Biodiv Sci ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 186-199. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018264
• Original Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Chen Qiangqiang1,2,Li Meiling1,3,Wang Xu4,Mueen Qamer Faisal5,Wang Peng6,Yang Jianwei6,Wang Muyang1,Yang Weikang1,*()
Received:
2018-10-05
Accepted:
2019-02-01
Online:
2019-02-20
Published:
2019-04-16
Contact:
Yang Weikang
Chen Qiangqiang, Li Meiling, Wang Xu, Mueen Qamer Faisal, Wang Peng, Yang Jianwei, Wang Muyang, Yang Weikang. Identification of potential ecological corridors for Marco Polo sheep in Taxkorgan Wildlife Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2019, 27(2): 186-199.
生境因子 Habitat factors | 范围 Range | Fi (%) | 生境因子 Habitat factors | 范围 Range | Fi (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
夏季 Summer | 冬季 Winter | |||||
海拔 Elevation (m) | ≤ 3,500 | 2 | 0 | 距国道314线距离 Distance to G314 national road (m) | ≤ 1,000 | 0 |
3,501-4,000 | 65 | 65 | 1,001-2,000 | 25 | ||
4,001-4,500 | 100 | 100 | 2,001-3,000 | 50 | ||
4,501-5,000 | 10 | 14 | 3,001-4,000 | 75 | ||
≥ 5,001 | 5 | 0 | ≥ 4,001 | 100 | ||
坡度 Slope (°) | ≤ 10 | 35 | 100 | 距乡道距离 Distance to village road (m) | ≤ 400 | 0 |
11-20 | 100 | 83 | 401-600 | 25 | ||
21-30 | 40 | 44 | 601-800 | 50 | ||
≥ 31 | 30 | 35 | 801-1,000 | 75 | ||
坡位 Slope position | 上 Top | 60 | 69 | ≥ 1,001 | 100 | |
中 Middle | 100 | 100 | 距居民点距离 Distance to settlement (m) | ≤ 400 | 0 | |
下 Bottom | 40 | 63 | 401-800 | 25 | ||
坡向 Slope aspect | 东 East | 100 | 73 | 801-1,200 | 50 | |
南 South | 60 | 100 | 1,201-1,600 | 75 | ||
西 West | 35 | 16 | ≥ 1,601 | 100 | ||
北 North | 65 | 50 | 距牧场距离 Distance to pastures (m) | ≤ 750 | 0 | |
植被类型 Vegetation type | 垫状驼绒藜高寒荒漠a | 5 | 0 | 751-1,500 | 25 | |
风毛菊、红景天稀疏植被b | 10 | 0 | 1,501-2,250 | 50 | ||
羊茅高寒草原c | 20 | 22 | 2,251-3,000 | 75 | ||
短花针茅荒漠草原d | 25 | 30 | ≥ 3,001 | 100 | ||
麻黄荒漠e | 30 | 17 | ||||
驼绒藜荒漠f | 45 | 17 | ||||
高山绢蒿、高山紫菀高寒荒漠g | 100 | 100 | ||||
距水源距离 Distance to water (m) | ≤ 1,000 | 100 | 100 | |||
1,001-2,000 | 65 | 48 | ||||
≥ 2,001 | 55 | 63 |
Table 1 Values of habitat factors of Marco Polo sheep
生境因子 Habitat factors | 范围 Range | Fi (%) | 生境因子 Habitat factors | 范围 Range | Fi (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
夏季 Summer | 冬季 Winter | |||||
海拔 Elevation (m) | ≤ 3,500 | 2 | 0 | 距国道314线距离 Distance to G314 national road (m) | ≤ 1,000 | 0 |
3,501-4,000 | 65 | 65 | 1,001-2,000 | 25 | ||
4,001-4,500 | 100 | 100 | 2,001-3,000 | 50 | ||
4,501-5,000 | 10 | 14 | 3,001-4,000 | 75 | ||
≥ 5,001 | 5 | 0 | ≥ 4,001 | 100 | ||
坡度 Slope (°) | ≤ 10 | 35 | 100 | 距乡道距离 Distance to village road (m) | ≤ 400 | 0 |
11-20 | 100 | 83 | 401-600 | 25 | ||
21-30 | 40 | 44 | 601-800 | 50 | ||
≥ 31 | 30 | 35 | 801-1,000 | 75 | ||
坡位 Slope position | 上 Top | 60 | 69 | ≥ 1,001 | 100 | |
中 Middle | 100 | 100 | 距居民点距离 Distance to settlement (m) | ≤ 400 | 0 | |
下 Bottom | 40 | 63 | 401-800 | 25 | ||
坡向 Slope aspect | 东 East | 100 | 73 | 801-1,200 | 50 | |
南 South | 60 | 100 | 1,201-1,600 | 75 | ||
西 West | 35 | 16 | ≥ 1,601 | 100 | ||
北 North | 65 | 50 | 距牧场距离 Distance to pastures (m) | ≤ 750 | 0 | |
植被类型 Vegetation type | 垫状驼绒藜高寒荒漠a | 5 | 0 | 751-1,500 | 25 | |
风毛菊、红景天稀疏植被b | 10 | 0 | 1,501-2,250 | 50 | ||
羊茅高寒草原c | 20 | 22 | 2,251-3,000 | 75 | ||
短花针茅荒漠草原d | 25 | 30 | ≥ 3,001 | 100 | ||
麻黄荒漠e | 30 | 17 | ||||
驼绒藜荒漠f | 45 | 17 | ||||
高山绢蒿、高山紫菀高寒荒漠g | 100 | 100 | ||||
距水源距离 Distance to water (m) | ≤ 1,000 | 100 | 100 | |||
1,001-2,000 | 65 | 48 | ||||
≥ 2,001 | 55 | 63 |
Fig. 3 Core habitat areas of Marco Polo sheep and the quality of linkages shown by the ratio of cost-weighted distance (CWD) to least-cost path (LCP). Red lines indicate higher cost of movement along the path of least resistance and green lines indicate higher quality along the least-cost path. The numbers in the figure represent core patches.
Fig. 4 Maps showing least-cost corridors for the Marco polo sheep in the study area. Lower resistance paths are shown in blue, and red areas represent higher cost-weighted distance.
廊道Corridor | 欧几里 得距离 EucD (km) | 加权成 本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成 本路径 LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值 CFC (Amps) | 廊道Corridor | 欧几里 得距离 EucD (km) | 加权成本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成本路径 LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值CFC (Amps) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-28 | 13.68 | 9.60 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 10.67 | 75.06 | 19-20 | 33.96 | 378.30 | 6.30 | 11.14 | 60.05 | 35.23 |
5-10 | 5.93 | 59.95 | 2.35 | 10.12 | 25.53 | 69.68 | 9-28 | 21.94 | 345.53 | 10.56 | 15.75 | 32.71 | 34.34 |
4-20 | 25.24 | 65.65 | 2.95 | 2.60 | 22.27 | 68.02 | 7-28 | 12.60 | 197.59 | 6.77 | 15.68 | 29.20 | 33.65 |
5-28 | 14.41 | 151.92 | 5.55 | 10.55 | 27.40 | 67.89 | 20-24 | 53.19 | 1,024.50 | 28.79 | 19.26 | 35.59 | 32.74 |
25-26 | 19.42 | 150.66 | 3.62 | 7.76 | 41.61 | 66.95 | 14-23 | 24.48 | 457.02 | 23.16 | 18.67 | 19.74 | 32.55 |
24-25 | 34.96 | 239.04 | 15.21 | 6.84 | 15.72 | 62.88 | 18-20 | 27.22 | 389.17 | 6.59 | 14.30 | 59.05 | 32.32 |
11-15 | 26.88 | 118.06 | 4.35 | 4.39 | 27.17 | 59.10 | 6-20 | 27.56 | 424.47 | 10.39 | 15.40 | 40.86 | 32.26 |
10-14 | 19.88 | 109.08 | 7.37 | 5.49 | 14.81 | 56.77 | 12-14 | 20.13 | 391.45 | 13.74 | 19.45 | 28.49 | 31.20 |
1-3 | 13.30 | 39.67 | 4.87 | 2.98 | 8.14 | 56.26 | 15-23 | 17.21 | 380.47 | 5.32 | 22.10 | 71.54 | 29.35 |
18-19 | 12.59 | 71.92 | 4.87 | 5.71 | 14.76 | 53.08 | 10-11 | 9.67 | 402.79 | 5.57 | 41.64 | 72.37 | 28.81 |
13-20 | 16.96 | 222.02 | 10.49 | 13.09 | 21.16 | 52.00 | 4-6 | 18.49 | 407.77 | 9.67 | 22.05 | 42.16 | 27.89 |
7-12 | 9.33 | 128.15 | 5.37 | 13.74 | 23.87 | 51.24 | 8-13 | 8.31 | 113.96 | 6.39 | 13.72 | 17.82 | 27.00 |
6-9 | 8.20 | 66.22 | 3.37 | 8.08 | 19.64 | 49.61 | 15-16 | 20.48 | 187.68 | 12.66 | 9.16 | 14.82 | 27.00 |
9-18 | 11.71 | 126.48 | 5.19 | 10.81 | 24.35 | 46.89 | 17-20 | 44.94 | 79.65 | 4.65 | 1.77 | 17.15 | 27.00 |
2-28 | 26.20 | 301.39 | 10.17 | 11.50 | 29.64 | 44.66 | 20-21 | 11.31 | 125.54 | 5.67 | 11.10 | 22.14 | 27.00 |
23-26 | 30.33 | 214.05 | 8.39 | 7.06 | 25.51 | 43.61 | 20-22 | 33.10 | 174.76 | 5.85 | 5.28 | 29.90 | 27.00 |
7-9 | 10.44 | 304.11 | 7.47 | 29.14 | 40.72 | 42.75 | 25-27 | 19.13 | 240.98 | 4.57 | 12.60 | 52.71 | 27.00 |
14-15 | 13.17 | 282.16 | 4.05 | 21.42 | 69.76 | 40.14 | 14-19 | 29.39 | 895.98 | 13.97 | 30.49 | 64.15 | 26.42 |
1-11 | 14.26 | 507.33 | 9.32 | 35.58 | 54.43 | 38.09 | 2-6 | 14.56 | 172.00 | 9.06 | 11.81 | 18.98 | 26.31 |
6-28 | 25.55 | 347.54 | 13.21 | 13.60 | 26.30 | 38.01 | 6-18 | 14.43 | 187.94 | 11.52 | 13.03 | 16.32 | 26.30 |
19-24 | 24.20 | 663.07 | 22.25 | 27.39 | 29.81 | 36.52 | 10-12 | 13.10 | 451.88 | 14.46 | 34.50 | 31.24 | 21.91 |
15-26 | 40.58 | 457.27 | 13.74 | 11.27 | 33.28 | 35.96 | 14-24 | 35.42 | 1,056.31 | 30.62 | 29.82 | 34.49 | 19.06 |
2-4 | 11.42 | 366.32 | 6.24 | 32.07 | 58.71 | 35.74 | 平均 Average | 20.54 | 282.52 | 8.79 | 14.79 | 32.78 | 41.00 |
Table 2 Characteristics of the 45 mapped corridors between the 28 core patches in the summer
廊道Corridor | 欧几里 得距离 EucD (km) | 加权成 本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成 本路径 LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值 CFC (Amps) | 廊道Corridor | 欧几里 得距离 EucD (km) | 加权成本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成本路径 LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值CFC (Amps) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-28 | 13.68 | 9.60 | 0.90 | 0.70 | 10.67 | 75.06 | 19-20 | 33.96 | 378.30 | 6.30 | 11.14 | 60.05 | 35.23 |
5-10 | 5.93 | 59.95 | 2.35 | 10.12 | 25.53 | 69.68 | 9-28 | 21.94 | 345.53 | 10.56 | 15.75 | 32.71 | 34.34 |
4-20 | 25.24 | 65.65 | 2.95 | 2.60 | 22.27 | 68.02 | 7-28 | 12.60 | 197.59 | 6.77 | 15.68 | 29.20 | 33.65 |
5-28 | 14.41 | 151.92 | 5.55 | 10.55 | 27.40 | 67.89 | 20-24 | 53.19 | 1,024.50 | 28.79 | 19.26 | 35.59 | 32.74 |
25-26 | 19.42 | 150.66 | 3.62 | 7.76 | 41.61 | 66.95 | 14-23 | 24.48 | 457.02 | 23.16 | 18.67 | 19.74 | 32.55 |
24-25 | 34.96 | 239.04 | 15.21 | 6.84 | 15.72 | 62.88 | 18-20 | 27.22 | 389.17 | 6.59 | 14.30 | 59.05 | 32.32 |
11-15 | 26.88 | 118.06 | 4.35 | 4.39 | 27.17 | 59.10 | 6-20 | 27.56 | 424.47 | 10.39 | 15.40 | 40.86 | 32.26 |
10-14 | 19.88 | 109.08 | 7.37 | 5.49 | 14.81 | 56.77 | 12-14 | 20.13 | 391.45 | 13.74 | 19.45 | 28.49 | 31.20 |
1-3 | 13.30 | 39.67 | 4.87 | 2.98 | 8.14 | 56.26 | 15-23 | 17.21 | 380.47 | 5.32 | 22.10 | 71.54 | 29.35 |
18-19 | 12.59 | 71.92 | 4.87 | 5.71 | 14.76 | 53.08 | 10-11 | 9.67 | 402.79 | 5.57 | 41.64 | 72.37 | 28.81 |
13-20 | 16.96 | 222.02 | 10.49 | 13.09 | 21.16 | 52.00 | 4-6 | 18.49 | 407.77 | 9.67 | 22.05 | 42.16 | 27.89 |
7-12 | 9.33 | 128.15 | 5.37 | 13.74 | 23.87 | 51.24 | 8-13 | 8.31 | 113.96 | 6.39 | 13.72 | 17.82 | 27.00 |
6-9 | 8.20 | 66.22 | 3.37 | 8.08 | 19.64 | 49.61 | 15-16 | 20.48 | 187.68 | 12.66 | 9.16 | 14.82 | 27.00 |
9-18 | 11.71 | 126.48 | 5.19 | 10.81 | 24.35 | 46.89 | 17-20 | 44.94 | 79.65 | 4.65 | 1.77 | 17.15 | 27.00 |
2-28 | 26.20 | 301.39 | 10.17 | 11.50 | 29.64 | 44.66 | 20-21 | 11.31 | 125.54 | 5.67 | 11.10 | 22.14 | 27.00 |
23-26 | 30.33 | 214.05 | 8.39 | 7.06 | 25.51 | 43.61 | 20-22 | 33.10 | 174.76 | 5.85 | 5.28 | 29.90 | 27.00 |
7-9 | 10.44 | 304.11 | 7.47 | 29.14 | 40.72 | 42.75 | 25-27 | 19.13 | 240.98 | 4.57 | 12.60 | 52.71 | 27.00 |
14-15 | 13.17 | 282.16 | 4.05 | 21.42 | 69.76 | 40.14 | 14-19 | 29.39 | 895.98 | 13.97 | 30.49 | 64.15 | 26.42 |
1-11 | 14.26 | 507.33 | 9.32 | 35.58 | 54.43 | 38.09 | 2-6 | 14.56 | 172.00 | 9.06 | 11.81 | 18.98 | 26.31 |
6-28 | 25.55 | 347.54 | 13.21 | 13.60 | 26.30 | 38.01 | 6-18 | 14.43 | 187.94 | 11.52 | 13.03 | 16.32 | 26.30 |
19-24 | 24.20 | 663.07 | 22.25 | 27.39 | 29.81 | 36.52 | 10-12 | 13.10 | 451.88 | 14.46 | 34.50 | 31.24 | 21.91 |
15-26 | 40.58 | 457.27 | 13.74 | 11.27 | 33.28 | 35.96 | 14-24 | 35.42 | 1,056.31 | 30.62 | 29.82 | 34.49 | 19.06 |
2-4 | 11.42 | 366.32 | 6.24 | 32.07 | 58.71 | 35.74 | 平均 Average | 20.54 | 282.52 | 8.79 | 14.79 | 32.78 | 41.00 |
廊道 Corridor | 欧几里 得距离 EucD (km) | 加权成 本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成 本距离LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值CFC (Amps) | 廊道 Corridor | 欧几里 得距离EucD (km) | 加权成 本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成 本距离LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值CFC (Amps) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-15 | 13.49 | 30.95 | 6.34 | 2.29 | 4.88 | 91.46 | 25-26 | 20.05 | 412.09 | 6.17 | 20.55 | 66.83 | 36.05 |
9-12 | 5.48 | 88.06 | 4.05 | 16.08 | 21.77 | 80.38 | 18-24 | 36.71 | 1,636.84 | 41.54 | 44.59 | 39.40 | 34.71 |
6-9 | 5.48 | 28.32 | 2.22 | 5.17 | 12.74 | 79.90 | 23-13 | 12.86 | 803.84 | 11.82 | 62.49 | 68.04 | 34.00 |
17-20 | 48.11 | 45.08 | 3.07 | 0.94 | 14.67 | 75.00 | 4-20 | 30.13 | 593.00 | 18.69 | 19.68 | 31.74 | 33.77 |
1-28 | 24.28 | 195.34 | 13.51 | 8.04 | 14.46 | 73.43 | 20-19 | 43.16 | 2,051.04 | 38.53 | 47.53 | 53.24 | 31.33 |
14-19 | 14.25 | 183.03 | 7.37 | 12.84 | 24.85 | 71.63 | 18-19 | 31.93 | 1,837.59 | 37.42 | 57.54 | 49.10 | 30.64 |
12-18 | 4.22 | 45.40 | 5.19 | 10.76 | 8.74 | 65.19 | 1-7 | 21.97 | 1,361.46 | 19.17 | 61.96 | 71.01 | 30.56 |
6-28 | 21.66 | 619.93 | 12.31 | 28.62 | 50.35 | 63.12 | 11-10 | 9.71 | 518.61 | 7.32 | 53.43 | 70.90 | 27.77 |
15-23 | 13.68 | 480.66 | 6.64 | 35.14 | 72.37 | 61.96 | 8-17 | 20.23 | 499.82 | 6.85 | 24.71 | 72.99 | 27.00 |
14-3 | 8.23 | 355.53 | 6.02 | 43.20 | 59.05 | 59.63 | 17-22 | 10.07 | 41.90 | 3.50 | 4.16 | 11.98 | 27.00 |
5-25 | 6.81 | 111.03 | 2.42 | 16.31 | 45.86 | 53.14 | 20-21 | 12.28 | 97.28 | 4.57 | 7.92 | 21.28 | 27.00 |
13-5 | 6.66 | 154.23 | 5.72 | 23.14 | 26.96 | 47.54 | 25-27 | 17.96 | 377.52 | 8.07 | 21.03 | 46.79 | 27.00 |
24-25 | 35.90 | 1,235.26 | 17.20 | 34.41 | 71.83 | 46.03 | 19-25 | 43.78 | 2,136.49 | 35.55 | 48.80 | 60.10 | 26.56 |
2-28 | 28.36 | 858.78 | 16.54 | 30.29 | 51.91 | 45.31 | 2-4 | 13.89 | 570.71 | 11.37 | 41.08 | 50.20 | 26.53 |
10-28 | 18.74 | 711.69 | 12.36 | 37.98 | 57.57 | 44.83 | 2-6 | 16.72 | 557.02 | 17.43 | 33.31 | 31.95 | 24.45 |
7-16 | 11.57 | 179.77 | 12.06 | 15.54 | 14.90 | 44.40 | 2-20 | 25.92 | 1,015.82 | 25.60 | 39.18 | 39.69 | 23.94 |
16-15 | 21.83 | 686.87 | 19.66 | 31.47 | 34.94 | 43.52 | 11-7 | 15.35 | 914.29 | 13.97 | 59.57 | 65.47 | 23.56 |
11-3 | 16.52 | 529.36 | 15.44 | 32.04 | 34.29 | 43.31 | 13-26 | 20.94 | 503.17 | 7.05 | 24.02 | 71.42 | 22.93 |
10-14 | 13.56 | 379.56 | 13.02 | 28.00 | 29.16 | 41.61 | 23-24 | 26.53 | 2,109.18 | 27.06 | 79.51 | 77.94 | 22.45 |
1-11 | 15.50 | 700.52 | 12.51 | 45.20 | 56.00 | 40.67 | 23-26 | 31.65 | 987.18 | 19.18 | 31.19 | 51.46 | 22.23 |
20-12 | 12.83 | 508.98 | 11.14 | 39.68 | 45.68 | 38.35 | 11-14 | 14.05 | 740.74 | 11.41 | 52.71 | 64.91 | 20.86 |
20-18 | 11.71 | 507.04 | 7.99 | 43.30 | 63.47 | 37.17 | 4-6 | 29.28 | 955.24 | 30.68 | 32.62 | 31.14 | 18.96 |
15-26 | 39.21 | 1,204.82 | 23.79 | 30.73 | 50.65 | 36.48 | 19-24 | 28.16 | 1,815.86 | 24.56 | 64.49 | 73.92 | 17.89 |
20-24 | 42.64 | 1,774.72 | 37.30 | 41.62 | 47.58 | 36.14 | 平均 Average | 20.72 | 726.63 | 14.92 | 32.87 | 45.45 | 41.22 |
Table 3 Characteristics of the 47 mapped corridors between the 28 core patches in winter
廊道 Corridor | 欧几里 得距离 EucD (km) | 加权成 本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成 本距离LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值CFC (Amps) | 廊道 Corridor | 欧几里 得距离EucD (km) | 加权成 本距离 CWD (km) | 最小成 本距离LCP (km) | CWD : EucD | CWD : LCP | 中心 性值CFC (Amps) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-15 | 13.49 | 30.95 | 6.34 | 2.29 | 4.88 | 91.46 | 25-26 | 20.05 | 412.09 | 6.17 | 20.55 | 66.83 | 36.05 |
9-12 | 5.48 | 88.06 | 4.05 | 16.08 | 21.77 | 80.38 | 18-24 | 36.71 | 1,636.84 | 41.54 | 44.59 | 39.40 | 34.71 |
6-9 | 5.48 | 28.32 | 2.22 | 5.17 | 12.74 | 79.90 | 23-13 | 12.86 | 803.84 | 11.82 | 62.49 | 68.04 | 34.00 |
17-20 | 48.11 | 45.08 | 3.07 | 0.94 | 14.67 | 75.00 | 4-20 | 30.13 | 593.00 | 18.69 | 19.68 | 31.74 | 33.77 |
1-28 | 24.28 | 195.34 | 13.51 | 8.04 | 14.46 | 73.43 | 20-19 | 43.16 | 2,051.04 | 38.53 | 47.53 | 53.24 | 31.33 |
14-19 | 14.25 | 183.03 | 7.37 | 12.84 | 24.85 | 71.63 | 18-19 | 31.93 | 1,837.59 | 37.42 | 57.54 | 49.10 | 30.64 |
12-18 | 4.22 | 45.40 | 5.19 | 10.76 | 8.74 | 65.19 | 1-7 | 21.97 | 1,361.46 | 19.17 | 61.96 | 71.01 | 30.56 |
6-28 | 21.66 | 619.93 | 12.31 | 28.62 | 50.35 | 63.12 | 11-10 | 9.71 | 518.61 | 7.32 | 53.43 | 70.90 | 27.77 |
15-23 | 13.68 | 480.66 | 6.64 | 35.14 | 72.37 | 61.96 | 8-17 | 20.23 | 499.82 | 6.85 | 24.71 | 72.99 | 27.00 |
14-3 | 8.23 | 355.53 | 6.02 | 43.20 | 59.05 | 59.63 | 17-22 | 10.07 | 41.90 | 3.50 | 4.16 | 11.98 | 27.00 |
5-25 | 6.81 | 111.03 | 2.42 | 16.31 | 45.86 | 53.14 | 20-21 | 12.28 | 97.28 | 4.57 | 7.92 | 21.28 | 27.00 |
13-5 | 6.66 | 154.23 | 5.72 | 23.14 | 26.96 | 47.54 | 25-27 | 17.96 | 377.52 | 8.07 | 21.03 | 46.79 | 27.00 |
24-25 | 35.90 | 1,235.26 | 17.20 | 34.41 | 71.83 | 46.03 | 19-25 | 43.78 | 2,136.49 | 35.55 | 48.80 | 60.10 | 26.56 |
2-28 | 28.36 | 858.78 | 16.54 | 30.29 | 51.91 | 45.31 | 2-4 | 13.89 | 570.71 | 11.37 | 41.08 | 50.20 | 26.53 |
10-28 | 18.74 | 711.69 | 12.36 | 37.98 | 57.57 | 44.83 | 2-6 | 16.72 | 557.02 | 17.43 | 33.31 | 31.95 | 24.45 |
7-16 | 11.57 | 179.77 | 12.06 | 15.54 | 14.90 | 44.40 | 2-20 | 25.92 | 1,015.82 | 25.60 | 39.18 | 39.69 | 23.94 |
16-15 | 21.83 | 686.87 | 19.66 | 31.47 | 34.94 | 43.52 | 11-7 | 15.35 | 914.29 | 13.97 | 59.57 | 65.47 | 23.56 |
11-3 | 16.52 | 529.36 | 15.44 | 32.04 | 34.29 | 43.31 | 13-26 | 20.94 | 503.17 | 7.05 | 24.02 | 71.42 | 22.93 |
10-14 | 13.56 | 379.56 | 13.02 | 28.00 | 29.16 | 41.61 | 23-24 | 26.53 | 2,109.18 | 27.06 | 79.51 | 77.94 | 22.45 |
1-11 | 15.50 | 700.52 | 12.51 | 45.20 | 56.00 | 40.67 | 23-26 | 31.65 | 987.18 | 19.18 | 31.19 | 51.46 | 22.23 |
20-12 | 12.83 | 508.98 | 11.14 | 39.68 | 45.68 | 38.35 | 11-14 | 14.05 | 740.74 | 11.41 | 52.71 | 64.91 | 20.86 |
20-18 | 11.71 | 507.04 | 7.99 | 43.30 | 63.47 | 37.17 | 4-6 | 29.28 | 955.24 | 30.68 | 32.62 | 31.14 | 18.96 |
15-26 | 39.21 | 1,204.82 | 23.79 | 30.73 | 50.65 | 36.48 | 19-24 | 28.16 | 1,815.86 | 24.56 | 64.49 | 73.92 | 17.89 |
20-24 | 42.64 | 1,774.72 | 37.30 | 41.62 | 47.58 | 36.14 | 平均 Average | 20.72 | 726.63 | 14.92 | 32.87 | 45.45 | 41.22 |
[4] |
Boyce MS, McDonald LL ( 1999) Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 268-272.
DOI URL PMID |
[5] |
Carroll C, McRae BH, Brookes A ( 2012) Use of Linkage Mapping and Centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conservation Biology, 26, 78-87.
DOI URL PMID |
[6] | Chen QQ, Li ML, Han F, Wang MY, Xu WX, Yang WK ( 2018) Population survey of Ovis ammon polii in Taxkorgan Nature Reserve, Xinjiang. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 37, 637-645. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 陈强强, 李美玲, 韩芳, 汪沐阳, 徐文轩, 杨维康 ( 2018) 新疆塔什库尔干野生动物自然保护区马可波罗盘羊种群调查. 四川动物, 37, 637-645.] | |
[7] |
Chi Y, Shi HH, Feng AP ( 2015) Typical island landscape ecological network establishment—A case study of Chongming Island. Marine Environmental Science, 34, 433-440. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 池源, 石洪华, 丰爱平 ( 2015) 典型海岛景观生态网络构建——以崇明岛为例. 海洋环境科学, 34, 433-440.]
DOI URL |
|
[8] | Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA ( 2006) Connectivity conservation: Maintaining connections for nature. In: Connectivity Conservation (eds Crooks KR, Sanjayan M), pp. 1-20. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[9] |
Douglas-Hamilton I, Krink T, Vollrath F ( 2005) Movements and corridors of African elephants in relation to protected areas. Naturwissenschaften, 92, 158-163.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Dutta T, Sharma S, McRae BH, Roy PS, DeFries R ( 2016) Connecting the dots: Mapping habitat connectivity for tigers in central India. Regional Environmental Change, 16, 53-67.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Feng TT, Manen FT, Zhao NX, Li M, Wei FW ( 2009) Habitat assessment for giant pandas in the Qinling Mountain region of China. Journal of Wildlife Management, 73, 852-858.
DOI URL |
[12] |
Gong MH, Dai ZG, Zeng ZG, Zhang Q, Song YL ( 2007) A preliminary survey of population size and habitats of Marco Polo sheep (Ovis ammon polii) in Taxkorgan Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 27, 317-324. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 龚明昊, 戴志刚, 曾治高, 张琼, 宋延龄 ( 2007) 新疆塔什库尔干自然保护区马可波罗盘羊种群数量和栖息地初步调查. 兽类学报, 27, 317-324.]
DOI URL |
|
[13] |
Hashmi MM, Frate L, Nizami SM, Carranza ML ( 2017) Assessing transhumance corridors on high mountain environments by least cost path analysis: The case of yak herds in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189, 488-497.
DOI URL PMID |
[14] | Jiang ZG, Jiang JP, Wang YZ, Zhang E, Zhang YY, Li LL, Xie F, Cai B, Cao L, Zheng GM, Dong L, Zhang ZW, Ding P, Luo ZH, Ding CQ, Ma ZJ, Tang SH, Cao WX, Li CW, Hu HJ, Ma Y, Wu Y, Wang YX, Zhou KY, Liu SY, Chen YY, Li JT, Feng ZJ, Wang Y, Wang B, Li C, Song XL, Cai L, Zang CX, Zeng Y, Meng ZB, Fang HX, Ping XG ( 2016) Red list of China’s vertebrates. Biodiversity Science, 24, 501-551. (in Chinese and in English) |
[ 蒋志刚, 江建平, 王跃招, 张鹗, 张雁云, 李立立, 谢锋, 蔡波, 曹亮, 郑光美, 董路, 张正旺, 丁平, 罗振华, 丁长青, 马志军, 汤宋华, 曹文宣, 李春旺, 胡慧建, 马勇, 吴毅, 王应祥, 周开亚, 刘少英, 陈跃英, 李家堂, 冯祚建, 王燕, 王斌, 李成, 宋雪琳, 蔡蕾, 臧春鑫, 曾岩, 孟智斌, 方红霞, 平晓鸽 ( 2016) 中国脊椎动物红色名录. 生物多样性, 24, 501-551.] | |
[15] |
Jiang ZG, Ma Y, Wu Y, Wang YX, Feng ZJ, Zhou KY, Liu SY, Luo ZH, Li CW ( 2015) China’s mammalian diversity. Biodiversity Science, 23, 351-364. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 蒋志刚, 马勇, 吴毅, 王应祥, 冯祚建, 周开亚, 刘少英, 罗振华, 李春旺 ( 2015) 中国哺乳动物多样性. 生物多样性, 23, 351-364.]
DOI URL |
|
[16] |
Kanagaraj R, Wiegand T, Kramer-Schadt S, Goyal SP ( 2013) Using individual-based movement models to assess inter-patch connectivity for large carnivores in fragmented landscapes. Biological Conservation, 167, 298-309.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Khan B, Ablimit A, Khan G, Jasra AW, Ali H, Ali R, Ahmad E, Ismail M ( 2016) Abundance, distribution and conservation status of Siberian ibex, Marco Polo and Blue sheep in Karakoram-Pamir Mountain area. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 28, 216-225.
DOI URL |
[18] |
Knaapen JP, Scheffer M, Harms B ( 1992) Estimating habitat isolation in landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 23, 1-16.
DOI URL |
[19] |
Lees AC, Peres CA ( 2008) Conservation value of remnant riparian forest corridors of varying quality for Amazonian birds and mammals. Conservation Biology, 22, 439-449.
DOI URL |
[20] | Li S, Zhang XF, Shi JB, Dong SK, Gao XX ( 2018) Effects of highway from Inner Mongolia to Xinjiang on habitat suitability of ungulates in Alashan desert. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37, 103-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 李帅, 张相锋, 石建斌, 董世魁, 高晓霞 ( 2018) 蒙新高速公路对阿拉善荒漠区有蹄类野生动物生境适宜性的影响. 生态学杂志, 37, 103-110.] | |
[21] |
Li WP, Bao H, Zhang MH ( 2017) Habitat analysis and design of potential ecological corridors for Amur tiger in Northeastern China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 37, 317-326. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[1] |
Abrahms B, Sawyer SC, Jordan NR, McNutt JW, Wilson AM, Brashares JS, Hayward M ( 2017) Does wildlife resource selection accurately inform corridor conservation? Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 412-422.
DOI URL |
[2] |
Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E ( 2003) The application of ‘least- cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 233-247.
DOI URL |
[21] |
[ 李维平, 包衡, 张明海 ( 2017) 中国东北虎栖息地分析与潜在生态廊道构建. 兽类学报, 37, 317-326.]
DOI URL |
[22] | Liang GD ( 1984) The Taxkorgan Nature Reserve was established. Xinjiang Forestry, ( 5), 26. (in Chinese) |
[ 梁果栋 ( 1984) 塔什库尔干野生动物保护区成立. 新疆林业, ( 5), 26.] | |
[23] |
Liu HM, Liu XM, Wang CZ, Wang Q ( 2016) Assessment and conservation strategy on habitat suitability of Syrmaticus humiae in Jinzhongshan National Nature Reserve. Journal of Geo-information Science, 18, 526-536. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 刘慧明, 刘晓曼, 王昌佐, 王桥 ( 2016) 金钟山国家级自然保护区黑颈长尾雉生境适宜性评价. 地球信息科学学报, 18, 526-536.]
DOI URL |
|
[24] | McRae BH ( 2012) Centrality Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins. |
[25] | McRae BH, Kavanagh DM ( 2011) Linkage Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Fort Collins. |
[26] | McRae BH, Shah VB ( 2009) Circuit Scape Users’ Guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara. |
[27] | Mi CR, Guo YM, Huettmann F, Han XS ( 2017) Species distribution model sampling contributes to the identification of target species: Take black-necked crane and hooded crane as two cases. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 4476-4482. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 宓春荣, 郭玉民, Huettmann F, 韩雪松 ( 2017) 基于物种分布模型的精确采样提高目标物种发现率: 以黑颈鹤(Grus nigricollis)、白头鹤(Grus monacha)为例. 生态学报, 37, 4476-4482.] | |
[28] |
Pelletier D, Clark M, Anderson MG, Rayfield B, Wulder MA, Cardille JA ( 2014) Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: Tiling, pinch points, and omni directional connectivity. PLoS ONE, 9, e84135.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Pierik ME, Dell’Acqua M, Confalonieri R, Bocchi S, Gomarasca S ( 2016) Designing ecological corridors in a fragmented landscape: A fuzzy approach to circuit connectivity analysis. Ecological Indicators, 67, 807-820.
DOI URL |
[30] |
Qing J, Xu C, Yang B, Yang ZS, Qi DW, Yang XY, Gu XD, Dai Q ( 2016) Corridor design for the giant panda in the Xiaoxiangling Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 1125-1133. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 青菁, 胥池, 杨彪, 杨志松, 齐敦武, 杨旭煜, 古晓东, 戴强 ( 2016) 小相岭山系大熊猫廊道规划. 生态学报, 36, 1125-1133.]
DOI URL |
|
[31] |
Salas EAL, Valdez R, Michel S ( 2017) Summer and winter habitat suitability of Marco Polo argali in southeastern Tajikistan: A modeling approach. Heliyon, 3, e00445.
DOI URL |
[32] |
Sawyer SC, Epps CW, Brashares JS ( 2011) Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: Do least-cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 668-678.
DOI URL |
[33] | Schaller GB, Kang A ( 2008) Status of Marco Polo sheep Ovis ammon polii in China and adjacent countries: Conservation of a vulnerable subspecies. Oryx, 42, 100-106. |
[34] |
Schaller GB, Li H, Ta LP, Lü H, Ren JR, Qiu MJ, Wang HB ( 1987) Status of large mammals in the Taxkorgan Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Biological Conservation, 42, 53-71.
DOI URL |
[35] |
Smallwood P, Shank C, Dehgan A, Zahler P ( 2011) Wildlife Conservation .. in Afghanistan? BioScience, 61, 506-511.
DOI URL |
[36] |
Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Fortin M, McRae BH, Scribner KIM ( 2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: Considerations for parameterization and analysis. Molecular Ecology, 19, 3576-3591.
DOI URL PMID |
[37] | Tian B, Zhou YX, Zhang LQ, Ma ZJ, Yang B, Tang CD ( 2008) A GIS and remote sensing based analysis of migratory bird habitat suitability for Chongming Dongtan Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28, 3049-3059. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 田波, 周云轩, 张利权, 马志军, 杨波, 汤臣栋 ( 2008) 遥感与GIS支持下的崇明东滩迁徙鸟类生境适宜性分析. 生态学报, 28, 3049-3059.] | |
[38] |
Tischendorf L, Fahring L ( 2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90, 7-19.
DOI URL |
[39] |
Titeux N, Dufrene M, Radoux J, Hirzel AH, Defourny P ( 2007) Fitness-related parameters improve presence-only distribution modelling for conservation practice: The case of the red-backed shrike. Biological Conservation, 138, 207-223.
DOI URL |
[40] | Valdez R, Michel S, Subbotin A, Klich D ( 2016) Status and population structure of a hunted population of Marco Polo argali Ovis ammon polii (Cetartiodactyla, Bovidae) in Southeastern Tajikistan. Mammalia, 80, 49-57. |
[41] |
Wang YT, Dai ZG, Yang SJ, Luo YZ ( 2016) The distribution of Marco Polo sheep and their habitat vegetation dynamics in east Pamir. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36, 209-217. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 王玉涛, 戴志刚, 杨世杰, 罗玉柱 ( 2016) 东帕米尔高原盘羊分布与栖息地植被覆盖时空变化. 生态学报, 36, 209-217.]
DOI URL |
|
[42] | Wang ZQ, Chen ZC, Hao CY ( 2009) Breeding habitat suitability evaluation of red-crown crane in Zhalong National Nature Reserve by the method of habitat suitability index. Wetland Science, 7, 197-201. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 王志强, 陈志超, 郝成元 ( 2009) 基于HSI模型的扎龙国家级自然保护区丹顶鹤繁殖生境适宜性评价. 湿地科学, 7, 197-201.] | |
[43] |
Willis EO ( 1974) Populations and local extinctions of birds on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecological Monographs, 44, 153-169.
DOI URL |
[44] | Wu CG, Zhou ZX, Wang PC, Xiao WF, Teng MJ, Peng L ( 2009) Evaluation of landscape connectivity based on Least Cost Model. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 20, 2042-2048. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 吴昌广, 周志翔, 王鹏程, 肖文发, 滕明君, 彭丽 ( 2009) 基于最小费用模型的景观连接度评价. 应用生态学报, 20, 2042-2048.] | |
[45] |
Yeganeh KZ, Faryadi S, Yavari A, Kamali Y, Shabani AA ( 2016) Habitat suitability & connectivity of Alborz wild sheep in the east of Tehran, Iran. Open Journal of Ecology, 6, 325-342.
DOI URL |
[46] |
Yu YQ, Ji MZ, Liu CG, Li KC, Guo ST ( 2008) Geographical distribution and vicissitude of argali, Ovis ammon, in China. Biodiversity Science, 16, 197-204. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[ 余玉群, 姬明周, 刘楚光, 李克长, 郭松涛 ( 2008) 中国盘羊的地理分布和历史变迁. 生物多样性, 16, 197-204.]
DOI URL |
|
[47] |
Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR ( 2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: A review. Landscape Ecology, 27, 777-797.
DOI URL |
[48] | Zhuge HJ, Li XW, Zhang X, Gao F, Xu DH ( 2014) Identification and conservation assessment of suitable habitats for Tibetan antelope in the alpine desert, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 25, 3483-3490. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 诸葛海锦, 李晓文, 张翔, 高峰, 许东华 ( 2014) 青藏高原高寒荒漠区藏羚适宜生境识别及其保护状况评估. 应用生态学报, 25, 3483-3490.] | |
[49] | Zhuge HJ, Lin DQ, Li XW ( 2015) Identification of ecological corridors for Tibetan antelope and assessment of their human disturbances in the alpine desert of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 26, 2504-2510. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[ 诸葛海锦, 林丹琪, 李晓文 ( 2015) 青藏高原高寒荒漠区藏羚生态廊道识别及其保护状况评估. 应用生态学报, 26, 2504-2510.] | |
[3] |
Allen CH, Parrott L, Kyle C ( 2016) An individual-based modelling approach to estimate landscape connectivity for bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). PeerJ, 4, 1-22.
DOI URL PMID |
[1] | Dekui Yan. Common elements, deficiencies, and optimization suggestions of biodiversity conservation policies in China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2024, 32(5): 23293-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn