鸟类调查的样线法和样点法比较:以崇明东滩春季盐沼鸟类调查为例

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.044

生物多样性 ›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 44-49. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.044 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2010.044

鸟类调查的样线法和样点法比较:以崇明东滩春季盐沼鸟类调查为例

蔡音亭, 干晓静, 马志军^*()

复旦大学生物多样性科学研究所, 生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室, 长江河口湿地生态系统野外科学观测研究站, 上海 200433

收稿日期:2009-06-18 接受日期:2009-11-11 出版日期:2010-01-20 发布日期:2010-01-20
通讯作者: 马志军
作者简介:* E-mail: zhijunm@fudan.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(2006CB403305);国家自然科学基金(30670269);上海市科学技术委员会重大项目(07DZ12038);世界自然基金会湿地先锋行动项目

A comparison of line transect and point count surveys: a case study of spring saltmarsh birds at Chongming Dongtan

Yinting Cai, Xiaojing Gan, Zhijun Ma^*()

Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of Yangtze River Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Biodiversity Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433

Received:2009-06-18 Accepted:2009-11-11 Online:2010-01-20 Published:2010-01-20
Contact: Zhijun Ma

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了探讨样线法和样点法对盐沼湿地鸟类调查的有效性及适用性, 我们于2008年3-5月采用固定距离样线法和固定半径样点法对崇明东滩盐沼鸟类进行了调查。5次调查共记录到鸟类24种, 其中样线法记录到19种, 样点法记录到21种, 两种调查方法平均每次记录到的鸟类种数没有显著差异, 表明两种方法对盐沼鸟类种类的发现能力相似。两种方法得到的鸟类密度之间有显著的相关性,说明两种方法在反映鸟类群落中每种鸟类的相对数量方面具有可比性。但除了仅在一种调查方法中记录到的种类, 样点法调查得到的每种鸟类密度和鸟类总密度均高于样线法的调查结果。因此, 在对鸟类种群或群落的时空特征进行比较时, 需要考虑所采用的调查方法对调查结果的影响。

关键词: 鸟类调查, 样线法, 样点法, 盐沼, 崇明东滩

Abstract

We compared fixed-distance line transect and fixed-radius point count surveys for estimating saltmarsh bird richness and abundance at Chongming Dongtan. A total of 24 bird species were recorded during five surveys in spring 2008, 19 during line transects and 21 during point counts. The average number of species detected per survey did not differ between the two methods. Density estimates of individual species from the two methods were correlated, suggesting that the two methods consistently estimate relative abundance. However, density of individual species and of all species combined as estimated by point count surveys were higher than those by line transect surveys. Our results indicate that it is important to account for different survey methods when comparing temporal and spatial differences in bird species richness and abundance.

Key words: bird surveys, line transects, point counts, saltmarsh, Chongming Dongtan

蔡音亭, 干晓静, 马志军 (2010) 鸟类调查的样线法和样点法比较:以崇明东滩春季盐沼鸟类调查为例. 生物多样性, 18, 44-49. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.044.

Yinting Cai, Xiaojing Gan, Zhijun Ma (2010) A comparison of line transect and point count surveys: a case study of spring saltmarsh birds at Chongming Dongtan. Biodiversity Science, 18, 44-49. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.044.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2010.044

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2010/V18/I1/44

图/表 2

参考文献 23

[1]	Anderson BW, Ohmart RD (1981) Comparisons of avian census results using variable distance transect and variable circular plot techniques. Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 186-192.
[2]	Bajema RA, Devault TL, Scott PE, Lima SL (2001) Reclaimed coal mine grasslands and their significance for henslow’s sparrows in the American Midwest. The Auk, 118, 422-431.
[3]	Bibby C, Burgess N, Hill D, Mustoe S (2000) Bird Census Techniques, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London.
[4]	Bibby C, Jones M, Marsden S (1998) Expedition Field Techniques: Bird Survey. Expedition Advisory Centre, Royal Geographical Society, London.
[5]	Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to Distance Sampling. Oxford University Press, New York.
[6]	Casagrande DG, Beissinger SR (1997) Evaluation of four methods for estimating parrot population size. The Condor, 99, 445-457.
[7]	Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 345, 101-118.
[8]	Craig MD (2004) A comparison of species counts and density estimates derived from area searches, line transects and point counts in the jarrah forest of southwestern Australia. Corella, 28, 55-59.
[9]	Dobkin DS, Rich AC (1998) Comparison of line-transect, spot-map, and point-count surveys for birds in riparian habitats of the great basin. Journal of Field Ornithology, 69, 430-443.
[10]	Edwards DK, Dorsey GL, Crawford JA (1981) A comparison of three avian census methods. Studies in Avian Biology, 6, 170-176.
[11]	Greenberg R (2006) Tidal marshes: home for the few and the highly selected. Studies in Avian Biology, 32, 2-9.
[12]	Raman TRS (2003) Assessment of census techniques for interspecific comparisons of tropical rainforest bird densities: a field evaluation in the western Ghats, India. Ibis, 145, 9-21.
[13]	Ratkowsky AV, Rathowsky DA (1979) A survey of the bird of the Mt. Wellington Range, Tasmania, during the non-breeding months. Emu, 78, 223-226.
[14]	Reynolds RT, Scott JM, Nussbaum RA (1980) A variable circular plot method for estimating bird numbers. The Condor, 82, 309-311.
[15]	Roberts JP, Schnell GD (2006) Comparison of survey methods for wintering grassland birds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 77, 46-60.
[16]	Robel RJ, Antholz SJ, Kemp KE, Runco CB (2000) Assessment of avian populations in Kansas tallgrass prairie landscape: two survey methods compared. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 103, 139-149.
[17]	SPSS Inc. (2003) SPSS for Windows, Release 12.0.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago.
[18]	Sutherland WJ, Newton I, Green RE (2004) Bird Ecology and Conservation. Oxford University Press, New York.
[19]	Verner J, Ritter LV (1985) A comparison of transects and point counts in oak-pine woodlands of California. The Condor, 87, 47-68.
[20]	Wilson RR, Twedt DJ, Elliott AB (2000) Comparison of line transects and point counts for monitoring spring migration in forested wetlands. Journal of Field Ornithology, 71, 345-355.
[21]	Xu HF (徐宏发), Zhao YL (赵云龙) (2005) Scientific Surveys on Chongming Dongtan Migratory Birds Nature Reserve of Shanghai (崇明东滩鸟类自然保护区科学考察集). China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Xu L (许龙), Zhang ZW (张正旺), Ding CQ (丁长青) (2003) Line transect methods in avian census. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 22(5), 127-130. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Zheng GM (郑光美) (1995) Ornithology (鸟类学). Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

鸟类名称 Species	样线法 Line transect surveys	样点法 Point count surveys	P
震旦鸦雀 Paradoxornis heudei	1.17 ± 0.60	2.51 ± 0.78	0.01^{a *}
东方大苇莺 Acrocephalus orientalis	1.12 ± 1.38	1.20 ± 1.27	0.59^a
斑背大尾莺 Locustella pryeri	0.37 ± 0.18	0.61 ± 0.24	0.01^{a *}
棕扇尾莺 Cisticola juncidis	0.30 ± 0.17	0.76 ± 0.27	0.002^{a *}
棕头鸦雀 Paradoxornis webbianus	0.32 ± 0.11	0.55 ± 0.20	0.05^a
攀雀 Remiz consobrinus	0.22 ± 0.39	0.66 ± 0.88	0.22^a
家燕 Hirundo rustica	0.20 ± 0.27	0.75 ± 0.02	0.20^a
大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus	0.15 ± 0.21	0.30 ± 0.42	0.18^b
黑眉苇莺 Acrocephalus bistrigiceps	0.04 ± 0.05	0.07 ± 0.12	0.32^a
蓝胸秧鸡 Gallirallus striatus	0.01 ± 0.01	0.16 ± 0.06	0.004^{a *}
黄苇鳱 Ixobrychus sinensis	0.01 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.11	0.18^b
钝翅尾莺 Acrocephalus concinens	0.01 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.04	0.18^b
鹤鹬 Tringa erythropus	0.01 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.02	0.18^b
青脚鹬 T. nebularia	0.00 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.02	0.32^b
黑水鸡 Gallinula chloropus	0.00 ± 0.01	0.01 ± 0.02	0.32^b
池鹭 Ardeola bacchus	0.00 ± 0.01	?	-
白眉鸭 Anas querquedula	0.00 ± 0.01	?	-
北蝗莺 Locustella ochotensis	0.00 ± 0.01	?	-
紫背苇鳱 Ixobrychus eurhythmus	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
黄眉柳莺 Phylloscopus inornatus	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
金腰燕 Hirundo daurica	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
普通翠鸟 Alcedo atthis	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
扇尾沙锥 Gallinago gallinago	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
鹀类 Emberiza spp.	0.19 ± 0.25	0.75 ± 0.99	0.17^a
未识别鸟类 Unidentified birds	0.08 ± 0.08	0.48 ± 0.13	-
总计 Total	4.20 ± 1.35	8.95 ± 1.75	0.01^{a *}

鸟类名称 Species	样线法 Line transect surveys	样点法 Point count surveys	P
震旦鸦雀 Paradoxornis heudei	1.17 ± 0.60	2.51 ± 0.78	0.01^{a *}
东方大苇莺 Acrocephalus orientalis	1.12 ± 1.38	1.20 ± 1.27	0.59^a
斑背大尾莺 Locustella pryeri	0.37 ± 0.18	0.61 ± 0.24	0.01^{a *}
棕扇尾莺 Cisticola juncidis	0.30 ± 0.17	0.76 ± 0.27	0.002^{a *}
棕头鸦雀 Paradoxornis webbianus	0.32 ± 0.11	0.55 ± 0.20	0.05^a
攀雀 Remiz consobrinus	0.22 ± 0.39	0.66 ± 0.88	0.22^a
家燕 Hirundo rustica	0.20 ± 0.27	0.75 ± 0.02	0.20^a
大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus	0.15 ± 0.21	0.30 ± 0.42	0.18^b
黑眉苇莺 Acrocephalus bistrigiceps	0.04 ± 0.05	0.07 ± 0.12	0.32^a
蓝胸秧鸡 Gallirallus striatus	0.01 ± 0.01	0.16 ± 0.06	0.004^{a *}
黄苇鳱 Ixobrychus sinensis	0.01 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.11	0.18^b
钝翅尾莺 Acrocephalus concinens	0.01 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.04	0.18^b
鹤鹬 Tringa erythropus	0.01 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.02	0.18^b
青脚鹬 T. nebularia	0.00 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.02	0.32^b
黑水鸡 Gallinula chloropus	0.00 ± 0.01	0.01 ± 0.02	0.32^b
池鹭 Ardeola bacchus	0.00 ± 0.01	?	-
白眉鸭 Anas querquedula	0.00 ± 0.01	?	-
北蝗莺 Locustella ochotensis	0.00 ± 0.01	?	-
紫背苇鳱 Ixobrychus eurhythmus	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
黄眉柳莺 Phylloscopus inornatus	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
金腰燕 Hirundo daurica	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
普通翠鸟 Alcedo atthis	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
扇尾沙锥 Gallinago gallinago	?	0.01 ± 0.02	-
鹀类 Emberiza spp.	0.19 ± 0.25	0.75 ± 0.99	0.17^a
未识别鸟类 Unidentified birds	0.08 ± 0.08	0.48 ± 0.13	-
总计 Total	4.20 ± 1.35	8.95 ± 1.75	0.01^{a *}

鸟类调查的样线法和样点法比较:以崇明东滩春季盐沼鸟类调查为例

A comparison of line transect and point count surveys: a case study of spring saltmarsh birds at Chongming Dongtan

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 2

参考文献 23

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	农荞伊, 曹军, 程文达, 彭艳琼. 不同方法对蜜蜂总科昆虫资源与多样性监测效果的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2025, 33(4): 25057-.
[2]	白皓天, 余上, 潘新园, 凌嘉乐, 吴娟, 谢恺琪, 刘阳, 陈学业. AI辅助识别的鸟类被动声学监测在城市湿地公园中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(8): 24188-.
[3]	吴乐婕, 刘泽康, 田星, 张群, 李博, 吴纪华. 海三棱藨草基因型多样性对种群营养生长和繁殖策略的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23478-.
[4]	张菁, 白煜, 黄子强, 张正旺, 李东来. 盐地碱蓬盐沼与相邻泥质滩涂湿地迁徙期鸻鹬类的群落组成及行为差异[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 351-360.
[5]	张倩雯, 龚粤宁, 宋相金, 王新财, 杨昌腾, 束祖飞, 邹发生. 红外相机技术与其他几种森林鸟类多样性调查方法的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(3): 229-237.
[6]	刘琳, 安树青, 智颖飙, 张明祥, 李红丽. 不同土壤质地和淤积深度对大米草生长繁殖的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(11): 1279-1287.
[7]	田园, 冯永军, 张春兰, 遇宝成, 唐小平, 胡慧建. 样线法在南方山地生态系统野生动物调查中的试点效果评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(1): 109-115.
[8]	邓自发, 欧阳琰, 谢晓玲, 清华, 肖燕, 安树青. 全球变化主要过程对海滨生态系统生物入侵的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(6): 605-614.
[9]	王智晨, 张亦默, 潘晓云, 马志军, 陈家宽, 李博. 冬季火烧与收割对互花米草地上部分生长与繁殖的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2006, 14(4): 275-283.
[10]	陈中义, 李博, 陈家宽. 互花米草与海三棱藨草的生长特征和相对竞争能力[J]. 生物多样性, 2005, 13(2): 130-136.
[11]	王淯, 王小明. 矮岩羊种群生态的初步研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2003, 11(1): 59-62.