生物多样性 ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (5): 448-457. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08343
收稿日期:
2008-12-23
接受日期:
2009-05-23
出版日期:
2009-09-20
发布日期:
2009-09-20
通讯作者:
邓文洪
作者简介:
*E-mail: dengwh@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:
Daqing Zhou, Chunfa Zhou, Wenhong Deng()
Received:
2008-12-23
Accepted:
2009-05-23
Online:
2009-09-20
Published:
2009-09-20
Contact:
Wenhong Deng
摘要:
为了解次生林中潜在洞巢资源(包括各种啄木鸟的啄洞和人工巢箱)的多寡对次级洞巢鸟集团及繁殖鸟类群落结构的影响, 2007年11月至2008年7月, 我们在吉林省吉林市大岗林场选择洞巢密度不同的样地, 对其次级洞巢鸟及鸟类群落结构进行了比较研究。根据洞巢资源密度我们将9块样地分为3组, 即巢箱区(啄洞密度最低, 悬挂人工巢箱使其潜在洞巢资源总密度大幅提高)、低密度区(啄洞密度较低, 无巢箱)和高密度区(啄洞密度较高, 无巢箱), 调查了3组样地内鸟类的组成和密度、潜在洞巢资源的利用情况等。3组样地中均调查到4种初级洞巢鸟, 其种类组成略有不同; 4种次级洞巢鸟在3组样地广泛分布, 分别为白眉姬鹟(Ficedula zanthopygia)、大山雀(Parus major)、沼泽山雀(P. palustris)和普通鳾(Sitta europaea)。巢箱区和高密度区的次级洞巢鸟总密度显著高于低密度区。巢箱区同高密度区一样, 大山雀和白眉姬鹟的密度显著高于低密度区, 这是由于大山雀和白眉姬鹟是人工巢箱的主要利用鸟种, 而沼泽山雀和普通鳾的密度在三组样地间差异不显著。初级洞巢鸟总密度与啄洞密度、次级洞巢鸟总密度与潜在洞巢资源总密度都呈显著正相关关系。潜在洞巢资源丰富的样地中鸟类群落多样性指数显著高于潜在洞巢资源贫乏样地中的鸟类群落多样性指数, 人为增加洞巢资源可以改变鸟类群落组成并显著提高群落的多样性指数。三组样地中鸟类群落的均匀性、丰富度指数和种间相遇率没有显著差异, 群落相似性指数也相近。高密度区和低密度区鸟类群落集团结构相似。次级洞巢鸟密度的增加短时期内未对群落内其他主要鸟种的密度产生显著影响。研究结果显示, 初级洞巢鸟的密度决定了啄洞的丰富程度, 而洞巢资源的差异会对次级洞巢鸟集团的分布模式产生影响, 进而影响整个繁殖鸟类群落的结构。
周大庆, 周春发, 邓文洪 (2009) 潜在洞巢资源差异对次级洞巢鸟及繁殖鸟类群落的影响. 生物多样性, 17, 448-457. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08343.
Daqing Zhou, Chunfa Zhou, Wenhong Deng (2009) Influence of potential cavity resources on secondary cavity-nesters and breeding bird community composition. Biodiversity Science, 17, 448-457. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08343.
样地 Plots | 啄洞密度 Cavity (inds./ha) | 巢箱密度 Nest box (inds./ha) | 洞巢资源总密度 Total cavities (inds./ha) | 样地平均面积 Average area of plots (ha) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.25 ± 0.16 | 3.49 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | 9.57 ± 0.19 | ||||
高密度区 HDP | 6.48 ± 0.21 | - | 6.48 ± 0.21 | 6.90 ± 0.21 | ||||
低密度区 LDP | 2.10 ± 0.24 | - | 2.10 ± 0.24 | 8.57 ± 0.71 |
表1 大岗林场三组不同潜在洞巢资源密度样地的主要特征
Table 1 Major characteristics for the three kinds of plots with different density of potential cavity resources in Dagang Forestry Farm
样地 Plots | 啄洞密度 Cavity (inds./ha) | 巢箱密度 Nest box (inds./ha) | 洞巢资源总密度 Total cavities (inds./ha) | 样地平均面积 Average area of plots (ha) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.25 ± 0.16 | 3.49 ± 0.31 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | 9.57 ± 0.19 | ||||
高密度区 HDP | 6.48 ± 0.21 | - | 6.48 ± 0.21 | 6.90 ± 0.21 | ||||
低密度区 LDP | 2.10 ± 0.24 | - | 2.10 ± 0.24 | 8.57 ± 0.71 |
图1 巢箱区、高密度区和低密度区洞巢资源的利用概况
Fig. 1 Utilization of cavity resources in NBP, HDP and LDP. NBT, NBB, and NBZ were the utilization of total cavity resources, nest boxes and cavities in NBP respectively; HDZ and LDZ were the utilization of cavities in HDP and LDP respectively. Refer to Table 1 for definitions of NBP, HDP and LDP.
样地 Plots | 多样性指数 Species diversity index | 均匀度指数 Evenness index | 物种丰富度指数 Species richness index | 种间相遇率 PIE |
---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.694 ± 0.245 a | 0.903 ± 0.048 | 1.821 ± 0.418 | 0.838 ± 0.068 |
高密度区 HDP | 1.791 ± 0.309 a | 0.908 ± 0.039 | 1.998 ± 0.562 | 0.852 ± 0.068 |
低密度区 LDP | 1.376 ± 0.304 b | 0.884 ± 0.065 | 1.660 ± 0.495 | 0.793 ± 0.112 |
表2 巢箱区、高密度区和低密度区鸟类群落多样性的比较
Table 2 Pairwise comparisons of bird community diversity in NBP, HDP and LDP
样地 Plots | 多样性指数 Species diversity index | 均匀度指数 Evenness index | 物种丰富度指数 Species richness index | 种间相遇率 PIE |
---|---|---|---|---|
巢箱区 NBP | 1.694 ± 0.245 a | 0.903 ± 0.048 | 1.821 ± 0.418 | 0.838 ± 0.068 |
高密度区 HDP | 1.791 ± 0.309 a | 0.908 ± 0.039 | 1.998 ± 0.562 | 0.852 ± 0.068 |
低密度区 LDP | 1.376 ± 0.304 b | 0.884 ± 0.065 | 1.660 ± 0.495 | 0.793 ± 0.112 |
图2 高密度区与低密度区繁殖鸟类群落取食集团结构的比较。MD: 平均欧式距离。
Fig. 2 Guild structure of breeding bird community in HDP and LDP. Refer to Table 1 for definitions of HDP and LDP and Appendix I for scientific names of bird species. MD, Mean Euclidean distance between all species pairs.
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
隼形目 Falconiformes | 鹰科 Accipitridae | 日本松雀鹰 Accipiter gularis* | - | 0.08 ± 0.37 | - |
苍鹰 A. gentilis* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
灰脸鵟鹰 Butastur indicus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
鸡形目 Galliformes | 松鸡科 Tetraonidae | 花尾榛鸡 Bonasa bonasia* | 0.14 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.46 | 0.28 ± 0.96 |
雉科 Phasianidae | 环颈雉 Phasianus colchicus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - | |
鸽形目 Columbiformes | 鸠鸽科 Columbidae | 山斑鸠 Streptopelia orientalis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.32 | - |
鹃形目 Cuculiformes | 杜鹃科 Cuculidae | 大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 |
鸮形目 Strigiformes | 鸱鸮科 Strigidae | 长尾林鸮 Strix uralensis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
鴷形目 Piciformes | 啄木鸟科 Picidae | 星头啄木鸟 Picoides canicapillus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - |
小斑啄木鸟 P. minor* | - | 0.10 ± 0.35 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
白背啄木鸟 P. leucotos* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.21 ± 0.80 | ||
大斑啄木鸟 P. major* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.29 ± 0.56 | 0.14 ± 0.38 | ||
灰头绿啄木鸟 Picus canus* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
雀形目 Passeriformes | 鹡鸰科 Motacillidae | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni* | - | 0.12 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.70 |
山椒鸟科 Campephagidae | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus* | - | 0.07 ± 0.22 | - | |
鸦科 Corvidae | 松鸦 Garrulus glandarius* | 0.20 ± 0.75 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | |
灰喜鹊 Cyanopica cyana* | 0.21 ± 0.80 | - | - | ||
鸫科 Turdidae | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus* | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
虎斑地鸫 Zoothera dauma* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
斑鸫 Turdus eunomus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.48 | ||
灰背鸫 T. hortulorum* | 0.89 ± 0.96 | 1.43 ± 1.23 | 0.42 ± 0.78 | ||
鹟科 Muscicapidae | 乌鹟 Muscicapa sibirica* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.12 ± 0.40 | 0.17 ± 0.45 | |
北灰鹟 M. dauurica* | 0.18 ± 0.33 | 0.38 ± 0.59 | 0.14 ± 0.37 | ||
白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia* | 0.66 ± 0.62 | 0.88 ± 1.06 | 0.10 ± 0.26 | ||
莺科 Sylviidae | 巨嘴柳莺 Phylloscopus schwarzi* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | - | |
黄腰柳莺 P. proregulus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | 0.43 ± 1.03 | 0.42 ± 1.06 | 0.69 ± 1.59 | ||
极北柳莺 P. borealis | 0.08 ± 0.26 | - | - | ||
冕柳莺 P. coronatus | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
冠纹柳莺 P. reguloides | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.26 ± 0.61 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | ||
长尾山雀科 Aegithalidae | 银喉长尾山雀 Aegithalos caudatus* | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.15 ± 0.42 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
山雀科 Paridae | 大山雀 Parus major* | 2.11 ± 1.81 | 1.90 ± 1.94 | 0.73 ± 0.92 | |
沼泽山雀 P. palustris* | 1.11 ±1.27 | 1.39 ± 1.86 | 0.66 ± 0.72 | ||
鳾科 Sittidae | 普通鳾 Sitta europaea* | 2.55 ± 1.30 | 2.69 ± 1.45 | 2.08 ± 1.31 | |
燕雀科 Fringillidae | 锡嘴雀 Coccothraustes coccothraustes* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
长尾雀 Uragus sibiricus* | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.35 | - | ||
鹀科 Emberizidae | 白眉鹀 Emberiza tristrami | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
黄喉鹀 E. elegans | 3.34 ± 1.97 | 3.53 ± 2.23 | 2.32 ± 1.27 | ||
栗鹀 E. rutila | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | ||
芦鹀 E. schoeniclus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
附录I 巢箱区、高密度区和低密度区的鸟种名录及密度
Appendix Ι The checklist and densities (inds./ha) of birds in NBP, HDP and LDP
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
隼形目 Falconiformes | 鹰科 Accipitridae | 日本松雀鹰 Accipiter gularis* | - | 0.08 ± 0.37 | - |
苍鹰 A. gentilis* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
灰脸鵟鹰 Butastur indicus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
鸡形目 Galliformes | 松鸡科 Tetraonidae | 花尾榛鸡 Bonasa bonasia* | 0.14 ± 0.38 | 0.20 ± 0.46 | 0.28 ± 0.96 |
雉科 Phasianidae | 环颈雉 Phasianus colchicus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - | |
鸽形目 Columbiformes | 鸠鸽科 Columbidae | 山斑鸠 Streptopelia orientalis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.32 | - |
鹃形目 Cuculiformes | 杜鹃科 Cuculidae | 大杜鹃 Cuculus canorus* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 |
鸮形目 Strigiformes | 鸱鸮科 Strigidae | 长尾林鸮 Strix uralensis* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
鴷形目 Piciformes | 啄木鸟科 Picidae | 星头啄木鸟 Picoides canicapillus* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | - |
小斑啄木鸟 P. minor* | - | 0.10 ± 0.35 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
白背啄木鸟 P. leucotos* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.21 ± 0.80 | ||
大斑啄木鸟 P. major* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.29 ± 0.56 | 0.14 ± 0.38 | ||
灰头绿啄木鸟 Picus canus* | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
目 Order | 科 Family | 鸟种 Species | 巢箱区 NBP (n = 21) | 高密度区 HDP (n = 21) | 低密度区 LDP (n = 21) |
雀形目 Passeriformes | 鹡鸰科 Motacillidae | 树鹨 Anthus hodgsoni* | - | 0.12 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.70 |
山椒鸟科 Campephagidae | 灰山椒鸟 Pericrocotus divaricatus* | - | 0.07 ± 0.22 | - | |
鸦科 Corvidae | 松鸦 Garrulus glandarius* | 0.20 ± 0.75 | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | |
灰喜鹊 Cyanopica cyana* | 0.21 ± 0.80 | - | - | ||
鸫科 Turdidae | 红胁蓝尾鸲 Tarsiger cyanurus* | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
虎斑地鸫 Zoothera dauma* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
斑鸫 Turdus eunomus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.10 ± 0.48 | ||
灰背鸫 T. hortulorum* | 0.89 ± 0.96 | 1.43 ± 1.23 | 0.42 ± 0.78 | ||
鹟科 Muscicapidae | 乌鹟 Muscicapa sibirica* | 0.10 ± 0.26 | 0.12 ± 0.40 | 0.17 ± 0.45 | |
北灰鹟 M. dauurica* | 0.18 ± 0.33 | 0.38 ± 0.59 | 0.14 ± 0.37 | ||
白眉姬鹟 Ficedula zanthopygia* | 0.66 ± 0.62 | 0.88 ± 1.06 | 0.10 ± 0.26 | ||
莺科 Sylviidae | 巨嘴柳莺 Phylloscopus schwarzi* | 0.03 ± 0.16 | 0.08 ± 0.24 | - | |
黄腰柳莺 P. proregulus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
黄眉柳莺 P. inornatus | 0.43 ± 1.03 | 0.42 ± 1.06 | 0.69 ± 1.59 | ||
极北柳莺 P. borealis | 0.08 ± 0.26 | - | - | ||
冕柳莺 P. coronatus | 0.03 ± 0.16 | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | ||
冠纹柳莺 P. reguloides | 0.11 ± 0.28 | 0.26 ± 0.61 | 0.08 ± 0.26 | ||
长尾山雀科 Aegithalidae | 银喉长尾山雀 Aegithalos caudatus* | 0.21 ± 0.48 | 0.15 ± 0.42 | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
山雀科 Paridae | 大山雀 Parus major* | 2.11 ± 1.81 | 1.90 ± 1.94 | 0.73 ± 0.92 | |
沼泽山雀 P. palustris* | 1.11 ±1.27 | 1.39 ± 1.86 | 0.66 ± 0.72 | ||
鳾科 Sittidae | 普通鳾 Sitta europaea* | 2.55 ± 1.30 | 2.69 ± 1.45 | 2.08 ± 1.31 | |
燕雀科 Fringillidae | 锡嘴雀 Coccothraustes coccothraustes* | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.16 | |
长尾雀 Uragus sibiricus* | 0.04 ± 0.19 | 0.19 ± 0.35 | - | ||
鹀科 Emberizidae | 白眉鹀 Emberiza tristrami | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | |
黄喉鹀 E. elegans | 3.34 ± 1.97 | 3.53 ± 2.23 | 2.32 ± 1.27 | ||
栗鹀 E. rutila | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - | ||
芦鹀 E. schoeniclus | - | 0.04 ± 0.19 | - |
[1] | Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird Census Techniques. Academic Press, London. |
[2] | Bock CE, Fleck DC (1995) Avian response to nest box addition in two forests of the Colorado Front Range. Journal of Field Ornithology, 66,352-362. |
[3] | Brawn JD, Balda RP (1988) Population biology of cavity nesters in northern Arizona: do nest sites limit breeding densities? Condor, 90,61-71. |
[4] | Brush T (1983) Cavity use by secondary cavity-nesting birds and response to manipulations. Condor, 85,461-466. |
[5] | Cody ML (1985) An Introduction to Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press, Orlando. |
[6] | Cornelius C, Cockle K, Politi N, Berkunsky I, Sandoval L, Ojeda V, Rivera L, Hunter M, Martin K (2008) Cavity-nesting birds in Neotropical forests: cavities as a potentially limiting resource. Ornitologia Neotropical, 19,253-268. |
[7] | Cui P (崔鹏), Deng WH (邓文洪) (2007) Review on the status and development of bird community research. Chinese Journal of Zoology (动物学杂志), 42(4),149-158. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Deng QX (邓秋香), Zhou T (周彤), Gao W (高玮) (2006) Function of primary cavity-nesting birds on bird community structure in deciduous broad-leaved forest. Journal of Northeast Forestry University (东北林业大学学报), 34(6),58-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] |
Holmes RT, Bonney RE, Pacala SW (1979) Guild structure of the Hubbard Brook bird community: a multivariate approach. Ecology, 60,512-520.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Holmes RT, Recher HF (1986) Determinants of guild structure in forest bird communities: an intercontinental comparison. Condor, 88,427-439.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52,577-586.
DOI URL PMID |
[12] |
Li Z (李臻), Yang LY (杨丽媛), Liu W (刘文), Deng WH (邓文洪) (2008) Effect of artificial nestboxes on the diversity of secondary cavity-nesting birds and the stability of breeding bird community. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 16,601-606. (in Chinese with English abstract)
DOI URL |
[13] |
Loman J (2006) Does nest sites availability limit the density of hole nesting birds in small woodland patches? Web Ecology, 6,37-43.
DOI URL |
[14] | Margalef R (1958) Information theory in ecology. International Journal of General Systems, 3,36-71. |
[15] | McAleece N, Lambshead J, Patterson G, Gage J (1997) BioDiversity pro, version 2. The Natural History Museum, London, and The Scottish Association of Marine Science, Oban, Scotland. |
[16] |
Morrison ML (1984) Influence of sample size and sampling design on analysis of avian foraging behavior. Condor, 86,146-150.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Newton I (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biological Conservation, 70,265-276.
DOI URL |
[18] | Newton I (1998) Population Limitation in Birds. Academic Press, San Diego. |
[19] |
Pearson SM (1993) The spatial extent and relative influence of landscape-level factors on wintering bird populations. Landscape Ecology, 8,3-18.
DOI URL |
[20] | Pielou EC (1969) An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York. |
[21] |
Purcell KL, Verner J, Oring LW (1997) A comparison of the breeding ecology of birds nesting in boxes and tree cavities. Auk, 114,646-656.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Root RB (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecological Monographs, 37,317-350.
DOI URL |
[23] | Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. |
[24] | SPSS Inc. (2008) SPSS Statistics 17. 0, Release 17.0.0. Chicago, IL. |
[25] |
von Haartman L (1957) Adaptation in hole-nesting birds. Evolution, 11,339-347.
DOI URL |
[26] | Walankiewicz W (1991) Do secondary cavity-nesting birds suffer more from competition for cavities or from predation in a primeval deciduous forest? Natural Areas Journal, 11,203-212. |
[27] | Wang HT (王海涛), Gao W (高玮) (2002) Utilization of natural cavities by secondary cavity-nesting birds in secondary forest. Zoological Research (动物学研究), 23,136-140. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[28] |
Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21,213-251.
DOI URL |
[29] |
Wiktander U, Olsson O, Nilsson SG (2001) Seasonal variation in home-range size, and habitat area requirement of the lesser spotted woodpecker ( Dendrocopos minor) in southern Sweden. Biological Conservation, 100,387-395.
DOI URL |
[30] | Zar JH (1999) Multisample hypothesis:the analysis of variance. In: Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. (ed. Zar JH), pp.178-189. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. |
[31] | Zheng GM (郑光美) (2002) A Checklist on the Classification and Distribution of the Birds of China (中国鸟类分类与分布名录). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[32] | Zhou F (周放) (1987) Guild structure of the forest bird community in Dinghushan. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 7,176-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Zhu TC (祝廷成), Yan ZK (严仲铠), Zhou SB (周守标) (2003) The Plants on the Changbaishan Massif of China (中国长白山植物). Beijing Science and Technology Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 李巧峡, 李有龙, 李纪纲, 陈晨龙, 孙坤. 光周期调控维西堇菜与裂叶堇菜开放花和闭锁花的发育[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(6): 23484-. |
[2] | 杨小凤, 李小蒙, 廖万金. 植物开花时间的遗传调控通路研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(6): 825-842. |
[3] | 张慧, 刘倩, 黄晓磊. 社会性昆虫级型和行为分化机制研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(4): 507-516. |
[4] | 蓝方源, 马行健, 逯金瑶, 李雨果, 柴汝松, 李翔, 罗亦欧, 张宇泽, 叶子凌, 付昌健, 暴文爽, 李立, 邢晓莹. 城市化对鸟类筑巢的影响研究综述[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(11): 1539-1553. |
[5] | 柯锦秀, 陈多, 郭延平. 植物叶缘形态的发育调控机理[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(9): 988-997. |
[6] | 国春策, 张睿, 山红艳, 孔宏智. 调控进化与形态多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22(1): 72-79. |
[7] | 张蒙, 孙吉吉, 王彦平, 蒋萍萍, 丁平, 徐高福. 千岛湖栖息地片段化对大山雀营巢资源利用的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2010, 18(4): 383-389. |
[8] | 李臻, 杨丽媛, 刘文, 邓文洪. 人工巢箱对次级洞巢鸟类多样性及繁殖鸟类群落稳定性的作用[J]. 生物多样性, 2008, 16(6): 601-606. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn