生物多样性 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 286-296. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018300
谢立红1,2,黄庆阳1,2,曹宏杰1,2,杨帆1,2,王继丰1,2,倪红伟1,2,*()
收稿日期:
2018-11-10
接受日期:
2019-03-11
出版日期:
2019-03-20
发布日期:
2019-03-20
通讯作者:
倪红伟
基金资助:
Xie Lihong1,2,Huang Qingyang1,2,Cao Hongjie1,2,Yang Fan1,2,Wang Jifeng1,2,Ni Hongwei1,2,*()
Received:
2018-11-10
Accepted:
2019-03-11
Online:
2019-03-20
Published:
2019-03-20
Contact:
Ni Hongwei
摘要:
植物功能性状反映了植物对生长环境的响应和适应, 是连接植物与环境的桥梁, 研究植物功能性状特征及其随坡向的变化规律, 对认识不同微地形生境下植物群落空间格局形成及适应机制具有重要意义。本文以五大连池不同历史年代的8座火山共有树种色木槭(Acer mono)为研究对象, 测定了9类叶功能性状, 研究了植物叶功能性状在火山间及火山坡向间(阴坡-阳坡)的变化规律, 以期揭示生境对火山植物主要叶功能性状的影响, 以及阴阳坡植物生存策略的变化, 初步探讨了植物对环境的适应机制。结果表明: (1)坡向的变化是造成色木槭叶功能性状差异的重要原因; (2)火山间叶功能性状的差异反映了它们具有不同的资源环境, 色木槭生长主要受氮元素的限制; (3)南北坡向及火山间叶片厚度与叶面积均呈极显著的正相关关系, 叶片厚度与比叶面积在不同火山间均呈显著的正相关关系, 这与色木槭在火山土壤条件下的自我保护密切相关, 色木槭通过这些指标间的功能调节来适应环境的变化, 并形成最佳功能组合。五大连池不同历史年代火山的色木槭采用增加植物叶片叶干物质浓度、叶面积、叶片厚度、叶氮和叶磷浓度提高固碳能力, 通过降低比叶面积和氮磷比来适应干旱、土壤养分贫瘠的环境。
谢立红,黄庆阳,曹宏杰,杨帆,王继丰,倪红伟 (2019) 五大连池火山色木槭叶功能性状特征. 生物多样性, 27, 286-296. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018300.
Xie Lihong,Huang Qingyang,Cao Hongjie,Yang Fan,Wang Jifeng,Ni Hongwei (2019) Leaf functional traits of Acer mono in Wudalianchi Volcano, China. Biodiversity Science, 27, 286-296. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018300.
图1 五大连池火山研究区位置示意图
Fig. 1 Location map of research area in Wudalianchi volcanoes. WS, Weishan; BGLQS, Beigelaqiushan; NGLQS, Nangelaqiushan; BJS, Bijiashan; WHS, Wohushan; XGS, Xiaogushan; DJDBS, Dongjiaodebushan; XJDBS, Xijiaodebushan.
图2 五大连池8座火山色木槭叶功能性状。不同大写字母表示不同火山间叶功能性状差异显著, 不同小写字母表示每座火山南北坡间叶功能性状差异显著(P < 0.05)。DJDBS、XGS、BJS、XJDBS、WS、WHS、BGLQS和NGLQS的含义见图1。
Fig. 2 Leaf functional traits of Acer mono on eight volcanoes in Wudalianchi. The different capital letter shows that there is significant difference in leaf functional traits between volcanoes, the different small letter shows that there is significant difference in leaf functional traits between north and south slopes. DJDBS, XGS, BJS, XJDBS, WS, WHS, BGLQS and NGLQS are the same as in Fig. 1.
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | 叶面积 Leaf size | 比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | 叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | 叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | 叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东焦得布山 Dongjiaodebushan (DJDBS) | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.10 |
小孤山 Xiaogushan (XGS) | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.12 |
笔架山 Bijiashan (BJS) | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
西焦得布山 Xijiaodebushan (XJDBS) | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
尾山 Weishan (WS) | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.16 |
卧虎山 Wohushan (WHS) | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
北格拉球山 Beigelaqiushan (BGLQS) | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.12 |
南格拉球山 Nangelaqiushan (NGLQS) | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.15 |
南坡 South slope | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
北坡 North slope | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
南北坡向间 South /North | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.10 |
火山间 Between volcanoes | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.15 |
表1 五大连池8座火山及其南北坡向间色木槭叶功能性状变异系数
Table 1 Variation coefficient of leaf functional traits of Acer mono on eight volcanoes and its north-south slope in Wudalianchi
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | 叶面积 Leaf size | 比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | 叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | 叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | 叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
东焦得布山 Dongjiaodebushan (DJDBS) | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.40 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.10 |
小孤山 Xiaogushan (XGS) | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.12 |
笔架山 Bijiashan (BJS) | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
西焦得布山 Xijiaodebushan (XJDBS) | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
尾山 Weishan (WS) | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.16 |
卧虎山 Wohushan (WHS) | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.08 |
北格拉球山 Beigelaqiushan (BGLQS) | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.12 |
南格拉球山 Nangelaqiushan (NGLQS) | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.15 |
南坡 South slope | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
北坡 North slope | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.18 |
南北坡向间 South /North | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.10 |
火山间 Between volcanoes | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.15 |
变量 Variable | 火山间 Between volcanoes | 坡向间 Between slopes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
F | P | F | P | |
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | 1.280 | 0.366 | 1.558 | 0.232 |
叶面积 Leaf size | 1.207 | 0.395 | 2.983 | 0.106 |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 1.333 | 0.346 | 0.339 | 0.570 |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 1.140 | 0.425 | 4.302 | 0.057 |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | 0.996 | 0.496 | 0.149 | 0.705 |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | 4.482 | 0.026* | 0.341 | 0.569 |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | 3.285 | 0.059 | 0.010 | 0.922 |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 2.835 | 0.084 | 1.397 | 0.257 |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | 4.065 | 0.034* | 0.464 | 0.507 |
表2 五大连池8座火山色木槭叶功能性状方差分析结果
Table 2 One-way ANOVA for leaf functional traits of Acer mono on eight volcanoes in Wudalianchi
变量 Variable | 火山间 Between volcanoes | 坡向间 Between slopes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
F | P | F | P | |
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | 1.280 | 0.366 | 1.558 | 0.232 |
叶面积 Leaf size | 1.207 | 0.395 | 2.983 | 0.106 |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 1.333 | 0.346 | 0.339 | 0.570 |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 1.140 | 0.425 | 4.302 | 0.057 |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | 0.996 | 0.496 | 0.149 | 0.705 |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | 4.482 | 0.026* | 0.341 | 0.569 |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | 3.285 | 0.059 | 0.010 | 0.922 |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 2.835 | 0.084 | 1.397 | 0.257 |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | 4.065 | 0.034* | 0.464 | 0.507 |
变量 Variable | LKC | N/P | |
---|---|---|---|
小孤山 XGS | 0.006* | 0.425 | |
笔架山 BJS | 0.004* | 0.068 | |
西焦得布山 XJDBS | 0.158 | 0.959 | |
尾山 WS | 0.199 | 0.154 | |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.492 | 0.300 | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.251 | 0.109 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.008* | 0.154 | |
笔架山 BJS | 0.808 | 0.018* | |
西焦得布山 XJDBS | 0.064 | 0.454 | |
尾山 WS | 0.050* | 0.485 | |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.018* | 0.795 | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.039* | 0.363 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.833 | 0.042* | |
笔架山 Bijiaoshan (BJS) | 西焦得布山 XJDBS | 0.043* | 0.063 |
尾山 WS | 0.034* | 0.006* | |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.012* | 0.012* | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.026* | 0.004* | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.652 | 0.606 | |
西焦得布山 Xijiaodebushan (XJDBS) | 尾山 WS | 0.880 | 0.167 |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.427 | 0.322 | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.757 | 0.118 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.090 | 0.143 | |
尾山 Weishan (WS) | 卧虎山 WHS | 0.516 | 0.655 |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.874 | 0.822 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.071 | 0.014* | |
卧虎山 Wohushan (WHS) | 北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.620 | 0.506 |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.025* | 0.028* | |
北格拉球山 Beigelaqiushan (BGLQS) | 南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.055 | 0.010* |
表3 五大连池8座火山间色木槭叶钾浓度(LKC)和叶氮磷比(N/P)的多重比较(P = 0.05)
Table 3 Multiple comparison of leaf kalium content (LKC), ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus (N/P) of Acer mono between eight volcanoes in Wudalianchi
变量 Variable | LKC | N/P | |
---|---|---|---|
小孤山 XGS | 0.006* | 0.425 | |
笔架山 BJS | 0.004* | 0.068 | |
西焦得布山 XJDBS | 0.158 | 0.959 | |
尾山 WS | 0.199 | 0.154 | |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.492 | 0.300 | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.251 | 0.109 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.008* | 0.154 | |
笔架山 BJS | 0.808 | 0.018* | |
西焦得布山 XJDBS | 0.064 | 0.454 | |
尾山 WS | 0.050* | 0.485 | |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.018* | 0.795 | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.039* | 0.363 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.833 | 0.042* | |
笔架山 Bijiaoshan (BJS) | 西焦得布山 XJDBS | 0.043* | 0.063 |
尾山 WS | 0.034* | 0.006* | |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.012* | 0.012* | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.026* | 0.004* | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.652 | 0.606 | |
西焦得布山 Xijiaodebushan (XJDBS) | 尾山 WS | 0.880 | 0.167 |
卧虎山 WHS | 0.427 | 0.322 | |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.757 | 0.118 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.090 | 0.143 | |
尾山 Weishan (WS) | 卧虎山 WHS | 0.516 | 0.655 |
北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.874 | 0.822 | |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.071 | 0.014* | |
卧虎山 Wohushan (WHS) | 北格拉球山 BGLQS | 0.620 | 0.506 |
南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.025* | 0.028* | |
北格拉球山 Beigelaqiushan (BGLQS) | 南格拉球山 NGLQS | 0.055 | 0.010* |
LDMC | LS | SLA | LT | LCC | LKC | LNC | LPC | N/P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content (LDMC) | -0.553 | -0.623 | -0.528 | 0.232 | 0.211 | -0.271 | -0.492 | 0.081 | |
叶面积 Leaf size (LS) | -0.516 | 0.674 | 0.984** | 0.410 | -0.489 | -0.122 | 0.684 | -0.428 | |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area (SLA) | -0.750* | 0.709* | 0.612 | 0.052 | -0.345 | -0.168 | 0.895** | -0.445 | |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness (LT) | -0.370 | 0.966** | 0.560 | 0.355 | -0.489 | -0.200 | 0.666 | -0.492 | |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content (LCC) | 0.241 | -0.262 | -0.376 | -0.224 | 0.039 | 0.525 | 0.001 | 0.382 | |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content (LKC) | 0.018 | 0.448 | -0.047 | 0.522 | 0.374 | 0.572 | -0.374 | 0.697 | |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) | -0.655 | 0.295 | 0.370 | 0.197 | 0.337 | 0.539 | -0.203 | 0.929** | |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content (LPC) | -0.149 | 0.384 | 0.398 | 0.300 | -0.353 | -0.403 | -0.468 | -0.442 | |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus (N/P) | -0.271 | -0.079 | -0.043 | -0.101 | 0.404 | 0.543 | 0.853** | -0.852** |
表4 五大连池8座火山北坡(对角线下部)和南坡(对角线上部)的色木槭叶功能性状相关系数
Table 4 Pearson correlation coefficients among leaf functional traits of Acer mono on north (lower diagonal) and south (upper diagonal) slope of eight volcanoes in Wudalianchi
LDMC | LS | SLA | LT | LCC | LKC | LNC | LPC | N/P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content (LDMC) | -0.553 | -0.623 | -0.528 | 0.232 | 0.211 | -0.271 | -0.492 | 0.081 | |
叶面积 Leaf size (LS) | -0.516 | 0.674 | 0.984** | 0.410 | -0.489 | -0.122 | 0.684 | -0.428 | |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area (SLA) | -0.750* | 0.709* | 0.612 | 0.052 | -0.345 | -0.168 | 0.895** | -0.445 | |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness (LT) | -0.370 | 0.966** | 0.560 | 0.355 | -0.489 | -0.200 | 0.666 | -0.492 | |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content (LCC) | 0.241 | -0.262 | -0.376 | -0.224 | 0.039 | 0.525 | 0.001 | 0.382 | |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content (LKC) | 0.018 | 0.448 | -0.047 | 0.522 | 0.374 | 0.572 | -0.374 | 0.697 | |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) | -0.655 | 0.295 | 0.370 | 0.197 | 0.337 | 0.539 | -0.203 | 0.929** | |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content (LPC) | -0.149 | 0.384 | 0.398 | 0.300 | -0.353 | -0.403 | -0.468 | -0.442 | |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus (N/P) | -0.271 | -0.079 | -0.043 | -0.101 | 0.404 | 0.543 | 0.853** | -0.852** |
LDMC | LS | SLA | LT | LCC | LKC | LNC | LPC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content (LDMC) | ||||||||
叶面积 Leaf size (LS) | -0.371 | |||||||
比叶面积 Specific leaf area (SLA) | -0.700 | 0.732* | ||||||
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness (LT) | -0.320 | 0.978** | 0.734* | |||||
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content (LCC) | 0.104 | 0.203 | 0.128 | 0.196 | ||||
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content (LKC) | 0.439 | -0.194 | -0.554 | -0.284 | 0.254 | |||
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) | -0.230 | -0.114 | -0.120 | -0.150 | 0.594 | 0.506 | ||
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content (LPC) | -0.306 | 0.540 | 0.811* | 0.529 | -0.034 | -0.477 | -0.468 | |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus (N/P) | 0.069 | -0.404 | -0.497 | -0.406 | 0.420 | 0.586 | 0.906** | -0.756* |
表5 五大连池8座火山色木槭叶功能性状的相关系数
Table 5 Pearson correlation coefficients among leaf functional traits of Acer mono on eight volcanoes in Wudalianchi
LDMC | LS | SLA | LT | LCC | LKC | LNC | LPC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content (LDMC) | ||||||||
叶面积 Leaf size (LS) | -0.371 | |||||||
比叶面积 Specific leaf area (SLA) | -0.700 | 0.732* | ||||||
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness (LT) | -0.320 | 0.978** | 0.734* | |||||
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content (LCC) | 0.104 | 0.203 | 0.128 | 0.196 | ||||
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content (LKC) | 0.439 | -0.194 | -0.554 | -0.284 | 0.254 | |||
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content (LNC) | -0.230 | -0.114 | -0.120 | -0.150 | 0.594 | 0.506 | ||
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content (LPC) | -0.306 | 0.540 | 0.811* | 0.529 | -0.034 | -0.477 | -0.468 | |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus (N/P) | 0.069 | -0.404 | -0.497 | -0.406 | 0.420 | 0.586 | 0.906** | -0.756* |
指标 Index | 北坡 North slope | 南坡 South slope | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 公因方差 Communality | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 公因子方差 Communality | |
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | -0.774 | -0.025 | 0.571 | 0.925 | -0.582 | -0.520 | 0.609 |
叶面积 Leaf size | 0.918 | -0.209 | 0.324 | 0.990 | 0.887 | 0.310 | 0.883 |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 0.828 | -0.287 | -0.329 | 0.876 | 0.835 | 0.167 | 0.726 |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 0.833 | -0.180 | 0.485 | 0.961 | 0.885 | 0.235 | 0.839 |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | -0.225 | 0.638 | 0.258 | 0.524 | 0.100 | 0.760 | 0.588 |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | 0.424 | 0.619 | 0.622 | 0.949 | -0.673 | 0.375 | 0.594 |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | 0.593 | 0.735 | -0.280 | 0.971 | -0.414 | 0.882 | 0.949 |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 0.206 | -0.872 | 0.075 | 0.809 | 0.837 | 0.111 | 0.712 |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | 0.196 | 0.943 | -0.215 | 0.974 | -0.704 | 0.677 | 0.953 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 3.483 | 3.140 | 1.357 | 4.437 | 2.415 | ||
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 38.695 | 34.886 | 15.083 | 49.302 | 26.832 | ||
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 38.695 | 73.581 | 88.663 | 49.302 | 76.133 |
表6 五大连池8座火山色木槭叶功能性状在南北坡的主成分分析结果
Table 6 Principal component analysis of leaf functional traits in Acer mono on north and south slopes of eight volcanoes in Wudalianchi
指标 Index | 北坡 North slope | 南坡 South slope | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 公因方差 Communality | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 公因子方差 Communality | |
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | -0.774 | -0.025 | 0.571 | 0.925 | -0.582 | -0.520 | 0.609 |
叶面积 Leaf size | 0.918 | -0.209 | 0.324 | 0.990 | 0.887 | 0.310 | 0.883 |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 0.828 | -0.287 | -0.329 | 0.876 | 0.835 | 0.167 | 0.726 |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 0.833 | -0.180 | 0.485 | 0.961 | 0.885 | 0.235 | 0.839 |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | -0.225 | 0.638 | 0.258 | 0.524 | 0.100 | 0.760 | 0.588 |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | 0.424 | 0.619 | 0.622 | 0.949 | -0.673 | 0.375 | 0.594 |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | 0.593 | 0.735 | -0.280 | 0.971 | -0.414 | 0.882 | 0.949 |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 0.206 | -0.872 | 0.075 | 0.809 | 0.837 | 0.111 | 0.712 |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | 0.196 | 0.943 | -0.215 | 0.974 | -0.704 | 0.677 | 0.953 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 3.483 | 3.140 | 1.357 | 4.437 | 2.415 | ||
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 38.695 | 34.886 | 15.083 | 49.302 | 26.832 | ||
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 38.695 | 73.581 | 88.663 | 49.302 | 76.133 |
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 公因子方差 Communality |
---|---|---|---|---|
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | -0.498 | -0.386 | 0.743 | 0.949 |
叶面积 Leaf size | 0.761 | 0.461 | 0.313 | 0.890 |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 0.893 | 0.359 | -0.178 | 0.959 |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 0.772 | 0.425 | 0.318 | 0.878 |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | -0.143 | 0.757 | 0.337 | 0.707 |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | -0.669 | 0.283 | 0.421 | 0.705 |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | -0.523 | 0.810 | -0.242 | 0.989 |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 0.855 | -0.044 | 0.115 | 0.746 |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | -0.801 | 0.540 | -0.188 | 0.969 |
特征值 Eigen value | 4.335 | 2.274 | 1.181 | |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 48.170 | 25.262 | 13.124 | |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 48.170 | 73.432 | 86.557 |
表7 五大连池8座火山色木槭叶功能性状主成分分析结果
Table 7 Principal component analysis of leaf functional traits of Acer mono on eight volcanoes in Wudalianchi
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal component 1 | 主成分2 Principal component 2 | 主成分3 Principal component 3 | 公因子方差 Communality |
---|---|---|---|---|
叶干物质浓度 Leaf dry matter content | -0.498 | -0.386 | 0.743 | 0.949 |
叶面积 Leaf size | 0.761 | 0.461 | 0.313 | 0.890 |
比叶面积 Specific leaf area | 0.893 | 0.359 | -0.178 | 0.959 |
叶片厚度 Leaf thickness | 0.772 | 0.425 | 0.318 | 0.878 |
叶碳浓度 Leaf carbon content | -0.143 | 0.757 | 0.337 | 0.707 |
叶钾浓度 Leaf kalium content | -0.669 | 0.283 | 0.421 | 0.705 |
叶氮浓度 Leaf nitrogen content | -0.523 | 0.810 | -0.242 | 0.989 |
叶磷浓度 Leaf phosphorus content | 0.855 | -0.044 | 0.115 | 0.746 |
叶氮磷比 Ratio of nitrogen and phosphorus | -0.801 | 0.540 | -0.188 | 0.969 |
特征值 Eigen value | 4.335 | 2.274 | 1.181 | |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 48.170 | 25.262 | 13.124 | |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 48.170 | 73.432 | 86.557 |
1 |
Bao L, Liu YH ( 2009) Comparison of leaf functional traits in different forest communities in Mt. Dongling of Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29, 3692-3703. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 宝乐, 刘艳红 ( 2009) 东灵山地区不同森林群落叶功能性状比较. 生态学报, 29, 3692-3703.]
DOI URL |
|
2 | Bao SD ( 2000) Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis, pp. 30-84. China Agriculture Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[ 鲍士旦 ( 2000) 土壤农化分析, 30-84页. 中国农业出版社, 北京.] | |
3 |
Cornelisse JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E ( 2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany, 51, 335-380.
DOI URL |
4 |
Craine JM, Jackson RD ( 2010) Plant nitrogen and phosphorus limitation in 98 North American grassland soils. Plant and Soil, 334, 73-84.
DOI URL |
5 |
Dang JJ, Zhao CZ, Li Y, Hou ZJ, Dong XG ( 2015) Relationship between leaf traits of Melica przewalskyi and slope aspects in alpine grassland of Qilian Mountains, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 23-31. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 党晶晶, 赵成章, 李钰, 侯兆疆, 董小刚 ( 2015) 祁连山高寒草地甘肃臭草叶性状与坡向间的关系. 植物生态学报, 39, 23-31.]
DOI URL |
|
6 |
Diemer M ( 1998) Leaf lifespans of high-elevation, aseasonal and Andean shrub species in relation to leaf traits and leaf habit. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 7, 457-465.
DOI URL |
7 |
Dijkstra FA, Pendall E, Morgan JA ( 2012) Climate change alters stoichiometry of phosphorus and nitrogen in a semiarid grassland. New Phytologist, 196, 807-815.
DOI URL PMID |
8 |
Dramini F, Diaz S, Gurvich DE ( 2002) Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species. New Phytologist, 154, 147-157.
DOI URL |
9 |
Elser JJ, Bracken MES, Cleland EE ( 2007) Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 10, 1135-1142.
DOI URL |
10 |
Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C ( 2001) A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Functional Ecology, 15, 688-695.
DOI URL |
11 |
Hallik L, Niinemets W, Wright IJ ( 2009) Are species shade and drought tolerance reflected in leaf-level structural and functional differentiation in Northern Hemisphere temperate woody flora. New Phytologist, 184, 257-274.
DOI URL PMID |
12 |
Hu YS, Yao XY, Liu YH ( 2014) The functional traits of forests at different succession stages and their relationship to terrain factors in Changbai Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 34, 5915-5924. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 胡耀升, 么旭阳, 刘艳红 ( 2014) 长白山不同演替阶段森林植物功能性状及其与地形因子间的关系. 生态学报, 34, 5915-5924.]
DOI URL |
|
13 | Huang QY, Zhu DG, Zhong HX, Xie LH, Ni HW ( 2014) Floristic analysis on spermatophyte genera in Wudalianchi. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 34, 200-203. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 黄庆阳, 朱道光, 钟海秀, 谢立红, 倪红伟 ( 2014) 五大连池种子植物属的区系分析. 植物研究, 34, 200-203.] | |
14 |
Koerselman W, Meuleman AF ( 1996) The vegetation N : P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1441-1450.
DOI URL |
15 |
Leith H ( 1975) Primary productivity of the major vegetation units of the world. Ecological Studies, 14, 203-214.
DOI URL |
16 | Li YL, Mao W, Zhao XY, Zhang TH ( 2010) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in typical desert and desertified regions, North China. Environmental Science, 31, 1716-1725. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李玉霖, 毛伟, 赵学勇, 张铜会 ( 2010) 北方典型荒漠及荒漠化地区植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征研究. 环境科学, 31, 1716-1725.] | |
17 | Liu JH, Zeng DH ( 2006) Leaf traits and their interrelationships of main plant species in southeast Horqin Sandy Land. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25, 921-925. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘金环, 曾德慧 ( 2006) 科尔沁沙地东南部地区主要植物叶片性状及其相互关系. 生态学杂志, 25, 921-925.] | |
18 | Liu MX, Ma JZ ( 2013) Feature variations of plant functional traits and environmental factor in south- and north-facing slope. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 20, 102-106. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘旻霞, 马建祖 ( 2013) 阴阳坡植物功能性状与环境因子的变化特征. 水土保持研究, 20, 102-106.] | |
19 | Liu MX, Ma JZ ( 2012) Responses of plant functional traits and soil factors to slope aspect in alpine meadow of South Gansu, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 23, 3295-3300. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 刘旻霞, 马建祖 ( 2012) 甘南高寒草甸植物功能性状和土壤因子对坡向的响应. 应用生态学报, 23, 3295-3300.] | |
20 |
Meng TT, Ni J, Wang GH ( 2007) Plant functional traits, environments and ecosystem functioning. Journal of Plant Ecology (Chinese Version), 31, 150-165. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 孟婷婷, 倪健, 王国宏 ( 2007) 植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能. 植物生态学报, 31, 150-165.]
DOI URL |
|
21 |
Niklas KJ, Owens T, Reich PB, Cobb ED ( 2005) Nitrogen/phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth. Ecology Letters, 8, 636-642.
DOI URL |
22 | Qin J, Kong HY, Liu H ( 2016) Stoichionmetric characteristics of soil C, N, P and K in different Pinus massoniana forests. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 44(2), 68-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 秦娟, 孔海燕, 刘华 ( 2016) 马尾松不同林型土壤C, N, P, K的化学计量特征. 西北农林科技大学学报 (自然科学版) , 44(2), 68-76.] | |
23 |
Reich PB, Oleksyn J ( 2004) Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 11001-11006.
DOI URL |
24 |
Ren SJ, Yu GR, Tao B, Wang SQ ( 2007) Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 654 terrestrial plant species in NSTEC. Environmental Science, 28, 2665-2673. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 任书杰, 于贵瑞, 陶波, 王绍强 ( 2007) 中国东部南北样带654种植物叶片氮和磷的化学计量学特征研究. 环境科学, 28, 2665-2673.]
DOI URL |
|
25 | Shi Y, Wen ZM, Gong SH ( 2011) Comparisons of relationships between leaf and fine root traits in hilly area of the Loess Plateau, Yanhe River basin, Shaanxi Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31, 6805-6814. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 施宇, 温仲明, 龚时慧 ( 2011) 黄土丘陵区植物叶片与细根功能性状关系及其变化. 生态学报, 31, 6805-6814.] | |
26 |
Su WH, Shi Z, Yang B, Yang JJ, Zhao GH ( 2015) Intraspecific functional trait variation in a tree species (Lithocarpus dealbatus) along latitude. Plant Diversity and Resources, 37, 309-317. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 苏文华, 施展, 杨波, 杨建军, 赵冠华 ( 2015) 滇石栎沿纬度梯度叶片功能性状的种内变化. 植物分类与资源学报, 37, 309-317.]
DOI URL |
|
27 |
Wang XK, Wang CK ( 2015) Acclimation of leaf phenology and adapation of photosynthetic capacity of Larix gmelinii to environmental changes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35, 4538-4546. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 王先奎, 王传宽 ( 2015) 兴安落叶松对环境变化的物候驯化和光合能力适应. 生态学报, 35, 4538-4546.]
DOI URL |
|
28 |
Westoby M ( 1998) A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme. Plant and Soil, 199, 213-227.
DOI URL |
29 | Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M ( 2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature, 428, 821-827. |
30 |
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M ( 2001) Strategy shifts in leaf physiology, structure and nutrient content between species of high- and low-rainfall and high- and low-nutrient habitats. Functional Ecology, 15, 423-434.
DOI URL |
31 |
Wu TG, Chen BF, Xiao YH, Pan YJ, Chen Y ( 2010) Leaf stoichiometry of trees in three forest types in Pearl River Delta, South China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 34, 58-63. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 吴统贵, 陈步峰, 肖以华, 潘勇军, 陈勇 ( 2010) 珠江三角洲3种典型森林类型乔木叶片生态化学计量学. 植物生态学报, 34, 58-63.]
DOI URL |
|
32 | Xie LH, Cao HJ, Huang QY, Wang JF, Ni HW ( 2018) Leaf functional traits and interrelationships of 3 plant species in Lava Plateau of new volcanic in Wudalianchi. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 38(4), 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 谢立红, 曹宏杰, 黄庆阳, 王继丰, 倪红伟 ( 2018) 五大连池新期火山熔岩台地3种植物叶功能性状及其相互关系. 西北植物学报, 38(4), 1-9.] | |
33 |
Xu MS, Huang HX, Shi QR, Yang XD, Zhou LL ( 2015) Responses of soil water content to change in plant functional traits in evergreen broadleaved forests in eastern Zhejiang Province. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 857-866. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 许洺山, 黄海侠, 史青如, 杨晓东, 周刘丽 ( 2015) 浙东常绿阔叶林植物功能性状对土壤含水量变化的响应. 植物生态学报, 39, 857-866.]
DOI URL |
|
34 | Zhao HY, Li YL, Wang XY, Mao W, Zhao XY, Zhang TH ( 2010) Variations in leaf traits of 52 plants in Horqin Sandy Land. Journal of Desert Research, 30, 1292-1298. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 赵红洋, 李玉霖, 王新源, 毛伟, 赵学勇, 张铜会 ( 2010) 科尔沁沙地52种植物叶片性状变异特征研究. 中国沙漠, 30, 1292-1298.] | |
35 | Zhao WF ( 1987) Volcanic geology in Wudalianchi of Dedu. Northeastern Seismological Research, 3(1), 87-92. (in Chinese) |
[ 赵文峰 ( 1987) 德都五大连池火山地质. 东北地震研究, 3(1), 87-92.] | |
36 |
Zhang X, Wang ZN, Lu JY, Yang M, Yang HM ( 2016) Responses of leaf traits to drought at different growth stages of alfalfa. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 2669-2676. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 张曦, 王振南, 陆姣云, 杨梅, 杨惠敏 ( 2016) 紫花苜蓿叶性状对干旱的阶段性响应. 生态学报, 36, 2669-2676.]
DOI URL |
|
37 |
Zhou X, Zuo XA, Zhao XY, Liu C, Lü P ( 2016) Scale variation and correlation of plant functional traits in the Horqin Sandy Land, China. Journal of Desert Research, 36(1), 20-26. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 周欣, 左小安, 赵学勇, 刘川, 吕朋 ( 2016) 科尔沁沙地植物功能性状的尺度变异及关联. 中国沙漠, 36(1), 20-26.]
DOI URL |
|
38 |
Zhou ZQ, Xu LJ, Zhang YH, Xia CM, Li HG, Liu T, Ma KP ( 2011) An analysis of the ecological value of Wudalianchi, Heilongjiang Province, China. Biodiversity Science, 19, 63-70. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 周志强, 徐丽娇, 张玉红, 夏春梅, 李洪光, 刘彤, 马克平 ( 2011) 黑龙江五大连池的生态价值分析. 生物多样性, 19, 63-70.]
DOI URL |
[1] | 张入匀, 李艳朋, 倪云龙, 桂旭君, 练琚愉, 叶万辉. 鼎湖山南亚热带常绿阔叶林叶功能性状沿群落垂直层次的种内变异[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(12): 1279-1290. |
[2] | 翁昌露,张田田,巫东豪,陈声文,金毅,任海保,于明坚,罗媛媛. 古田山10种主要森林群落类型的α和β多样性格局及影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(1): 33-41. |
[3] | 严岳鸿, 何祖霞, 苑虎, 邢福武. 坡向差异对广东古兜山自然保护区蕨类植物多样性的生态影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(1): 41-47. |
[4] | 雷波, 包维楷, 贾渝, 刘俊华. 不同坡向人工油松幼林下地表苔藓植物层片的物种多样性与结构特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2004, 12(4): 410-418. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn