Biodiv Sci

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The effect of climatic factors and anthropogenic activities on different genetic diversity indicators of amphibians and mammals

Ping Fan1,2, Zhixin Wen2, Gang Song2*   

  1. 1 College of Basic Medicine, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712046 

    2 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101

  • Received:2025-01-13 Revised:2025-04-24 Accepted:2025-06-03
  • Contact: Gang Song

Abstract:

Aims: Climatic change and anthropogenic activities have become the principal threats to global biodiversity. Genetic diversity, a fundamental component of biodiversity, is integral to species' adaptation to environmental changes. Amphibians and mammals have distinct differences in evolutionary history, physiological functions, and ecological behaviors. Notably, their contrasting thermoregulatory capacities and mobility render amphibians may be more susceptible to climate change and human activities than mammals. However, it remains uncertain whether these differences result in divergent patterns of genetic diversity. Haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity are the critical metrics in assessing genetic diversity, yet their respective responses to climatic and anthropogenic influences need to be further investigated. 

Methods: This study concentrates on amphibians and mammals, employing the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene fragment to investigate the impacts of climatic factors and human activities on haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity of these two vertebrate groups. 

Results: We found a substantial difference in overall nucleotide diversity (D=0.230, P < 0.01) and haplotype diversity (D=0.211, P < 0.05) between amphibians and mammals. Distinct patterns were record on that how climatic and anthropogenic factors influenced nucleotide and haplotype diversity between the two groups. For amphibians, haplotype diversity was positively correlated with precipitation seasonality range (SPR; β=0.467, P < 0.05), while it was negatively correlated with the annual temperature range (ATR; β=−0.223, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the Human Influence Index (HII) showed a positive correlation with amphibian nucleotide diversity (HII; β=0.035, P < 0.05). Conversely, in mammals, HII was negatively correlated with haplotype diversity (HII; β=-0.018, P < 0.05), whereas the annual temperature exhibited a positive correlation with nucleotide diversity (AT; β=0.002, P < 0.05). 

Conclusion: Our results underscore the complexity of genetic diversity responses to climatic and anthropogenic influences. We advocate for the integration of multiple metrics to investigate the distribution patterns of genetic diversity and their driving factors. Future research should further explore the mechanisms through which human activities and climatic factors impact genetic diversity across various animal groups, aiming to develop more targeted biodiversity conservation strategies.

Key words: Climate, Anthropogenic activities, Genetic Diversity, Amphibians, Mammals