生物多样性 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 645-650.doi: 10.17520/biods.2017237

• 保护论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

《名古屋议定书》背景下我国传统知识的保护:以德昂族酸茶为例

傅玮琳1, 董梅2, 杨文华3, 杨兴媛4, 王玉珏4, 成功4, *()   

  1. 1 中国人民大学知识产权学院, 北京 100872
    2 《云南农业大学学报》编辑部, 昆明 650201
    3 云南省德宏傣族景颇族自治州文物管理所, 云南芒市 678400
    4 中央民族大学生命与环境科学学院, 北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-02 接受日期:2017-12-27 出版日期:2018-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 成功 E-mail:victor_chenggong@126.com
  • 作者简介:

    # 共同第一作者

  • 基金项目:
    中央民族大学“111校内学科创新引智计划”(B08044);中央民族大学少数民族事业发展协同创新中心(中央民族大学一流学科建设基金)

Protection of Chinese traditional knowledge in the backdrop of the Nagoya Protocol: A case study on acid tea of the De’ang Minority

Weilin Fu1, Mei Dong2, Wenhua Yang3, Xingyuan Yang4, Yujue Wang4, Gong Cheng4, *()   

  1. 1 College of Intellectual Property Law, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
    2 Editorial Office of the Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201
    3 Administration of Cultural Heritage of Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Mangshi, Yunnan 678400
    4 College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081
  • Received:2017-09-02 Accepted:2017-12-27 Online:2018-06-20
  • Contact: Cheng Gong E-mail:victor_chenggong@126.com
  • About author:

    # Co-first authors

中国于2016年9月6日成为《名古屋议定书》缔约方, 意味着遗传资源及相关传统知识的保护以及获取与惠益分享制度, 在国际和国内层面已经步入履行阶段。传统知识的防御性保护是防范生物剽窃, 建设性保护是促进惠益分享。本研究通过多年的实地调研发现, 德昂族酸茶作为一类与遗传资源相关的传统知识, 在原持有方不知情同意的情况下, 被某利用方申请了专利, 构成了生物剽窃。本研究指出, 传统知识防御性保护可考虑修订国内专利法, 将传统知识强制性来源披露要求纳入其中, 进而防范生物剽窃。为促进传统知识的持有方分享应得惠益和可持续利用, 本研究建议依据《名古屋议定书》精神, 通过立法制定特殊制度, 创造性地发展出可行的惠益分享制度, 区分不同的传统知识主体资格, 以事先知情同意程序和共同商定条件为途径, 以补偿责任或知识共享许可协议为手段, 来实现《生物多样性公约》的保护与可持续利用两大目标, 方能达成传统知识的建设性保护。

关键词: 名古屋议定书, 获取与惠益分享, 酸茶传统知识, 生物剽窃, 来源披露制度

China entered the Nagoya Protocol on September 6, 2016, signaling its establishment of the regime regarding protection of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge as well as the Access and Benefit Sharing system (ABS) at both the national and international levels. It is stated that the purpose of defensive protection is to prevent bio-piracy while that of constructive protection is to facilitate benefit sharing. Based on years of field research, we reveal in this study that a user of De’ang acid tea, which is associated with local traditional knowledge, has applied for its patent without the consent of the original holder of its traditional knowledge, thereby constituting an act of bio-piracy. To achieve the purpose of defensive protection, we suggest that domestic patent laws be amended to make it mandatory (for any applicant) to disclose the origin of the traditional knowledge concerned to prevent bio-piracy. To achieve the purpose of constructive protection, we propose that, in accordance with the Nagoya Protocol, a sui generis system should be established through legislation to creatively develop a workable benefit sharing system, which involves identification of various traditional knowledge holding subjects, follows the principles of Prior Informed Consent (PIC) and Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT), and adopts the measure of compensation liabilities or Creative Commons License (CC) with the view to fulfill two major objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity, namely conservation and sustainable use.

Key words: Nagoya Protocol, access and benefit sharing (ABS), traditional knowledge associated with acid tea, bio-piracy, disclosure of origin (DOO)

[1] Cheng G, Wang C, Xue DY (2012) Attitude to the traditional knowledge of international governmental organizations and suggested strategies of China. Biodiversity Science, 20, 505-511. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[成功, 王程, 薛达元 (2012) 国际政府间组织对传统知识议题的态度以及中国的对策建议. 生物多样性, 20, 505-511.]
[2] Damodaran A (2008) Traditional knowledge, intellectual property rights and biodiversity conservation: Critical issues and key challenges. Journal of Intellectual Property, 13, 509-513.
[3] Fu R (2006) Creative common license. Library, (4), 46-48. (in Chinese)
[傅蓉 (2006) 知识共享许可协议. 图书馆, (4), 46-48.]
[4] Fu WL, Cheng G (2017) On dealing with bio-piracy under the system of patent law—based on De’ang acid tea traditional knowledge. China Invention and Patent, 14(2), 12-16. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[傅玮琳, 成功 (2017) 专利法框架下应对“生物剽窃”之制度探索——以德昂族酸茶为例. 中国发明与专利, 14(2), 12-16.]
[5] Jiang WJ, Yang D (2016) The Symposium on Intellectual Property Focus, Difficulties and Hot Issues in the 13th Five-Year Plan Period held in Beijing. Intellectual Property, (4), 3-17. (in Chinese)
[蒋文杰, 杨丹 (2016) “十三五”时期知识产权焦点、难点和热点问题学术研讨会在京召开. 知识产权, (4), 3-17.]
[6] Li CX (2008) De’ang’s unique ethnic acid tea skills. Ethnic Today, (7), 43-44. (in Chinese)
[李淳信 (2008) 德昂族独特的酸茶技艺. 今日民族, (7), 43-44.]
[7] Liu CT (2003) Analysis of intellectual property rights. Chinese Social Sciences, (4), 109-121. (in Chinese)
[刘春田 (2003) 知识财产权解析. 中国社会科学, (4), 109-121.]
[8] Qin TB (2005) Selected Compilation of International and Foreign Laws on Genetic Resources. Law Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[秦天宝 (2005) 国际与外国遗传资源法选编. 法律出版社, 北京.]
[9] Wei GH, Li T (2015) On the protection principles of folk literature and art works. Intellectual, (3), 48-52. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[韦贵红, 李潭 (2015) 民间文学艺术作品的保护原则探析. 知识产权, (3), 48-52.]
[10] Wu T, Petriello MA (2011) Culture and biodiversity losses linked with response. Science, 331, 30-31.
[11] Xue DY (2007) Access and benefit sharing of genetic resources: Background, progress and challenges. Biodiversity Science, 15, 563-568. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[薛达元 (2007) 遗传资源获取与惠益分享: 背景、进展与挑战. 生物多样性, 15, 563-568.]
[12] Xue DY (2011) Analysis for the main elements and potential impacts of Nagoya Protocol. Biodiversity Science, 19, 113-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[薛达元 (2011)《名古屋议定书》的主要内容及其潜在影响. 生物多样性, 19, 113-119.]
[13] Xue DY (2014) On the national regime for access and benefit- sharing of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge in China: An enlightenment from coming into force of Nagoya Protocol. Biodiversity Science, 22, 547-548. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[薛达元 (2014) 建立遗传资源及相关传统知识获取与惠益分享国家制度:写在《名古屋议定书》生效之际. 生物多样性, 22, 547-548.]
[14] Xue DY, Cai L (2006) New hotspot of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Traditional knowledge protection. Environmental Protection, (12b), 72-74. (in Chinese)
[薛达元, 蔡蕾 (2006) 《生物多样性公约》新热点: 传统知识保护. 环境保护, (12b), 72-74.]
[15] Xue DY, Guo L (2009) On concepts and protection of traditional knowledge. Biodiversity Science, 17, 135-142. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[薛达元, 郭泺 (2009) 论传统知识的概念与保护生物多样性, 17, 135-142.]
[16] Xue DY, Lin YM (2006) Property right theory on bio-genetic resources and benefit sharing system. In: Patent Law Research (ed. State Intellectual Property Office of P. R. China , pp. 31-57. Intellectual Property Right Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[薛达元, 林燕梅 (2006) 生物遗传资源产权理论与惠益分享制度. 见: 国家知识产权局编《专利法研究》, 31-57页. 知识产权出版社, 北京.]
[17] Xue DY, Wu JY, Zhao FW (2012) Actions, progress and prospects in implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity during the past 20 years in China. Biodiversity Science, 20, 623-632. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[薛达元, 武建勇, 赵富伟 (2012) 中国履行《生物多样性公约》二十年: 行动、进展与展望. 生物多样性, 20, 623-632.]
[18] Zhang Y, Xue XT (2009) Quality analysis of acid tea. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, (12), 133-136. (in Chinese)
[张杨, 薛晓霆 (2009) 酸茶品质分析与研究. 现代农业科技, (12), 133-136.]
[19] Zhao FW, Xue DY, Wu JY (2015) Hot spots and proposed actions of negotiations of the Nagoya Protocol after it functions. Biodiversity Science, 23, 536-542. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[赵富伟, 薛达元, 武建勇 (2015)《名古屋议定书》生效后的谈判焦点与对策. 生物多样性, 23, 536-542.]
[1] 李保平,薛达元. (2019) 遗传资源数字序列信息在生物多样性保护中的应用及对惠益分享制度的影响. 生物多样性, 27(12): 1379-1385.
[2] 刘文静, 徐靖, 银森录, 田瑜, 李俊生. (2017) 探讨我国与邻国共有药用植物的惠益分享机制. 生物多样性, 25(8): 907-913.
[3] 武建勇, 薛达元. (2017) 生物遗传资源获取与惠益分享国家立法的重要问题. 生物多样性, 25(11): 1156-1160.
[4] 徐靖, 郑苗壮, 刘岩, 刘文静, 银森录, 李俊生. (2016) 国家管辖范围外海域遗传资源获取和惠益分享机制构建建议. 生物多样性, 24(1): 108-.
[5] 赵富伟, 薛达元, 武建勇. (2015) 《名古屋议定书》生效后的谈判焦点与对策. 生物多样性, 23(4): 536-542.
[6] 臧春鑫, 蔡蕾, 关潇, 徐靖, 李俊生. (2014) 《名古屋议定书》政府间委员会谈判进展回顾. 生物多样性, 22(5): 677-681.
[7] 武建勇, 薛达元, 赵富伟, 王艳杰. (2013) 从植物遗传资源透视《名古屋议定书》对中国的影响. 生物多样性, 21(6): 758-764.
[8] 徐靖, 蔡蕾, 王爱华, 薛达元, 杨庆文, 李俊生, 银森录. (2013) 全球多边惠益分享机制: 遗传资源获取和惠益分享谈判的新焦点. 生物多样性, 21(1): 127-131.
[9] 徐靖, 李俊生, 薛达元. (2012) 《遗传资源获取与惠益分享的名古屋议定书》遵约机制的谈判进展与对策. 生物多样性, 20(6): 779-783.
[10] 成功, 王程, 薛达元. (2012) 国际政府间组织对传统知识议题的态度以及中国的对策建议. 生物多样性, 20(4): 505-511.
[11] 薛达元. (2011) 《名古屋议定书》的主要内容及其潜在影响. 生物多样性, 19(1): 113-119.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed