Biodiv Sci ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 22217. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2022217
• Original Papers: Animal Diversity • Previous Articles Next Articles
Hao Dong, Ziyi Ke, Yatao Wu, Junqi Miao, Fang Zhang*()
Received:
2022-04-24
Accepted:
2022-07-06
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2022-09-18
Contact:
*Fang Zhang, E-mail: biozhf@ahnu.edu.cn
Hao Dong, Ziyi Ke, Yatao Wu, Junqi Miao, Fang Zhang. Changes in vocal characteristics of male concave-eared torrent frogs (Odorrana tormota) in different chorus tides[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2023, 31(1): 22217.
蛙编号 Frog no. | 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.11/0.08 | 0.04/0.19 | 0.15/0.26 | 354.13/391.38 | 0.63/0.75 | 1.10/0.68 |
2 | 0.04/0.04 | 0.05/0.09 | 0.09/0.13 | 333.88/302.50 | 1.00/0.70 | 1.11/0.63 |
3 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.02/0.06 | 0.04/0.16 | 309.78/341.78 | 0.44/1.44 | 0.75/0.04 |
4 | 0.21/0.06 | 0.08/0.17 | 0.29/0.22 | 447.00/481.33 | 0.45/0.67 | 0.65/0.27 |
5 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.06/0.05 | 0.12/0.14 | 415.56/352.75 | 0.33/0.88 | 0.56/0.44 |
6 | 0.05/0.16 | 0.14/0.02 | 0.19/0.18 | 430.94/354.00 | 0.38/0.44 | 0.94/0.67 |
7 | 0.05/0.07 | 0.02/0.16 | 0.08/0.23 | 272.60/377.84 | 0.70/0.25 | 0.63/0.63 |
8 | 0.05/0.11 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.06/0.21 | 443.33/419.44 | 0.33/0.89 | 0.56/0.39 |
9 | 0.08/0.11 | 0.09/0.04 | 0.18/0.15 | 335.88/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.70/0.36 |
10 | 0.11/0.14 | 0.08/0.10 | 0.19/0.24 | 411.25/455.00 | 0.75/1.44 | 0.33/0.35 |
11 | 0.08/0.25 | 0.05/0.06 | 0.13/0.31 | 347.18/372.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.05/0.31 |
12 | 0.02/0.09 | 0.03/0.09 | 0.04/0.18 | 412.78/357.58 | 0.78/0.83 | 0.50/0.34 |
Table 1 The sound characteristic parameters of the male Odorrana tormota in different tide periods (high tide/low tide)
蛙编号 Frog no. | 半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.11/0.08 | 0.04/0.19 | 0.15/0.26 | 354.13/391.38 | 0.63/0.75 | 1.10/0.68 |
2 | 0.04/0.04 | 0.05/0.09 | 0.09/0.13 | 333.88/302.50 | 1.00/0.70 | 1.11/0.63 |
3 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.02/0.06 | 0.04/0.16 | 309.78/341.78 | 0.44/1.44 | 0.75/0.04 |
4 | 0.21/0.06 | 0.08/0.17 | 0.29/0.22 | 447.00/481.33 | 0.45/0.67 | 0.65/0.27 |
5 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.06/0.05 | 0.12/0.14 | 415.56/352.75 | 0.33/0.88 | 0.56/0.44 |
6 | 0.05/0.16 | 0.14/0.02 | 0.19/0.18 | 430.94/354.00 | 0.38/0.44 | 0.94/0.67 |
7 | 0.05/0.07 | 0.02/0.16 | 0.08/0.23 | 272.60/377.84 | 0.70/0.25 | 0.63/0.63 |
8 | 0.05/0.11 | 0.01/0.10 | 0.06/0.21 | 443.33/419.44 | 0.33/0.89 | 0.56/0.39 |
9 | 0.08/0.11 | 0.09/0.04 | 0.18/0.15 | 335.88/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.70/0.36 |
10 | 0.11/0.14 | 0.08/0.10 | 0.19/0.24 | 411.25/455.00 | 0.75/1.44 | 0.33/0.35 |
11 | 0.08/0.25 | 0.05/0.06 | 0.13/0.31 | 347.18/372.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.05/0.31 |
12 | 0.02/0.09 | 0.03/0.09 | 0.04/0.18 | 412.78/357.58 | 0.78/0.83 | 0.50/0.34 |
半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样本量 Sample size (n) | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
平均值 Mean | 0.07/0.11 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.13/0.20 | 376.19/378.31 | 0.62/0.86 | 0.74/0.46 |
标准差 Standard error of mean | 0.05/0.06 | 0.04/0.05 | 0.07/0.06 | 57.62/51.46 | 0.35/0.45 | 0.25/0.15 |
最大值 Maximum | 0.21/0.25 | 0.14/0.19 | 0.29/0.31 | 447.00/481.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.11/0.68 |
最小值 Minimum | 0.01/0.04 | 0.01/0.02 | 0.04/0.09 | 272.60/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.33/0.27 |
Table 2 Descriptive statistics and difference analysis of the male Odorrana tormota’s vocal characteristics in different chorus tides (high tide/low tide)
半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration (ms) | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump (time/calls) | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate (calls/min) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样本量 Sample size (n) | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 | 12/12 |
平均值 Mean | 0.07/0.11 | 0.06/0.09 | 0.13/0.20 | 376.19/378.31 | 0.62/0.86 | 0.74/0.46 |
标准差 Standard error of mean | 0.05/0.06 | 0.04/0.05 | 0.07/0.06 | 57.62/51.46 | 0.35/0.45 | 0.25/0.15 |
最大值 Maximum | 0.21/0.25 | 0.14/0.19 | 0.29/0.31 | 447.00/481.33 | 1.45/1.56 | 1.11/0.68 |
最小值 Minimum | 0.01/0.04 | 0.01/0.02 | 0.04/0.09 | 272.60/302.44 | 0.19/0.22 | 0.33/0.27 |
半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z | -1.60b | -1.51b | -2.13b | -2.31b | -0.09b | -2.85b |
P | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
Table 3 Pairwise pairing analysis of the male Odorrana tormota’s vocal characteristics in different chorus periods (high tide vs low tide)
半谐波含量 Subharmonics content | 混音含量 Chaos content | 非线性含量 Nonlinear content | 时长 Duration | 频率跳跃 Frequency jump | 鸣叫频次 Calling rate | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Z | -1.60b | -1.51b | -2.13b | -2.31b | -0.09b | -2.85b |
P | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | > 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
[1] |
Bass AH, McKibben JR (2003) Neural mechanisms and behaviors for acoustic communication in teleost fish. Progress in Neurobiology, 69, 1-26.
PMID |
[2] |
Bee MA (2012) Sound source perception in anuran amphibians. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 301-310.
DOI PMID |
[3] |
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2014) Complexity and behavioral ecology. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 435-442.
DOI URL |
[4] | Brumm H, Naguib M (2009) Environmental acoustics and the evolution of bird song. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 40, 1-33. |
[5] |
Digby A, Bell BD, Teal PD (2014) Non-linear phenomena in little spotted kiwi calls. Bioacoustics, 23, 113-128.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Feng AS, Arch VS, Yu ZL, Yu XJ, Xu ZM, Shen JX (2009) Neighbor-stranger discrimination in concave-eared torrent frogs, Odorrana tormota. Ethology, 115, 851-856.
DOI URL |
[7] |
Feng AS, Narins PM (2008) Ultrasonic communication in concave-eared torrent frogs (Amolops tormotus). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 194, 159-167.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Fitch WT, Neubauer J, Herzel H (2002) Calls out of chaos: The adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Animal Behaviour, 63, 407-418.
DOI URL |
[9] |
Gerhardt HC, Dyson ML, Tanner SD, Murphy CG (1994) Female treefrogs do not avoid heterospecific calls as they approach conspecific calls: Implications for mechanisms of mate choice. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1323-1332.
DOI URL |
[10] |
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2003) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: Common problems and diverse solutions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 559.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Halfwerk W, Dixon MM, Ottens KJ, Taylor RC, Ryan MJ, Page RA, Jones PL (2014) Risks of multimodal signaling: Bat predators attend to dynamic motion in frog sexual displays. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217, 3038-3044.
DOI URL |
[12] | Narins P (2013) Behavioral responses of anuran amphibians to biotic, synthetic and anthropogenic noise. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19, 10-29. |
[13] |
Riede T, Arcadi AC, Owren MJ (2007) Nonlinear acoustics in the pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Vocalizing at the edge. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 1758-1767.
DOI URL |
[14] |
Riede T, Herzel H, Mehwald D, Seidner W, Trumler E, Böhme G, Tembrock G (2000) Nonlinear phenomena in the natural howling of a dog-wolf mix. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 1435-1442.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Suthers RA, Narins PM, Lin WY, Schnitzler HU, Denzinger A, Xu CH, Feng AS (2006) Voices of the dead: Complex nonlinear vocal signals from the larynx of an ultrasonic frog. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 4984-4993.
PMID |
[16] |
Townsend SW, Manser MB (2011) The function of nonlinear phenomena in meerkat alarm calls. Biology Letters, 7, 47-49.
DOI PMID |
[17] | Trivers RL (1972) Parental Investment and Sexual Selection. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. |
[18] |
Welch AM, Semlitsch RD, Gerhardt HC (1998) Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. Science, 280, 1928-1930.
PMID |
[19] | Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (2006) The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication. Hearing and Sound Communication in Amphibians. Springer, New York. |
[20] |
Wollerman L, Wiley RH (2002) Background noise from a natural Chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog. Animal Behaviour, 63, 15-22.
DOI URL |
[21] | Wu YT, Bao JH, Lee P, Wang JM, Wang S, Zhang F (2021) Nonlinear phenomena conveying body size information and improving attractiveness of the courtship calls in the males of Odorrana tormota. Asian Herpetological Research, 12, 117-123. |
[22] | Yuan C, Wang S, Liu SW, Jin Y, Zhang F (2019) Correlation between fertility and body characteristic parameters of female frogs (Odorrana tormota) and their mating patterns. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 54, 30-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[袁成, 王生, 刘姝文, 金莹, 张方 (2019) 雌性凹耳蛙生育力与体型参数间相关性及其配对模式. 动物学杂志, 54, 30-36.] | |
[23] |
Zhang F, Chen P, Chen ZQ, Zhao J (2015) Ultrasonic frogs call at a higher pitch in noisier ambiance. Current Zoology, 61, 996-1003.
DOI PMID |
[1] | Jiantan Zhang, Yanpeng Li, Ruyun Zhang, Yunlong Ni, Wenying Zhou, Juyu Lian, Wanhui Ye. Height-diameter models based on branch wood density classification for the south subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Dinghushan [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2021, 29(4): 456-466. |
[2] | Yuanzhi Li, Junli Xiao, Hanlun Liu, Youshi Wang, Chengjin Chu. Advances in higher-order interactions between organisms [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2020, 28(11): 1333-1344. |
[3] | Fang Li, Yilin Shu, Hailong Wu. Polymorphism of exon 2 of MHC Class II B gene in the Chinese concave- eared torrent frog (Odorrana tormota) [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2012, 20(2): 184-192. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
Copyright © 2022 Biodiversity Science
Editorial Office of Biodiversity Science, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China
Tel: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn