物种分布区范围地理格局的Rapoport法则

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08337

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

Rapoport法则最初是关于物种分布的纬度位置与纬度分布宽度的关系的假说, 被认为是宏观生态学的重要假说之一。Rapoport法则提出以后引发了广泛的实证检验和理论探讨, 并扩展到海拔和海洋深度梯度的分析。对Rapoport法则的检验发展了多种算法, 包括基于中域效应模型的比较分析法, 提出了气候变异性等多种机理解释, 并建立了物种分布区范围格局与物种丰富度格局、分布边界限制等重要宏观生态学现象之间的联系。关于该法则的普适性仍存在明显的意见分歧, 但分析和检验方法被认为是影响结果的重要因素, 方法的改进将是这一领域今后研究的关键。本文主要从Rapoport法则的概念、检验方法、机理性解释, 关于其普适性的争论及其与物种丰富度格局的关系等方面, 综述这一领域的研究进展。

关键词: Rapoport法则, 物种分布区, 算法, 机理, 普适性

Abstract

Rapoport’s rule is a hypothesis about the relationship between species latitudinal locations and their latitudinal range widths. By stimulating a wide range of empirical tests and theoretical discussions, Rapoport’s rule has been recognized as one of a few crucial hypotheses in macroecology, and has been extended to distributional patterns across gradients in elevation and ocean depth. A variety of algorithms have been applied to test the rule, and several interpretations, in addition to climatic variability, have been proposed as underlying mechanisms. Studies have also bridged the Rapoport’s effect with other important biogeographic phenomenon, e.g. species richness pattern, species-area relationship, and boundary limit to distribution. However, the universality of Rapoport’s rule is still debatable, and tests of the rule are greatly affected by data collection and analysis methodology. Hence, methodological improvements are key to settling the debate on the rule. Our objectives are to provide an overview on Rapoport’s rule, including conceptual changes, changes in methodology and mechanistic interpretations, the debate on the universality of the rule, and the relationship between Rapoport’s rule and latitudinal/altitudinal patterns of species richness.

Key words: Rapoport’s rule, species range, algorithm, mechanisms, generality

沈泽昊, 卢绮妍 (2009) 物种分布区范围地理格局的Rapoport法则. 生物多样性, 17, 560-567. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08337.

Zehao Shen, Qiyan Lu (2009) The Rapoport’s rule for the geographic patterns of species range size. Biodiversity Science, 17, 560-567. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08337.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08337

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2009/V17/I6/560

参考文献 60

[1]	Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (1996) Spatial patterns in the geographic range sizes of bird species in the New World. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 351, 897-912.
[2]	Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[3]	Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology, 58, 445-449.
[4]	Cardillo M (2002) The life-history basis of latitudinal diversity gradients: how do species traits vary from the poles to the equator? Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 79-87.
[5]	Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2000) Areas, cradles and museums: the latitudinal gradient in species richness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 311-315. DOI URL PMID
[6]	Colwell RK, Hurtt GC (1994) Nonbiological gradients in species richness and a spurious Rapoport effect. The American Naturalist, 144, 570-595.
[7]	Colwell RK, Lees DC (2000) The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 70-76. URL PMID
[8]	Cowlishaw G, Hacker JE (1997) Distribution, diversity, and latitude in African primates. The American Naturalist, 150, 505-512. URL PMID
[9]	Cowlishaw G, Hacker JE (1998) Too much latitude for Rapoport’s rule? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 241-242.
[10]	Diniz-Filho JAF, Torres NM (2002) Phylogenetic comparative methods and the geographic range size-body size relationship in New World terrestrial carnivora. Evolutionary Ecology, 16, 351-367.
[11]	Edwards W, Westoby M (1996) Reserve mass and dispersal investment in relation to geographic range of plant species: phylogenetically independent contrasts. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 329-338.
[12]	Fleishman E, Austin GT, Weiss A (1998) An empirical test of Rapoport’s rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities. Ecology, 79, 2472-2483.
[13]	France D (1992) The North American latitudinal gradient in species richness and geographical range of freshwater crayfish and amphipods. The American Naturalist, 139, 342-354.
[14]	Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Spicer JI (1998) Rapoport's rule: time for an epitaph? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 70-74. DOI URL PMID
[15]	Gaston KJ, Chown SL (1999) Why Rapoport's rule does not generalize? Oikos, 84, 309-312.
[16]	Gaston KJ, Spicer JI (2001) The relationship between range size and niche breadth: a test using five species of Gammarus (Amphipoda). Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 179-188.
[17]	Grytnes J-A, Beaman JH, Romdal TS, Rahbek C (2008) The mid-domain effect matters: simulation analyses of range-size distribution data from Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Journal of Biogeography, 35, 2138-2147.
[18]	Harcourt AH (2000) Latitude and latitudinal extent: a global analysis of the Rapoport effect in a tropical mammalian taxon: primates. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 1169-1182.
[19]	Hausdorf B (2006) Latitudinal and altitudinal diversity patterns and Rapoport effects in north-west European land snails and their causes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 87, 309-323.
[20]	Hawkins BA, Diniz-Filho JAF (2006) Beyond Rapoport’s rule: evaluating range size patterns of New World birds in a two-dimensional framework. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 461-469.
[21]	Letcher AJ, Harvey PH (1994) Variation in geographical range size among mammals of the Palearctic. The American Naturalist, 144, 30-42.
[22]	Lu QY (卢绮妍), Shen ZH (沈泽昊) (2009) Altitudinal pattern of species range size of vascular plants in Mt. Shennongjia: a test of Rapoport’s rule. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 17, 644-651. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Lyons SK, Willig MR (1997) Latitudinal patterns of range size: methodological concerns and empirical evaluations for New World bats and marsupials. Oikos, 79, 568-580.
[24]	Lyons SK, Willig MR (2002) Species richness, latitude, and scale-sensitivity. Ecology, 83, 47-58.
[25]	Mileikovsky SA (1971) Types of larval development in marine bottom invertebrates, their distribution and ecological significance: a reevaluation. Marine Biology, 19, 193-213.
[26]	Mora C, Robertson DR (2005) Causes of latitudinal gradients in species richness: a test with fishes of the tropical eastern Pacific. Ecology, 86, 1771-1782.
[27]	Orme CDL, Davies RG, Olson VA, Thomas GH, Ding T-S, Rasmussen PC, Ridgely RS, Stattersfield AJ, Bennett PM, Owens IPF, Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (2006) Global patterns of geographic range size in birds. PLoS Biology, 4, 1276-1283.
[28]	Pagel MD, May RM, Collie AR (1991) Ecological aspects of the geographical distribution and diversity of mammalian species. The American Naturalist, 137, 791-815.
[29]	Pagel MD (1992) A method for the analysis of comparative data. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 156, 431-442.
[30]	Price TD, Helbig AJ, Richman AD (1997) Evolution of breeding distributions in the Old World leaf warblers (Genus Phylloscopus). Evolution, 51, 552-561. DOI URL PMID
[31]	Rahbek C (1997) The relationship among area, elevation and regional species richness in neotropical birds. The American Naturalist, 149, 875-902. URL PMID
[32]	Rapoport EH (1975) Areografía. Estrategias Geográficas de las Especies. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, p. 214.
[33]	Rapoport EH (1982) Areography. Geographical Strategies of Species. Pergamon Press, New York.
[34]	Ribas CR, Schoereder JH (2006) Is the Rapoport effect widespread? Null models revisited. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15, 614-624.
[35]	Rohde K (1992) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514-527.
[36]	Rohde K (1996) Rapoport’s rule is a local phenomenon and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Biodiversity Letters, 3, 10-13.
[37]	Rohde K (1998) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity. Area matters, but how much? Oikos, 82, 184-190.
[38]	Rohde K (1999) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity and Rapoport’s rule revisited: a review of recent work, and what can parasites teach us about the causes of the gradients? Ecography, 22, 593-613.
[39]	Rohde K, Heap M, Heap D (1993) Rapoport’s rule does not apply to marine teleosts and cannot explain latitudinal gradients in species richness. The American Naturalist, 142, 1-16.
[40]	Rosenzweig ML (1992) Species diversity gradients: we know more and less than we thought. Journal of Mammalogy, 73, 715-730.
[41]	Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[42]	Roy K, Jablonski D, Valentine JW (1994) Eastern Pacific molluscan provinces and latitudinal diversity gradient: no evidence for “Rapoport’s rule”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 8871-8874.
[43]	Ruggiero A (1994) Latitudinal correlates of the sizes of mammalian geographical ranges in South America. Journal of Biogeography, 21, 545-559.
[44]	Ruggiero A, Lawton JH, Blackburn TM (1998) The geographic ranges of mammalian species in South America: spatial patterns in environmental resistance and anisotropy. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 1093-1103.
[45]	Ruggiero A, Werenkraut V (2007) One-dimensional analyses of Rapoport’s rule reviewed through meta-analysis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 401-414.
[46]	Sanders NJ (2002) Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport’s rule. Ecography, 25, 25-32.
[47]	Sax DF (2001) Latitudinal gradients and geographic ranges of exotic species: implications for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 139-150
[48]	Shmida A, Wilson MV (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 12, 1-20.
[49]	Smith FDM, May RM, Harvey PH (1994) Geographical ranges of Australian mammals. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63, 441-450.
[50]	Smith KF, Brown JH (2002) Patterns of diversity, depth range and body size among pelagic fishes along a gradient of depth. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 11, 313-322.
[51]	Stevens GC (1989) The latitudinal gradients in geographical range: how so many species co-exist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133, 240-256.
[52]	Stevens GC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. The American Naturalist, 140, 893-911. DOI URL PMID
[53]	Stevens GC (1996) Extending Rapoport’s rule to Pacific marine fishes. Journal of Biogeography, 23, 149-154.
[54]	Storch D (2000) Rapoport effect and speciation/extinction rates in the tropics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15, 514.
[55]	Taylor PH, Gaines SD (1999) Can Rapoport’s rule be rescued? Modeling causes of the latitudinal gradient in species richness. Ecology, 80, 2474-2482.
[56]	Terborgh J (1971) Distribution on environmental gradients: theory and a preliminary interpretation of distributional patterns in the avifauna of the Cordillera Vilcabamba, Peru. Ecology, 52, 23-40.
[57]	Thompson K, Gaston KJ, Band SR (1999) Range size, dispersal and niche breadth in the herbaceous flora of central England. Journal of Ecology, 87, 150-155.
[58]	Willig MR, Gannon MR (1997) Gradients of species density and turnover in marsupials: a hemispheric perspective. Journal of Mammalogy, 78, 756-765.
[59]	Willig MR, Kaufman DM, Stevens RD (2003) Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 34, 273-309.
[60]	Wright S, Keeling J, Gillman L (2006) The road from Santa Rosalia: a faster tempo of evolution in tropical climates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 7718-7722.