IUCN受威胁物种红色名录进展及应用
Progress and application of IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
Corresponding authors: * E-mail:xieyan@ioz.ac.cn
Received: 2022-08-3 Accepted: 2022-10-27
IUCN受威胁物种红色名录已经成为世界上最全面的关于全球动物、真菌和植物物种灭绝风险状况的信息来源, 是生物多样性健康的关键指标, 是促进生物多样性保护和决策的有力工具。本文全面介绍IUCN受威胁物种红色名录(简称IUCN红色名录)的发展以及应用状况, 积极推动其在中国的物种评估和广泛应用。总结了IUCN红色名录从依赖于评估专家的主观意志决定物种濒危等级的濒危物种红皮书(Red Data Book)到IUCN受威胁物种等级和标准(3.1版)的客观量化和所有门类使用统一标准的过程。该等级体系可囊括全球所有物种, 其中“受威胁”的3个等级——极危(CR)、濒危(EN)或易危(VU)需使用5个标准进行量化评估, 对评估规范有非常严格的要求。该等级和标准体系不仅适用于全球层面, 同样也适用于地区层面物种评估, 只是在具体物种种群如果和周边其他地区(国家)存在种群交流情况时, 评估结果要进行调整。迄今为止, 全球层面使用该等级体系和标准评估了14万多种(其中在中国有分布的物种10,846种), 100多个国家和地方制定了地区/国家层面的红色名录, 中国红色名录评估了5.5万多种。IUCN红色名录已广泛应用于评估生物多样性变化速度; 为保护规划提供决策信息; 支持履行国际公约、修订国家/地区重点保护物种名录和自然保护地管理等; 指导资源有效合理分配和宣传教育等。广泛应用过程中, 讨论主要集中在获取数据的方法改进上; 另外, 一方面有专家认为标准存在缺陷需要完善, 另一方面有呼吁维持标准的长期相对稳定, 以便进行跨时间、跨区域、跨物种门类的比较。本文提出来了中国红色名录的持续机制和应用建议, 包括建立中国红色名录委员会、建立中国红色名录专业网站、发展评估专家队伍、建立中国红色名录评估更新机制, 以及加强国际协作、促进全球和中国红色名录的应用和发展。
关键词:
Aim: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN Red List) has become the world’s most comprehensive information source on the global extinction risk status of animal, fungus and plant species, a critical indicator of the health of biodiversity and a powerful tool to catalyse action for biodiversity conservation and policy decision. The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively introduce the development and application of the IUCN Red List, to promote Chinese species assessment and wide application in China.
Review Results: (1) The history of the IUCN Red List. During the phase of Red Data Book of Endangered Species, it was largely dependent on individual experts’ personal judgement to make decisions on threatened categories. From 1991, the criteria gradually became quantified and unified for all taxon groups. Since IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1 published in 2001, the categories and criteria has been kept stable and become widely applied around the world. Until now, more than 140,000 species (among them, 10,846 species are distributed in China) have been evaluated at the global level, over 55,000 species evaluated at China country level, and over 100 countries/regions have developed their regional/national Red List.
(2) Global criteria and assessment. The category system covers all species in the world, among which, three categories regarded as “threatened”, i.e., Critical Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU), must be evaluated by the five set of criteria. The current global level assessment work is mainly completed by the IUCN Species Survival Committee (SSC) and its partners, and there are strict requirements for the assessment.
(3) National and regional criteria and applications. Compared with the global application, the category and criteria are applicable to regional applications, only the assessment results should be adjusted if the species population communicates with neighboring regions (or countries).
(4) Assessment status of China Red List. The first comprehensive assessment began in 2000 for 10,211 species, and the China Red List of Species was published in 2004. The second comprehensive assessment began in 2008, and the official release began in 2013. By the end of 2021, over 55,000 species assessments were completed, including all terrestrial vertebrates and higher plants, some marine fishes, invertebrates, and large fungi. Yunnan Province has issued the first provincial red list.
(5) Application of the Red List. The application of Red List continues to grow rapidly, both globally and in China. The Red List Index is used to measure biodiversity changes over time. The Red List is also applied for decision-making on species conservation priorities and key priority conservation areas, implementation of international conventions, formulating (revising) key protected species list of countries (regions) and protected area management and effective allocation of resources and public awareness raising.
(6) Major discussions on Red List application. Since the publication of the Categories and Criteria, major discussions are on the methodology of obtaining data. While a few experts believe that some criteria are flawed and need to be improved, and some others calls for maintaining a long-term relative stable of criteria for comparisons over time.
(7) Recommendations on sustainable mechanism and application in China. We recommend to establish China Red List Committee, develop a professional website for China Red List, build capacity of Red List assessors, establish mechanism for receiving and reviewing assessment reports, and strengthen international cooperation to promote application and development of global and China Red List.
Keywords:
本文引用格式
解焱 (2022)
Yan Xie (2022)
自1964年以来, 世界自然保护联盟(IUCN)的受威胁物种红色名录(Red List of Threatened Species)逐步演变成为全球动物、植物和真菌濒临绝灭危险状况最全面的信息来源。该名录中评估物种的等级和标准已经被广泛用于全球、国家和地区各类物种的受威胁状况评估, 以及物种保护和可持续利用相关的各个领域(IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022)。本文就IUCN红色名录在全球和在中国的应用现状进行了综述, 并提出了加强应用的建议。
1 发展历史
1963年IUCN物种生存委员会(Species Survival Commission, SSC)提出了编制濒危物种红皮书(Red Data Book)的计划, 1966年出版了兽类和鸟类两卷, 并创新性地采用了活页方式, 希望物种的信息和濒危级别采用不断更新的方式。随后出版了两栖爬行类、被子植物、淡水鱼类、无脊椎动物。20世纪70年代中期, 出现了第一本国家濒危物种红皮书(Fitter & Fitter, 1987)。中国依据IUCN的标准, 并根据国情作了一些变更, 主要是增加了“稀有” (Rare)和“国内绝迹” (Extirpated from China)这两个等级, 相继出版了《中国植物红皮书》 (傅立国, 1991)包含388个种,《中国濒危动物红皮书》1-4卷(乐佩琦和陈宜瑜, 1998; 汪松, 1998; 赵尔宓, 1998; 郑光美和王岐山, 1998), 包括兽类、鸟类、两栖爬行类和鱼类400种。
初期红皮书中物种的评估只有定性标准, 没有定量标准, 主观性较强。Mace和Lande (1991)首次提出了量化标准, 建议了3个受威胁等级, 并与一定时间段内濒临灭绝的几率相对应——极危(Critically Endangered, CR)对应的灭绝几率为50%, 濒危(Endangered, EN) 20%, 易危(Vulnerable, VU) 10%, 根据这一量化原则, 逐步形成了目前广泛应用的量化评估标准(附录1)。Mace等(1992)为使量化的标准适用于所有的生物门类, 引入了未受威胁等级。1994年12月, IUCN理事会采用了IUCN (1994)出版的版本2.3, 并基于此版本编制了《1996 IUCN受威胁动物红色名录》(1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals) (Baillie & Groombridge, 1996)和《世界受威胁树木名录》(The World List of Threatened Trees) (Oldfield et al, 1998)。SSC/IUCN成立了标准修订工作组进行持续修订, 2000年2月IUCN理事会通过了等级和标准版本3.1 (IUCN, 2012b)。
2001年,《IUCN红色名录等级和标准: 版本3.1》(IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1)出版(IUCN, 2001), 考虑到物种绝灭风险评估必须保持稳定, 以便比较红色名录状态随时间的变化, 因此将其基本作为短时期内相对固定的版本, (IUCN, 2012b)。2012年出版了该版本的第二次修订版本(以下简称《等级和标准》), 第二版保留了与2001年第一版中相同的评估系统。为了满足支持评估结果的信息偶尔需要发生变化, 原来在第一版附件3中列出的信息被移至一个单独的参考文件中《IUCN红色名录评估和物种详述文件标准和一致性检查》(Documentation Standards and Consistency Checks for IUCN Red List Assessments and Species Accounts) (IUCN, 2012b)。
自2001年起,《等级和标准》一直被用作《IUCN受威胁物种红色名录》(The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM) (以下简称《IUCN红色名录》)上全球红色名录评估的标准。同时, 与《地区和国家水平红色名录标准应用指南》(Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels) (IUCN, 2003, 2012a) (以下简称《地区应用指南》)一起, 被世界上100多个国家用作国家红色名录评估的标准(IUCN, 2022a)。同时IUCN编制并不断更新《IUCN物种红色名录等级和标准使用指南》(Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria) (以下简称《使用指南》), 2022年1月出版了版本15 (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022)。《等级和标准》《地区应用指南》《使用指南》, 构成了红色名录评估最重要的3个文件。
2022年7月22日, 在IUCN红色名录官方网站首页上显示的数据(IUCN, 2022a)为:《IUCN红色名录》(只包括全球层面评估的物种)已经包含了147,517个物种(在中国有分布的物种10,846种), 其中脊椎动物被评估物种数占已知物种数比例最高, 达到77%, 鸟类和哺乳类比例分别达到100%和91%。但其他类群评估较低, 例如植物只达到14%, 而无脊椎动物只有2%。在评估的物种中超过41,000种面临绝灭威胁, 约占总评估数量的28%, 包括: 41%的两栖类, 37%的鲨鱼和魟, 34%的针叶树, 33%的造礁石珊瑚, 26%的兽类、13%的鸟类、21%的爬行类和69%的苏铁类。
除了新评估物种外, 还会重新评估过去已经评估过的物种状况。有的物种由于保护努力, 受威胁程度降低而被降级。例如我国的大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)从濒危降为易危、朱鹮(Nipponia nippon)从极危降为濒危、藏羚羊(Pantholops hodgsonii)从濒危降为易危, 这表明它们的生存状况得到了改善(IUCN, 2022a)。也有许多物种因为面临更大的威胁而被升级, 如黄胸鹀(Emberiza aureola)从1988年经过了9次评估, 受威胁等级也从1988、1994、2000年的低危/无危(Low Risk/Least Concern, LR/LC) (2.3版本), 提升到2004年的近危(Near Threatened, NT), 2008、2012年的易危, 2013、2016、2017年的濒危, 升至2017年10月最近一次评估的极危(IUCN, 2022a)。其中每一次评估的详细信息都可查询, 每一次调整理由都做了解释。物种受威胁等级随时间的改变情况被用于测算红色名录指数(Red List Index, RLI), 以指示一个类群或者一个区域物种的受威胁变化趋势(IUCN, 2022a)。
2 全球标准和评估
2.1 《等级和标准》简介
《等级和标准》的受威胁物种等级体系包括了完整的序列(图1), 除了我们通常比较了解的与绝灭风险有关的等级之外, 还包括数据缺乏(Data Deficient, DD)、无危(Least Concern, LC)、未予评估(Not Evaluated, NE)等级(IUCN, 2012b; IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022), 因此, 《IUCN红色名录》不只包括受威胁物种。《地区应用指南》中考虑了在地区或国家层面涉及的等级, 包括图1中“地区绝灭” (Regionally Extinct, RE)和“不宜评估” (Not Applicable, NA)两个等级(IUCN, 2012a)。在中国的评估中的“地区绝灭” (RE)是指在中国范围内已经绝灭, 但在世界其他地方还有自然生长的物种; “不宜评估” (NA)包括了那些在中国处于分布边缘, 且数据缺乏, 不适合在目前状况下评估的物种(汪松和解焱, 2004)。这意味着, 未来地球上任何一个物种都有机会被评估为图1中的某一个等级,《IUCN红色名录》将包括人类发现的所有物种(IUCN, 2022a)。
图1
其中的关键部分, 也是评估中的难点是“受威胁”的3个等级——极危、濒危和易危。《等级和标准》针对这3个等级, 从5个方面列出了量化标准(附录1), 包括A. 种群大小的降低(reduction in population size), B. 地理范围(geographic range), C. 小种群的大小(衰退) (small population size (decline)), D. 小种群大小(或分布范围小) (small population size (or restricted range)), E. 数量化分析(quantitative analysis) (IUCN, 2012b)。每一个分类单元都必须经过所有标准的评估, 只要符合其中任何一条标准, 即可将该分类单元列入相应水平的受威胁等级(IUCN, 2012b)。根据IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2022)的说明, 标准(A-E)的选择经过了广泛评估, 适用于确定各类不同生物及其多元化生活史中所面临的威胁因素。与各受威胁等级有关的标准量化数值是经过广泛协商制定的, 即使这些数值没有被给出正式的理由, 但一般认为它们是被确定在适当的水平。各等级的不同标准是独立设置的, 但遵循共同的标准, 《等级和标准》的制定和完善一直在寻求广泛的一致性。正是这些原因使得《等级和标准》不但能够适用于评估差异极大的物种门类, 例如适用于大型脊椎动物, 也同样适用于植物、无脊椎动物和真菌, 而且评估结果具有兼容性, 可进行不同门类受威胁严重程度的对比。《等级和标准》实现了以下目标(IUCN, 2012b): (1)为不同国家或地区的人们提供可以统一使用的体系; (2)通过使用清晰明确的量化标准, 更加客观地评估导致物种濒临绝灭危险的作用因素; (3)提供一个便于差异极大的物种或类群间进行比较的新体系; (4)使受威胁物种名录的使用者更好地理解各物种分级的理由。
2.2 评估质量控制
《IUCN红色名录》是使用《等级和标准》进行绝灭风险评估的分类单元(taxa)的清单, 除了种之外, 还包括种以下的分类单元, 如亚种、亚种群、品种、变种等。为了保障《IUCN红色名录》的质量, 全球层面的评估工作采取了以下评估质量控制措施: 全球层面评估主要由SSC/IUCN与合作伙伴完成。SSC/IUCN是一个由来自全球, 超过1万名专家组成的网络, 这些专家分成160多个专家组(specialist group)、红色名录权威机构(red list authorities)和特别工作组(task forces)。IUCN红色名录上的大多数评估都是由IUCN主导的评估项目中指定的成员或专家开展的, 但评估实际上可以由任何拥有对相关物种足够了解的人进行, 评估结果提交给IUCN红色名录权威机构和相关门类负责评估的专家参考, 并最终决定是否采纳。
地区评估和国家评估的质量把关在各个地区和国家。不是IUCN主导的地区评估和国家评估不会纳入到《IUCN红色名录》网站(iucnredlist.org)中, 仅分布在一个国家的特有物种可以被视为全球性评估(IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022)。
所有的评估还必须包括支持评估结果的信息,《应用指南》中包括了详细支持性信息要求。一般包括总结为什么该分类单元被列在具体等级的原因; 按照标准格式描述其栖息地、威胁因素等信息, 并需要提供一张分布图(IUCN, 2012b; IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022)。IUCN物种信息服务(IUCN Species Information Service, SIS)用于存储和管理物种信息和评估, 也大大提高了信息的准确性, SSC专家组、红色名录权威机构、红色名录伙伴或IUCN主导的评估项目都需要使用SIS进行提交, 并经过质量检查, 修改合格后, 再进行发布。其他专家的评估可通过指南要求的格式, 使用电子文件进行提交。SSC下设立的红色名录权威机构负责确保纳入《IUCN红色名录》的所有物种都是按照《等级和标准》进行了正确的评估(IUCN, 2022b)。
3 国家和地区标准和应用
图1呈现了适用于地区应用的IUCN红色名录受威胁等级体系, 与全球层面相比较, 地区应用的等级体系增加了“地区绝灭”和“不宜评估”两个级别(汪松和解焱, 2004; IUCN, 2012a)。《等级和标准》中关于“受威胁”的3个等级——极危、濒危或易危的5个量化评估标准(附录1), 同样适用于地区应用。根据《地区应用指南》(IUCN, 2012a), 如果要评估的区域种群与该区域以外的同种种群是隔离的, 则可在该地理区域内不做任何改变地使用《等级和标准》; 但是如果要评估的区域种群, 与接壤的区域之间存在个体交流, 区域评估工作需增加考虑邻近地区同一分类单元的种群对区域种群的影响, 参照《地区应用指南》提供的方法进行调整。评估的区域越小, 物种存在种群之间交流的问题越严重, 对物种绝灭风险的评估会变得越不可靠。因此, 建议面积较小的国家可以与周边国家一起编制区域红色名录(IUCN, 2012a)。
全球性的受威胁等级不一定与其地区或国家的等级一样。例如, 在全球被定为无危的分类单元, 在某个特定区域, 由于其数量很少或正在衰退, 或许仅仅因为它们处于全球分布区的边缘, 数量稀少, 可能被划为极危。反之亦然。因此,《地区应用指南》建议地区(国家)红色名录出版物中包括以下3个方面的信息: (1)区域红色名录等级, (2)全球红色名录等级, (3)估计该区域种群占全球种群的比例(%)。
迄今为止, 已有超过26个地区(包括多个国家)、113个国家和45个地区制定了红色名录。过去这些文件都分散在各国的大学图书馆、政府环境部门, 未能充分发挥作用。而且世界各地从事相关工作的许多专家也几乎没有机会交流知识和经验(IUCN, 2022a)。因此, 2003年, SSC成立了国家红色名录工作组(National Red List Working Group, NRLWG)收集国家编制经验, 建立网站, 促进经验的分享(
4 中国红色名录评估状况
2008年, 环境保护部联合中国科学院启动了中国生物多样性红色名录的编制工作。中国生物多样性红色名录: 高等植物卷、中国生物多样性红色名录: 脊椎动物卷、中国生物多样性红色名录: 大型真菌卷分别于2013年9月、2015年5月、2018年5月正式对外发布(臧春鑫等, 2016; 姚一建, 2020), 评估了高等植物34,450种(覃海宁等, 2017), 脊椎动物(不含海洋鱼类) 4,357种, 大型真菌9,302种。随后陆续开展了一些新的评估和部分门类的重评估, 截至2021年底, 中国完成了超过5.5万物种评估(表1), 包括全部的陆生脊椎动物和高等植物, 部分鱼类、无脊椎动物、大型真菌。这是继南非之后首个在国家层面全部完成所有野生高等植物的评估(覃海宁等, 2017a)。2021年科学出版社出版了《中国生物多样性红色名录·脊椎动物》, 包括哺乳动物(第一卷, 蒋志刚, 2021)、鸟类(第二卷, 张雁云和郑光美, 2021)、爬行动物(第三卷, 王跃昭, 2021)、两栖类(第四卷, 江建平等, 2021)、淡水鱼类(第五卷, 张鹗和曹文宣, 2021), 合计4,686种(表1)。
表1 中国红色名录的评估现状
Table 1
物种大类 Large group | 物种门类 Taxon | 评估数量 Number assessed | 受威胁比例 Proportion of threatened species (%) | 参考文献 Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
脊椎动物(不含海洋鱼类) Vertebrates (excluding marine fishes) | 淡水鱼类 Freshwater fish | 1,591 | 22.5 | 2021 |
两栖类 Amphibian | 全部475种 475 (all species) | 37.05 | 2021 | |
爬行类 Reptilia | 全部475种 475 (all) | 30.53 | 2021 | |
鸟类 Aves | 全部1,445种 1,445 (all) | 9.97 | 2021 | |
哺乳类 Mammalia | 全部700种 700 (all) | 25.86 | 2021 | |
合计 Total | 4,686 | |||
海洋鱼类 Marine fishes | 盲鳗纲 Myxini | 全部9种 9 (all) | 100 | 2004 |
软骨鱼纲、硬骨鱼纲 Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes | 部分受威胁程度较高的物种, 合计539种 Partial species highly threatened, totaling 539 | 84 | ||
无脊椎动物 Invertebrate | 淡水水母目 Limnomedusae | 全部9种 9 (all) | 55.6 | |
造礁石珊瑚 Scleractinia | 全部260种 260 (all) | 100 | ||
蝶类 Butterflies | 全部1,224种 1,224 (all) | 12.8 | ||
肠鳃动物门 Enteropneusta | 全部6种 6 (all) | 50 | ||
腹足纲、双壳纲、十足目、剑尾目、蛛形纲、昆虫纲、海参纲 Gastropoda, Bivalvia, Decapoda, Xiphosura, Arachnida, Insecta and Holothuroidea | 部分934种 934 (partial) | - | ||
合计 Total | 2,435 | 34.74 | ||
高等植物(全部) Higher plant (all) | 被子植物 Angiospermae | 30,068 | 11.18 | 2017b |
裸子植物 Gymnospermae | 274种及种下分类单元 274 species and lower taxa | 50.7 | 2021 | |
石松类和蕨类植物 Lycophytes and Pteridophyta | 2,244 | 8.11 | 2017 | |
苔藓植物 Bryophyte | 3,221 | 5.77 | 2017 | |
合计 Total | 35,784 | 10.84 | 2017b | |
大型真菌Macrofungi | 大型担子菌 Macro-basidiomycetes | 6,268 | 0.72 | 2020 |
地衣类 Lichens | 2,145 | 1.31 | 2020 | |
非地衣型大型子囊菌 Non-lichenized macro-ascomycetes | 870 | 2.76 | 2020 | |
合计 Total | 9,302 | 1.04 | 2020 |
2017年5月22日, 云南省生态环境厅、中国科学院昆明植物研究所和中国科学院昆明动物研究所联合发布了《云南省生物物种红色名录(2017版)》, 这是我国发布的首个省级生物物种红色名录, 总计评估了11个类群的25,451个物种, 其中大型真菌和地衣分别为2,759种和1,067种, 高等植物19,333种(苔藓植物1,912种、蕨类植物1,363种、裸子植物115种、被子植物15,943种), 脊椎动物2,285种(鱼类619种、两栖类190种、爬行类211种、鸟类949种、哺乳类316种) (蒋志刚和马克平, 2017)。
5 红色名录的应用
5.1 评估生物多样性丧失或者恢复的速度
RLI首先被IUCN应用于全球层面的评估数据, 附录2呈现了1980-2020年间兽类、鸟类、两栖类、造礁石珊瑚和苏铁的RLI变化情况, 表明了全球这些主要门类状况在持续下降, 其中珊瑚物种趋于灭绝的速度最快, 两栖类总体而言是面临威胁最严重的类群。
除了跟踪全球趋势外, 还可以将RLI进行分类, 以显示不同生物地理区域、国家、生态系统、栖息地、一些物种门类以及与各类国际公约和条约相关的物种的趋势(Butchart et al, 2007)。
在物种门类方面, Pacoureau等(2021)使用地球生命指数(Living Planet Index) (衡量了18种海洋鲨鱼和鳐鱼的57个丰度-时间序列数据集的丰度变化)和RLI (衡量了所有31种海洋鲨鱼和鳐鱼的灭绝风险变化的指标)发现, 自1970年以来, 由于相对捕鱼压力(relative fishing pressure)增加了18倍, 全球海洋鲨鱼和鳐鱼的丰度下降了71%。传粉鸟类和哺乳动物的RLI显示, 传粉鸟类和兽类物种状况正在恶化, 走向灭绝的物种比远离灭绝的物种更多。近几十年来, 平均每年有2.5个物种走向灭绝, 表明这些类群灭绝风险大幅增加, 可能影响到这些物种给人类提供的效益(Regan et al, 2015)。
RLI不仅用于具体物种类群, 也可用于某一区域内的所有物种或某些门类物种。RLI已经被一些国家使用, 来跟踪其减少生物多样性丧失的成效(IUCN, 2022a), 也成为一些国家编制生物多样性公约履约成效的重要指数(Brooks et al, 2015; McCay & Lacher, 2021)。Juslén等(2016)对芬兰12个类群2000年和2010年评估中包括了10,131个物种生境信息, 采用RLI进行了生境变化的评估结果显示: 除森林和农村生物群落外, 所有按生境分组物种的RLI变化均呈下降趋势; 甲虫和蝽象在农村和森林栖息地呈上升趋势, 其他16个物种类群和生境组合的观测趋势均为负值。Tolley等(2019)测算了南非爬行动物1990年和2018年的红色名录指数, 2018年的RLI略低于1990年, 特有爬行动物的下降比所有爬行动物的总和更明显, 同时发现许多受威胁的爬行动物并未受到保护或者受到很少的保护, 说明目前保护地网络范围并不能充分降低爬行动物灭绝的风险; 另外, 南非自然保护地扩展计划扩展的区域并不会覆盖更多受到威胁物种。Saiz等(2015)使用2000年和2010年的西班牙红色名录评估了加那利群岛、巴利阿里群岛和西班牙半岛的国家范围和地方范围内维管束植物受威胁水平的变化, 发现768个物种的等级发生了变化(占西班牙植物区系的10%), 主要是因为了解的信息增加(63%)、IUCN标准的修改(14%)和受威胁状态的变化(12%)。在此期间, 所有的国家和地方RLI值都有所下降, 表明西班牙维管束植物的保护状况普遍下降。
RLI可以用来显示保护行动的成效。Bolam等(2021)发现, 自1993年以来, 保护行动阻止了21-32种鸟类和7-16种哺乳动物的灭绝, 自2010年以来, 阻止了9-18种鸟类和2-7种哺乳动物的灭绝。但许多物种仍然受到高度威胁, 而且可能仍会灭绝。考虑到自1993年以来已有10种鸟类和5种哺乳动物灭绝(或被强烈怀疑灭绝), 如果不采取保护行动, 灭绝率将会高出2.9-4.2倍。Young等(2014)研究了使用RLI作为达雷尔野生动物保护信托基金(Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust)保护影响的一个指标的可行性。在17个目标两栖动物、鸟类和哺乳动物物种中, 有8个种由于保护而改善了红色名录等级(降低了灭绝风险)。保护行动让1988-2012年间RLI上涨了67%, 如果1988年取消保护, RLI则会下降23%。
使用“Red List Index”为主题词检索在Web of Sciences获得105篇相关英文文献, 涉及中国的2篇。用“红色名录指数”在中国知网检索, 获得5篇相关中文文章。这说明中国还未能广泛应用RLI来衡量生物多样性变化情况, 主要原因可能是过去缺乏系统的生物多样性监测和评估数据。但崔鹏等(2014)发现1996-2008年兽类的RLI下降; 1998-2004年, 淡水鱼类的RLI下降; 1988-2012年鸟类整体上受威胁程度虽在加剧, 但部分高濒危物种的保护状况一定程度上得到改善。因此, 应用RLI对中国的门类或区域进行生物多样性变化状况评估是值得关注的一个领域。
5.2 为保护规划提供信息
《IUCN红色名录》物种评估结果已经广泛用于确定国家、地区、保护地内物种的多样性的重要性和受威胁程度。世界各国都在已有的各类物种名录中, 加注全球或者国家或者任何地理区域的红色名录的受威胁等级。本文使用中国知网搜索的638篇中文文献中, 70%以上文献都在各类地理范围名录(全国某些门类的名录、省级某些门类的名录、自然保护地的物种(调查)名录、流域的物种名录、馆藏名录等)中加入了IUCN红色名录、中国红色名录受威胁等级。在新种描述时会使用《等级和标准》进行评估。
IUCN和地区红色名录已被越来越广泛地用于保护规划, 用以确定关键生物多样性区域(Key Biodiversity Areas, KBAs), 包括重要鸟区(Important Bird Areas, IBAs)、重要植物区(Important Plant Areas)、零灭绝联盟(Alliance for Zero Extinction, AZE)的地点(IUCN, 2022a)、半球计划实施方式(Pimm et al, 2018)、评估保护网络成效和保护空缺(Li & Pimm, 2016)、确定保护威胁分布热点和开展保护规划(Harfoot et al, 2021)。2005年成立的AZE陆续发布和更新了被《IUCN红色名录》评估为濒危或极危物种中在全球仅剩最后一个分布点的物种清单, 确定了853个包含1个或多个AZE物种的地点(Alliance for Zero Extinction, 2022)。经过AZE成员(相关国家政府、科研院所和民间组织以及国际组织)的共同努力, 到2018年, 总共有360种(2005年列入的AZE物种), 不再符合列入标准(占2005年清单的45%)。这包括因为分布或分类信息的增加(83%), 良好保护导致物种被降到更低受威胁等级(12%), 物种范围扩张, 不再局限于单一位点(4%), 或由于生存状况恶化而灭绝(1%) (Luther et al, 2021)。基于IUCN红色名录中1,428种淡水软体动物的空间信息分析, Böhm等(2021)发现淡水软体动物物种空间丰富度模式和其他淡水类群(除了小龙虾外)非常不同, 找到了新的保护优先区域。
我国也广泛使用红色名录信息分析确定优先保护区域或优先保护行动, 为保护规划提供信息。解焱等(2009)撰写的《中国生物多样性地理图集》, 使用《中国物种红色名录》(汪松和解焱, 2004)信息对全国各门类受威胁物种空间格局进行了全面的分析。2006年“中国生多样性保护远景规划项目”筛选了国家重要的保护对象(物种、群落和生态系统)并对其分布和状态进行分析(中华人民共和国环境保护部, 2010; Wu et al, 2011; 李俊生等, 2016)。覃海宁等(2017b)使用中国红色名录评估数据进行空间分析, 发现我国受威胁被子植物主要集中分布在西南地区以及台湾、海南等岛屿, 且主要分布在中低海拔地区; 生境丧失及破碎化是我国被子植物濒危的首要因子, 涉及约84.1%的受威胁物种; 其次是过度采挖, 涉及38%的物种。蔡波等(2016)使用中国红色名录评估数据分析发现, 长江以南的华南和西南地区受威胁的爬行类物种最多; 受威胁因素主要包括栖息地质量退化及生境破碎化、过度利用及污染和气候变化等。周大庆等(2016)结合红色名录评估结果, 对3,632种脊椎动物的就地保护状况进行评估。结果表明虽然有94.66%的脊椎动物在自然保护区内得到不同程度的保护, 但保护状况良好的比例明显偏低, 多数物种的保护状况堪忧。
另外, 红色名录可以为环境影响评估提供信息, 用于告知决策者实施拟议项目可能造成的环境后果。例如, 综合生物多样性评估工具(Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool, IBAT)使用红色名录信息, 为商业和保护部门提供决策信息。关于栖息地和对物种的威胁的大量信息也被用于生物多样性管理和保护地恢复规划过程(IUCN, 2022a)。
5.3 为国际政策、公约和国家法规政策提供信息
《IUCN红色名录》为多个相关多边环境协定提供信息, 包括为《濒危野生动植物种国际贸易公约》(The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, CITES)和《保护野生动物迁徙物种公约》(Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals, CMS)更新纳入管理的物种附录提供信息; 用于监测《生物多样性公约》(Convention on Biological Diversity, CBD)全球及国家生物多样性战略计划所列目标的进展(Brooks et al, 2015; McCay & Lacher, 2021); 衡量联合国可持续发展目标(United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs), 特别是目标15, 实现进展; 有助于《关于特别是作为水禽栖息地的国际重要湿地公约》(Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat)的国际重要湿地、《保护世界文化和自然遗产公约》(Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, WHC)的自然(及混合)遗产地选点和评估等工作; 有助于发挥生物多样性和生态系统服务政府间科学政策平台(IPBES)的功能(IUCN, 2022a), 用于编制全球性报告,《全球生物多样性和生态系统服务评估报告》(The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services)使用红色名录测算, 提出全球有百万物种濒临灭绝风险, 全球物种灭绝在加速(IPBES, 2019)。
红色名录结果可用于帮助国家重点保护名录的更新。例如刘金等(2019)对中国水鸟选取种群大小、种群趋势、分布范围、《红色名录》《中国脊椎动物红色名录》、CITES附录等6个指标, 构建了物种保护优先性的指标体系, 对296种中国水鸟的保护优先性进行了评估和分析, 建议对中国47种水鸟的国家重点保护名录等级予以升级, 36种水鸟的保护等级维持不变, 将2种水鸟的保护等级予以降级。
5.4 用于宣传教育和影响保护资源分配
自2008年以来, 全球环境基金(Global Environment Facility, GEF)将《IUCN红色名录》信息纳入资源分配框架后, 涉及物种和生态保护的其他基金会和资助机构, 如关键生态系统伙伴基金(Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, CEPF); 拯救我们的物种(Save Our Species, SOS); 穆罕默德·本·扎耶德物种保护基金(Mohamed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund)等也使用IUCN红色名录指导其在保护方面的投资(IUCN, 2022a)。
6 《等级和标准》应用的主要讨论
《等级和标准》在各国和各门类广泛应用过程中, 一些专家进行了相关讨论, 这些讨论主要包括以下几个方面:
6.1 获取数据的创新方法探讨
6.1.1 数据缺乏可能导致受威胁状况被低估
许多研究认为数据缺乏物种的受威胁程度受到低估, 导致保护优先度降低, 但实际受威胁程度可能很高(Li et al, 2016; Borgelt et al, 2022)。Borgelt等(2022)发现, 85%的DD两栖动物很可能受到灭绝的威胁, 而哺乳动物和爬行动物中, 这个比例也超过一半。他们预测, 如果考虑DD物种受威胁比例, 南美洲生物多样性热点地区的物种受威胁比例可能会提高到20%, 这意味着当前的红色名录衍生的指数和优先级可能有偏差。González-del-Pliego等(2019)使用地理分布数据、系统发育推断的生态特征和两栖动物系统发育等信息估计, 在全球所有2,200个DD物种中, 有一半受到威胁, 这使得两栖动物受威胁物种的数量增加了50%, 其中500种可能处于濒危或极危, 3种可能已经灭绝。Liu等(2022)根据自1758年以来定名的5类脊椎动物的53,808个种的红色名录数据发现, 新描述物种的灭绝风险显著增加——1758-1767年间描述物种的受威胁物种比例为11.9%, 而2011-2020年间为30.0%。因此建议加大野外调查工作力度, 促进新物种的发现, 并立即对新描述的物种采取保护行动。
6.1.2 创新数据获取方法研究
许多研究人员寻找适合各自物种类群的方法来缓解数据缺乏的问题, 提出了多种创新方法获取数据, 对DD物种进行受威胁等级的评估。最常见的是根据物种的生物学特征、生态需求、栖息地状况、物种分布预测等信息建立模型进行分析。Walls和Dulvy (2020)建立了一个生态特征模型(最大体型、中位数深度和繁殖模式)来预测22种在大西洋东北区域和13种在地中海数据缺乏的鲨鱼和鳐鱼的保护状况, 发现地中海特有物种受到威胁的可能性是大西洋东北区域特有物种的3.8倍。大西洋东北区域有超过一半(55%, 22个中有12个)和地中海有三分之二(62%, 13个中8个)的数据缺乏物种预计将受到威胁。李熠等(2020a, b)针对大型真菌数据严重缺乏问题, 以冬虫夏草(Ophiocordyceps sinensis)为例, 提出利用物种分布模型对未来分布区变化进行预测, 在信息缺乏的大型真菌类红色名录评估中具有重要的应用潜力。其他创新方法还包括根据标本数量估测成熟个体数, 何强和贾渝(2017)对苔藓植物进行评估时, 将10年内发表的新分类群暂评为数据缺乏(DD)等级, 再根据馆藏标本份数估计栖息地物种成熟个体数。根据野外工作经验, 他们提出一份正常数量的标本可以代表标本采集地点平均存在50个成熟个体。
数据获取创新方法不仅用于帮助DD物种确定受威胁等级, 也为其他物种的受威胁等级调整提供数据。Ficetola等(2015)针对高分辨率分布数据缺乏或者只有很少的物种建立了演绎生境适宜性模型的情况, 测试了5,363个占有面积(area of occupancy)狭窄的两栖类物种, 准确率很高(94%), 同时提出其中61个森林物种的灭绝风险应当高于目前在红色名录评估的等级。Li等(2016)建议利用更高精度的遥感信息分析获得更加精准的栖息地信息来帮助评估, 包括1)一个物种的分布范围有多少是在其已知适宜生存的海拔范围内, 2)针对森林物种, 其分布范围有多少仍有森林覆盖, 和3)其分布范围有多少在自然保护地范围内。这些数据将能够帮助定量分析一个物种灭绝的风险。Ocampo-Peñuela等(2016)使用海拔、森林覆盖对IUCN红色名录中586种特有和受威胁森林鸟类的分布范围进行精细化后, 发现210种鸟类的濒危等级提升了, 其中189种目前被定为“未受威胁”。多位研究人员提出应当考虑物种对气候变化的脆弱性, 预测气候变化对物种的影响后进行评估, 王文婷等(2021)认为被《中国物种红色名录》(汪松和解焱, 2004)评估为无危的菊叶红景天(Rhodiola chrysanthemifolia)的气候变化脆弱性反而大于被评估为濒危的大花红景天(R. crenulata)。
6.2 建议对标准进行完善
在应用《等级和标准》时, 一些特殊门类的专家认为现有标准不能适用于其研究的门类, 建议对标准进行一些修改, 修改的主要建议是增加用于评估的信息内容, 以提高评估的准确性。Brooks等(2019)建议使用物种的分布范围、生境和高程等数据, 与陆地土地覆盖和高程数据集叠加, 绘制物种的栖息地面积(area of habitat, AOH), 也被称为适宜栖息地范围(extent of suitable habitat, ESH), 用于红色名录的评估和信息记录。AOH和《等级和标准》中用于评估物种灭绝风险的两个空间指标为分布范围(extent of occurrence, EOO)和占有面积(area of occupancy, AOO)不同。AOH可以指导保护, 例如, 评估自然保护地内物种栖息地的比例, 监测栖息地的丧失和碎片化。哈维斯等(2020)针对海龟的评估, 建议通过重新调整“红色名录”评估尺度规模, 将全球性和区域性层级均包括在内。Trull等(2018)建议在红色名录评估中考虑气候变化相关的生物学特征, 他们研究了IUCN红色名录中受气候变化威胁的两栖动物和鸟类的地理分布格局, 与全球物种丰富度地理格局以及使用特征选择的物种地理格局不一致。拥有某些特征, 如具有广泛温度耐受性的物种, 总是存在受气候变化威胁的可能性, 这表明在红色名录评估中存在违反直觉的因素。Bird等(2020)建议增加鸟类生活史和特征的关键数据, 他们根据首次繁殖年龄、最大寿命和成年成虫年存活率的模型值, 得出了所有物种的世代长度, 从1.42年到27.87年不等(中位数为2.99), 这与《等级和标准》标准A评估种群下降的三代时期为10年比较一致。然而, 在其他情况下, 对于整个科、属或单个物种, 世代长度对其估计的灭绝风险有重大影响, 导致长寿物种的灭绝风险高于短命物种。由于缺乏生命史数据, 一些物种的世代长度可能被低估了。
有些不同物种门类的评估专家认为自己研究的门类存在特殊性,《等级和标准》不能完全适用。Cardoso等(2012)指出红色名录评估存在类群偏颇, 对体型小、分布范围狭窄和扩散能力低的物种, 评估严重不足, 而这些物种占了地球生物的绝大多数, 特别是当地特有物种比例高。他们研究了《等级和标准》的每一条, 找到了无脊椎动物应用方面的缺陷, 解释了由于不适用和/或误导性阈值可能导致评估时被错误应用, 建议用一些更现实的替代方法应用现有标准, 建议在现有评估框架中增加新的标准, 帮助对无脊椎动物进行更全面和有效的评估。
也有研究认为在使用《等级和标准》得出的结果基础上, 再增加一些因素, 对评估结果进行适当调整。蒋志刚和罗振华(2012)提出了中国陆生脊椎动物濒危等级评估的理论框架, 建议依据物种特有性、生境需求、物种对生态系统的影响力、资源分布特点、生态时间尺度和进化时间尺度、世代繁殖对策类型以及人工养殖水平等因素, 在初步评定的物种濒危等级基础上进行升级或降级。赵阳等(2021)赞同这样的思路, 但是针对陆生脊椎动物设计的框架, 有些原则在洞穴鱼类的评价中应用的话会普遍高估洞穴鱼类的濒危等级。他们提出了在使用《等级和标准》标准B1评估后, 再结合受威胁因素和物种生活史特性, 对评估结果进行调整, 选择两种国家重点保护鱼类——小眼金线鲃(Sinocyclocheilus microphthalmus)和无眼金线鲃(S. anophthalmus)评估后发现, 小眼金线鲃评估等级为濒危, 无眼金线鲃为极危等级, 对比《IUCN红色名录》等评估结果, 濒危等级均上升。
6.3 建议维护《等级和标准》的一致性
反对频繁调整《等级和标准》的理由认为, 频繁调整评估标准, 容易导致不同门类、不同地区(国家)、不同时期的评估结果之间不兼容。例如Fox等(2019)利用英国对54种蝴蝶和431种大型蛾类的长期监测数据, 使用《等级和标准》的标准A (过去10年种群规模减少)显示了昆虫种群变化范围大, 对绝灭风险评估存在重大影响, 可能导致绝灭风险评估结果不准确。作者呼吁IUCN应为解决昆虫这类随时间种群变化大的情况提供解决方案。针对Fox等人的建议, Akçakaya等(2021)认为, 虽然昆虫种群随时间的变异性高, 但替代《等级和标准》的建议是不必要的, 将会造成全球评估结果的不一致; 持续应用标准化方法计算种群减少, 能够对无脊椎动物物种面临的绝灭风险进行稳定和客观的评估。
7 中国红色名录的持续机制和应用建议
中国物种红色名录在收集信息和评估方面迈出了重要的一步, 随着研究和监测工作的开展, 了解的信息会越来越丰富, 可以评估更多的物种。而且随着生境和社会环境的变化, 不久的将来, 许多物种的当前评估结果将会发生变化, 这些变化必须要及时反映到管理实践中。为此, 我们建议, 应建立中国红色名录的长期更新机制, 调动各门类物种专家的积极性, 长期开展中国物种受威胁状况评估和重评估工作, 将此项工作纳入到中国生物多样性的常规管理中, 为中国的生物多样性管理规划、法规建设和保护实践服务; 加强与国际接轨, 支持和加强全球评估和应用工作, 为全球生物多样性保护做出贡献。具体建议如下:
7.1 建立中国红色名录委员会
红色名录将长期处于动态评估和应用的过程中, IUCN认为红色名录上的评估在约10年的时间内就会过时(IUCN, 2012b), 2004年我国出版的《中国物种红色名录》, 到2013年时发现其中很多物种有了更多的信息, 或者生存状况发生改变(臧春鑫等, 2016), 这是正常的和必然的。《中国物种红色名录》《中国生物多样性红色名录》应当被视为中国红色名录评估工作中的不同阶段。我国现阶段已经评估了5.5万多个物种, 这些物种评估10年后同样应当进行重新评估, 一些物种生存状况变化太快则需要在更短时间内进行重新评估, 同时需要不断评估更多的物种。为此应当建立一个中国红色名录委员会(以下简称委员会), 下设秘书处。委员会委员和秘书处工作人员都应经过专业培训并参加过具体的红色名录评估工作。该委员会及秘书处的主要职责包括: (1)建立和维护“中国红色名录网站”, 为信息更新和查询提供权威平台; (2)定期/不定期发布中国红色名录报告。IUCN每4年发布一次报告, 总结过去4年的全面评估进展、最新的生物多样性状况趋势, 影响生物多样性的因素, 并提出相应的保护措施(IUCN, 2022b)。但是如果有较多或更新, 随时可以发布; (3)审查任何提交给平台的新的评估或者调整已有评估等级的申请; (4)组织专家开展新的评估; (5)组织对已有评估的重评估; (6)开展红色名录信息综合分析, 为国家或地区保护规划、国家和地区重点保护名录更新提供支持信息; (7)测算RLI, 分析生物多样性变化趋势, 为国家保护决策提供支持; (8)组织红色名录评估技术的培训; (9)开展红色名录应用的推广和宣传; (10)开展与IUCN红色名录或其他国家红色名录之间的交流与合作。
7.2 急需建立中国物种红色名录网站
早期红皮书采用活页装订, 就是考虑到红色名录中的物种将增加、受威胁等级和物种信息将不断更新(Fitter & Fitter, 1987), 印刷方式出版不仅速度慢、成本高、使用不方便, 且无法详细记录红色名录动态更新的历史记录, 因此, 应尽快参照IUCN红色名录网站(iucnredlist.org)的功能, 在目前已经完成的中国红色名录工作基础上, 把所有已经评估的物种的红色名录等级及相关支持信息上网, 成为公开、透明、动态的中国受威胁物种红色名录。委员会秘书处负责将通过审查的物种评估信息上网, 维护网站的正常工作及将重要信息材料上网。
同时该网站应与IUCN红色名录网站沟通合作, 融入全球红色名录评估的信息, 并随之及时更新, 未来还可融入周边国家或区域的红色名录评估信息, 促进跨国物种保护合作。
7.3 发展评估专家队伍
我国从事物种研究的专家队伍正在迅速扩大, 大量科研院所的研究人员和大专院校的教授讲师, 民间保护组织, 国家公园和自然保护区科研人员, 以及野生生物观赏爱好者(特别是观鸟爱好者), 都拥有大量物种的当地生存状况的知识和信息。SSC的160多个专家组是全球及地区红色名录评估工作的主力, 中国目前有300多位SSC成员, 并已建立了SSC中国植物专家组(2002年11月)和SSC中国物种专家委员会(2021年10月)。应鼓励大家参加IUCN红色名录网络培训(
7.4 建立中国红色名录评估更新机制
目前中国的红色名录评估大部分是生态环境部和中国科学院共同组织开展的, 实际上任何个人或单位都可以开展评估工作(IUCN, 2012b)。因此, 任何人如果发现一个物种的评估等级存在偏差或者因为获得了新的信息需要进行重新评估时, 或者未评估的类群或者发现新种时, 都可以按照相关要求进行重评估或者新评估, 评估报告须提交给委员会。经委员会审查、返回专家修改、修改版本核定通过后, 秘书处再对这些物种的评估报告进行更新或者增加列入到网站。评估结果发生调整的, 应详细记录历史评估情况。与全球评估相关的信息, 可通过SSC相关专家组, 或者通过委员会与IUCN红色名录权威机构进行沟通, 促进全球评估等级的更新。
考虑到《等级和标准》是在全球范围应用, 中国在做评估时应当严格遵循《使用指南》。过去大部分对《等级和标准》的修改建议, 应可纳入为获取更加准确的评估用信息的创新, 并未真正构成对标准的改变。如果确实需要对标准本身进行修改, 应当积极与IUCN红色名录权威机构进行交流和探讨, 要意识到最终纳入全球标准可能是一个漫长的过程; 或者通过中国委员会组织跨门类讨论, 形成中国统一标准和规范。不建议某个门类单独采用与《等级和标准》不一样的标准进行评估, 这可能导致评估结果无法与国际或其他门类兼容; 导致与过去的评估结果无法对比; 也可能导致对评估结果的误读, 因为普遍是按照《等级和标准》来理解评估结果的。
7.5 促进全球和中国红色名录在管理中的应用
在做保护优先性评估的时候, 红色名录是一个非常好的工具, 我们应当积极将全球和中国红色名录评估结果, 与国家对生物多样性相关的公约履约、规划、保护行动、战略环评和项目环评工作等紧密地结合在一起, 真正将生物多样性的信息纳入到地区的战略环评程序以及大型项目的环评之中, 将生物多样性指标成为一个重要的环评指标。红色名录等级信息也可以为国家重点保护名录更新提供重要信息。
不过同时需要意识到, 对于物种绝灭风险的评估, 濒危等级的数据并不能直接等同于保护优先性, 即并不是极危的物种就一定要采取重要的保护措施, 而无危的就不采取保护措施。保护的优先性要考虑非常多的其他因素, 包括物种分布因素、生物因素、社会因素、经济因素、执法效率因素等等(IUCN, 2012b)。因此, 将红色名录评估结果变成可以执行的国家或者省级重点保护名录之间, 需要建立新的标准和转化过程。
致谢
非常感谢李彬彬、汪松教授对本论文草稿提供了非常宝贵的意见。非常感谢审稿者提供的重要修改意见。
附录 Supplementary Material
附录1 IUCN红色名录濒危等级(极危、濒危、易危)评估的五个标准(A-E)汇总表
Appendix 1 Summary of the five criteria (A-E) used to evaluate if a taxon belongs in an IUCN Red List Threatened Category (Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable)
附录2 兽类、鸟类、两栖类、造礁石珊瑚和苏铁的红色名录指数
Appendix 2 The Red List Index (RLI) of species survival for mammals, birds, amphibians, reef-forming corals and cycads
参考文献
Calculating population reductions of invertebrate species for IUCN Red List assessments
DOI:10.1007/s10841-021-00303-0 URL [本文引用: 1]
1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals
Generation lengths of the world’s birds and their implications for extinction risk
DOI:10.1111/cobi.13486 URL [本文引用: 1]
The conservation status of the world’s freshwater molluscs
How many bird and mammal extinctions has recent conservation action prevented?
More than half of data deficient species predicted to be threatened by extinction
DOI:10.1038/s42003-022-03638-9
PMID:35927327
[本文引用: 3]
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is essential for practical and theoretical efforts to protect biodiversity. However, species classified as "Data Deficient" (DD) regularly mislead practitioners due to their uncertain extinction risk. Here we present machine learning-derived probabilities of being threatened by extinction for 7699 DD species, comprising 17% of the entire IUCN spatial datasets. Our predictions suggest that DD species as a group may in fact be more threatened than data-sufficient species. We found that 85% of DD amphibians are likely to be threatened by extinction, as well as more than half of DD species in many other taxonomic groups, such as mammals and reptiles. Consequently, our predictions indicate that, amongst others, the conservation relevance of biodiversity hotspots in South America may be boosted by up to 20% if DD species were acknowledged. The predicted probabilities for DD species are highly variable across taxa and regions, implying current Red List-derived indices and priorities may be biased.© 2022. The Author(s).
Harnessing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to track the Aichi Targets and Sustainable Development Goals
DOI:10.1080/14888386.2015.1075903 URL [本文引用: 3]
Measuring terrestrial area of habitat (AOH) and its utility for the IUCN red list
Improvements to the Red List index
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0000140
PMID:17206275
[本文引用: 3]
The Red List Index uses information from the IUCN Red List to track trends in the projected overall extinction risk of sets of species. It has been widely recognised as an important component of the suite of indicators needed to measure progress towards the international target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. However, further application of the RLI (to non-avian taxa in particular) has revealed some shortcomings in the original formula and approach: It performs inappropriately when a value of zero is reached; RLI values are affected by the frequency of assessments; and newly evaluated species may introduce bias. Here we propose a revision to the formula, and recommend how it should be applied in order to overcome these shortcomings. Two additional advantages of the revisions are that assessment errors are not propagated through time, and the overall level extinction risk can be determined as well as trends in this over time.
Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red list indices for birds
DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020383
PMID:15510230
[本文引用: 1]
The rapid destruction of the planet's biodiversity has prompted the nations of the world to set a target of achieving a significant reduction in the rate of loss of biodiversity by 2010. However, we do not yet have an adequate way of monitoring progress towards achieving this target. Here we present a method for producing indices based on the IUCN Red List to chart the overall threat status (projected relative extinction risk) of all the world's bird species from 1988 to 2004. Red List Indices (RLIs) are based on the number of species in each Red List category, and on the number changing categories between assessments as a result of genuine improvement or deterioration in status. The RLI for all bird species shows that their overall threat status has continued to deteriorate since 1988. Disaggregated indices show that deteriorations have occurred worldwide and in all major ecosystems, but with particularly steep declines in the indices for Indo-Malayan birds (driven by intensifying deforestation of the Sundaic lowlands) and for albatrosses and petrels (driven by incidental mortality in commercial longline fisheries). RLIs complement indicators based on species population trends and habitat extent for quantifying global trends in the status of biodiversity. Their main weaknesses are that the resolution of status changes is fairly coarse and that delays may occur before some status changes are detected. Their greatest strength is that they are based on information from nearly all species in a taxonomic group worldwide, rather than a potentially biased subset. At present, suitable data are only available for birds, but indices for other taxonomic groups are in development, as is a sampled index based on a stratified sample from all major taxonomic groups.
Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines
DOI:10.1126/science.1187512
PMID:20430971
[本文引用: 2]
In 2002, world leaders committed, through the Convention on Biological Diversity, to achieve a significant reduction in the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. We compiled 31 indicators to report on progress toward this target. Most indicators of the state of biodiversity (covering species' population trends, extinction risk, habitat extent and condition, and community composition) showed declines, with no significant recent reductions in rate, whereas indicators of pressures on biodiversity (including resource consumption, invasive alien species, nitrogen pollution, overexploitation, and climate change impacts) showed increases. Despite some local successes and increasing responses (including extent and biodiversity coverage of protected areas, sustainable forest management, policy responses to invasive alien species, and biodiversity-related aid), the rate of biodiversity loss does not appear to be slowing.
Exploring the status and causes of China’s threatened reptiles through the red list assessment
DOI:10.17520/biods.2015354
[本文引用: 1]
This study investigated the living status of reptile species in China. Based on surveys and revised IUCN criterion (Version 3.1), we evaluated the endangerment status and completed China’s Biodiversity Red List, Volume of Vertebrates. The reptiles assessed included 3 orders, 32 families, 133 genera and 461 species, in which Crocodylia contains 3 families, 3 genera and 3 species, Testudines contains 6 families, 18 genera and 34 species, Lacertilia in Squamata contains 10 families, 41 genera and 188 species, and Serpentes in Squamata contains 13 families, 71 genera and 236 species. The study identified 2 species as Regionally Extinction (RE), 34 species as Critically Endangered (CR), 37 species as Endangered (EN), 66 species as Vulnerable (VU), 78 species as Near Threatened (NT), 175 species were identified as of Least Concern (LC) and 69 species as Data Deficient (DD). The threatened species (including CR, EN and VU) in reptile taxa are listed as follows: Testudines contained 31 species, Lacertilia in Squamata contained 38 species, Serpentes in Squamata contained 67 species, and Crocodylia contained 1 species. In China, threatened reptiles totaled 137 species, which accounted for 29.72% of reptiles in China (461 species), which is higher than that of the global assessment of the 2014 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (13.61%). Of the 137 threatened species, Crocodylia and Testudines were the two most endangered groups (covering 100% and 91.18%, respectively), followed by Serpentes in Squamata with 28.39%, and Lacertilia in Squamata (20.21%) was the least endangered. There were 39 species of endemic reptiles in China identified as endangered, which were 27.27% and 28.47% of the total number of reptiles endemic to China (143) and endangered species (137), respectively. The most endangered species were distributed in the southwestern and southern regions of China. The main threats to species survival: habitat destruction and fragmentation, overuse and the heavy pollution, and climate change. Given the uniqueness and diversity of Chinese reptile fauna, the complexity of topography and geomorphology, and the imbalance of the development of social economy, we suggest that the whole society should act to protect endangered reptiles, especially endemic and critically endangered species, which is one of the most important tasks of biodiversity conservation in China.
通过红色名录评估探讨中国爬行动物受威胁现状及原因
DOI:10.17520/biods.2015354
[本文引用: 1]
为了评估中国爬行动物红色名录, 我们按照爬行动物生物学特性, 适当修改了IUCN濒危物种红色名录标准Version 3.1。在此基础上, 评估了中国爬行动物生存现状, 参与编制了《中国生物多样性红色名录——脊椎动物卷》。此次评估的中国爬行动物有3目32科133属461种, 结果为: 区域灭绝(RE) 2种、极危(CR) 34种、濒危(EN) 37种、易危(VU) 66种、近危(NT) 78种、无危(LC) 175种以及数据缺乏(DD) 69种。中国受威胁(包括极危、濒危、易危)的爬行动物共计137种, 约占总数的29.72%, 包括龟鳖目31种、有鳞目蛇亚目67种、蜥蜴亚目38种和鳄形目1种, 高于2014年《IUCN濒危物种红色名录》评估的世界爬行动物受威胁比例(13.61%)。在所有受威胁物种中, 受威胁比例最高的类群是鳄形目(100%)和龟鳖目(91.18%), 其次是有鳞目蛇亚目(28.39%), 第三是有鳞目蜥蜴亚目(20.21%)。中国爬行动物特有种受威胁物种有39种, 占特有种总数(143种)的27.27%, 占受威胁物种总数(137)的28.47%。长江以南的华南和西南地区受威胁的物种最多。爬行动物受人类干扰严重, 主要表现为: 栖息地质量退化及生境破碎化、过度利用及污染和气候变化等。尽管自1989年《中华人民共和国野生动物保护法》实施以来, 一些中国濒危爬行动物的生存状况得到改善。但鉴于中国爬行动物区系的独特性和多样性、地形地貌的复杂性及社会经济发展的不均衡性, 为了维持区域生态安全和资源可持续利用, 拯救中国濒危爬行动物, 尤其是中国特有爬行动物中的极危物种, 是中国动物保护工作最迫切的任务之一。
The underrepresentation and misrepresentation of invertebrates in the IUCN Red List
DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.011 URL [本文引用: 1]
Conservation and taxonomic updates for the Jamaican endemic genus Dendrocousinsia (Euphorbiaceae)
DOI:10.1007/s12228-014-9357-x URL [本文引用: 1]
Assessing the red list index for vertebrate species in China
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14085
[本文引用: 1]
The Red List Index (RLI) is widely recognized as the most authoritative and objective index for assessing the risk of extinction for species. Good results have been achieved in the application of RLI in assessment of the progress of United Nation’s Millennium Development Goals at global scale. In this paper, RLI was applied at national scale based on multi-source data from International Union for Conservation of Nature, BirdLife International, Red List Categories in China Red Data Book (1998) and China Species Red List (2004) to evaluate trends in the status of vertebrate species in China. RLI of amphibians and reptiles were not assessed because of a lack of data. From 1996 to 2008, the RLI of China's mammals decreased, so did that of China's freshwater fishes from 1998 to 2004. The RLI of birds calculated using Equal-steps method decreased slightly between 1988 and 2012; however, when RLI was calculated using Extinction-risk method, the index initially increased slightly and then turned downward. Due to habitat degradation and loss, the threat status of mammals and freshwater fishes has been increasing. Overall, the threat status of birds is increasing though there were some improvements in the status of critically endangered species. We suggest that more taxonomic groups should be assessed using Red List guidelines so that calculation of RLI is possible. And on the basis of RLI, governments and decision makers should make more effective conservation plans for endangered species.
中国脊椎动物红色名录指数评估
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.14085
[本文引用: 1]
红色名录指数(Red List Index, RLI)是评估物种濒危状况变化趋势的最有效指标, 已经被列为联合国千年发展目标的指标之一, 在全球尺度的应用取得了很好的效果。本研究基于多来源的中国脊椎动物濒危等级评估数据, 对兽类、鸟类、两栖类、爬行类和淡水鱼类的濒危状况变化趋势进行了评估。两栖类和爬行类由于在任意两个年度同时被评估的物种数量少, 不符合计算RLI的条件, 未进行指数计算。结果表明: 1996-2008年, 兽类的RLI下降; 1998-2004年, 淡水鱼类的RLI下降; 1988-2012年, 根据Equal-steps方法计算的鸟类RLI略有下降, 但根据Extinction-risk方法计算的RLI先略有上升又呈下降趋势, 总体呈下降趋势。总体看来, 3个类群的RLI变化幅度均较小, 兽类和淡水鱼类的受威胁程度在加剧; 鸟类整体上受威胁程度虽在加剧, 但部分高濒危物种的保护状况一定程度上得到改善。建议全面开展物种濒危状况评估工作, 并根据濒危等级变化制定有效的保护计划。
Red list assessment of lycophytes and ferns in China
To understand the extinction risk of lycophytes and ferns in China, we conducted an evaluation of the two groups according to IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (version 3.1) at the national level. During a period of 16 months, a group of three researchers evaluated each taxon by means of reading literature, checking herbarium specimens, and consulting colleagues working on lycophytes and ferns in China. A total of 30 colleagues share their knowledge, mainly regarding living status and distribution, on Chinese lycophytes and ferns. Here we present a preliminary red list of Chinese lycophytes and ferns which includes 2,244 taxa of the following categories: 43 Critically Endangered (CR, among which six have probably been already extinct), 68 Endangered (EN), 71 Vulnerable (VU), 66 Near Threatened (NT), 1,124 Least Concern (LC), and 872 Data Deficient (DD). The taxa which have been taken into account include species, subspecies, and varieties only, with forms and hybrids excluded. Of the 182 threatened species (VU, EN, and CR), 79 are endemic (or nearly) to China. Conservation priorities are suggested for the 79 threatened and endemic species, especially the 24 critically endangered species which include Adiantum meishanianum, A. nelumboides, Angiopteris chingii, Asplenium cornutissimum, Bolbitis hainanensis, Huperzia quasipolytrichoides var. rectifolia, Isoëtes orientalis, I. taiwanensis, I. yunguiensis, Paesia taiwanensis, Parathelypteris subimmersa, Polystichum basipinnatum, P. cavernicola, P. minutissimum, P. oblanceolatum, P. speluncicola, Pronephrium longipetiolatum, Pseudocyclosorus caudipinnus, Pteridrys lofouensis, Pteris angustipinna, Selliguea cruciformis, Tectaria ebenina, T. hekouensis, and Woodsia okamotoi. This red list is of a preliminary nature as a rather high proportion of taxa belong to DD (up to 872, ca. 39 % of total taxa in China). To gain a complete and precise red list, further evaluation work, especially taxonomic revisions based on field observations, is needed for the lycophytes and ferns in China. These include Angiopteris, Asplenium, Athyrium, Deparia, Dryopteris, Huperzia, Polystichum, Pteris, Selaginella, Polypodiaceae, and Thelypteridaceae which are still relatively poorly understood in terms of taxonomy and conservation.
中国石松类和蕨类植物的红色名录评估
为了解中国现存石松类和蕨类植物的灭绝风险, 我们按照IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Version 3.1)首次开展了国家水平上的红色名录评估。三人评估小组通过查阅文献、标本以及向其他30位中国蕨类同行征询物种信息等途径, 历经16个月的时间完成了此次评估。经统计, 中国目前所知的石松类和蕨类植物共计2,244种(包括亚种和变种, 但不包括变型和杂交种)。评估结果为: 极危(CR) 43种(其中6种可能已经灭绝)、濒危(EN) 68种、易危(VU) 71种、近危(NT) 66种、无危(LC) 1,124种、数据缺乏(DD) 872种。受威胁种类(包括VU、EN、CR)共计182种, 其中79种为中国特有或准特有种。特有而又极度濒危的植物有24种, 分别是梅山铁线蕨(Adiantum meishanianum)、荷叶铁线蕨(A. nelumboides)、秦氏莲座蕨(Angiopteris chingii)、壮乡铁角蕨(Asplenium cornutissimum)、海南实蕨(Bolbitis hainanensis)、直叶金发石杉(Huperzia quasipolytrichoides var. rectifolia)、东方水韭(Isoëtes orientalis)、台湾水韭(I. taiwanensis)、云贵水韭(I. yunguiensis)、台湾曲轴蕨(Paesia taiwanensis)、海南金星蕨(Parathelypteris subimmersa)、基羽鞭叶耳蕨(Polystichum basipinnatum)、洞生耳蕨(P. cavernicola)、微小耳蕨(P. minutissimum)、倒披针耳蕨(P. oblanceolatum)、岩穴耳蕨(P. speluncicola)、长柄新月蕨(Pronephrium longipetiolatum)、尾羽假毛蕨(Pseudocyclosorus caudipinnus)、罗浮牙蕨(Pteridrys lofouensis)、细叶凤尾蕨(Pteris angustipinna)、十字假瘤蕨(Selliguea cruciformis)、黑柄叉蕨(Tectaria ebenina)、河口叉蕨(T. hekouensis)和冈本氏岩蕨(Woodsia okamotoi), 它们应予以最优先保护。目前的红色名录只是一个初步评估结果, 若要得到一份更完整更准确的红色名录, 我们还需要做进一步的信息收集和评估工作, 特别要加强中国石松类和蕨类植物的分类学研究。今后评估工作中应重点关注的类群主要有莲座蕨属(Angiopteris)、铁角蕨属(Asplenium)、蹄盖蕨属(Athyrium)、对囊蕨属(Deparia)、鳞毛蕨属(Dryopteris)、石杉属(Huperzia)、耳蕨属(Polystichum)、凤尾蕨属(Pteris)、卷柏属(Selaginella)、水龙骨科(Polypodiaceae)和金星蕨科(Thelypteridaceae), 这些类群的物种分布与生存信息目前最为缺乏。
Habitat availability for amphibians and extinction threat: A global analysis
DOI:10.1111/ddi.12296 URL [本文引用: 1]
Insect population trends and the IUCN Red List process
DOI:10.1007/s10841-018-0117-1
[本文引用: 1]
Reliable assessment of extinction risk is a key factor in the preparation of Red Lists and in prioritizing biodiversity conservation. Temporal population trends can provide important evidence for such assessments, but imperfect sampling (observation errors) and short-term stochastic variation in population levels caused by environmental variability (process errors) can reduce the reliability of trends and lead to incorrect quantification of extinction risk. The assessment of insect taxa is likely to be particularly prone to these problems, due to the highly dynamic nature of many insect populations, driven by short life-cycles and sensitivity to environmental factors such as the weather. Using long-term United Kingdom monitoring data for 54 butterfly and 431 macro-moth species, we demonstrate the impact of insect population variability on the assessment of extinction risk using the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Criterion A (reduction in population size over the last 10years). For both taxa, varying the start year of the 10-year population trend had a substantial effect on whether particular species met Red List thresholds and on the overall number of species assessed as threatened. We conclude that for these insect taxa strict application of the 10-year rule produces Red List classifications that are unacceptably biased by the start year. Use of long-term trends with adjustment based on species performance over the last decade may offer a pragmatic solution to this problem. We call for further IUCN guidance for practitioners undertaking Red List assessments of taxa with populations that have high temporal variability.
The application of IUCN Red List criteria at regional levels
DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00112.x URL [本文引用: 1]
Phylogenetic and trait-based prediction of extinction risk for data-deficient amphibians
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.005 URL [本文引用: 1]
Using the IUCN Red List to map threats to terrestrial vertebrates at global scale
Science, scale and the frontier of governing mobile marine species
科学、尺度与治理移动性海洋物种的边疆
Assessing the threat status of China’s bryophytes
DOI:10.17520/biods.2016205 URL [本文引用: 1]
中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则和评估结果
DOI:10.17520/biods.2016205
[本文引用: 1]
本文阐述了中国苔藓植物濒危等级的评估原则。这一原则主要参考“IUCN物种红色名录濒危等级和标准(3.1版)”, 同时也吸收了其他苔藓学家的评估指南和结果。作者将10年内发表的新分类群暂评为数据缺乏(DD)等级, 根据馆藏标本份数估计栖息地物种成熟个体数。在此基础上, 对3,221个中国苔藓植物分类群进行评估, 结果为: 极危(CR) 16种; 濒危(EN) 58种; 易危(VU) 112种; 近危(NT) 214种; 无危(LC) 1,900种; 数据缺乏(DD) 921种。极危、濒危和易危等级的受威胁苔藓植物合计186种, 占中国苔藓植物种数的5.77%。
Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN Species Survival Commission
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission
Guidelines for Application of IUCN Criteria at Regional Levels, Version 3.0
Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels, Version 4.0
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1, 2nd edn
Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria
Significance of country red lists of endangered species for biodiversity conservation
DOI:10.17520/biods.2020149
[本文引用: 2]
Both the IUCN Red List of Endangered Species and country red lists of endangered species assess the risk of extinction of species, the former being a global assessment whereas the latter provides regional assessments. The IUCN Red List of Endangered Species alerts the world to the status of endangered species, and also serves as a database of global biodiversity. Country red lists, on the other hand, ascertain the status of species in particular countries, filling knowledge gaps in the former. The two lists are thus complementary to each other. However, insufficient attention has been paid to date to country red lists of endangered species. Country-level red lists should be given greater attention for at least the following reasons: (1) a sovereign country is the main authority for taking conservation action in regard to wildlife species within its boundaries based on the level of endangerment (conservation status) of the species; (2) for endemic species in a country, the country red list status constitutes its global status; (3) for species whose ranges cross national borders, the country’s red list status reflects the survival status of the species in the country; (4) combined with the IUCN global red list, the country red list provides a basis from which to consider the establishment of transnational protected areas, the protection of important habitats for migratory species, and the protection of international migration corridors; (5) the category of “Regional Extinction” is unique to country/regional red lists of endangered species, providing an indication of the danger of extinction of the species at the country level; and (6) country red lists of endangered species can provide updated information on the inventory, classification, distribution and status of species in the country. Yet, the importance of country red lists is often overlooked under many different circumstances. Following onset of the global COVID-19 pandemic, however, people’s outlook in China has been changing in regard to the relationship between humans and wildlife. Consequently, China will be amending national laws on wildlife protection, epidemic prevention, and the List of State Key Protected Wild Animal Species, in order to better prevent and control emerging zoonoses. The status of wildlife species included in the country red list of endangered species should be one of the defining elements for identifying and updating species on the List of State Key Protected Wild Animal Species in China. Thus, it is critical to recognize the significance of the country red list of endangered species at this special moment in time.
国家濒危物种红色名录的生物多样性保护意义
DOI:10.17520/biods.2020149
[本文引用: 2]
IUCN濒危物种红色名录与国家濒危物种红色名录都是物种灭绝风险的测度, 前者是全球性评估, 后者则是国别研究。IUCN濒危物种红色名录预警了全球物种的濒危状况, 为全球生物多样性研究提供了大数据; 国别红色名录确定了各国物种受威胁状况, 填补了前者的知识空缺, 两份名录互为补充。目前对国家濒危物种红色名录重视不够。基于如下原因, 应当重视国别濒危物种红色名录的意义: (1)国家是濒危物种保护的行为主体, 物种在一个国家的生存状况是确定其保护级别、开展濒危物种保育的依据; (2)对于仅分布于一个国家的特有物种来说, 其国别濒危物种红色名录等级即是其全球濒危等级; (3)对于跨国境分布的物种来说, 国别濒危物种红色名录等级则确定了该物种在本国的生存状况; (4)结合IUCN濒危物种红色名录, 国别濒危物种红色名录为建立跨国保护地、保护迁徙物种的栖息地与跨国迁徙洄游通道提供依据; (5)国别濒危物种红色名录所特有的“区域灭绝”等级, 反映了一个物种边缘种群在该国的区域灭绝, 恢复“区域灭绝”物种是该物种原分布国重引入保育工作的重点; (6)国别濒危物种红色名录提供了该国物种编目、分类、分布和生存状况的最新信息。然而, 国别濒危物种红色名录的重要性在许多情况下被忽视了。目前正值全球新冠肺炎大流行, 人们正在重新审视人与野生动物的关系。我国将修订有关野生动物保护与防疫法法律以及《国家重点保护野生动物名录》, 防控新的人与野生动物共患疾病再次暴发。对于确定国家重点保护野生动物物种名录来言, 物种受威胁程度是物种列为国家重点保护物种的特征之一。重视国别红色名录有特别的意义。
Assessing species endangerment status: Progress in research and an example from China
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.11145
[本文引用: 1]
It is an important task in biodiversity conservation to assess species endangerment status and determine protection priorities. Although IUCN Redlist Criteria are improving through periodical revision, people are still developing different criteria because information about population census, habitat status and life history of a given species are often lacking. We reviewed the progress of assessing species endangerment status, both internationally and domestically, and propose that future designations combine distribution area, life history, ecological function, anthropogenic interference and special use data to more accurately assess endangerment status. As an example, we assessed the status of terrestrial vertebrates in China using this method. Our results showed that five species were listed in the category of extinct, 30 species were extinct, 343 species were endangered, 459 species were threatened, 439 species were concerned, and 1,032 species were least concerned.
物种受威胁状况评估: 研究进展与中国的案例
DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.11145
[本文引用: 1]
评估物种濒危等级, 确定物种保护优先序, 是生物多样性保护的一项重要工作。通过不断的修订, IUCN红色名录濒危等级标准已经趋于完善。但是, 目前人们还在探索在无法获得物种的种群数量、生境、生活史数据时, 如何寻找替代指标评估物种濒危等级。我们综述了国内外物种濒危状况研究的进展, 提出了结合物种分布区、生活史、生态功能、人为干扰和特殊利用价值的评估物种受威胁状况的方法, 并以此方法评估了中国陆生脊椎动物的生存状况。结果表明, 列入灭绝级的物种有5个, 功能性灭绝级的物种有30个, 濒危级的物种有343个, 受胁级的物种有459个, 关注级的物种有439个, 无危级的物种有1,032个。
The state’s will, scientific decision and citizen participation: In memory of the first provincial species red list in China
DOI:10.17520/biods.2017198 URL [本文引用: 1]
中国生物多样性保护的国家意志、科学决策和公众参与: 第一份省域物种红色名录研究
DOI:10.17520/biods.2017198 [本文引用: 1]
Application of the Red List Index as an indicator of habitat change
DOI:10.1007/s10531-016-1075-0 URL [本文引用: 1]
Remotely sensed data informs red list evaluations and conservation priorities in Southeast Asia
China’s endemic vertebrates sheltering under the protective umbrella of the giant panda
DOI:10.1111/cobi.12618 URL [本文引用: 1]
Red list assessment of macrofungi in China: Challenges and measures
DOI:10.17520/biods.2019178 URL [本文引用: 1]
中国大型真菌红色名录评估中存在的问题及今后的对策
DOI:10.17520/biods.2019178
[本文引用: 1]
2018年5月22日国际生物多样性日, 生态环境部和中国科学院联合发布了“中国生物多样性红色名录——大型真菌卷”, 对9,302种大型真菌的受威胁现状进行了评估。根据大型真菌的生物学特性, 此次评估还对IUCN红色名录评估等级标准体系进行了适当调整。本文总结了评估过程中发现的问题: (1)部分物种的分类学地位存在争议, 缺少汉语学名; (2)大量物种的地理分布、种群数量及动态变化等信息缺乏; (3) IUCN的部分评估标准在大型真菌中难以使用; (4)物种的受威胁因素不明确, 缺乏科学定量的分析。针对以上问题, 我们建议: (1)加强真菌分类学研究, 按命名规范拟定物种的汉语学名; (2)加强大型真菌的资源调查, 对重要物种和多样性热点区域进行长期定点监测; (3)引入物种分布建模等定量分析方法, 完善IUCN的评估标准, 使之更适用于大型真菌的评估; (4)鼓励公众参与, 建立交流互动平台, 扩大红色名录工作的影响, 加强大型真菌多样性保护。
Incorporating species distribution model into the red list assessment and conservation of macrofungi: A case study with Ophiocordyceps sinensis
DOI:10.17520/biods.2019158 URL [本文引用: 2]
物种分布模型在大型真菌红色名录评估及保护中的应用: 以冬虫夏草为例
DOI:10.17520/biods.2019158
[本文引用: 2]
我国大型真菌资源丰富, 由于受气候变化和人类活动等的影响, 近年来很多物种受到不同程度的威胁, 亟待保护。红色名录评估是物种保护的第一步, 为有效保护我国大型真菌多样性, 2016年生态环境部和中国科学院联合启动中国大型真菌红色名录评估项目。合理的评估依赖于完善的物种地理分布、种群数量规模及其动态变化信息。大型真菌评估信息较少, 需要引入新的方法解决评估信息不足的问题。冬虫夏草(Ophiocordyceps sinensis)是一种重要的食药用菌, 具有较高的经济价值, 受到全世界的广泛关注, 评估信息相对充足, 此次被评为易危物种。利用物种分布模型对冬虫夏草未来分布区变化的预测在评估过程中发挥了重要作用。为了将物种分布模型分析方法引入大型真菌的受威胁等级评估, 本文以此前我们利用物种分布模型预测冬虫夏草的潜在分布区及其对气候变化响应的研究为例, 介绍了应用物种分布模型预测大型真菌的潜在分布区、未来气候变化情景下分布区变化趋势的方法和流程, 以及在应用中可能存在的问题和解决方案。通过本文的分析, 我们认为物种分布模型在大型真菌的红色名录评估和保护中具有重要的应用潜力, 值得推广应用。
Species diversity and suggestions for adjustment of the national protection level of waterbirds in China
中国水鸟的物种多样性及其国家重点保护等级调整的建议
Undescribed species have higher extinction risk than known species
Conservation actions benefit the most threatened species: A 13-year assessment of Alliance for Zero Extinction species
The development of new criteria for listing species on the IUCN Red List
Assessing extinction threats: Toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories
DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00119.x URL [本文引用: 1]
National level use of International Union for Conservation of Nature knowledge products in American National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans and National Reports to the Convention on Biological Diversity
Biodiversity Conservation Strategy and Action Plan of China (2011-2030)
中国生物多样性保护战略和行动计划(2011-2030)
https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bwj/201009/t20100921_194841.htm. (accessed on 2022-07-22)
Incorporating explicit geospatial data shows more species at risk of extinction than the current Red List
Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays
DOI:10.1038/s41586-020-03173-9 URL [本文引用: 1]
How to protect half of Earth to ensure it protects sufficient biodiversity
Seahorse Resources (Hippocampus spp.) in the Waters of Bintan Island, Lampung Bay and Tanakeke Island
Threatened Species List of China’s higher plants
DOI:10.17520/biods.2017144 URL [本文引用: 1]
中国高等植物受威胁物种名录
Evaluating the endangerment status of China’s angiosperms through the red list assessment
DOI:10.17520/biods.2017156 URL [本文引用: 2]
中国被子植物濒危等级的评估
Global trends in the status of bird and mammal pollinators
DOI:10.1111/conl.12162 URL [本文引用: 1]
Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants
DOI:10.1111/cobi.12437
PMID:25580521
[本文引用: 1]
The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List Index (RLI) is used to measure trends in extinction risk of species over time. The development of 2 red lists for Spanish vascular flora during the past decade allowed us to apply the IUCN RLI to vascular plants in an area belonging to a global biodiversity hotspot. We used the Spanish Red Lists from 2000 and 2010 to assess changes in level of threat at a national scale and at the subnational scales of Canary Islands, Balearic Islands, and peninsular Spain. We assigned retrospective IUCN categories of threat to 98 species included in the Spanish Red List of 2010 but absent in the Spanish Red List of 2000. In addition, we tested the effect of different random and taxonomic and spatial Spanish samples on the overall RLI value. From 2000 to 2010, the IUCN categories of 768 species changed (10% of Spanish flora), mainly due to improved knowledge (63%), modifications in IUCN criteria (14%), and changes in threat status (12%). All measured national and subnational RLI values decreased during this period, indicating a general decline in the conservation status of the Spanish vascular flora. The Canarian RLI value (0.84) was the lowest, although the fastest deterioration in conservation status occurred on peninsular Spain (from 0.93 in 2000 to 0.92 in 2010). The RLI values based on subsamples of the Spanish Red List were not representative of RLI values for the entire country, which would discourage the use of small areas or small taxonomic samples to assess general trends in the endangerment of national biotas. The role of the RLI in monitoring of changes in biodiversity at the global and regional scales needs further reassessment because additional areas and taxa are necessary to determine whether the index is sufficiently sensitive for use in assessing temporal changes in species' risk of extinction.© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.
No safe haven: Protection levels show imperilled South African reptiles not sufficiently safe-guarded despite low average extinction risk
DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.02.006 URL [本文引用: 1]
Patterns and biases of climate change threats in the IUCN Red List
DOI:10.1111/cobi.13022
PMID:28861903
[本文引用: 1]
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List assessments rely on published data and expert inputs, and biases can be introduced where underlying definitions and concepts are ambiguous. Consideration of climate change threat is no exception, and recently numerous approaches to assessing the threat of climate change to species have been developed. We explored IUCN Red List assessments of amphibians and birds to determine whether species listed as threatened by climate change display distinct patterns in terms of habitat occupied and additional nonclimatic threats faced. We compared IUCN Red List data with a published data set of species' biological and ecological traits believed to infer high vulnerability to climate change and determined whether distributions of climate change-threatened species on the IUCN Red List concur with those of climate change-threatened species identified with the trait-based approach and whether species possessing these traits are more likely to have climate change listed as a threat on the IUCN Red List. Species in some ecosystems (e.g., grassland, shrubland) and subject to particular threats (e.g., invasive species) were more likely to have climate change as a listed threat. Geographical patterns of climate change-threatened amphibians and birds on the IUCN Red List were incongruent with patterns of global species richness and patterns identified using trait-based approaches. Certain traits were linked to increases or decreases in the likelihood of a species being threatened by climate change. Broad temperature tolerance of a species was consistently related to an increased likelihood of climate change threat, indicating counterintuitive relationships in IUCN assessments. To improve the robustness of species assessments of the vulnerability or extinction risk associated with climate change, we suggest IUCN adopt a more cohesive approach whereby specific traits highlighted by our results are considered in Red List assessments. To achieve this and to strengthen the climate change-vulnerability assessments approach, it is necessary to identify and implement logical avenues for further research into traits that make species vulnerable to climate change (including population-level threats).© 2017 Society for Conservation Biology.
Eliminating the dark matter of data deficiency by predicting the conservation status of Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea sharks and rays
DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108459 URL [本文引用: 1]
Missing names from the Fungal Name Repositories found in the literature related to Chinese fungi
DOI:10.11646/phytotaxa.411.1.1
[本文引用: 1]
Fungal taxonomy has a history of more than 260 years, with authors publishing over 475,000 names. Three online Fungal Name Repositories were established to manage registration of new names. During data collection for a project to develop a modern Checklist of Fungi in China and the first Redlist assessment of macrofungi in China, 532 names of Chinese fungi, distinguished in 5 different categories, were found missing from the three repositories. The absence of these names from the repositories badly hampered the transmission of information on fungi. Managing and checking these names is important in maintaining the high quality of fungal taxonomy and provides a sound basis for any future research involving fungi.
Vulnerability of two Rhodiola species under climate change in the future
DOI:10.17520/biods.2021209 URL [本文引用: 1]
未来气候变化下两种红景天植物的脆弱性
DOI:10.17520/biods.2021209
[本文引用: 1]
气候变化对全球的物种多样性有深远影响, 尤其是对高山物种多样性。研究未来气候变化下物种的灭绝风险对生物多样性保护具有重要的意义。本文针对青藏高原的2种重要药用植物大花红景天(Rhodiola crenulata)和菊叶红景天(R. chrysanthemifolia), 利用气候生态位因子分析法研究了它们对气候变化的敏感性、暴露性和脆弱性, 讨论了2种“共享社会经济途径” (SSP2-45和SSP5-85)情景下的未来气候对这2个物种脆弱性的影响。同时计算了2种红景天的气候生态位的边缘性和特化性, 通过主成分分析法对其气候生态位进行了二维可视化, 并分析了它们的气候变化脆弱性与气候生态位之间的关系。结果表明, 未来气候变化情景下2种红景天在其分布区都显示出西部脆弱性高而东部脆弱性低的特征, 而脆弱性都表现为较低的横断山脉地区将成为其未来气候避难所。2种红景天在SSP5-85气候情景下的脆弱性高于SSP2-45, 资源和能源密集型社会经济途径(即SSP5-85)将会增大物种的灭绝风险。此外, 被《中国物种红色名录》评估为无危的菊叶红景天的气候变化脆弱性反而大于被评估为濒危的大花红景天。生态位因子分析结果表明大花红景天的生态位边缘性和特化性都低于菊叶红景天, 研究推断同地区不同物种的气候变化脆弱性主要由物种的气候生态位决定。
Assessment of the threatened status of macro-basidiomycetes in China
A red list assessment of macrofungi was performed to determine the threatened status of known macro-basidiomycetes in China. Forty-five species were considered threatened, with species classified as either Possibly Extinct (PE), Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU). These species account for 0.72% of the 6,268 macro-basidiomycete species. More than one-third of the threatened species are edible or medicinal fungi, and most of them are uncultivable, meaning they only grow in the wild. The threatened basidiomycete species are mainly distributed across Southwest and Northeast China. The main threats to these species are shrinking and destruction of habitat caused by human activities, although excessive picking is a major threat for the edible and medicinal species. However, there were insufficient data for 4,251 macro-basidiomycetes species, 67.82% of all species, which suggests that this red list assessment is incomplete.
中国大型担子菌受威胁现状评估
基于文献和标本信息以及专家提供的数据, 依据中国大型真菌评估的标准和程序, 对中国范围内已知大型担子菌进行了受威胁状态评估。结果显示, 在评估的6,268种担子菌中, 受威胁(疑似灭绝、极危、濒危、易危)的物种有45种, 受威胁比例为0.72%。受威胁的大型担子菌物种中食药用菌比例达1/3以上, 且大部分物种仍无法人工栽培, 主要依赖野生资源。我国受威胁担子菌主要集中分布在西南和东北地区。人类活动导致的物种栖息地萎缩和破坏是我国大型担子菌受威胁的首要因子, 过度采挖是食药用菌受威胁的重要原因。此外, 数据不足的大型担子菌共4,251种, 占被评估大型担子菌总数的67.82%, 表明我国大型担子菌物种多样性及相关研究还存在不足。
Threatened categories assessment of lichens in China
Lichens are important components of macrofungi, and thus they are also main subjects in the Red List Assessment of Macrofungi in China. A total of 2,164 lichen species were evaluated here, including 2,145 ascomycete lichen species and 19 basidiomycete lichen species. These species were organized into 2 phyla, 9 classes, 34 orders, 92 families and 352 genera. The results showed that, of the 28 species identified as threatened, 3 species were Critically Endangered (CR), 7 species were Endangered (EN) and 18 species were Vulnerable (VU). These 28 represented 1.29% of all evaluated species, with 6 other species considered to be Near Threatened (NT) and 657 species assessed as Least Concern (LC). More than half the species, 1,473 (68.07%), were Data Deficient (DD) and could not be further evaluated due to lack of data. This highlights the severe lack of lichen research and the urgent need for lichen taxonomists in China. The extremely slow growth, weak adaptability to habitat degradation, particular sensitivity to air pollution, narrow distribution and small population size characteristic of lichens all contribute to the susceptible state of lichens that face habitat destruction caused by human activities. In addition, it is worth noting that some lichen species evaluated as Vulnerable here, have since been overexploited due to their edibility and well-known medicinal value. These species’ conservation status will be further aggravated if they continue to lack effective protection.
中国地衣的濒危等级评估
地衣是大型真菌的重要组成部分, 是中国大型真菌红色名录评估的主要对象之一。本次评估的地衣共2,164种, 其中子囊菌地衣2,145种, 担子菌地衣19种, 分属于2门9纲34目92科352属。评估结果显示, 地衣受威胁物种共28种, 占被评估地衣物种总数的1.29%, 其中极危3种, 濒危7种, 易危18种; 近危6种, 无危657种, 而数据不足的物种达1,473种。这类因为缺乏足够的数据资料而未能进一步评估其生存状态和红色名录等级的物种占评估地衣总数的68.07%, 凸显了我国地衣学研究的严峻形势及对地衣分类学人才的迫切需要。对受威胁物种的分析表明, 地衣由于自身生长缓慢和对环境污染敏感, 并且绝大多数分布区域狭窄, 种群数量少, 对生境退化的适应和恢复生长的能力弱, 人类活动和气候变化导致的栖息地破坏和碎片化使得这些地衣的生存受到严重威胁。值得注意的是, 评为易危的一些地衣, 因具有较大的食药用价值而被过度采挖利用, 如不采取有效保护措施, 其受威胁程度将进一步加剧。
Endangered status and biodiversity conservation of China’s Gesneriaceae
中国苦苣苔科植物濒危现状与多样性保护
Effectiveness of China’s nature reserves in representing ecological diversity
DOI:10.1890/100093 URL [本文引用: 1]
International new criteria for endangered species Categories
国际濒危物种等级新标准
An updated red list assessment of gymnosperms from China (Version 2021)
Aims: It is important to conduct periodical red list assessments, understand the threatened status and threats, for effective species conservation. Here we report a new red list assessment of gymnosperm species native to China with a comparison between this new assessment and the earlier assessment released in 2013. Methods: We collected species data from published references and databases and adopted the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria ver. 3.1 for the red list assessment. Results: This new red list assessment of gymnosperms includes 274 species and infraspecies, belonging to 37 genera and 8 families, all of which are native to China. Compared with the red list version released in 2013, 2 families were reduced in priority, while 3 genera and 40 species and infraspecies increased in priority during this study. These changes are caused by updating recent taxonomic novelties and adding a few taxa missing in the previous assessment. Among the 274 assessed specific and infraspecific taxa, 139 were listed as threatened (including Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN), and Vulnerable (VU)). Of the total assessed species, up to 50.7% are listed as threatened, which is similar to the proportion of the previous assessment. In addition, there are 27 species and infraspecies listed as Data Deficient (DD), approximately 9.9% of the total assessed species. Conclusions: Threats to Chinese gymnosperm species include internal attributes of relic and endemic species, over-exploitation, habitat loss, and global warming. The high ratio of Data Deficient (DD) species suggests that it is necessary to conduct targeted field investigations to better understand the living status and threats of gymnosperms in China in order to lay a solid foundation for the next red list assessment. The new assessment will be helpful to guide conservation practices of Chinese gymnosperms.
中国裸子植物红色名录评估(2021版)
定期开展物种红色名录评估, 了解植物濒危状态、致危因素变化, 对于物种保育有重要意义。本文报道了国产裸子植物的最新评估结果, 并与2013版红色名录进行了比较。本次评估了国产裸子植物274个种和种下分类群(隶属于8科37属)。与2013版红色名录相比, 本次评估减少了2科, 增加了3属和40个种和种下分类群。分类群变化是由于上次评估遗漏属种、新类群、新分布记录以及分类群名称和等级变化所致。本次评估有139个种和种下分类群被列入受威胁等级(包括极危、濒危和易危), 占总评估种类的50.7%, 与2013版的51.0%相比, 受威胁程度基本不变。物种自身进化属性、资源过度利用、生境丧失和全球变暖是国产裸子植物的主要致危因素。此外, 还有27种列为数据缺乏(DD), 占总种数的9.9%, 较2013版略有增加, 表明我国裸子植物需开展针对性野外调查和相关研究, 以摸清物种的野外生存现状, 为深入认识我国裸子植物濒危程度奠定数据基础。新的红色名录评估对濒危物种保育实践也有重要意义。
Red list assessment of macrofungi in China
DOI:10.17520/biods.2019152 [本文引用: 1]
中国大型真菌红色名录评估
DOI:10.17520/biods.2019152 [本文引用: 1]
Development of red list assessment of macrofungi in China
Macrofungi are important with both their ecological and socioeconomic values. Due to environmental pollution, climate change, habitat loss and fragmentation, and over-exploitation of resources, the diversity of macrofungi is under serious threatened. To evaluate the threatened status of macrofungi nationwide in China, the project of “Red List Assessment of Macrofungi in China” was officially launched in 2016 by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (formerly the Ministry of Environmental Protection) in conjunction with the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Based on extensive and comprehensive collection of literature on the occurrence and distribution of macrofungi in China, and referring to the categories and criteria of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Species, the evaluation methods and process of the Red List of China's macrofungi were formulated according to the biological features of macrofungi and the current understanding of macrofungi in China. Experts on macrofungi around China were mobilized and organized to assess the threatened status of 9,302 species of macrofungi reported in China. Ninety-seven species are considered under threatened (including Possibly Extinct, Critically Endangered, Endangered and Vulnerable), accounting for 1.04% of the total number of species assessed; 101 species are Near Threatened, 2,764 species are Least Concern and 6,340 species are Data Deficient, occupying 1.09%, 29.71% and 68.16%, successively, of the species assessed. The assessment, which brings together the wisdom of more than 140 experts all over the country, is the first nationwide attempt to assess the threaten status of macrofungi in China, involving the largest number of macrofungal species, the widest range of macrofungal groups, the widest coverage of distribution area and the largest number of expert participants at home and abroad. It is of great significance to the conservation and management of the diversity of macrofungi in China.
中国大型真菌红色名录评估研究进展
大型真菌具有重要的生态价值和经济价值, 但由于环境污染、气候变化、生境丧失与破碎化, 以及资源过度利用等因素, 其生物多样性受到严重威胁。为了全面评估中国大型真菌的生存状况, 国家生态环境部(原环境保护部)联合中国科学院于2016年启动了《中国生物多样性红色名录——大型真菌卷》的编制工作。经广泛和全面收集文献资料, 依据IUCN物种红色名录等级与标准, 结合大型真菌特点和国内研究现状, 制定了中国大型真菌红色名录评估方法和流程, 动员和组织了全国相关研究力量, 对9,302种大型真菌的受威胁状况进行了评估。结果显示, 中国大型真菌受威胁物种(包括疑似灭绝、极危、濒危、易危)共97个, 占被评估物种总数的1.04%; 近危101种, 占总数的1.09%; 无危2,764种, 占总数的29.71%; 数据不足6,340种, 占总数的68.16%。此次评估工作汇集了全国140多位专家的智慧, 是国内外迄今为止涉及物种数量最大、类群范围最宽、覆盖地域最广、参与人员最多的一次大型真菌生存状况评估, 对我国大型真菌多样性保护与管理具有重要意义。
Accounting for conservation: Using the IUCN Red List Index to evaluate the impact of a conservation organization
DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.039 URL [本文引用: 1]
Preparation of the China Biodiversity Red List and its significance for biodiversity conservation within China
DOI:10.17520/biods.2015272
[本文引用: 2]
China started to use the IUCN Red List Criteria of Threatened Species to assess endangered species in the early 1980s. Although the Species Red List of China has been widely cited both at home and abroad, there are still some imperfections in the red list. In 2008, the Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Academy of Science started the project of the China Biodiversity Red List in order to further the understanding of threats to biodiversity in China and to improve the scientific basis of biodiversity conservation. The China Biodiversity Red List: Higher Plants and the Biodiversity Red List of China: Vertebrates were published in September 2013 and May 2015, respectively. Compiling of the Biodiversity Red List of China was a large systematic project, over 500 experts from relevant fields participated the exhaustive assessment of the threat to 34,450 higher plant species and 4,357 vertebrate species (not including marine fishes) in China. This assessment was the largest scale so far which provided the most complete information set for the widest scope of organisms in China. For instance, it summed up the number of known vertebrate and higher plant species in China and confirmed worldwide species richness rankings of the country; it improved the IUCN Red List assessment system as well; it assessed and analyzed the degree of threats to and the differences in distribution of known higher plants and vertebrates in China; and it assessed and analyzed the conditions threatening higher plants and vertebrates. The most prevalent factors threatening higher plants and vertebrates were habitat loss and degradation caused by human activities. The Biodiversity Red List of China will have profoundly influences on biodiversity protection and management in the country.
《中国生物多样性红色名录》的制定及其对生物多样性保护的意义
DOI:10.17520/biods.2015272
[本文引用: 2]
早在20世纪80年代, 我国就引入IUCN红色名录原理, 对我国生物物种的濒危状况开展评估工作。但是随着经济发展和气候变化, 一些物种的数量和分布区发生了变化, 加之在以往的评估中存在一些不足, 亟需对我国生物物种的濒危状况开展一次全面的评估。2008年, 环境保护部联合中国科学院启动了《中国生物多样性红色名录》的编制工作, 《中国生物多样性红色名录——高等植物卷》和《中国生物多样性红色名录——脊椎动物卷》分别于2013年9月和2015年5月正式对外发布。本文回顾了《中国生物多样性红色名录》的编制背景、过程和取得的成果。《中国生物多样性红色名录》完成了对我国34,450种高等植物和除海洋鱼类外的4,357种脊椎动物受威胁状况的评估, 是迄今为止对象最广、信息最全、参与专家人数最多的一次评估。在评估中取得了一系列成果: 统计了中国已知高等植物和脊椎动物物种数, 确定了物种丰富度在世界上的排名; 完善了国际上所使用的IUCN红色名录评估等级标准体系; 评估分析了我国已知高等植物和脊椎动物的受威胁程度及分布差异; 评估分析了高等植物和脊椎动物濒危灭绝的原因, 其中人类活动导致的生境丧失和退化是首要因素。这些成果将对我国生物多样性保护和管理工作产生积极的影响。
Assessment of endangerment category on Chinese cavefish: A case study of two national protected fish species
中国洞穴鱼类濒危等级评估——以两种国家重点保护鱼类为例
Evaluation of in situ conservation of vertebrates in China
中国脊椎动物就地保护状况评估
Threat status of non-lichenized macro-ascomycetes in China and its threatening factors
On May 22, 2018, the 25th International Day for Biological Diversity, a “China Biodiversity Red List—Macrofungi” was officially released by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The List included 870 species of non-lichenized macro-ascomycetes (as “macro-ascomycetes” below). A total of 24 species were listed as threatened including 1 Possibly Extinct, 6 Critically Endangered, 3 Endangered and 14 Vulnerable, accounting for 2.76% of the species assessed. Besides, 189 macro-ascomycetes were assessed as Least Concern and 616 as Data Deficient, accounting for 21.72% and 70.80%, respectively. The evaluation method, assessment process and results were presented herein; and the status of the China’s macro-ascomycetes, geographic distribution of the threatened species and major threatening factors were analyzed. The conservation actions and advices were also proposed. Fungal taxonomy is fundamental of and essential for evaluation of biodiversity red list of threatened species. In a relatively long period of time, field investigations and taxonomic studies are critical tasks and need continuous financial support from different sources. Future evaluations of threatened species of macrofungi in China rely on co-operations among taxonomists, workers in nature reserves, ecologists and amateurs.
中国非地衣型大型子囊菌受威胁现状评估及致危因素
2018年5月22日是第25个国际生物多样性日, 生态环境部和中国科学院联合发布了《中国生物多样性红色名录——大型真菌卷》。子囊菌是真菌界物种数量最丰富的类群, 其中小型种类居多, 此次参评的我国非地衣型大型子囊菌(以下简称“大型子囊菌”)包括870种。评估结果表明, 我国大型子囊菌受威胁物种有24种, 其中疑似灭绝1种、极危6种、濒危3种、易危14种, 受威胁物种占评估大型子囊菌物种数的2.76%。此外, 无危的大型子囊菌189种, 占评估物种数的21.72%, 数据不足的616种, 占评估物种数的70.80%。本文对中国大型子囊菌红色名录评估的方法、过程和评估结果等进行了介绍, 对其受威胁现状、受威胁物种的区域分布、致危因素等进行了总结分析, 并提出了相应的保护措施和建议。分类学研究是进行红色名录评估的基础, 在未来相当长的一段时间里, 真菌资源调查和分类学研究仍然需要引起重视并投入资金。建议分类学工作者、保护区管理人员、业余爱好者群体和生态学家合作并广泛参与大型真菌受威胁状况的评估。
/
〈 |
|
〉 |
