
Biodiv Sci ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 22217. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022217 cstr: 32101.14.biods.2022217
• Original Papers: Animal Diversity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hao Dong, Ziyi Ke, Yatao Wu, Junqi Miao, Fang Zhang*(
)
Received:2022-04-24
Accepted:2022-07-06
Online:2023-01-20
Published:2022-09-18
Contact:
*Fang Zhang, E-mail: biozhf@ahnu.edu.cn
Hao Dong, Ziyi Ke, Yatao Wu, Junqi Miao, Fang Zhang. Changes in vocal characteristics of male concave-eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota) in different chorus tides[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(1): 22217.
| 蛙编号 Frog no. | 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.11/0.08 | 0.04/0.19 | 0.15/0.26 | 354.13/391.38 | 0.63/0.75 | 1.10/0.68 |
| 2 | 0.04/0.04 | 0.05/0.09 | 0.09/0.13 | 333.88/302.50 | 1.00/0.70 | 1.11/0.63 |
| 3 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.02/0.06 | 0.04/0.16 | 309.78/341.78 | 0.44/1.44 | 0.75/0.04 |
| 4 | 0.21/0.06 | 0.08/0.17 | 0.29/0.22 | 447.00/481.33 | 0.45/0.67 | 0.65/0.27 |
| 5 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.06/0.05 | 0.12/0.14 | 415.56/352.75 | 0.33/0.88 | 0.56/0.44 |
| 6 | 0.05/0.16 | 0.14/0.02 | 0.19/0.18 | 430.94/354.00 | 0.38/0.44 | 0.94/0.67 |
| 7 | 0.05/0.07 | 0.02/0.16 | 0.08/0.23 | 272.60/377.84 | 0.70/0.25 | 0.63/0.63 |
| 8 | 0.05/0.11 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.06/0.21 | 443.33/419.44 | 0.33/0.89 | 0.56/0.39 |
| 9 | 0.08/0.11 | 0.09/0.04 | 0.18/0.15 | 335.88/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.70/0.36 |
| 10 | 0.11/0.14 | 0.08/0.10 | 0.19/0.24 | 411.25/455.00 | 0.75/1.44 | 0.33/0.35 |
| 11 | 0.08/0.25 | 0.05/0.06 | 0.13/0.31 | 347.18/372.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.05/0.31 |
| 12 | 0.02/0.09 | 0.03/0.09 | 0.04/0.18 | 412.78/357.58 | 0.78/0.83 | 0.50/0.34 |
Table 1 The sound characteristic parameters of the male Odorrana tormota in different tide periods (high tide/low tide)
| 蛙编号 Frog no. | 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.11/0.08 | 0.04/0.19 | 0.15/0.26 | 354.13/391.38 | 0.63/0.75 | 1.10/0.68 |
| 2 | 0.04/0.04 | 0.05/0.09 | 0.09/0.13 | 333.88/302.50 | 1.00/0.70 | 1.11/0.63 |
| 3 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.02/0.06 | 0.04/0.16 | 309.78/341.78 | 0.44/1.44 | 0.75/0.04 |
| 4 | 0.21/0.06 | 0.08/0.17 | 0.29/0.22 | 447.00/481.33 | 0.45/0.67 | 0.65/0.27 |
| 5 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.06/0.05 | 0.12/0.14 | 415.56/352.75 | 0.33/0.88 | 0.56/0.44 |
| 6 | 0.05/0.16 | 0.14/0.02 | 0.19/0.18 | 430.94/354.00 | 0.38/0.44 | 0.94/0.67 |
| 7 | 0.05/0.07 | 0.02/0.16 | 0.08/0.23 | 272.60/377.84 | 0.70/0.25 | 0.63/0.63 |
| 8 | 0.05/0.11 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.06/0.21 | 443.33/419.44 | 0.33/0.89 | 0.56/0.39 |
| 9 | 0.08/0.11 | 0.09/0.04 | 0.18/0.15 | 335.88/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.70/0.36 |
| 10 | 0.11/0.14 | 0.08/0.10 | 0.19/0.24 | 411.25/455.00 | 0.75/1.44 | 0.33/0.35 |
| 11 | 0.08/0.25 | 0.05/0.06 | 0.13/0.31 | 347.18/372.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.05/0.31 |
| 12 | 0.02/0.09 | 0.03/0.09 | 0.04/0.18 | 412.78/357.58 | 0.78/0.83 | 0.50/0.34 |
| 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 样本量 Sample size (n) | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 平均值 Mean | 0.07/0.11 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.13/0.20 | 376.19/378.31 | 0.62/0.86 | 0.74/0.46 |
| 标准差 Standard error of mean | 0.05/0.06 | 0.04/0.05 | 0.07/0.06 | 57.62/51.46 | 0.35/0.45 | 0.25/0.15 |
| 最大值 Maximum | 0.21/0.25 | 0.14/0.19 | 0.29/0.31 | 447.00/481.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.11/0.68 |
| 最小值 Minimum | 0.01/0.04 | 0.01/0.02 | 0.04/0.09 | 272.60/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.33/0.27 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistics and difference analysis of the male Odorrana tormota’s vocal characteristics in different chorus tides (high tide/low tide)
| 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 样本量 Sample size (n) | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
| 平均值 Mean | 0.07/0.11 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.13/0.20 | 376.19/378.31 | 0.62/0.86 | 0.74/0.46 |
| 标准差 Standard error of mean | 0.05/0.06 | 0.04/0.05 | 0.07/0.06 | 57.62/51.46 | 0.35/0.45 | 0.25/0.15 |
| 最大值 Maximum | 0.21/0.25 | 0.14/0.19 | 0.29/0.31 | 447.00/481.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.11/0.68 |
| 最小值 Minimum | 0.01/0.04 | 0.01/0.02 | 0.04/0.09 | 272.60/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.33/0.27 |
| 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z | -1.60b | -1.51b | -2.13b | -2.31b | -0.09b | -2.85b |
| P | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
Table 3 Pairwise pairing analysis of the male Odorrana tormota’s vocal characteristics in different chorus periods (high tide vs low tide)
| 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z | -1.60b | -1.51b | -2.13b | -2.31b | -0.09b | -2.85b |
| P | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
| [1] |
Bass AH, McKibben JR (2003) Neural mechanisms and behaviors for acoustic communication in teleost fish. Progress in Neurobiology, 69, 1-26.
PMID |
| [2] |
Bee MA (2012) Sound source perception in anuran amphibians. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 301-310.
DOI PMID |
| [3] |
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2014) Complexity and behavioral ecology. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 435-442.
DOI URL |
| [4] | Brumm H, Naguib M (2009) Environmental acoustics and the evolution of bird song. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 40, 1-33. |
| [5] |
Digby A, Bell BD, Teal PD (2014) Non-linear phenomena in little spotted kiwi calls. Bioacoustics, 23, 113-128.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
Feng AS, Arch VS, Yu ZL, Yu XJ, Xu ZM, Shen JX (2009) Neighbor-stranger discrimination in concave-eared torrent frogs, Odorrana tormota. Ethology, 115, 851-856.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
Feng AS, Narins PM (2008) Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 194, 159-167.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H (2002) Calls out of chaos: The adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Animal Behaviour, 63, 407-418.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
Gerhardt HC, Dyson ML, Tanner SD, Murphy CG (1994) Female treefrogs do not avoid heterospecific calls as they approach conspecific calls: Implications for mechanisms of mate choice. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1323-1332.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2003) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: Common problems and diverse solutions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 559.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
Halfwerk W, Dixon MM, Ottens KJ, Taylor RC, Ryan MJ, Page RA, Jones PL (2014) Risks of multimodal signaling: Bat predators attend to dynamic motion in frog sexual displays. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217, 3038-3044.
DOI URL |
| [12] | Narins P (2013) Behavioral responses of anuran amphibians to biotic, synthetic and anthropogenic noise. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19, 10-29. |
| [13] |
Riede T, Arcadi AC, Owren MJ (2007) Nonlinear acoustics in the pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Vocalizing at the edge. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1758-1767.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
Riede T, Herzel H, Mehwald D, Seidner W, Trumler E, Böhme G, Tembrock G (2000) Nonlinear phenomena in the natural howling of a dog-wolf mix. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1435-1442.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
Suthers RA, Narins PM, Lin WY, Schnitzler HU, Denzinger A, Xu CH, Feng AS (2006) Voices of the dead: Complex nonlinear vocal signals from the larynx of an ultrasonic frog. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 4984-4993.
PMID |
| [16] |
Townsend SW, Manser MB (2011) The function of nonlinear phenomena in meerkat alarm calls. Biology Letters, 7, 47-49.
DOI PMID |
| [17] | Trivers RL (1972) Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. |
| [18] |
Welch AM, Semlitsch RD, Gerhardt HC (1998) Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science, 280, 1928-1930.
PMID |
| [19] | Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (2006) The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication. Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians. Springer, New York. |
| [20] |
Wollerman L, Wiley RH (2002) Background noise from a natural Chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour, 63, 15-22.
DOI URL |
| [21] | Wu YT, Bao JH, Lee P, Wang JM, Wang S, Zhang F (2021) Nonlinear phenomena conveying body size information and improving attractiveness of the courtship calls in the males of Odorrana tormota. Asian Herpetological Research, 12, 117-123. |
| [22] | Yuan C, Wang S, Liu SW, Jin Y, Zhang F (2019) Correlation between fertility and body characteristic parameters of female frogs (Odorrana tormota) and their mating patterns. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 54, 30-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
| [袁成, 王生, 刘姝文, 金莹, 张方 (2019) 雌性凹耳蛙生育力与体型参数间相关性及其配对模式. 动物学杂志, 54, 30-36.] | |
| [23] |
Zhang F, Chen P, Chen ZQ, Zhao J (2015) Ultrasonic frogs call at a higher pitch in noisier ambiance. Current Zoology, 61, 996-1003.
DOI PMID |
| [1] | Wenqi Gao, Jingrong Xiang, Yao Zhao, Lingshuang Fan, Yuan Gu, Weihan Shao, Gaojun Li, Guangjun Zhao, Mingbin Chen, Xingwei Cai, Kai Chen. Stream fish community characteristics and their response to land use in Limushan and Jianfengling of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2026, 34(2): 25374-. |
| [2] | Lin Wang, Ziyang Yin, Huifang Huang, Jing Wang. A new parameter estimation method based on the Carter-Morley Jones egg- shape model [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2025, 33(1): 24203-. |
| [3] | Jiantan Zhang, Yanpeng Li, Ruyun Zhang, Yunlong Ni, Wenying Zhou, Juyu Lian, Wanhui Ye. Height-diameter models based on branch wood density classification for the south subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Dinghushan [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(4): 456-466. |
| [4] | Yuanzhi Li, Junli Xiao, Hanlun Liu, Youshi Wang, Chengjin Chu. Advances in higher-order interactions between organisms [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(11): 1333-1344. |
| [5] | Fang Li, Yilin Shu, Hailong Wu. Polymorphism of exon 2 of MHC Class II B gene in the Chinese concave- eared torrent frog (Odorrana tormota) [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2012, 20(2): 184-192. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2026 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn