Biodiv Sci ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 24285.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024285  cstr: 32101.14.biods.2024285

• Original Papers • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Beta diversity of woody plants in a tropical seasonal rainforest at Xishuangbanna: Roles of space, environment, and forest stand structure

Guoshan Shi1(), Feng Liu2, Guanghong Cao3, Dian Chen3, Shangwen Xia1(), Yun Deng1,4(), Bin Wang5(), Xiaodong Yang1(), Luxiang Lin1,4,*()()   

  1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
    2. Yunnan Academy of Forestry and Grassland, Kunming 650204, China
    3. Administration Bureau of Naban River Watershed National Nature Reserve, Jinghong, Yunnan 666100, China
    4. National Forest Ecosystem Research Station at Xishuangbanna, Mengla, Yunnan 666303, China
    5. School of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650504, China
  • Received:2024-07-01 Accepted:2024-10-15 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2024-12-20
  • Contact: E-mail: linluxa@xtbg.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Science Foundation of China-Yunnan Province(U1902203);Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDB31030000);NSFC China-UNEP Grant(42061144005)

Abstract:

Aims: Beta diversity measures the pattern of spatial and temporal changes in species composition. The factors driving beta diversity, such as spatial distance and environment conditions, are key topics in ecological research. However, as an important characteristic parameter of forest community, the driving effect of forest stand structure in shaping woody plants beta diversity remains largely unexplored. This study aims to address the contribution of forest stand structure, alongside space and environment, to beta diversity and its components.

Methods: Focusing on woody plants in the 20 ha tropical seasonal rainforest dynamics plot in Nabanhe, Yunnan, this study decomposed beta diversity into two components: Species turnover and species richness difference, across different sampling scales. By using multivariate regression based on distance matrices and variance partitioning, we revealed the relative contributions of spatial, environmental, and forest stand structure factors in shaping beta diversity and its two components.

Results: The results showed that: (1) beta diversity and its species turnover component and species richness difference component decreased with the increase increasing sampling scale, with species turnover consistently dominating beta diversity. (2) Environmental distance had a relatively high explanatory power for beta diversity and its species turnover component, with its influence increasing from 8.8% to 23.9% for beta diversity and from 5.1% to 26.5% for species turnover as the sampling scale expanded. However, environmental distance had little effect on species richness difference component. (3) Forest stand structure demonstrated relatively high explanatory power for beta diversity (11.3%‒25.1%) and maintained a certain degree of explanatory power for both species turnover component and species richness difference component across all scales. At the same time, pure spatial distance, whether or not stand structure was included, had a low explanatory power for beta diversity and its components.

Conclusion: This study supports the viewpoint that the relative importance of environmental filtering in beta diversity, particularly the species turnover component, increases with sampling scale. In contrast, dispersal limitation plays a limited role at local scales. This study further reveals that forest stand structure indicating the light availability and heterogeneity is also an important driving force for beta diversity, similar to environmental factors such as topography and soil. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms by which stand structure influence woody plant beta diversity in the future.

Key words: species turnover component, species richness difference component, environmental filtering, dispersal limitation, variation partitioning, sampling scales