生物多样性 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 25055.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2025055

• • 上一篇    下一篇

地方重点保护野生动物名录调整方法探究: 以湖南省陆生脊椎动物为例

郑俊妮1#, 尚袁凌博1,2#, 罗堯1, 魏营3, 高志伟1, 周宗泽1,3, 廖凌娟3, 杨道德1*   

  1. 1. 中南林业科技大学野生动植物保护研究所, 长沙 410004; 2. 岳阳市林业科学研究所, 湖南岳阳 414000; 3. 湖南省林业局野生动植物保护处, 长沙 410004
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-14 修回日期:2025-05-04 接受日期:2025-09-01 出版日期:2025-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨道德

Refining the adjustment method for local key protected wildlife lists: A case study of terrestrial vertebrates in Hunan Province, China

Junni Zheng1#, Yuanlingbo Shang1,2#, Yao Luo1, Ying Wei3, Zhiwei Gao1, Zongze Zhou1,3, Lingjuan Liao3, Daode Yang1*   

  1. 1 Institute of Wildlife Conservation, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China 

    2 Forestry Institute of Yueyang City, Yueyang, Hunan 414000, China 

    3 Wildlife Protection Division of Hunan Forestry Bureau, Changsha 410004, China

  • Received:2025-02-14 Revised:2025-05-04 Accepted:2025-09-01 Online:2025-08-20
  • Contact: Daode Yang

摘要: 地方重点保护野生动物名录是地方行政主管部门开展野生动物科学保护和有效管理的基础。地方重点保护野生动物, 指国家重点保护野生动物以外, 由省、自治区、直辖市重点保护的野生动物。2002年公布的《湖南省地方重点保护野生动物名录》距今已有20多年, 在国务院发布新的《国家重点保护野生动物名录》《有重要生态、科学和社会价值的陆生野生动物名录》后, 及时调整和修订地方重点保护野生动物名录, 对适应地方野生动物保护新的形势和要求至关重要。为了提高调整名录的科学性和合理性, 很有必要建立一套科学、定量的物种优先保护评估方法。本研究首先对湖南省陆生野生动物资源调查数据进行系统收集、整理和信息分类; 再采用层次分析法, 构建湖南省物种优先保护评价指标体系, 并对种群大小、种群趋势、分布范围、省内受胁等级、国内受胁等级、国际受胁等级、关注度、相似度、栖息地状况、生态价值、观赏价值、科研价值共12个指标进行赋值, 形成定量评估后的优先保护物种名录; 然后再邀请专家进行审定, 形成湖南省地方重点保护陆生野生动物初步名录; 最后依据专家咨询意见、专家评审意见及相关单位和公众的征求意见, 对此初步名录进行微调, 最终形成的新版《湖南省地方重点保护野生动物名录》已于2023年8月公布执行。本研究形成的陆生脊椎动物初步名录共列入265种, 隶属于4纲24目77科, 其中新增23种, 保留247种, 调出78种; 湖南省公布的新版《湖南省地方重点保护野生动物名录》包括陆生脊椎动物4纲24目79科270种。初步名录与最终公布的新版名录相差无几, 仅删减9种爬行类和4种两栖类, 增加14种鸟类、2种蛇类和2种蛙类。本研究将地方重点保护野生动物物种遴选方法, 由传统的专家经验评估转变为科学的定量评估, 并结合专家复审和综合民调意见, 提升了地方重点保护野生动物名录的客观性、准确性以及不同类群之间的协调性。本方法切实可行, 可为其他地方重点保护野生动物名录的调整提供借鉴。

关键词: 地方重点保护野生动物, 层次分析法, 野生动物名录调整, 物种优先保护, 评价指标体系

Abstract

Aims: Local key protected wildlife lists from the foundation for provincial-level authorities to implement scientific conservation and effective management of wild animals. These lists include species protected at provincial, autonomous regional, or municipal level, excluding those under national key protection. The List of Local Key Protected Wild Animals of Hunan Province, published in 2002, has remained unchanged for over two decades. Following the release of the updated National List of Key Protected Wild Animals and the List of Terrestrial Wildlife with Important Ecological, Scientific and Social Values by the State Council, it is crucial to adjust and revise the provincial-level lists to reflect new conservation priorities and ecological conditions. To improve the scientific rigor and rationality of such updates, a quantitative, systematic method for prioritizing species is urgently needed. 

Methods: This study first compiled, organized, and classified terrestrial wildlife survey data from Hunan Province. A species prioritization evaluation system was then constructed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), based on 12 indicators: Population size, population trend, distribution range, provincial threat status, national threat status, international threat status, public attention, taxonomic similarity, habitat condition, ecological value, and scientific research value. Each indicator was assigned a score, generating a preliminary list of priority species for protection. Expert evaluations were subsequently conducted to review and refine the list. Based on expert consultations, review feedback, and public input, minor adjustments were made to finalize the new List of Local Key Protected Wild Animals of Human Province, official released in August 2023. 

Results: The preliminary terrestrial vertebrate list generated through this method included 265 species across 4 classes, 24 orders, and 77 families, comprising 23 newly added species, 78 species removed, and 247 retained. The officially published version included 270 species in 79 families and 24 orders. Differences between the two lists were minimal: 9 reptile and 4 amphibian species were excluded, while 14 bird species, 2 snake species, and 2 frog species were added. 

Perspective: This study represents a shift from traditional expert-based species selection toward a scientific, quantitative evaluation approach, supplemented by expert review and public consultation. The method enhances the objectivity, accuracy, and taxonomic balance of local key protected wildlife lists. It is practical and applicable for similar revisions in other provincial-level regions.

Key words: local key protected wild animals, analytic Hierarchy Process, wildlife list adjustment, species priority conservation, evaluation index system