Biodiv Sci ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 1158-1167. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2018213
Special Issue: 生物入侵
• Original Papers: Plant Diversity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Baiwen Jiang1, Jing Li1, Rui Chen1, Ping Lu1,*(), Qi Li1, Tongyu Xiao1, Yamei Bai1, Xianfeng Zhang2, Yiqi Li1
Received:
2018-08-03
Accepted:
2018-10-27
Online:
2018-11-20
Published:
2019-01-08
Contact:
Lu Ping
About author:
# Co-first authors
Baiwen Jiang, Jing Li, Rui Chen, Ping Lu, Qi Li, Tongyu Xiao, Yamei Bai, Xianfeng Zhang, Yiqi Li. Effects of annual precipitation pattern variation and different cultivation modes on the growth of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2018, 26(11): 1158-1167.
Fig. 1 Distribution of simulated precipitation in different annual precipitation patterns. AP, Average annual precipitation pattern; DP, Deficient annual precipitation pattern; PP, Plentiful annual precipitation pattern.
株高 Height | 相对生长速率 RGR | 根冠比 R/S | 总生物量 Total biomass | |
---|---|---|---|---|
反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus | ||||
栽培方式 Cultivation mode (Cult.) | 10.13** | 227.91*** | 3.99 ns | 2,862.44*** |
降雨年型 Precipitation pattern (Prec.) | 56.76*** | 41.66*** | 88.75*** | 388.53*** |
采样时间 Sampling time (Samp.) | 1,023.21*** | 15,173.44*** | 332.55*** | 3,435.53*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 Cult. × Prec. | 14.23*** | 37.79*** | 4.32* | 29.16*** |
栽培方式 × 采样时间 Cult. × Samp. | 5.82** | 14.74*** | 1.92 ns | 366.46*** |
采样时间 × 降雨年型 Samp. × Prec. | 17.56*** | 10.31*** | 30.41*** | 73.84*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 × 采样时间 Cult. × Prec. × Samp. | 5.44*** | 4.81** | 13.21*** | 40.47*** |
大豆 Glycine max | ||||
栽培方式 Cultivation mode (Cult.) | 1,314.58*** | 32.78*** | 64.97*** | 2,043.58*** |
降雨年型 Precipitation pattern (Prec.) | 532.56*** | 7.53** | 153.70*** | 527.47*** |
采样时间 Sampling time (Samp.) | 560.08*** | 638.95*** | 337.36*** | 884.17*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 Cult. × Prec. | 3.30ns | 5.41* | 36.27** | 0.83 ns |
栽培方式 × 采样时间 Cult. × Samp. | 131.53*** | 28.96*** | 5.95** | 219.98*** |
采样时间 × 降雨年型 Samp. × Prec. | 31.31*** | 24.19*** | 18.22*** | 102.11*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 × 采样时间 Cult. × Prec. × Samp. | 3.78** | 12.87*** | 16.86*** | 37.72*** |
Table 1 Repeated measurements of variance analysis (F value) of the effects of precipitation pattern, cultivation mode, sampling time, and their interactions on height, relative growth rate (RGR), root/shoot ratio (R/S) and total biomass of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max
株高 Height | 相对生长速率 RGR | 根冠比 R/S | 总生物量 Total biomass | |
---|---|---|---|---|
反枝苋 Amaranthus retroflexus | ||||
栽培方式 Cultivation mode (Cult.) | 10.13** | 227.91*** | 3.99 ns | 2,862.44*** |
降雨年型 Precipitation pattern (Prec.) | 56.76*** | 41.66*** | 88.75*** | 388.53*** |
采样时间 Sampling time (Samp.) | 1,023.21*** | 15,173.44*** | 332.55*** | 3,435.53*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 Cult. × Prec. | 14.23*** | 37.79*** | 4.32* | 29.16*** |
栽培方式 × 采样时间 Cult. × Samp. | 5.82** | 14.74*** | 1.92 ns | 366.46*** |
采样时间 × 降雨年型 Samp. × Prec. | 17.56*** | 10.31*** | 30.41*** | 73.84*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 × 采样时间 Cult. × Prec. × Samp. | 5.44*** | 4.81** | 13.21*** | 40.47*** |
大豆 Glycine max | ||||
栽培方式 Cultivation mode (Cult.) | 1,314.58*** | 32.78*** | 64.97*** | 2,043.58*** |
降雨年型 Precipitation pattern (Prec.) | 532.56*** | 7.53** | 153.70*** | 527.47*** |
采样时间 Sampling time (Samp.) | 560.08*** | 638.95*** | 337.36*** | 884.17*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 Cult. × Prec. | 3.30ns | 5.41* | 36.27** | 0.83 ns |
栽培方式 × 采样时间 Cult. × Samp. | 131.53*** | 28.96*** | 5.95** | 219.98*** |
采样时间 × 降雨年型 Samp. × Prec. | 31.31*** | 24.19*** | 18.22*** | 102.11*** |
栽培方式 × 降雨年型 × 采样时间 Cult. × Prec. × Samp. | 3.78** | 12.87*** | 16.86*** | 37.72*** |
Fig. 2 Effects of precipitation patterns and cultivation modes on plant height of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max. The values in the figures are means ± standard error, n = 4. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between growth periods for the same precipitation pattern, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation patterns for the same growth period (P < 0.05), and asterisk indicates significant difference between the plants in mixed-culture and the plants in mono-culture grown in the same precipitation treatment and the same growth stage (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001). AP, Average annual precipitation pattern; DP, Deficient annual precipitation pattern; PP, Plentiful annual precipitation pattern.
Fig. 3 Effects of precipitation patterns and cultivation modes on total biomass of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max. The values in the figures are means ± standard error, n = 4. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between growth periods for the same precipitation pattern, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation patterns for the same growth period (P < 0.05), and asterisk indicates significant difference between the plants in mixed-culture and the plants in mono-culture grown in the same precipitation treatment and the same growth stage (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001). AP, Average annual precipitation pattern; DP, Deficient annual precipitation pattern; PP, Plentiful annual precipitation pattern.
Fig. 4 Effects of precipitation patterns and cultivation modes on root/shoot ratio of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max. The values in the figures are means ± standard error, n = 4. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between growth periods for the same precipitation pattern, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation patterns for the same growth period (P < 0.05), and asterisk indicates significant difference between the plants in mixed-culture and the plants in mono-culture grown in the same precipitation treatment and the same growth stage (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001). AP, Average annual precipitation pattern; DP, Deficient annual precipitation pattern; PP, Plentiful annual precipitation pattern.
Fig. 5 Effects of precipitation patterns and cultivation modes on the relative growth rate of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max. The values in the figures are means ± standard error, n = 4. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between growth periods for the same precipitation pattern, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation patterns for the same growth period (P < 0.05), and asterisk indicates significant difference between the plants in mixed-culture and the plants in mono-culture grown in the same precipitation treatment and the same growth stage (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001). AP, Average annual precipitation pattern; DP, Deficient annual precipitation pattern; PP, Plentiful annual precipitation pattern.
降雨年型 Precipitation pattern (Prec.) | 采样时间 Sampling time (Samp.) | 采样时间 × 降雨年型 Samp. × Prec. | |
---|---|---|---|
反枝苋植株相对生物量 Relative biomass of the plant (RB) of Amaranthus retroflexus | 167.06*** | 707.34*** | 135.35*** |
大豆植株相对生物量 Relative biomass of the plant (RB) of Glycine max | 73.55*** | 375.41*** | 72.50*** |
Table 2 Repeated measurements of variance analysis (F value) of the effects of precipitation pattern, sampling time, and their interaction on the relative biomass of the plant (RB) of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max
降雨年型 Precipitation pattern (Prec.) | 采样时间 Sampling time (Samp.) | 采样时间 × 降雨年型 Samp. × Prec. | |
---|---|---|---|
反枝苋植株相对生物量 Relative biomass of the plant (RB) of Amaranthus retroflexus | 167.06*** | 707.34*** | 135.35*** |
大豆植株相对生物量 Relative biomass of the plant (RB) of Glycine max | 73.55*** | 375.41*** | 72.50*** |
Fig. 6 Effects of precipitation patterns and cultivation modes on the relative biomass of the individual plant of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max. The values in the figures are means ± standard error, n = 4. Different capital letters indicate significant differences between growth periods for the same precipitation pattern, different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between precipitation patterns for the same growth period (P < 0.05), and the relative biomass of each species in each period of precipitation pattern was significantly different from that of 1.0 (except for the average annual precipitation pattern in June). AP, Average annual precipitation pattern; DP, Deficient annual precipitation pattern; PP, Plentiful annual precipitation pattern; RBA.r, Relative biomass of the individual plant of A. retroflexus; RBG.m, Relative biomass of the individual plant of G. max.
[1] | Bai X, Ta L, Zhao MW, Liu CC, Wei GY, Cui LT, Zeng GJ, Qin J (2016) New research progress on alien invasive plant Amaranthus retroflexus L. from 2010 to 2015. Crops, 173(4), 12-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[柏祥, 塔莉, 赵美微, 刘传才, 魏国印, 崔力拓, 曾广娟, 秦津 (2016) 外来入侵植物反枝苋的最新研究进展. 作物杂志, 173(4), 12-19.] | |
[2] | Bazzaz FA, Garbutt K, Reekie EG, Williams WE (1989) Using growth analysis to interpret competition between a C3 and a C4 annual under ambient and elevated CO2. Oecologia, 79, 223-235. |
[3] | Blumenthal D, Chimner RA, Welker JM, Morgan JA (2008) Increased snow facilitates plant invasion in mixed grass prairie. New Phytologist, 179, 440-448. |
[4] | Bonifas KD, Lindqiust JL (2009) Effects of nitrogen supply on the root morphology of corn and velvetleaf. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 32, 1371-1382. |
[5] | Bradley BA, Blumenthal DM, Wilcove DS, Ziska DS (2010) Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 310-318. |
[6] | Caplan JS, Yeakley JA (2010) Water relations advantages for invasive Rubus armeniacus over two native ruderal congeners. Plant Ecology, 210, 169-179. |
[7] | Cong X, Wu Y, Lu P, Xu NT, Liang H, Tian QY, Wang P, Zhang DX (2013) The effects of nitrogen fluctuation on the maximum net photosynthetic rate and photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and soybean (Glycine max). Crops, 152(1), 81-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[丛雪, 吴岩, 鲁萍, 徐宁彤, 梁慧, 田秋阳, 王鹏, 张东旭 (2013) 氮素波动对反枝苋和大豆最大净光合速率和光合氮利用效率的影响. 作物杂志, 152(1), 81-85.] | |
[8] | Daehler CC (2003) Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34, 183-211. |
[9] | Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: A general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology, 88, 528-534. |
[10] | Dawson W, Rohr RP, Kleunen MV, Fischer M (2012) Alien plant species with a wider global distribution are better able to capitalize on increased resource availability. New Phytologist, 194, 859-867. |
[11] | Dong QZ, Yang XY, Zhang Y, Xue H, Liu LL (2006) Effect of inadequate rainfall on yield and relative traits in soybean. Soybean Science & Technology, (3), 5-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[董全中, 杨兴勇, 张勇, 薛红, 刘玲玲 (2006) 降雨量不足对大豆产量及农艺性状影响的研究. 大豆科技, (3), 5-8.] | |
[12] | Dukes J, Mooney H (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 135-139. |
[13] | Dunbar KR, Facelli JM (1999) The impact of a novel invasive species, Orbea variegata (African carrion flower), on the chenopod shrublands of South Australia. Journal of Arid Environments, 41, 37-48. |
[14] | Ewe SM, Sternberg LDSL (2002) Seasonal water-use by the invasive exotic, Schinus terebinthifolius, in native and disturbed communities. Oecologia, 133, 441-448. |
[15] | Funk JL, Vitousek PM (2007) Resource-use efficiency and plant invasion in low-resource systems. Nature, 446, 1079-1081. |
[16] | Hao CY, Zhao W, Zhao TQ (2011) Comparative research on regional respond to global climate change in China. Area Research and Development, 30(3), 56-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[郝成元, 赵伟, 赵同谦 (2011) 全球气候变化背景下中国敏感区区域响应比较. 地域研究与开发, 30(3), 56-61.] | |
[17] | Harrington R, Brown B, Reich P (1989) Ecophysiology of exotic and native shrubs in southern Wisconsin. Oecologia, 80, 356-367. |
[18] | Huntington TG (2006) Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis. Journal of Hydrology, 319, 83-95. |
[19] | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Report of a Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. . (accessed on 2018-01-01 |
[20] | Knezevic SZ, Weise SF, Swanton CJ (2017) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Science, 42, 568-573. |
[21] | Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Amato M, Tommaso TD (2010) Photosynthetic response to water stress of pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in a southern-mediterranean area. Weed Science, 58, 126-131. |
[22] | Lu P, Jin CG, Zhang X, Jiang BW, Yan NN, Xiao TY, Bai YM, Li JX, Chen R, Li J (2017) The responses of the ecophysiological characteristics of Amaranthus retroflexus and Glycine max to seasonal rainfall fluctuations. Crops, 177(2), 119-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[鲁萍, 金成功, 张茜, 姜佰文, 闫南南, 肖同玉, 白雅梅, 李景欣, 陈睿, 李静 (2017) 反枝苋和大豆对降雨季节波动的生理生态响应. 作物杂志, 177(2), 119-125.] | |
[23] | Lu P, Li JX, Jin CG, Jiang BW, Bai YM (2016) Different growth responses of an invasive weed and a native crop to nitrogen pulse and competition. PLoS ONE, 11, e0156285. |
[24] | Lu P, Liang H, Wang HY, Bai YM, Gao FJ, Song G, Wu Y, Tian QY (2010) Research progress on exotic invasive weed Amaranthus retroflexus. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 29, 1662-1670. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[鲁萍, 梁慧, 王宏燕, 白雅梅, 高凤杰, 宋戈, 吴岩, 田秋阳 (2010) 外来入侵杂草反枝苋的研究进展. 生态学杂志, 29, 1662-1670.] | |
[25] | McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1999) Biomass allocation in plants: Ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology, 80, 2581-2593. |
[26] | Poorter L (1999) Growth response of 15 rain forest tree species to a light gradient: The relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Functional Ecology, 13, 396-410. |
[27] | Vaughn LG, Bernards ML, Arkebauer TJ, Lindqiust JL (2016) Corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) growth and transpiration efficiency under varying water supply. Weed Science, 64, 596-604. |
[28] | Xu GH, Wang HY, Liu J (2009) Effects of RRS on the amount and diversity of bacteria in rhizospheric soil. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29, 4535-4541. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[徐广惠, 王宏燕, 刘佳 (2009) 抗草甘膦转基因大豆(RRS)对根际土壤细菌数量和多样性的影响. 生态学报, 29, 4535-4541.] | |
[29] | Yang LH, Bastow JL, Spence KO, Wright AN (2008) What can we learn from resource pulse. Ecology, 89, 621-634. |
[30] | Zheng YL, Feng YL, Liu WX, Liao ZY (2009) Growth, biomass allocation, morphology, and photosynthesis of invasive Eupatorium adenophorum and its native congeners grown at four irradiances. Plant Ecology, 203, 263-271. |
[31] | Zou WX, Han XZ, Jiang H, Yang CB (2009) Characteristics of precipitation in black soil region and response of soil moisture dynamics in Northeast China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 27(9), 196-202. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[邹文秀, 韩晓增, 江恒, 杨春葆 (2009) 东北黑土区降水特征及其对土壤水分的影响. 农业工程学报, 27(9), 196-202.] |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn