Biodiversity Science ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 738-748.doi: 10.17520/biods.2018017

• Original Papers • Previous Article     Next Article

Structures of the tuf gene and its upstream part genes and characteristic analysis of conserved regions and activity from related gene promoters of a phytoplasma

Shaoshuai Yu, Caili Lin, Shengjie Wang, Wenxin Zhang, Guozhong Tian*()   

  1. Key Laboratory of Forest Protection of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091
  • Received:2018-01-16 Accepted:2018-03-26 Online:2018-09-11
  • Tian Guozhong
  • About author:# Co-first authors

Studies on the genetic diversity, key gene regulation and control of phytoplasma, which cause many diseases with various host plants and have a wide geographical distribution, will be conducive to facilitating integrated disease control. The large DNA fragments including tuf gene sequences and upstream six genes from PaWB-sdyz, PaWB-fjfz and LY-fjya1 strains were amplified using long fragment PCR primers. Sequence characteristic of conserved regions of the phytoplasma gene promoter and MLSA were performed. Upstream sequences adjoining the tuf gene was recombined with promoter-probe vector pSUPV4 to analyze their promoter activity. The sequences, 12,745-12,748 bp in length, of upstream tuf genes were amplified from the three strains. Comparative analysis showed that the gene structure order of the tuf gene and its upstream six gene sequences of PaWB-sdyz, PaWB-fjfz, LY-fjya1, OY-M, AYWB, PAa, SLY, AT phytoplasma strains were identical in the arrangement of 5’-rplL-rpoB-rpoC-rps12-rps7-fusA-tuf-3’. The potential sequence pattern of conserved region of the phytoplasma promoter was deduced: T90T100G92T75G67A85 (-35 region); T90A96T92A98T73T90 (-10 region). The different phytoplasma strains were clearly divided with comparatively high bootstrap values based on MLSA of coding genes, non-coding sequences, and deduced amino acid sequences of rplL-tuf nucleotide sequences. Genetic variation was comparatively high in the non-coding nucleotide sequences. A 130-bp upstream sequence of the tuf gene in PaWB-fjfz, LY-fjya1 strains and a 129-bp upstream sequence of the tuf gene in CWB-hnsy1 strain, and three representative strains of three variation types of upstream sequences adjoining the tuf gene from 16SrI group, were tested for promoter activity.

Key words: phytoplasma, promoter, gene structure, genetic diversity, multilocus sequence analysis

Table 1

Information of the primers used to amplify the large DNA fragments"

引物 Primer 序列 Sequence (5’-3’) 长度 Length (nt) Tm (℃) G+C (%) 扩增长度 Length amplified (bp)
op1 5'-GATTGACATGGCTAAGTTAACG-3' 22 54.9 40.9 3,676
op2 5'-TACACCTTTGTTTCCGTGGC-3' 20 58.4 50.0
op3 5'-AGGTAGCGGTCAAGAAGAAAT-3' 21 55.4 42.9 6,965
op4 5'-GAACCGCAAAGAACTGGG-3' 18 56.0 55.6
op5 5'-AATATTATTGACACTCCCGGAC-3' 22 55.5 40.9 2,661
op7 5'-CACATTTTATTAGCGCGCC-3' 19 57.2 47.4 1,519
op8 5'-AAAACCTAACGCAATCATGG-3' 20 55.5 40.0

Table 2

Primers used to amplify tuf gene promoters"

引物 Primer 引物序列 Primer sequences (5’-3’) 引物大小 Primer size (bp) Tm (℃) 引入酶切位点 Restriction site added

Table 3

Length of sequence amplified, coding region, non-coding region and amino acid sequence of phytoplasmas as well as reference strains"

Sequence amplified
length (bp)
Coding region
length (bp)
Non-coding region
length (bp)
Amino acid sequence
PaWB-sdyz 16SrI-D 12,746 12,307 439 4,096
PaWB-fjfz 16SrI-D 12,745 12,307 438 4,096
LY-fjya1 16SrI-B 12,748 12,307 441 4,096
OY-M 16SrI-B 12,745 12,307 438 4,096
AYWB 16SrI-A 12,735 12,343 392 4,107
PAa 16SrXII 12,611 12,211 400 4,063
SLY 16SrXII 12,611 12,211 400 4,063
AT 16SrX 12,835 12,301 534 4,093
PG-8A 4,587 4,158 429 1,382

Fig. 1

Gene structure diagram of tuf gene and its upstream genes from different phytoplasmas. The codes of samples in the figure were shown in “1.1” and “1.2.3”. Numbers represented the length of intergenic sequences (bp)."

Table 4

Characteristics of conserved region of relevant gene promoter of phytoplasma rplL-tuf intergenic sequences"

rplL-rpoB rpoC-rps12 rps12-rps7 fusA-tuf
-35 -10 -35 -10 -35 -10 -35 -10

Table 5

Nucleotide and its frequency in different sites of conserved regions of some phytoplasma gene promoters"

保守区域 Conserved region -35区 -35 region -10区 -10 region
Sequence characteristic
A(10) A(0) A(8) A(17) A(25) A(85) A(10) A(96) A(8) A(98) A(19) A(0)
T(90) T(100) T(0) T(75) T(6) T(15) T(90) T(4) T(92) T(2) T(73) T(90)
G(0) G(0) G(92) G(0) G(67) G(0) G(0) G(0) G(0) G(0) G(0) G(0)
C(0) C(0) C(0) C(8) C(2) C(0) C(0) C(0) C(0) C(0) C(8) C(10)

Table 6

Homology matrix of rplL-tuf nucleotide sequence coding region in MLSA analysis"

株系 Strain PaWB-sdyz PaWB-fjfz LY-fjya1 OY-M AYWB PAa SLY AT PG-8A
PaWB-sdyz 100
PaWB-fjfz 99.7 100
LY-fjya1 99.3 99.3 100
OY-M 99.6 99.6 99.4 100
AYWB 95.9 95.9 95.9 96.0 100
PAa 81.1 81.1 81.2 81.1 81.1 100
SLY 81.1 81.1 81.2 81.1 81.1 99.9 100
AT 72.7 72.8 72.9 72.8 73.3 73.6 73.6 100
PG-8A 71.2 71.3 71.4 71.3 71.4 71.3 71.3 70.9 100

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of the phytoplasma strains reconstructed based on the concatenated gene sequences data set of rplL-tuf nucleotide sequence coding region. The codes in the figure were shown in “1.1” and “1.2.3”."

Table 7

Homology matrix of rplL-tuf nucleotide sequence non-coding region in MLSA analysis"

株系 Strain PaWB-sdyz PaWB-fjfz LY-fjya1 OY-M AYWB PAa SLY AT PG-8A
PaWB-sdyz 100
PaWB-fjfz 99.3 100
LY-fjya1 99.3 98.6 100
OY-M 99.3 98.6 98.6 100
AYWB 94.6 94.3 94.1 94.1 100
PAa 71.9 71.8 71.3 72.3 73.2 100
SLY 71.9 71.8 71.3 72.3 73.2 100 100
AT 50.7 51.3 51.4 51.3 51.1 51.4 51.4 100
PG-8A 41.8 41.3 41.5 41.8 41.3 40.2 40.2 44.8 100

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree of the phytoplasma strains reconstructed based on the concatenated gene sequences data set of rplL-tuf nucleotide sequence non-coding region. The codes in the figure are shown in “1.1” and “1.2.3”."

Table 8

Homology matrix of RplL-TUF amino acid sequence in MLSA analysis"

株系 Strain PaWB-sdyz PaWB-fjfz LY-fjya1 OY-M AYWB PAa SLY AT PG-8A
PaWB-sdyz 100
PaWB-fjfz 99.6 100
LY-fjya1 98.9 99.0 100
OY-M 99.4 99.5 99.2 100
AYWB 97.8 97.9 98.0 98.0 100
PAa 83.8 83.9 84.1 83.9 83.7 100
SLY 83.8 83.9 84.1 83.9 83.7 99.8 100
AT 69.8 69.9 70.0 69.9 69.8 69.0 69.0 100
PG-8A 74.9 75.1 74.9 75.0 74.8 74.1 73.9 70.4 100

Fig. 4

Phylogenetic tree of the phytoplasma strains reconstructed based on the concatenated sequences data set of RplL-TUF amino acid sequence. The codes in the figure are shown in “1.1” and “1.2.3”."

[1] Andersen MT, Liefting LW, Havukkala I, Beever RE (2013) Comparison of the complete genome sequence of two closely related isolates of ‘Candidatus phytoplasma australiense’ reveals genome plasticity. BMC Genomics, 14, 529.
[2] Bai XD, Zhang JH, Ewing A, Miller SA, Radek AJ, Shevchenko DV, Tsukerman K, Walunas T, Lapidus A, Campbell JW, Hogenhout SA (2006) Living with genome instability: The adaptation of phytoplasma to diverse environments of their insect and plant hosts. Journal of Bacteriology, 188, 3682-3696.
[3] Du HT, Zhu HY, Wang JM, Zhao W, Tao XL, Ba CF, Tian YM, Su YH (2014) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and activity analysis of the promoter and enhancer of the pig lactase gene. Gene, 545, 56-60.
[4] Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791.
[5] Ishii Y, Kakizawa S, Hoshi A, Maejima K, Kagiwada S, Yamaji Y, Oshima K, Namba S (2009) In the non-insect- transmissible line of onion yellows phytoplasma (OY-NIM), the plasmid-encoded transmembrane protein ORF3 lacks the major promoter region. Microbiology, 155, 2058-2067.
[6] Kube M, Schneider B, Kuhl H, Dandekar T, Heitmann K, Migdoll AM, Reinhardt R, Seemüller E (2008) The linear chromosome of the plant-pathogenic mycoplasma ‘Candidatus phytoplasma mali’. BMC Genomics, 9, 306.
[7] Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1870-1874.
[8] Lee IM, Hammond RW, Davis RE, Gundersen DE (1993) Universal amplification and analysis of pathogen 16S rDNA for classification and identification of mycoplasma like organisms. Phytopathology, 83, 834-842.
[9] Li MG (2004) Advanced Molecular Genetics. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[李明刚 (2004) 高级分子遗传学. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[10] Liu Z, Zhang L, Xue C, Fang H, Zhao J, Liu M (2017) Genome-wide identification and analysis of MAPK and MAPKK gene family in Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.). BMC Genomics, 18, 855.
[11] Miyata S, Furuki K, Oshima K, Sawayanagi T, Nishigawa H, Jung HY, Ugaki M, Namba S (2002a) Complete nucleotide sequence of the S10-spc operon of phytoplasma: Gene organization and genetic code resemble those of Bacillus subtilis. DNA and Cell Biology, 21, 527-534.
[12] Miyata S, Furuki K, Sawayanagi T, Oshima K, Kuboyama T, Tsuchizaki T, Ugaki M, Namba S (2002b) Gene arrangement and sequence of str operon of phytoplasma resemble those of Bacillus more than those of Mycoplasma. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 68, 62-67.
[13] Oshima K, Kakizawa S, Nishigawa H, Jung HY, Wei W, Suzuki S, Arashida R, Nakata D, Miyata S, Ugaki M, Namba S (2004) Reductive evolution suggested from the complete genome sequence of a plant-pathogenic phytoplasma. Nature Genetics, 36, 27-29.
[14] Post LE, Nomura M (1980) DNA sequences from the str operon of Escherichia coli. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 255, 4660-4666.
[15] Ren ZG (2014) The Qualitative and Quantitative Detection and Identification of Several Important Phytoplasmas in China. Postdoctoral Research Report, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[任争光 (2014) 我国几种重要植原体定性和定量检测鉴定研究.博士后研究报告, 中国林业科学研究院, 北京.]
[16] Salehi M, Hosseini SAE, Salehi E, Bertaccini A (2017) Genetic diversity and vector transmission of phytoplasmas associated with sesame phyllody in Iran. Folia Microbiologica, 62, 99-109.
[17] Sanangelantoni AM, Tiboni O (1993) The chromosomal location of genes for elongation factor Tu and ribosomal protein S10 in the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis provides clues to the ancestral organization of the str and S10 operons in prokaryotes. Journal of General Microbiology, 139, 2579-2584.
[18] Tran-Nguyen LTT, Kube M, Schneider B, Reinhardt R, Gibb KS (2008) Comparative genome analysis of ‘Candidatus phytoplasma australiense’ (subgroup tuf-Australia I; rp-A) and ‘Ca. phytoplasma asteris’ strains OY-M and AY-WB. Journal of Bacteriology, 190, 3979-3991.
[19] Turner PC (translated by Liu JY, Liu WY) (2010) Molecular Biology, 3rd edn. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[特纳(著), 刘进元, 刘文颖 (译) (2010) 分子生物学, 第3版. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[20] Wang SJ (2017) Establishment of Molecular Detection Technology and Genetic Diversity Analysis of Plant Phytoplasma in China. PhD dissertation, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[王圣洁 (2017) 重要林木植原体分子检测技术的研发和遗传多样性研究. 博士学位论文, 中国林业科学研究院, 北京.]
[21] Yang YH (2008) Molecular Biology of the Gene. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[杨业华 (2008) 基因的分子生物学. 高等教育出版社, 北京.]
[22] Yu SS, Xu QC, Lin CL, Wang SJ, Tian GZ (2016a) Genetic diversity of phytoplasmas: Research status and prospects. Biodiversity Science, 24, 205-215. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[于少帅, 徐启聪, 林彩丽, 王圣洁, 田国忠 (2016a) 植原体遗传多样性研究现状与展望. 生物多样性, 24, 205-215.]
[23] Yu SS, Lin CL, Pan J, Ren ZG, Piao CG, Wang LF, Guo MW, Tian GZ (2016b) Comparative analysis of structure, function and genetic variation of upstream sequences adjoining tuf gene in paulownia and jujube witches’-broom phytoplasmas. Microbiology China, 43, 1060-1069. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[于少帅, 林彩丽, 潘皎, 任争光, 朴春根, 汪来发, 郭民伟, 田国忠 (2016b) 泡桐丛枝和枣疯病植原体tuf基因上游序列结构、功能和遗传变异比较分析. 微生物学通报, 43, 1060-1069.]
[24] Zhang Y, Han Q, Li C, Li W, Fan H, Xing Q, Yan B (2014) Genetic analysis of the TBX1 gene promoter in indirect inguinal hernia. Gene, 535, 290-293.
[25] Zhu YX, Li Y (2002)Modern Molecular Biology, 2nd edn. Higher Education Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[朱玉贤, 李毅 (2002)现代分子生物学, 第2版. 高等教育出版社, 北京.]
[26] Zurawski G, Zurawski SM (1985) Structure of the Escherichia coli S10 ribosomal protein operon. Nucleic Acids Research, 13, 4521-4526.
[1] XU Jin-Shi,CHAI Yong-Fu,LIU Xiao,YUE Ming,GUO Yao-Xin,KANG Mu-Yi,LIU Quan-Ru,ZHENG Cheng-Yang,JI Cheng-Jun,YAN Ming,ZHANG Feng,GAO Xian-Ming,WANG Ren-Qing,SHI Fu-Chen,ZHANG Qin-Di,WANG Mao. (2019) Community assembly, diversity patterns and distributions of broad-leaved forests in North China . Chin J Plant Ecol, 43(9): 732-741.
[2] QIN Hao,ZHANG Yin-Bo,DONG Gang,ZHANG Feng. (2019) Altitudinal patterns of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity of forest communities in Mount Guandi, Shanxi, China . Chin J Plant Ecol, 43(9): 762-773.
[3] He Jieli,Shi Tiantian,Chen Ling,Wang Haigang,Gao Zhijun,Yang Meihong,Wang Ruiyun,Qiao Zhijun. (2019) The Genetic Diversity of Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Germplasm Resources Based on the EST-SSR Markers . Chin Bull Bot, 54(6): 723-732.
[4] ZHANG Xin-Xin, WANG Xi, HU Ying, ZHOU Wei, CHEN Xiao-Yang, HU Xin-Sheng. (2019) Advances in the study of population genetic diversity at plant species’ margins . Chin J Plant Ecol, 43(5): 383-395.
[5] Zhang Yahong, Jia Huixia, Wang Zhibin, Sun Pei, Cao Demei, Hu Jianjun. (2019) Genetic diversity and population structure of Populus yunnanensis . Biodiv Sci, 27(4): 355-365.
[6] CHENG Yi-Kang, ZHANG Hui, WANG Xu, LONG Wen-Xing, LI Chao, FANG Yan-Shan, FU Ming-Qi, ZHU Kong-Xin. (2019) Effects of functional diversity and phylogenetic diversity on the tropical cloud forest community assembly . Chin J Plant Ecol, 43(3): 217-226.
[7] Xie Lifeng, Li Ning, Li Ye, Yao Minghua. (2019) Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Eggplant (Solanum melongena) Germplasm Resources Based on SRAP Method . Chin Bull Bot, 54(1): 58-63.
[8] Dexin Sun, Xiang Liu, Shurong Zhou. (2018) Dynamical changes of diversity and community assembly during recovery from a plant functional group removal experiment in the alpine meadow . Biodiv Sci, 26(7): 655-666.
[9] Wenju Zhang,Jun Rong,Chaoling Wei,Lianming Gao,Jiakuan Chen. (2018) Domestication origin and spread of cultivated tea plants . Biodiv Sci, 26(4): 357-372.
[10] Shengyuan Qin,Jun Rong,Wenju Zhang,Jiakuan Chen. (2018) Cultivation history of Camellia oleifera and genetic resources in the Yangtze River Basin . Biodiv Sci, 26(4): 384-395.
[11] Ren Mengyun, Du Leshan, Chen Yanjun, Zhang Dun, Shen Qi, Guan Xiao, Zhang Yindong. (2018) Analysis on Genetic Diversity of Cynomorium songaricum by ITS Sequence . Chin Bull Bot, 53(3): 313-321.
[12] Hou Qinxi, Ci Xiuqin, Liu Zhifang, Xu Wumei, Li Jie. (2018) Assessment of the evolutionary history of Lauraceae in Xishuangbanna National Nature Reserve using DNA barcoding . Biodiv Sci, 26(3): 217-228.
[13] Xunhe Huang,Zheqi Yu,Zhuoxian Weng,Danlin He,Zhenhua Yi,Weina Li,Jiebo Chen,Xiquan Zhang,Bingwang Du,Fusheng Zhong. (2018) Mitochondrial genetic diversity and maternal origin of Guangdong indigenous chickens . Biodiv Sci, 26(3): 238-247.
[14] Xingtong Wu,Lu Chen,Minqiu Wang,Yuan Zhang,Xueying Lin,Xinyu Li,Hong Zhou,Yafeng Wen. (2018) Population structure and genetic divergence in Firmiana danxiaensis . Biodiv Sci, 26(11): 1168-1179.
[15] ZHANG Li-Wen, HAN Guang-Xuan. (2018) A review on the relationships between plant genetic diversity and ecosystem functioning . Chin J Plan Ecolo, 42(10): 977-989.
Full text