生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 25125.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025125

• 遗传多样性及保护专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国上市公司生物遗传资源获取和惠益分享信息披露实证研究

王中庆*, 胡志伟   

  1. 山西大学法学院,太原 030031
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-02 修回日期:2025-09-03 接受日期:2025-09-16 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-09-19
  • 通讯作者: 王中庆
  • 基金资助:
    2025年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目《生态文明领域统筹推进国内法治与涉外法治研究》(25JJD820001)

Empirical study on access and benefit-sharing information disclosure of biological genetic resources by Chinese listed companies

Zhongqing Wang*, Zhiwei Hu   

  1. Law School, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031, China
  • Received:2025-04-02 Revised:2025-09-03 Accepted:2025-09-16 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-09-19
  • Contact: Zhongqing Wang
  • Supported by:
    Major Project of the Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education for 2025:Research on Coordinating Promotion of Domestic Rule of Law and Foreign-Related Rule of Law within the Ecological Civilization Domain(25JJD820001)

摘要: 党的二十届三中全会明确指出, 强化生物多样性保护工作协调机制, 积极完善绿色金融和市场信息披露制度, 深化环境信息依法披露制度改革。生物遗传资源获取和惠益分享作为全球生物多样性保护和可持续利用领域的关注焦点, 信息披露高度契合了《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》、绿色金融和信息驱动型自我规制等法治实践与理论基础。上市公司深度参与生物遗传资源国内配置和跨境流动, 应当是获取和惠益分享信息披露主题研究的典型样本, 本文通过整理2021–2023年度沪深证券交易所660份涵盖生物多样性主题的上市公司《可持续发展报告》, 从宏观与微观两个维度展开实证分析, 对于完善我国生物遗传资源获取和惠益分享机制具有路径指引和规范作用。目前, 实践中主要存在获取和惠益分享信息披露与绿色金融衔接不足、立法进展与自律规制指引受限、信息披露关联主体权义配置失衡等困境。未来需要强化获取和惠益分享信息披露与绿色金融的纵深联结、完善立法进展与自律规制的规范指引、健全获取和惠益分享信息披露的制度体系。

关键词: 上市公司, 生物遗传资源, 获取和惠益分享, 信息披露

Abstract

Background & Aims: The Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China explicitly emphasized the need to strengthen coordination mechanisms for biodiversity conservation, actively improve green finance and market information disclosure systems, and deepen the reform of the system for environmental information disclosure mandated by law. Access and benefit-sharing on biological genetic resources, as a focal concern in global biodiversity conservation and sustainable utilization, demonstrates high compatibility between its information disclosure mechanisms and the rule-of-law practices and theoretical foundations of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, green finance, and information-driven self-regulation. However, empirical analysis of access and benefit-sharing information disclosure practices among listed companies reveals notably low disclosure levels with substantial gaps compared to practical requirements. To address this, this study aims to enhance the breadth and depth of access and benefit-sharing information disclosure and provide effectively practical experience for access and benefit-sharing information disclosure models. 

Methods: Listed companies are deeply engaged in the domestic allocation and cross-border flows of biological genetic resources, and serve as paradigmatic research subjects for thematic studies on information disclosure related to access and benefit-sharing on biological genetic resources. By collating 660 biodiversity-themed sustainability reports issued by the Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2021 to 2023, this study conducts empirical study and theoretical analysis from both macro-dimension and micro-dimension. At the macro-level, the study conducts quantitative research focusing on indicators such as the number of listed companies involved, report themes, company nature, reference standards, geographical distribution, and industry sectors in China. At the micro-level, the study categorizes and analyses the content of these sustainability reports by key access and benefit-sharing elements, including specific objectives, participating entities, regulatory frameworks, applicable targets, and concrete mechanisms. 

Results: Empirical study finds that Chinese listed companies are actively embracing environmental, social and governance(ESG) concept in disclosing access and benefit-sharing on biological genetic resources. Information disclosure of biodiversity conservation in sustainability reports demonstrates significant growth, with expanding coverage of reporting companies, improved adoption of standards, and increased industry participation. Post-adoption of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, access and benefit-sharing information disclosure progressively aligns with normative requirements. Moreover, the status of access and benefit-sharing information disclosure fails to correlate positively with the broader ecological environment information disclosure trends. The effectiveness of access and benefit-sharing information disclosure varies significantly across listed companies based on their characteristics, geographical locations, and industrial sectors. The current disclosure critically lacks the specific objectives, participating entities, regulatory frameworks, applicable targets, and concrete mechanisms. of access and benefit-sharing on biological genetic resources deeply defined in the Nagoya Protocol. 

Suggestions: In the future, access and benefit-sharing on biological genetic resources issues need to be deeply embedded in the field of information disclosure, and the local implementation of global biodiversity conservation actions under the guidance of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework should be promoted. (1) Refine financial instruments and evaluation systems to integrate monetary benefits from access and benefit-sharing with green finance. (2) Improve the relevant legislation and refine the self-regulation mechanism to standardize access and benefit-sharing information disclosure. (3) Strengthen access and benefit-sharing agreements and approval systems, enhance information disclosure supervision, and explore assurance mechanism for validating agreements and administrative approvals.

Key words: listed companies, biological genetic resources, access and benefit-sharing, information disclosure