
Biodiv Sci ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 10-18. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.08225 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2009.08225
• Paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xuezhi Wang, Weihua Xu, Zhiyun Ouyang*(
)
Received:2008-09-10
Accepted:2009-01-06
Online:2009-01-20
Published:2009-01-20
Contact:
Zhiyun Ouyang
Xuezhi Wang, Weihua Xu, Zhiyun Ouyang. Impacts of spatio-temporal changes in agricultural land on giant panda habitat: A case study in the Baicaohe watershed of the mid-Minshan Mountains[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2009, 17(1): 10-18.
| 自然因子 Natural factors | 适宜 Suitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 标准 Criteria | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total fecal samples (%) | 标准 Criteria | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total fecal samples (%) | 标准 Criteria | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total fecal samples (%) | |||
| 海拔 Elevation (m) | 2,000-3,100 | 92.20 | 1,700-2,000; 3,100-3,500 | 7.80 | <1,700; ≥3,500 | 0 | ||
| 坡度 Slope (°) | ≤40 | 81.93 | 40-50 | 18.07 | >50 | 0 | ||
| 植被类型 Vegetation | 森林 Forest | 97.54 | 灌丛 Shrubs | 2.46 | 其他类型 Others | 0 | ||
| 竹类 Bamboos | 有 Presence | 97.33 | 无 Absence | 2.67 | ||||
Table 1 Assessment of natural factors used to determine habitat suitability for giant pandas
| 自然因子 Natural factors | 适宜 Suitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 标准 Criteria | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total fecal samples (%) | 标准 Criteria | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total fecal samples (%) | 标准 Criteria | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total fecal samples (%) | |||
| 海拔 Elevation (m) | 2,000-3,100 | 92.20 | 1,700-2,000; 3,100-3,500 | 7.80 | <1,700; ≥3,500 | 0 | ||
| 坡度 Slope (°) | ≤40 | 81.93 | 40-50 | 18.07 | >50 | 0 | ||
| 植被类型 Vegetation | 森林 Forest | 97.54 | 灌丛 Shrubs | 2.46 | 其他类型 Others | 0 | ||
| 竹类 Bamboos | 有 Presence | 97.33 | 无 Absence | 2.67 | ||||
| 人为干扰因子 Human factors | 强 Strong | 中等 Moderate | 弱 Weak | 无 None | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 距离 Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | 距离 Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | 距离Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | 距离Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | ||||
| 公路距离 Distance to roads | 0-100 | 0.0 | 100-300 | 2.2 | 300-700 | 6.6 | >700 | 91.2 | |||
| 居民点距离 Distance to human settlements | 0-700 | 0.0 | 700-900 | 3.5 | 900-1,400 | 5.3 | >1,400 | 91.2 | |||
| 农用地距离 Distance to agricultural land | 0-100 | 0.8 | 100-400 | 3.8 | 400-700 | 6.0 | >700 | 89.5 | |||
Table 2 Assessment of the effects of human factors on giant panda habitat
| 人为干扰因子 Human factors | 强 Strong | 中等 Moderate | 弱 Weak | 无 None | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 距离 Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | 距离 Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | 距离Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | 距离Distance (m) | 痕迹点比例 Ratio to total samples (%) | ||||
| 公路距离 Distance to roads | 0-100 | 0.0 | 100-300 | 2.2 | 300-700 | 6.6 | >700 | 91.2 | |||
| 居民点距离 Distance to human settlements | 0-700 | 0.0 | 700-900 | 3.5 | 900-1,400 | 5.3 | >1,400 | 91.2 | |||
| 农用地距离 Distance to agricultural land | 0-100 | 0.8 | 100-400 | 3.8 | 400-700 | 6.0 | >700 | 89.5 | |||
| 实际生境质量 人为影响强度 Degree of Quality of actual habitat human influences 潜在生境 质量 Quality of potential habitat | 强 Strong | 中 Moderate | 弱 Weak | 无 None |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 适宜 Suitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable |
| 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable |
| 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable |
Table 3 Realized habitat resulting from a combination of potential habitat and human effects on habitat
| 实际生境质量 人为影响强度 Degree of Quality of actual habitat human influences 潜在生境 质量 Quality of potential habitat | 强 Strong | 中 Moderate | 弱 Weak | 无 None |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 适宜 Suitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable |
| 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 次适宜 Marginally suitable |
| 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable | 不适宜 Unsuitable |
| 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 总计 Total | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 总计 Total | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 总计 Total | |||
| 自然保护区外 Outside reserves | 10,160 | 8,200 | 18,360 | 9,157 | 7,821 | 16,978 | 8,527 | 5,880 | 14,407 | ||
| 自然保护区内 Inside reserves | 32,740 | 30,614 | 63,354 | 32,426 | 30,448 | 62,874 | 33,242 | 28,785 | 62,026 | ||
| 总计 Total | 42,900 | 38,814 | 81,714 | 41,584 | 38,269 | 79,852 | 41,769 | 34,664 | 76,433 | ||
Table 4 The habitat area (hm2) of giant panda in Baicaohe watershed in 1994, 2001 and 2008
| 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 总计 Total | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 总计 Total | 次适宜 Marginally suitable | 适宜 Suitable | 总计 Total | |||
| 自然保护区外 Outside reserves | 10,160 | 8,200 | 18,360 | 9,157 | 7,821 | 16,978 | 8,527 | 5,880 | 14,407 | ||
| 自然保护区内 Inside reserves | 32,740 | 30,614 | 63,354 | 32,426 | 30,448 | 62,874 | 33,242 | 28,785 | 62,026 | ||
| 总计 Total | 42,900 | 38,814 | 81,714 | 41,584 | 38,269 | 79,852 | 41,769 | 34,664 | 76,433 | ||
| 海拔 Elevation | 潜在生境丧失面积 Potential habitat decreased (hm2) | 生境破坏面积 Damaged habitat by agricultural land (hm2) | 生境影响面积 Influenced habitat by agricultural land (hm2) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | |||
| 1,700-1,800 | 2,332 | 2,452 | 2,729 | 162 | 185 | 437 | 2,009 | 2,101 | 2,156 | ||
| 1,800-1,900 | 1,636 | 1,917 | 2,376 | 57 | 105 | 405 | 1,450 | 1,677 | 1,857 | ||
| 1,900-2,000 | 872 | 1,279 | 1,885 | 15 | 30 | 330 | 756 | 1,158 | 1,459 | ||
| 2,000-2,100 | 450 | 611 | 1,258 | 11 | 37 | 281 | 317 | 464 | 849 | ||
| 2,100-2,200 | 305 | 433 | 920 | 12 | 24 | 176 | 161 | 290 | 590 | ||
| 2,200-2,300 | 212 | 317 | 647 | 7 | 20 | 84 | 107 | 233 | 441 | ||
| 2,300-2,400 | 121 | 200 | 441 | 1 | 3 | 52 | 61 | 158 | 278 | ||
| 2,400-2,500 | 77 | 99 | 336 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 25 | 79 | 171 | ||
| 合计 Total | 6,005 | 7,308 | 10,592 | 265 | 407 | 1,795 | 4,886 | 6,160 | 7,801 | ||
Table 5 The influence area of agricultural land on giant panda habitat in 1994, 2001 and 2008
| 海拔 Elevation | 潜在生境丧失面积 Potential habitat decreased (hm2) | 生境破坏面积 Damaged habitat by agricultural land (hm2) | 生境影响面积 Influenced habitat by agricultural land (hm2) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | 1994 | 2001 | 2008 | |||
| 1,700-1,800 | 2,332 | 2,452 | 2,729 | 162 | 185 | 437 | 2,009 | 2,101 | 2,156 | ||
| 1,800-1,900 | 1,636 | 1,917 | 2,376 | 57 | 105 | 405 | 1,450 | 1,677 | 1,857 | ||
| 1,900-2,000 | 872 | 1,279 | 1,885 | 15 | 30 | 330 | 756 | 1,158 | 1,459 | ||
| 2,000-2,100 | 450 | 611 | 1,258 | 11 | 37 | 281 | 317 | 464 | 849 | ||
| 2,100-2,200 | 305 | 433 | 920 | 12 | 24 | 176 | 161 | 290 | 590 | ||
| 2,200-2,300 | 212 | 317 | 647 | 7 | 20 | 84 | 107 | 233 | 441 | ||
| 2,300-2,400 | 121 | 200 | 441 | 1 | 3 | 52 | 61 | 158 | 278 | ||
| 2,400-2,500 | 77 | 99 | 336 | 0 | 3 | 30 | 25 | 79 | 171 | ||
| 合计 Total | 6,005 | 7,308 | 10,592 | 265 | 407 | 1,795 | 4,886 | 6,160 | 7,801 | ||
| [1] | DeFries R, Hansen A, Newton AC, Hansen MC (2005) Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecological Applications, 15, 19-26. |
| [2] |
DeFries R, Hansen A, Turner BL, Reid R, Liu JG (2007) Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecological Applications, 17, 1031-1038.
URL PMID |
| [3] | Hansen AJ, Rasker R, Maxwell B, Rotella JJ, Johnson JD, Parmenter AW, Langner U, Cohen WB, Lawrence RL, Kraska MPV (2002) Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West. BioScience, 52, 151-162. |
| [4] |
Hansen AJ, DeFries R (2007) Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecological Applications, 17, 974-988.
URL PMID |
| [5] | Linderman M, Bearer S, An L, Tan YC, Ouyang ZY, Liu JG (2005) The effects of understory bamboo on broad-scale estimates of giant panda habitat. Biological Conservation, 121, 383-390. |
| [6] | Liu JG, Ouyang ZY, Taylor WW, Groop R, Tan YC, Zhang HM (1999) A framework for evaluating the effects of human factors on wildlife habitat: the case of giant pandas. Conservation Biology, 13, 1360-1370. |
| [7] | Liu JG, Linderman M, Ouyang ZY, An L, Yang J, Zhang HM (2001) Ecological degradation in protected areas: the case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science, 292, 98-101. |
| [8] | Liu XH (2001) Mapping and Modelling the Habitat of Giant Pandas in Foping Nature Reserve, China. Printer: Febodruk BV, Enschede, the Netherlands. |
| [9] | Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Liu JG (刘建国), Xiao H (肖寒), Tan YC (谭迎春), Zhang HM (张和民) (2001) An assessment of giant panda habitat in Wolong Nature Reserve. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 21, 1869-1874. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [10] | Serneels S, Lambin EL (2001) Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok district, Kenya: a spatial statistical model. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 85, 65-81. |
| [11] | State Forestry Administration (国家林业局) (2006) The Third National Survey Report on Giant Panda in China (全国第三次大熊猫调查报告). Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
| [12] | Taylor AH, Qin ZS (1993) Bamboo regeneration after flowering in the Wolong Giant Panda Reserve, China. Biological Conservation, 63, 231-234. |
| [13] | Viňa A, Bearer S, Chen XD, He GM, Linderman M, An L, Zhang HM, Ouyang ZY, Liu JG (2007) Temporal changes in giant panda habitat connectivity across boundaries of Wolong Nature Reserve, China. Ecological Applications, 17, 1019-1030. |
| [14] | Wang XZ (王学志), Xu WH (徐卫华), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Liu JG (刘建国), Xiao Y (肖燚), Chen YP (陈佑平), Zhao LJ (赵联军), Huang JZ (黄俊忠)(2008) Application of ecological-niche factor analysis in habitat assessment of giant pandas. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 28, 821-828. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [15] | Xiao Y (肖燚), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Zhu CQ (朱春全), Zhao JZ (赵景柱), He GJ (何国金), Wang XK (王效科) (2004) An assessment of giant panda habitat in Minshan, Sichuan, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 24, 1373-1379. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [16] | Xu WH (徐卫华), Ouyang ZY (欧阳志云), Jiang ZY (蒋泽银), Zheng H (郑华), Liu JG (刘建国)(2006) Assessment of giant panda habitat in the Daxiangling Mountain Range, Sichuan, China. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 14, 223-231. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [17] | Xu WH, Ouyang ZY, Viňa A, Zheng H, Liu JG, Xiao Y (2006) Designing a conservation plan for protecting the habitat for giant pandas in the Qionglai Mountain range, China. Diversity and Distributions, 12, 610-619. |
| [18] | Zhang WG (张文广), Tang ZH (唐中海), Qi DW (齐敦武), Hu YM (胡远满), Hu JC (胡锦矗) (2007) Habitat assessment for giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) on the northern slope of the Daxiangling Mountains. Acta Theriologica Sinica (兽类学报), 27, 146-152. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [1] | Jianchao Liang, Shutian Chen, Wenxiang He, Chunni Xiong, Zhenzhou Xu, Yuanxin Huang, Yuanzhihong Liu, Lang Zhang, Huijian Hu. Wild terrestrial vertebrate resources in Guangzhou: Diversity, distribution, and conservation [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(5): 25422-. |
| [2] | Cuiyi Jiang, Zhijing Xie, Zhongping Tian, Yueying Li, Mingxin Zheng, Shuai Fang, Mierkamili Maimaiti, Erfan Akberjan, Meixiang Gao, Jian Zhang. The role of microtopography in shaping forest soil Collembola community assembly in western Tianshan Mountains of Xinjiang [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(4): 25300-. |
| [3] | Xixia Lu, Fengxiang Zhou, Liming Yong, Qianhui Zeng, Liyuan Zhao, Yuke Zhang, Xianyan Wang. Impacts of coastal reclamation on Chinese white dolphin (Sousa chinensis) habitats in China from 1990 to 2020 [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(3): 25249-. |
| [4] | Linxi Yuan, Meizhen Wang, Lixiang Zhang, Peng Li, Yongsheng Zhang, Xuelong Jiang, Zhenhua Guan. Impact of human activities on the diversity of trees and potential food resources in the habitat of Hoolock tianxing [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(2): 25271-. |
| [5] | Yu Luo, Xuyan Zheng, Li Cao, Bo Wang, Yanqiong Peng, Yinling Luo, Huiping Zhou, Xiaofang Yang, Baige Miao, Chaoya Wang, Jie Gao. Habitat simplification reshapes the fig-fig wasp interaction network: Adaptive responses of volatile composition and community structure [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(2): 25328-. |
| [6] | Ming Li, Xiangling Qin, Yuru Zhu, Wen Xiong. Theoretical framework and operational mechanisms of value realization in biodiversity offsetting for nature reserves [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(1): 25241-. |
| [7] | Yu Li, Lizhi Zhou. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of wintering waterbird diversity in the mainstream of Huaihe River [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(8): 24590-. |
| [8] | Luyao Tian, Hao Yin. Research status and strategies for China’s ecological railway development based on biodiversity conservation [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(8): 24495-. |
| [9] | Shengnan Ji, Jiarong Han, Yueheng Ren, Xiaodong Mu, Yanpeng Zhu. Prediction of suitable habitats and risk assessment for key invasive alien plant species on Hainan Island based on the MaxEnt model [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(8): 25037-. |
| [10] | Fengxiang Zhou, Xixia Lu, Liming Yong, Qianhui Zeng, Liangliang Yang, Ping Li, Yuke Zhang, Xianyan Wang. Research progress on acoustic monitoring of cetaceans [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(7): 24556-. |
| [11] | Lü Zhou, Hua Guo, Shimao Yao, Cheng Tian. The spatio-temporal distribution patterns of Tragopan temminckii in Wanglang National Nature Reserve [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(7): 24537-. |
| [12] | Jinbo Xu, Yaqian Cui, Yuan Wang, Weibo Wang, Feng Liu, Guanglong Wang, Jingjing Hu, Dunzhu Pubu, Duoji Bianba, Zeng Dan, Kai Hu, Xiaochuan Wang, Gang Song, Yonglei Lü, Zhixin Wen. Habitat suitability evaluation of Macaca leucogenys in the Xizang Yarlung Zangbo Grand Canyon National Nature Reserve [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(7): 24493-. |
| [13] | Huan Xu, Fengfei Xin, Hongliang Shi, Lin Yuan, Shunqi Bo, Xinyi Zhao, Shuaitao Deng, Tingting Pan, Jing Yu, Saisai Sun, Cheng Xue. Evaluation of effects of integrated ecological restoration technology on habitat and bird diversity improvement in the North Branch of Yangtze River Estuary [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(5): 24478-. |
| [14] | Yan Kang, Jing Gan, Linlin Yu, Chenjing He, Liqing Zhang, Jingbin Wu. Design pattern and network development of urban microhabitat based on nature-based solutions (NbS): A case study of habitat gardens in Changning District, Shanghai [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(5): 24528-. |
| [15] | Zhang Mingyi, Wang Xiaomei, Zheng Yanxin, Wu Nan, Li Donghao, Fan Enyuan, Li Na, Shan Xiujuan, Yu Tao, Zhao Chunnuan, Li Bo, Xu Shuai, Wu Yuping, Ren Liqun. Resource status and habitat function of typical oyster reef areas in the Yellow River Estuary [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(4): 24208-. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn