Biodiv Sci ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 252-259.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.08024

Special Issue: 中国的森林生物多样性监测

• Special Issue • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Population distribution patterns and interspecific spatial associations in warm temperate secondary forests, Beijing

Yan Zhu1, Fan Bai1,2, Haifeng Liu1,3, Wenchao Li1, Liang Li1,2, Guangqi Li1,2, Shunzhong Wang1, Weiguo Sang1*   

  1. 1State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093

    2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

    3Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2011-01-30 Revised:2011-03-25 Online:2011-03-21 Published:2011-06-01
  • Contact: Weiguo Sang


Exploring tree population distribution patterns and interspecific spatial associations are helpful in elucidating the mechanisms underlying species coexistence in forest communities. We analyzed population distribution patterns and interspecific adult–adult spatial associations of common tree species at scales of 0–50 m in five 1-ha warm temperate secondary forest plots near Beijing, China. We found that: (1) all species showed aggregated spatial patterns at some scales; aggregation occurred mainly at neighborhood scales of < 15 m, tended to peak within a 1-m radius around focal conspecific trees, and the percentage of species exhibiting a random or regular pattern increased with scale, mainly occurring at scales of > 15 m; (2) the proportion of species pairs showing non-significant associations was high (~50%), and even in those species pairs that showed significant associations, segregation and partial overlap were dominant association types. Few species pairs (~4%) showed mixing. We feel that population spatial distribution of trees, particularly the observed prevalence of conspecific aggregation, in these plots was regulated by seed dispersal limitation and environmental heterogeneity. Moreover, aggregated distributions also promoted interspecific segregation and partial overlap. It is possible that distribution patterns were associated with habitats. Few species pairs showed interspecific mixing, in this case, interspecific competition exclusion difficultly occured, but in the interior of conspecific aggregation, density dependence should be a dominant mechanism regulating population distributions. Our findings contribute to a clearer understanding of the mechanisms influencing the structure of these forests.