦冬、马蹄香、常春藤、虎耳草、冷水花、小叶贯众 Liriope spicata, Saruma henryi, Hedera nepalensis var. sinensis, Saxifraga stolonifera, Pilea notata, Matteuccia struthiopteris |
2 | 山胡椒、鹅耳枥 Lindera glauca, Carpinus turczaninowii | 九节龙、南天竹 Thamnolia vermicularis, Nandina domestica | 伏地卷柏、铁线蕨、淫羊藿、扁竹兰、山麦冬、金盏苣苔、鸭儿芹 Selaginella nipponica, Adiantum capillus-veneris, Epimedium brevicornu, Iris confusa, Liriope spicata, Isometrum farreri, Cryptotaenia japonica |
3 | 刚竹、山核桃、棕榈 Phyllostachys sulphurea var. viridis, Carya cathayensis, Trachycarpus fortunei | 亮叶忍冬 Lonicera ligustrina var. yunnanensis | 花叶燕麦草、虎耳草、刺齿贯众、对马耳蕨、狭叶重楼、秋海棠 Arrhenatherum elatius, Saxifraga stolonifera, Cyrtomium caryotideum, Polystichum tsus-simense, Paris polyphylla var. stenophylla, Begonia grandis |
表3 秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归地的几种典型植物群落。植被种类统计时间为每年的7-9月, 在3个野外回归地中随机选择4个1 m × 1 m的样方进行统计。
Table 3 Several typical plant communities in reintroduction sites for Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Statistics of plants types in the table are from July to September every year, and four samples of 1 m × 1 m were randomly selected from three reintroduction sites.
编号 No. | 乔木 Trees | 灌木 Shrubs | 草本 Herbs |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 异叶天仙果 Ficus heteromorpha | 中华青夹叶、紫萁 Helwingia chinensis, Osmunda japonica | 山麦冬、马蹄香、常春藤、虎耳草、冷水花、小叶贯众 Liriope spicata, Saruma henryi, Hedera nepalensis var. sinensis, Saxifraga stolonifera, Pilea notata, Matteuccia struthiopteris |
2 | 山胡椒、鹅耳枥 Lindera glauca, Carpinus turczaninowii | 九节龙、南天竹 Thamnolia vermicularis, Nandina domestica | 伏地卷柏、铁线蕨、淫羊藿、扁竹兰、山麦冬、金盏苣苔、鸭儿芹 Selaginella nipponica, Adiantum capillus-veneris, Epimedium brevicornu, Iris confusa, Liriope spicata, Isometrum farreri, Cryptotaenia japonica |
3 | 刚竹、山核桃、棕榈 Phyllostachys sulphurea var. viridis, Carya cathayensis, Trachycarpus fortunei | 亮叶忍冬 Lonicera ligustrina var. yunnanensis | 花叶燕麦草、虎耳草、刺齿贯众、对马耳蕨、狭叶重楼、秋海棠 Arrhenatherum elatius, Saxifraga stolonifera, Cyrtomium caryotideum, Polystichum tsus-simense, Paris polyphylla var. stenophylla, Begonia grandis |
图1 秦岭石蝴蝶野外回归后的生长情况。A-C: 分别为1-3号回归地秦岭石蝴蝶的野外回归情况; D: 当年5-6月野外回归地刚移栽的秦岭石蝴蝶状态; E: 回归后当年7-8月的生长情况; F: 回归后当年9-11月的生长情况; G: 回归后当年12月至次年2月的生长情况; H: 回归后次年3-4月的生长情况; I: 回归后次年5-6月的生长情况; J: 回归后次年7-8月的生长情况; K: 回归后次年9-10月的生长情况。
Fig. 1 The growth of Petrocosmea qinlingensis after returning to the wild. A-C, The field reintroduction of the Petrocosmea qinlingensis at reintroduction sites from 1 to 3, respectively; D, From May to June of that year, the state of the reintroduction P. qinlingensis just transplanted in the reintroduction sites; E, Growth from July to August after the reintroduction of the current year; F, Growth from September to November after the reintroduction of the current year; G, Growth from December after the reintroduction of the current year to February of the next year; H, Growth from March to April of the following year after reintroduction; I, Growth from May to June of the following year after reintroduction; J, Growth from July to August of the following year after reintroduction; K, Growth from September to October of the following year after the reintroduction.
图2 环境因素对野外回归地秦岭石蝴蝶的影响。A-C: 夏季高温干旱对野外回归秦岭石蝴蝶的影响; D-F: 秋季暴雨对野外回归秦岭石蝴蝶的影响; G-I: 冬季低温冻害对野外回归秦岭石蝴蝶的影响。
Fig. 2 The effects of environmental factors on Petrocosmea qinlingensis after reintroduction to the wild. A-C, The effect of high temperature and drought in summer on P. qinlingensis after reintroduction to the wild; D-F, The effect of Autumn rainstorm on P. qinlingensis after reintroduction to the wild; G-I, The effect of low temperature and freezing injury in winter on P. qinlingensis after reintroduction to the wild.
编号 No. | 小区 Subarea | 回归株数 Reintroduction seedlings | 干旱(6-7月) Drought (June-July) | 暴雨(9-10月) Rainstorm (Sept. -Oct.) | 冻害(1-2月) Clod (Jan.-Feb.) | 回归15个月的存活率 Survival rate after reintroduction for 15 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
损失株数 Lost number | 损失率 Lost rate | 损失株数Lost number | 损失率 Lost rate | 损失株数 Lost number | 损失率 Lost rate | ||||
1 | a | 438 | 122 | 28% | 152 | 35% | 13 | 3% | 34% |
b | 322 | 57 | 18% | 82 | 25% | 15 | 5% | 52% | |
c | 116 | 15 | 13% | 31 | 27% | 9 | 8% | 53% | |
d | 124 | 19 | 15% | 12 | 10% | 11 | 9% | 66% | |
小计/平均 Sum or average | 1,000 | 213 | 19% ± 7% | 277 | 24% ± 10% | 48 | 6% ± 3% | 51% ± 13% | |
2 | a | 584 | 82 | 14% | 42 | 7% | 12 | 2% | 77% |
b | 216 | 65 | 30% | 16 | 7% | 8 | 4% | 59% | |
c | 122 | 37 | 30% | 19 | 16% | 5 | 4% | 50% | |
d | 78 | 22 | 28% | 5 | 6% | 3 | 4% | 62% | |
小计/平均 Sum or average | 1,000 | 206 | 26% ± 8% | 82 | 9% ± 5% | 28 | 4% ± 1% | 62% ± 11% | |
3 | a | 676 | 145 | 21% | 172 | 25% | 94 | 14% | 39% |
b | 202 | 65 | 32% | 97 | 48% | 32 | 16% | 4% | |
c | 122 | 18 | 15% | 23 | 19% | 22 | 18% | 48% | |
小计/平均 Sum or average | 1,000 | 228 | 23% ± 9% | 292 | 31% ± 15% | 148 | 16% ± 2% | 30% ± 23% | |
总计/平均 Total or average | 3,000 | 647 | 22% | 651 | 20% | 224 | 8% | 49% |
表4 不同环境因素对野外回归秦岭石蝴蝶存活率的影响
Table 4 The effects of environmental factor on the survival rate of Petrocosmea qinlingensis after reintroduction to the wild
编号 No. | 小区 Subarea | 回归株数 Reintroduction seedlings | 干旱(6-7月) Drought (June-July) | 暴雨(9-10月) Rainstorm (Sept. -Oct.) | 冻害(1-2月) Clod (Jan.-Feb.) | 回归15个月的存活率 Survival rate after reintroduction for 15 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
损失株数 Lost number | 损失率 Lost rate | 损失株数Lost number | 损失率 Lost rate | 损失株数 Lost number | 损失率 Lost rate | ||||
1 | a | 438 | 122 | 28% | 152 | 35% | 13 | 3% | 34% |
b | 322 | 57 | 18% | 82 | 25% | 15 | 5% | 52% | |
c | 116 | 15 | 13% | 31 | 27% | 9 | 8% | 53% | |
d | 124 | 19 | 15% | 12 | 10% | 11 | 9% | 66% | |
小计/平均 Sum or average | 1,000 | 213 | 19% ± 7% | 277 | 24% ± 10% | 48 | 6% ± 3% | 51% ± 13% | |
2 | a | 584 | 82 | 14% | 42 | 7% | 12 | 2% | 77% |
b | 216 | 65 | 30% | 16 | 7% | 8 | 4% | 59% | |
c | 122 | 37 | 30% | 19 | 16% | 5 | 4% | 50% | |
d | 78 | 22 | 28% | 5 | 6% | 3 | 4% | 62% | |
小计/平均 Sum or average | 1,000 | 206 | 26% ± 8% | 82 | 9% ± 5% | 28 | 4% ± 1% | 62% ± 11% | |
3 | a | 676 | 145 | 21% | 172 | 25% | 94 | 14% | 39% |
b | 202 | 65 | 32% | 97 | 48% | 32 | 16% | 4% | |
c | 122 | 18 | 15% | 23 | 19% | 22 | 18% | 48% | |
小计/平均 Sum or average | 1,000 | 228 | 23% ± 9% | 292 | 31% ± 15% | 148 | 16% ± 2% | 30% ± 23% | |
总计/平均 Total or average | 3,000 | 647 | 22% | 651 | 20% | 224 | 8% | 49% |
图3 秦岭石蝴蝶人工繁育苗与野外回归苗形态差异性比较。* P < 0.05。
Fig. 3 Morphological difference analysis between artificial breeding seedlings and reintroduction seedlings of Petrocosmea qinlingensis. * P < 0.05.
[1] | Hu FC, Zhao XF, Jiang LP, Li X, Chen JH, Sun W, Jiang JL, Li Y (2021) Cultivation technologies for the rare and endangered plant Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology, 49(2), 106-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[胡凤成, 赵新锋, 蒋丽萍, 李星, 陈建华, 孙旺, 蒋景龙, 李耘 (2021) 秦岭石蝴蝶育苗技术. 陕西林业科技, 49(2), 106-109.] | |
[2] | Hu XP, Jiang JL, Wang Q, Li Y (2022) In vitro tissue culture technology of leaves of Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Northern Horticulture, (10), 70-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[胡选萍, 蒋景龙, 王琦, 李耘 (2022) 秦岭石蝴蝶叶片离体组织培养技术. 北方园艺, (10), 70-76.] | |
[3] | Jiang JL, Sun W, Hu XP, Li Y, Hu FC, Wang Y, Wang Q (2019) Research status of the breeding of rare and endangered plant Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Molecular Plant Breeding, 17, 3024-3029. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[蒋景龙, 孙旺, 胡选萍, 李耘, 胡凤成, 王勇, 王琦 (2019) 珍稀濒危植物秦岭石蝴蝶的繁育研究现状. 分子植物育种, 17, 3024-3029.] | |
[4] | Li J, Yang N, Zhou TH (2015) Progress of rare and endangered plants Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 34(5), 38-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[黎君, 杨妮, 周天华 (2015) 珍稀濒危植物秦岭石蝴蝶的研究进展. 中国野生植物资源, 34(5), 38-40.] | |
[5] | Qiu ZJ, Zou CQ, Tan XL, Peng Y, Xie RX (2015) Study on plant cutting of Gesneriaceae. Northern Horticulture, 39(11), 60-65. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[邱志敬, 邹纯清, 谭小龙, 彭杨, 谢锐星 (2015) 苦苣苔科植物的扦插繁育研究. 北方园艺, 39(11), 60-65.] | |
[6] | Ren H, Jian SG, Liu HX, Zhang QM, Lu HF (2014) Research progress on field regression of rare and endangered plants. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 44, 230-237. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[任海, 简曙光, 刘红晓, 张倩媚, 陆宏芳 (2014) 珍稀濒危植物的野外回归研究进展. 中国科学: 生命科学, 44, 230-237.] | |
[7] | Sun W, Jiang JL, Hu XP, Li Y, Wang Q, Tao XB, Hu FC (2020) Genetic diversity analysis of endangered plant Petrocosmea qinlingensis based on SCoT. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 40, 425-431. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[孙旺, 蒋景龙, 胡选萍, 李耘, 王琦, 陶小斌, 胡凤成 (2020) 濒危植物秦岭石蝴蝶的SCoT遗传多样性分析. 西北植物学报, 40, 425-431.] | |
[8] | Wang WT (1981) Notulae de Gesneriaceis sinensibus (II). Bulletin of Botanical Research, 1(4), 35-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王文采 (1981) 中国苦苣苔科的研究(二). 植物研究, 1(4), 35-75.] | |
[9] | Wang Y, Yang PJ, Li CB, Fan R (2015) Introduction of the plant front cover: Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 35, 97, 130. (in Chinese) |
[王勇, 杨培君, 李长波, 樊荣 (2015) 封面植物介绍——秦岭石蝴蝶. 西北植物学报, 35, 97, 130.] | |
[10] | Wang YH, Gan JJ, Chen T, Gong YQ, Lu YZ, Li N (2018) Preliminary study on reproductive features of reintroduction population of Cycas debaoensis. Subtropical Plant Science, 47, 134-139. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[王运华, 甘金佳, 陈庭, 龚奕青, 陆燕兆, 李楠 (2018) 德保苏铁回归种群繁殖特征的初步研究. 亚热带植物科学, 47, 134-139.]
DOI |
|
[11] | Wu JS (1991) Rare and endangered plant—Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Plants, (3), 6. (in Chinese) |
[吴金山 (1991) 珍稀濒危植物——秦岭石蝴蝶. 植物杂志, (3), 6.] | |
[12] | Yang P, Lu T, Qiu ZJ, Chen P, Peng Y, Tan XL (2016) Analyses on ecological characteristics and endangered reason of endangered plant Petrocosmea qinlingensis. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 25(3), 90-95. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杨平, 陆婷, 邱志敬, 陈朋, 彭杨, 谭小龙 (2016) 濒危植物秦岭石蝴蝶的生态学特性及濒危原因分析. 植物资源与环境学报, 25(3), 90-95.] | |
[13] | Yang WG, Chu JL, Zhang YG, Li JM (2014) Assessment on the endangered status of Gesneriaceae plants in China. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 48, 746-751, 756. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[杨文光, 储嘉琳, 张耀广, 李家美 (2014) 中国苦苣苔科植物濒危状况评估分析. 河南农业大学学报, 48, 746-751, 756.] | |
[14] |
Yang WZ, Xiang ZY, Zhang SS, Kang HM, Shi FQ (2015) Plant species with extremely small populations (PSESP) and their significance in China’s national plant conservation strategy. Biodiversity Science, 23, 419-425. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[杨文忠, 向振勇, 张珊珊, 康洪梅, 史富强 (2015) 极小种群野生植物的概念及其对我国野生植物保护的影响. 生物多样性, 23, 419-425.]
DOI |
|
[15] | Zang RG, Dong M, Li JQ, Chen XY, Zeng SJ, Jiang MX, Li ZQ, Huang JH (2016) Conservation and restoration for typical critically endangered wild plants with extremely small population. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 7130-7135. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[臧润国, 董鸣, 李俊清, 陈小勇, 曾宋君, 江明喜, 李镇清, 黄继红 (2016) 典型极小种群野生植物保护与恢复技术研究. 生态学报, 36, 7130-7135.] | |
[16] | Zhou Y, Feng YH, Li YM, Zhou Q (2018) Reintroduction of endangered plant Paphiopedilum emersonii. Guizhou Science, 36(5), 10-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[周艳, 冯佑鸿, 李依蔓, 周庆 (2018) 濒危植物白花兜兰野外回归研究. 贵州科学, 36(5), 10-13.] |
[1] | 胡骞, 文野, 吕磊, 王鹏程, 李建强, 徐基良. 研究活动是否影响鸟类的巢存活率?——以红头长尾山雀为例[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(6): 22570-. |
[2] | 李婷婷, 朱锡红, 吴光年, 宋虓, 徐爱春. 镇海棘螈产卵场微生境选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(1): 22293-. |
[3] | 杨华林, 程跃红, 周天祥, 冯茜, 胡强, 张贵权, 杨建, 张晋东, 王彬, 周材权. 四川卧龙国家级自然保护区多空间尺度下绿尾虹雉的生境选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(7): 21535-. |
[4] | 夏昕, 任静, 李立, 王海燕, 宋玉成, 杨道德, 蒋志刚. 洞庭湖区麋鹿再野化初期秋冬季生境选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(8): 1087-1096. |
[5] | 王存璐,陈浒,肖华,张红梅,李林芝,郭城,陈静,魏强. 黔西北石漠化地区两栖动物多样性及其生境选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(4): 485-495. |
[6] | 张宇阳, 于涛, 马文宝, 王飞, 田成, 李俊清. 不同郁闭度对野外回归的梓叶槭幼树形态和生理特征的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(3): 323-332. |
[7] | 陈龙, 李月辉, 胡远满, 熊在平, 吴文, 李悦, 问青春. 小兴安岭铁力林业局冬季西伯利亚狍(Capreolus pygargus)的生境选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(4): 401-408. |
[8] | 唐卓, 杨建, 刘雪华, 王鹏彦, 李周园. 基于红外相机技术对四川卧龙国家级自然保护区 雪豹(Panthera uncia)的研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(1): 62-70. |
[9] | 刘何铭, 马遵平, 杨庆松, 方晓峰, 林庆凯, 宗意, 阿尔达克·阿庆, 王希华. 天童常绿阔叶林定居幼苗存活和生长的关联[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(1): 11-22. |
[10] | 李弛, 杨道德, 张玉铭, 宋玉成, 李鹏飞, 蒋志刚. 麋鹿夜间卧息地选择的季节变化[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(9): 1031-1038. |
[11] | 宋玉成, 李鹏飞, 杨道德, 温华军, 张玉铭, 蒋志刚. 湖北石首散养麋鹿种群的调控机制: 密度制约下种群产仔率下降[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(1): 33-40. |
[12] | 王瑾芳, 高贤明, 党伟光. 不同生境条件下紫茎泽兰实生幼苗的生存特性比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2008, 16(4): 346-352. |
[13] | 崔鹏, 康明江, 邓文洪. 繁殖季节同域分布的红腹角雉和血雉的觅食生境选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2008, 16(2): 143-149. |
[14] | 罗晨, 郭晓军, 岳梅, 向玉勇, 张芝利. 寄主植物对B型烟粉虱形态学和生物学特性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2006, 14(4): 333-339. |
[15] | 江红星, 楚国忠, 钱法文, 陆军. 江苏盐城黑嘴鸥(Larus saundersi)繁殖微生境的选择[J]. 生物多样性, 2002, 10(2): 170-174. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn