土壤原生动物对川滇高山栎恢复时间的响应及生长季动态

doi:10.17520/biods.2015121

生物多样性 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 793-801. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015121

所属专题：土壤生物与土壤健康；青藏高原生物多样性与生态安全

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

土壤原生动物对川滇高山栎恢复时间的响应及生长季动态

李玲娟^1,², 熊勤犁^1,^2,³, 潘开文^1,^*(), 张林^1,^*()

1 (中国科学院成都生物研究所, 成都 610041)
2 (中国科学院大学, 北京 100049)
3 (四川大学生命科学学院, 成都 610064);① 侯来利 (2007) 淮南市高塘湖水域浮游动物群落特征研究, 硕士学位论文, 安徽理工大学, 淮南.

收稿日期:2015-05-07 接受日期:2015-08-20 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2015-12-02
通讯作者: 潘开文,张林
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31100350, 30901146, 31370632)和国家科技支撑计划(2011BAC09B04-01-03)

The responses of soil protozoan communities to Quercus aquifolioides: recovery after cutting and growing season dynamics

Lingjuan Li^1,², Qinli Xiong^1,^2,³, Kaiwen Pan^1,^*(), Lin Zhang^1,^*()

1 Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
3 College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064

Received:2015-05-07 Accepted:2015-08-20 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-12-02
Contact: Pan Kaiwen,Zhang Lin

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

青藏高原东缘生态环境脆弱, 森林频繁遭到砍伐, 生物多样性受到严重威胁, 森林砍伐后的生态恢复成为研究热点。原生动物在生态恢复中作为指示生物起着重要作用。本文就未砍伐、砍伐后不同恢复时期(20年、10年和1年)生的川滇高山栎(Quercus aquifolioides)林的土壤理化性质和原生动物在生长季的变化进行比较研究, 以探讨生长季不同月份、不同恢复期的原生动物数量变化规律, 分析土壤理化性质与其相关性。结果表明: (1)恢复10年和1年的林地的鞭毛虫数量(193个/g干土, 164个/g干土)显著高于原始林地(22个/g干土), 肉足虫在恢复1年的林地中数量最多(600个/g干土), 纤毛虫数量则随次生演替进程逐渐增多。(2)在生长季不同月份原生动物的数量呈先增加后减少的趋势。鞭毛虫和肉足虫的峰值分别出现在7月和8月, 而纤毛虫的数量在7、8、9月明显高于6月。(3)原生动物数量与土壤理化性质密切相关。鞭毛虫数量与pH值呈显著正相关(P = 0.019), 纤毛虫数量与铵态氮(P = 0.002)和碳氮比呈显著正相关(P = 0.022), 肉足虫数量与硝态氮(P = 0.008)和碳氮比(P = 0.016)呈显著负相关。结果显示, 三种原生动物数量在生长季不同月份表现出较大的波动性, 其数量变化受土壤理化性质等多种因素调控。纤毛虫数量对川滇高山栎林砍伐恢复有正响应, 而鞭毛虫、肉足虫数量有负响应。

关键词: 川滇高山栎林, 砍伐, 生长季, 指示生物, 原生动物

Abstract

The eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is fragile but offers important ecological services. Because of frequent cutting, local biodiversity is seriously threatened. This makes ecological recovery from logging become a research hot spot. Protozoa as a biological indicator in ecological restoration plays an important role. In this paper, we selected four types of Quercus aquifolioides forests (mature stands, clearcuts for secondary growth aged 20 years, 10 years and 1 year) to study the alteration of soil physicochemical properties and protozoa quantity along different months during growing season. The main results showed that: (1) The amount of flagellates in the second growth forests within 10 years (193 ind./g dry soil) and within 1 year (164 ind./g dry soil) were significantly higher than that in the mature stands (22 ind./g dry soil), while the amount of amoebae was the most in the second growth forest within 1 year (600 ind./g dry soil). Ciliate quantities increased gradually along with the recovery after clearcuts. (2) Protozoa community quantities first showed a significant increase and then decrease with months during the growing season, the abundance of flagellates reach a peak in July, the amount of amoebae was largest in August and ciliate abundance was much greater in the other three months than June. (3) The amount of protozoa closely related to soil physicochemical properties. The amount of flagellates were positively significantly correlated to pH (P = 0.019), ciliate quantity was positively correlated with amino nitrogen (P = 0.002) and C/N ratio (P = 0.022), and amoebae quantity was negatively correlated with nitrate nitrogen (P = 0.008) and C/N ratio (P = 0.016). The results suggested a great fluctuation of protozoa communities in the growing season affected by soil physicochemical properties. Ciliates communities showed a positive response, while flagellate and amoebae showed a negative response, to the recovery of Quercus aquifolioides forest after cutting.

Key words: Quercus aquifolioides forest, cutting, growing season, biological indicator, soil protozoan

李玲娟, 熊勤犁, 潘开文, 张林 (2015) 土壤原生动物对川滇高山栎恢复时间的响应及生长季动态. 生物多样性, 23, 793-801. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015121.

Lingjuan Li, Qinli Xiong, Kaiwen Pan, Lin Zhang (2015) The responses of soil protozoan communities to Quercus aquifolioides: recovery after cutting and growing season dynamics. Biodiversity Science, 23, 793-801. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2015121.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2015121

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2015/V23/I6/793

图/表 5

参考文献 38

1	Adl MS, Guptta VVSR (2006) Protists in soil ecology and forest nutrient cycling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1805-1817.
2	Bonkowskia M, Cheng WX, Griffiths BS, Alphei J, Scheu S (2000) Microbial-faunal interactions in the rhizosphere and effects on plant growth.European Journal of Soil Biology, 36, 135-147.
3	Bossio DA, Scow KM, Guanapala N, Graham KJ (1998) Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles.Microbial Ecology, 36, 1-12.
4	Chen SF (陈素芳), Xu RL (徐润林), Wang YJ (王勇军), Zan QJ (昝启杰), Liao WB (廖文波) (2003) Effect of chemical prevention and cure of Mikania micrantha on soil protozoan community in Neilingding Island.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报), 9, 422-428. (in Chinese with English abstract)
5	Chen SF (陈素芳), Xu RL (徐润林) (2003) Advances of studies on the soil protozoa.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni(中山大学学报(自然科学版)), 42, 187-194. (in Chinese with English abstract)
6	Chen XN (陈小鸟), You WH (由文辉), Wang XY (王向阳), Yi L (易兰) (2009) Community traits of soil animal under different ground cover treatments in evergreen broad-leaved forest.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 17, 160-167. (in Chinese with English abstract)
7	Clarholm M (1981) Protozoan grazing of bacteria in soil--impact and importance.Microbial Ecology, 7, 343-350.
8	Clarholm M (1985) Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil-nitrogen.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 17, 181-187.
9	Committee of Handbook of Soil Fauna Research Methods (土壤动物研究方法手册编写组) (1998) Handbook of Soil Fauna Research Methods (土壤动物研究方法手册), pp. 63-70. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
10	Foissner W (1997) Protozoa as bioindicators in agroecosystems, with emphasis on farming practices, biocides, and biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 62, 93-103.
11	Foissner W (1999) Soil protozoa as bioindicators: pros and cons, methods, diversity, representative examples.Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 74, 95-112.
12	Forge TA, Hogue E, Neilsen G, Neilsen D (2003) Effects of organic mulches on soil microfauna in the root zone of apple: implications for nutrient fluxes and functional diversity of the soil food web.Applied Soil Ecology, 22, 39-54.
13	Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ingham ER, Coleman DC (1985) Interactions of bacteria fungi and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth.Ecological Monographs, 55, 119-140.
14	Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (中国科学院南京土壤研究所) (1978) Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis (土壤理化分析). Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai. (in Chinese)
15	Liao QY (廖庆玉), Zhang JH (章金鸿), Li M (李玫), Lu Y (卢彦), Huang XS (黄晓珊), Xu RL (徐润林) (2009) The application of acidolysis-extrusion and fenton reagent on treatment of ink sewage from touch panel making.Guangzhou Environmental Sciences(广州环境科学), 24(4), 41-46. (in Chinese with English abstract)
16	Liu F (刘芳), Li Q (李琪), Shen CC (申聪聪), Chu HY (褚海燕), Liang WJ (梁文举) (2014) Distribution of gymnamoebae communities along an elevational gradient in Changbai Mountains.Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 22, 608-617. (in Chinese with English abstract)
17	Liu XL (刘兴良), Liu SR (刘世荣), Su YM (宿以明), Cai XH (蔡小虎), Ma QY (马钦彦) (2006) Aboveground biomass of Quercus aquifolioides shrub community and its responses to altitudinal gradients in Balangshan Mountain, Sichuan Province.Scientia Silvae Sinicae(林业科学), 42(2), 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract)
18	Mayzlish E, Steinberger Y (2004) Effects of chemical inhibitors on soil protozoan dynamics in a desert ecosystem.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 39, 415-421.
19	Ning YZ (宁应之), Shen YF (沈韫芬) (1998) Soil protozoa in typical zones of China. II. Ecological study.Acta Zoologica Sinica(动物学报), 44, 271-276. (in Chinese with English abstract)
20	Ning YZ (宁应之), Shen YF (沈韫芬) (1996) Ecological studies on the forest soil protozoa of Mount Luojiashan and exploration of quantitative methods for soil protozoa.Zoological Research(动物学研究), 17, 225-232. (in Chinese with English abstract)
21	Ning YZ (宁应之), Wang HJ (王红军), Yu JH (禹娟红), Du HF (杜海峰) (2011) Response of the soil ciliate community to ecological restoration in Huajialing, Dingxi, Gansu.Zoological Research(动物学研究), 32, 223-231. (in Chinese with English abstract)
22	Ning YZ (宁应之), Wang XJ (王晓景), Li QL (李琦路), Yu JH (禹娟红), Ma ZX (马正学) (2009) Community characteristics of soil ciliates in the National Forest Park of the Taibai Mountains.Journal of Northwest Normal University(西北师范大学学报), 45, 82-88. (in Chinese with English abstract)
23	Rønn R, Vestergard M, Ekelund F (2012) Interactions between bacteria, protozoa and nematodes in soil. Acta Protozoologica, 51, 223-235.
24	Shen HX (申海香), Ma ZX (马正学), Ma SS (马尚盛), Ning YZ (宁应之), Wang J (王娟) (2009) Community characteristics of soil sarcodinid and flagellate in Taohuagou Forest Park in Xiaolongshan Mountains of Gansu.Chinese Journal of Ecology(生态学杂志), 28, 38-44. (in Chinese with English abstract)
25	Sichuan Vegetation Group(四川植被协作组) (1980) Sichuan Vegetation(四川植被). Sichuan People’s Publishing House, Chengdu. (in Chinese)
26	Usher MB, Sier ARJ, Hornung M, Millard P (2006) Understanding biological diversity in soil: the UK’s Soil Biodiversity Research Programme.Applied Soil Ecology, 33, 101-113.
27	Verhoeven R (2001) Response of soil microfauna to organic fertilisation in sandy virgin soils of coastal dunes.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 34, 390-396.
28	Wang GY (王国严), Xu AS (徐阿生) (2008) A review of researches on Quercus aquifolioides.Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology(四川林业科技), 29(2), 23-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
29	Wang JL (王建林), Zhong ZM (钟志明), Wang ZH (王忠红), Chen BX (陈宝雄), Yu CQ (余成群), Hu XX (胡兴祥), Shen ZX (沈振西), Daci ZG (大次卓嘎), Zhang XZ (张宪洲) (2014) Soil C/N distribution characteristics of alpine steppe ecosystem in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 34, 6678-6691. (in Chinese with English abstract)
30	Xiao JJ (肖玖金), Zhang J (张健), Yang WQ (杨万勤), Huang YM (黄玉梅), Yang L (杨鲁), Li JW (李纪伟), Yan D (严妲) (2008) Short-term response of soil fauna community to harvesting disturbance in Eucalyptus grandis plantation.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 28, 4531-4539. (in Chinese with English abstract)
31	Xu MQ, Cao H, Xie P, Deng DG, Feng WS, Xu J (2005) The temporal and spatial distribution, composition and abundance of protozoa in Chaohu Lake, China: relationship with eutrophication.European Journal of Protistology, 41, 183-192.
32	Yang WQ, Wang KY, Song GY, He YR (2002) Preliminary study on biological characteristics of degraded soil ecosystems in dry hot valley of the Jinsha River.Pedosphere, 12, 365-372.
33	You HZ (尤海舟), Liu XL (刘兴良), Miao N (缪宁), He F (何飞), Ma QY (马钦彦) (2010) Individual association and scale effect of spatial pattern of Quercus aquifolioides populations along the elevation gradients.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 30, 4004-4011. (in Chinese with English abstract)
34	Yu GB (余广彬), Yang XD (杨效东) (2007) Characteristics of litter and soil arthropod communities at different successional stages of tropical forests. Biodiversity Science(生物多样性), 15, 188-198. (in Chinese with English abstract)
35	Zhao YJ (赵玉娟), Li FC (李凤超), Zhang Q (张强), Zhang Y (张彦) (2012) Abundance and biomass of heterotrophic flagellates in Baiyangdian Lake, as well as their relationship with environmental factors.Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 32, 6819-6827. (in Chinese with English abstract)
36	Zhang SH (张四海), Cao ZP (曹志平), Hu CJ (胡婵娟) (2011) Effect of added straw carbon on soil microbe and protozoa abundance. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture(中国生态农业学报), 19, 1283-1288. (in Chinese with English abstract)
37	Zhou KX (周可新), Xu MQ (许木启), Cao H (曹宏), Ning YZ (宁应之) (2003) Soil protozoa as monitors of the environment. Chinese Journal of Zoology(动物学杂志), 38(1), 80-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
38	Zhu WZ (朱万泽), Wang SG (王三根), Hao YQ (郝云庆) (2010) Dynamics of nutrient supply to sprouts from the roots and soil during sprouting of Quercus aquifolioides shrublands, western Sichuan, China.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology(植物生态学报), 34, 1185-1195. (in Chinese with English abstract)

处理 Treatment	坡度 Slope (°)	海拔 Altitude (m)	灌丛盖度 Shrub canopy coverage	灌丛高度 Shrub height (m)
原始林 Mature stand (O)	23 ± 3	3,280	0.92 ± 0.06 ^a	4.13 ± 0.27 ^a
恢复20年 20 yr second forest (T)	23 ± 3	3,265	0.84 ± 0.05 ^b	2.45 ± 0.19^b
恢复10年 10 yr second forest (N)	23 ± 3	3,270	0.76 ± 0.05 ^b	1.98 ± 0.23 ^c
恢复1年 1 yr second forest (R)	23 ± 3	3,250	0.02 ± 0.00 ^c	0.08 ± 0.03 ^d

处理 Treatment	坡度 Slope (°)	海拔 Altitude (m)	灌丛盖度 Shrub canopy coverage	灌丛高度 Shrub height (m)
原始林 Mature stand (O)	23 ± 3	3,280	0.92 ± 0.06 ^a	4.13 ± 0.27 ^a
恢复20年 20 yr second forest (T)	23 ± 3	3,265	0.84 ± 0.05 ^b	2.45 ± 0.19^b
恢复10年 10 yr second forest (N)	23 ± 3	3,270	0.76 ± 0.05 ^b	1.98 ± 0.23 ^c
恢复1年 1 yr second forest (R)	23 ± 3	3,250	0.02 ± 0.00 ^c	0.08 ± 0.03 ^d

指标 Index	处理 Treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
土壤含水率 Soil moisture (%)	O	48.58 ± 3.70	37.38 ± 2.83	39.59 ± 2.03	52.67 ± 4.19
	T	45.26 ± 1.37	33.19 ± 2.31	37.55 ± 2.45	47.59 ± 2.48
	N	39.01 ± 4.01	33.06 ± 3.60	29.26 ± 2.76	42.12 ± 2.58
	R	39.43 ± 1.07	31.64 ± 0.58	38.16 ± 0.27	47.40 ± 0.47
pH	O	4.25 ± 4.25	4.45 ± 4.45	5.13 ± 5.13	4.92 ± 4.92
	T	4.86 ± 0.13	4.82 ± 0.13	5.08 ± 0.10	4.58 ± 0.16
	N	5.69 ± 0.29	5.33 ± 0.16	5.54 ± 0.08	5.27 ± 0.28
	R	5.03 ± 0.36	5.22 ± 0.31	6.23 ± 0.12	6.99 ± 0.16
铵态氮 Amino nitrogen (mg/kg)	O	13.09 ± 1.13	4.30 ± 0.42	9.55 ± 0.54	34.18 ± 2.96
	T	10.63 ± 1.15	13.13 ± 0.97	10.75 ± 1.16	40.75 ± 1.77
	N	3.59 ± 0.80	9.54 ± 1.14	6.91 ± 0.81	12.20 ± 1.71
	R	4.51 ± 0.11	0.23 ± 0.10	4.14 ± 0.19	4.82 ± 0.27
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen (mg/kg)	O	25.96 ± 1.45	3.14 ± 0.68	29.26 ± 2.62	11.91 ± 2.56
	T	31.27 ± 3.78	11.23 ± 2.94	36.21 ± 2.01	22.27 ± 4.61
	N	30.59 ± 2.40	9.05 ± 1.37	13.12 ± 2.25	43.11 ± 3.32
	R	20.06 ± 2.61	6.11 ± 1.19	33.39 ± 2.32	52.12 ± 2.11
全氮 Total N (g/kg)	O	6.08 ± 0.09	5.00 ± 0.07	4.55 ± 0.08	5.89 ± 0.11
	T	4.58 ± 0.04	4.07 ± 0.02	4.43 ± 0.03	4.50 ± 0.03
	N	3.80 ± 0.04	3.52 ± 0.05	3.87 ± 0.03	3.99 ± 0.03
	R	4.79 ± 0.02	4.78 ± 0.01	5.37 ± 0.01	5.62 ± 0.01
全碳 Total C (g/kg)	O	82.27 ± 1.65	64.99 ± 1.11	55.52 ± 1.32	78.49 ± 2.03
	T	59.33 ± 0.58	51.77 ± 0.37	56.66 ± 0.42	54.73 ± 0.27
	N	42.44 ± 0.55	40.11 ± 0.75	43.27 ± 0.45	42.82 ± 0.51
	R	39.88 ± 0.17	40.95 ± 0.08	44.06 ± 0.06	49.79 ± 0.09
碳氮比 C/N ratio	O	13.23 ± 0.80	12.78 ± 0.52	12.50 ± 2.28	12.88 ± 0.79
	T	12.94 ± 0.20	12.71 ± 0.42	12.77 ± 0.33	12.18 ± 0.36
	N	11.10 ± 0.24	11.15 ± 0.63	11.12 ± 0.28	10.64 ± 0.74
	R	8.32 ± 0.03	8.58 ± 0.09	8.21 ± 0.11	8.86 ± 0.08
土壤温度 Soil temperature (℃)	O	11.78 ± 1.03	13.58 ± 1.07	11.75 ± 1.37	9.64 ± 1.22
	T	11.57 ± 1.10	13.46 ± 1.14	11.88 ± 1.39	9.76 ± 1.18
	N	11.85 ± 1.11	13.68 ± 1.15	11.69 ± 1.39	9.59 ± 1.19
	R	12.15 ± 1.13	14.67 ± 1.21	12.83 ±1.35	10.55 ± 1.44
磷脂脂肪酸表征的微生物生物量	O	12.87 ± 2.95	9.87 ± 0.73	7.60 ± 0.83	5.14 ± 0.32
Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA)	T	4.46 ± 0.63	9.08 ± 1.28	5.18 ± 0.56	5.04 ± 0.55
(nmol/g)	N	9.75 ± 2.04	12.50 ± 1.30	4.84 ± 1.02	3.70 ± 0.49
	R	8.44 ± 0.40	8.35 ± 1.15	9.55 ± 1.45	4.78 ± 0.44

指标 Index	处理 Treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
土壤含水率 Soil moisture (%)	O	48.58 ± 3.70	37.38 ± 2.83	39.59 ± 2.03	52.67 ± 4.19
	T	45.26 ± 1.37	33.19 ± 2.31	37.55 ± 2.45	47.59 ± 2.48
	N	39.01 ± 4.01	33.06 ± 3.60	29.26 ± 2.76	42.12 ± 2.58
	R	39.43 ± 1.07	31.64 ± 0.58	38.16 ± 0.27	47.40 ± 0.47
pH	O	4.25 ± 4.25	4.45 ± 4.45	5.13 ± 5.13	4.92 ± 4.92
	T	4.86 ± 0.13	4.82 ± 0.13	5.08 ± 0.10	4.58 ± 0.16
	N	5.69 ± 0.29	5.33 ± 0.16	5.54 ± 0.08	5.27 ± 0.28
	R	5.03 ± 0.36	5.22 ± 0.31	6.23 ± 0.12	6.99 ± 0.16
铵态氮 Amino nitrogen (mg/kg)	O	13.09 ± 1.13	4.30 ± 0.42	9.55 ± 0.54	34.18 ± 2.96
	T	10.63 ± 1.15	13.13 ± 0.97	10.75 ± 1.16	40.75 ± 1.77
	N	3.59 ± 0.80	9.54 ± 1.14	6.91 ± 0.81	12.20 ± 1.71
	R	4.51 ± 0.11	0.23 ± 0.10	4.14 ± 0.19	4.82 ± 0.27
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen (mg/kg)	O	25.96 ± 1.45	3.14 ± 0.68	29.26 ± 2.62	11.91 ± 2.56
	T	31.27 ± 3.78	11.23 ± 2.94	36.21 ± 2.01	22.27 ± 4.61
	N	30.59 ± 2.40	9.05 ± 1.37	13.12 ± 2.25	43.11 ± 3.32
	R	20.06 ± 2.61	6.11 ± 1.19	33.39 ± 2.32	52.12 ± 2.11
全氮 Total N (g/kg)	O	6.08 ± 0.09	5.00 ± 0.07	4.55 ± 0.08	5.89 ± 0.11
	T	4.58 ± 0.04	4.07 ± 0.02	4.43 ± 0.03	4.50 ± 0.03
	N	3.80 ± 0.04	3.52 ± 0.05	3.87 ± 0.03	3.99 ± 0.03
	R	4.79 ± 0.02	4.78 ± 0.01	5.37 ± 0.01	5.62 ± 0.01
全碳 Total C (g/kg)	O	82.27 ± 1.65	64.99 ± 1.11	55.52 ± 1.32	78.49 ± 2.03
	T	59.33 ± 0.58	51.77 ± 0.37	56.66 ± 0.42	54.73 ± 0.27
	N	42.44 ± 0.55	40.11 ± 0.75	43.27 ± 0.45	42.82 ± 0.51
	R	39.88 ± 0.17	40.95 ± 0.08	44.06 ± 0.06	49.79 ± 0.09
碳氮比 C/N ratio	O	13.23 ± 0.80	12.78 ± 0.52	12.50 ± 2.28	12.88 ± 0.79
	T	12.94 ± 0.20	12.71 ± 0.42	12.77 ± 0.33	12.18 ± 0.36
	N	11.10 ± 0.24	11.15 ± 0.63	11.12 ± 0.28	10.64 ± 0.74
	R	8.32 ± 0.03	8.58 ± 0.09	8.21 ± 0.11	8.86 ± 0.08
土壤温度 Soil temperature (℃)	O	11.78 ± 1.03	13.58 ± 1.07	11.75 ± 1.37	9.64 ± 1.22
	T	11.57 ± 1.10	13.46 ± 1.14	11.88 ± 1.39	9.76 ± 1.18
	N	11.85 ± 1.11	13.68 ± 1.15	11.69 ± 1.39	9.59 ± 1.19
	R	12.15 ± 1.13	14.67 ± 1.21	12.83 ±1.35	10.55 ± 1.44
磷脂脂肪酸表征的微生物生物量	O	12.87 ± 2.95	9.87 ± 0.73	7.60 ± 0.83	5.14 ± 0.32
Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA)	T	4.46 ± 0.63	9.08 ± 1.28	5.18 ± 0.56	5.04 ± 0.55
(nmol/g)	N	9.75 ± 2.04	12.50 ± 1.30	4.84 ± 1.02	3.70 ± 0.49
	R	8.44 ± 0.40	8.35 ± 1.15	9.55 ± 1.45	4.78 ± 0.44

指标 Index	处理 Treatment		月份 Month		处理×月份 Treatment × Month
指标 Index	F	P	F	P	F	P
含水率 Soil moisture	4.267	0.029	6.186	0.029	0.686	0.578
pH值	25.600	0.000	40.044	0.000	34.024	0.000
铵态氮 Amino nitrogen	959.806	0.000	261.049	0.000	45.771	0.000
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen	1,337.074	0.000	20.403	0.001	14.887	0.000
全氮 Total N	437.802	0.000	3.700	0.020	1.711	0.122
全碳 Total C	214.283	0.000	0.017	0.898	0.659	0.593
碳氮比 C/N ratio	28.127	0.000	0.555	0.471	0.362	0.781
土壤温度 Soil temperature	8.174	0.000	94.545	0.000	0.404	0.751

土壤原生动物对川滇高山栎恢复时间的响应及生长季动态

The responses of soil protozoan communities to Quercus aquifolioides: recovery after cutting and growing season dynamics

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 38

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

	土壤含水率 Soil moisture	pH	铵态氮 Amino nitrogen	硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen	全氮 Total N	全碳 Total C	碳氮比 C/N ratio	鞭毛虫 Flagellates	纤毛虫 Ciliates	肉足虫 Amoebas
pH	-0.040
铵态氮 Amino nitrogen	0.465**	-0.341**
硝态氮 Nitrate nitrogen	0.401**	0.481**	-0.107
全氮 Total N	0.387**	0.124	0.149	0.127
全碳 Total C	0.389**	-0.196	0.349**	-0.015	0.834**
碳氮比 C/N ratio	0.249*	-0.482**	0.394**	-0.114	0.130	0.639**
鞭毛虫 Flagellates	-0.304*	0.293*	-0.172	0.001	-0.027	-0.154	-0.218
纤毛虫 Ciliates	0.057	-0.113	0.388**	-0.125	0.127	0.271*	0.286*	-0.040
肉足虫 Amoebas	-0.405**	0.084	-0.229	-0.328**	-0.026	-0.183	-0.300*	0.145	-0.103
原生动物 Protozoa	-0.472**	0.193	-0.253*	-0.281*	-0.029	-0.211	-0.337*	0.554*	-0.067	0.904*

[1]	郑梦瑶, 李媛, 王雪蓉, 张越, 贾彤. 芦芽山不同植被类型土壤原生动物群落构建机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(4): 23419-.
[2]	杨清, 李晓东, 杨胜娴, 巢欣, 刘惠秋, 巴桑. 雅鲁藏布江中游丰水期原生动物群落多样性及其影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22500-.
[3]	赵志霞, 赵常明, 邓舒雨, 申国珍, 谢宗强, 熊高明, 李俊清. 重度砍伐后极小种群野生植物崖柏群落结构动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(3): 333-339.
[4]	李凤超, 康现江, 杨文波, 管越强, 张晓慧, 刘炜炜, 沈公铭, 李继龙, 王宏伟. 拒马河北京段原生动物群落特征及其对河流营养状况的指示[J]. 生物多样性, 2006, 14(4): 327-332.
[5]	顾福康, 孙军, 何远, 田沁. 纤毛类原生动物中宿主－共生体系统的研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2001, 09(1): 38-43.
[6]	张锡元, 孙翀, 晏婷婷, 吴海, 郑翌, 李晓迎, 缪炜, 余育和, 沈韫芬. 螅状独缩虫(Cachesium polypinum)遗传多样性的 RAPD 分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2000, 08(3): 257-261.
[7]	沈韫芬. 中国淡水原生动物多样性及其所受威胁[J]. 生物多样性, 1998, 06(2): 81-86.