Biodiversity Science ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1239-1245.doi: 10.17520/biods.2017253

• Bioinventory • Previous Article     Next Article

Challenges regarding the necessity of voucher specimens for naming a new animal species: the Code, species conservation and the digital age

Jun Chen*()   

  1. Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
  • Received:2017-09-17 Accepted:2017-11-15 Online:2017-11-20
  • Chen Jun

With increased awareness of endangered species conservation, the development of digital technology, and different interpretations of some articles in the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Fourth edition), in recent years some new vertebrate species have been named and published without preserved dead bodies as type specimens. This has triggered discussions on the necessity of voucher specimens for naming a new animal species. In 2015, after Marshall & Evenhuis described a new insect species on the basis of 15 photographs only, a hot debate on this topic resulted. Supporters who advocate for naming new species without voucher specimens argue that, to name a new species without a voucher specimen is Code-compliant according to the Article 73.1.4. In addition, more and more skilled “digital collectors” would increase the likelihood of this kind of practice, and thus the threat to endangered species from collecting specimens could be reduced. Scholars on the other side of the debate argue that, in the Code, it is stressed that the specimen is the name-bearing type and not the illustration or description itself, and that describing new species based only on a picture and other non-physical specimens would result in errors in follow-up studies due to the lack of more detailed, accurate, and comprehensive morphological characteristics, along with possibilities of falsification. As well, collecting specimens is not the reason that species are endangered or extinct. In this article, the author summarizes the viewpoints of both sides of the debate. In consideration of some articles with ambiguous and even contradictory meanings, the author suggests that the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Fourth edition) be revised in response to the needs of endangered species conservation and new technological applications. Naming new species with voucher specimens should be encouraged, as well as collecting specimens using reasonable, moderate, and orderly principles.

Key words: voucher specimen, International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, species conservation, digital age

[1] Amorim DS, Santos CMD, Krell FT, with other 47 co-authors (2016) Timeless standards for species delimitation. Zootaxa, 4137, 121-128.
[2] Ceríaco LMP, Gutiérrez EE, Dubois A, supported by 490 signatories (2016) Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences. Zootaxa, 4196, 435-445.
[3] Cianferoni F, Bartolozzi L (2016) Warning: potential problems for taxonomy on the horizon? Zootaxa, 4139, 128-130.
[4] Davenport TRB, Stanley WT, Sargis EJ, De Luca DW, Mpunga NE, Machaga SJ, Olson LE (2006) A new genus of African monkey, Rungwecebus: morphology, ecology, and molecular phylogenetics. Science, 312, 1378-1381.
[5] Donegon TM (2008) New species and subspecies descriptions do not and should not always require a dead type specimen. Zootaxa, 1761, 37-48.
[6] Dubois A (2017) The need for reference specimens in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature. Bionomina, 12, 4-38.
[7] Dubois A, Nemésio A (2007) Does nomenclatural availability of nomina of new species or subspecies require the deposition of vouchers in collections? Zootaxa, 1409, 1-22.
[8] Erdmann MV, Caldwell RL, Moosa MK (1998) Indonesian ‘king of the sea’ discovered. Nature, 395, 335.
[9] Garraffoni ARS, Freitas AVL (2017) Photos belong in the taxonomic Code. Science, 355, 805.
[10] Gentile G, Snell H (2009) Conolophus marthae sp. nov. (Squamata, Iguanidae), a new species of land iguana from the Galápagos Archipelago. Zootaxa, 2201, 1-10.
[11] Godfray HCJ (2002) Challenges for taxonomy. Nature, 417, 17-19.
[12] Güntsch A, Hyam R, Hagedorn G, Chagnoux S, Röpert D, Casino A, Droege G, Glöckler F, Gödderz K, Groom Q, Hoffmann J, Holleman A, Kempa M, Koivula H, Marhold K, Nicolson N, Smith VS, Triebel D (2017) Actionable, long-term stable and semantic web compatible identifiers for access to biological collection objects. Database, Vol. 2017: article ID bax003; doi:10.1093/database/bax003.
[13] Gutiérrez EE, Pine RH (2017) Specimen collection crucial to taxonomy. Science, 355, 1275.
[14] International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th edn. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London.1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. 4th edn. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. .
[15] International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (translated by Bu WJ, Zheng LY) (2007) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edn. Adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese).
[卜文俊, 郑乐怡 (译) (2007) 国际动物命名法规(第四版)/国际生物科学协会通过. 科学出版社, 北京.]
[16] Jones T, Ehardt CL, Butynski TM, Davenport TRB, Mpunga NE, Machaga SJ, De Luca DW (2005) The highland mangabey Lophocebus kipunji: a new species of African monkey. Science, 308, 1161-1164.
[17] Kirwan GM, Schweizer M, Copete JL (2015) Multiple lines of evidence confirm that Hume’s Owl Strix butleri (A. O. Hume, 1878) is two species, with description of an unnamed species (Aves: Non-Passeriformes: Strigidae). Zootaxa, 3904, 28-50.
[18] Landry SO (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2164.
[19] Li C, Zhao C, Fan PF (2015) White-cheeked macaque (Macaca leucogenys): a new macaque species from Medog, southeastern Tibet. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 753-766.
[20] Löbl I, Cibois A, Landry B (2016) Describing new species in the absence of sampled specimens: a taxonomist’s own-goal. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 73, 83-86.
[21] Marshall SA, Evenhuis NL (2015) New species without dead bodies: a case for photo-based descriptions, illustrated by a striking new species of Marleyimyia Hesse (Diptera, Bombyliidae) from South Africa. ZooKeys, 525, 117-127.
[22] Marshall SA, Evenhuis NL (2016) Proxy types, taxonomic discretion, and taxonomic progress: a response to Löbl et al. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 73, 87-92.
[23] McCabe H, Wright J (2000) Tangled tale of a lost, stolen and disputed coelacanth. Nature, 406, 114.
[24] Mendes Pontes AR, Malta A, Asfora PH (2006) A new species of capuchin monkey, genus Cebus Erxleben (Cebidae, Primates): found at the very brink of extinction in the Pernambuco Endemism Centre. Zootaxa, 1200, 1-12.
[25] Minteer BA, Collins JP, Love KE, Puschendorf R (2014) Avoiding (re)extinction. Science, 344, 260-261.
[26] Pape T, supported by 34 signatories (2016) Species can be named from photos. Nature, 537, 307.
[27] Polaszek A, Grubb P, Groves C, Ehardt CL, Butynski TM (2005) What constitutes a proper description? Response. Science, 309, 2164-2166.
[28] Robb MS, Sangster G, Aliabadian M, van den Berg AB, Constantine M, Irestedt M, Khani A, Musavi SB, Nunes JMG, Willson MA, Walsh AJ (2016) The rediscovery of Strix butleri (Hume, 1878) in Oman and Iran, with molecular resolution of the identity of Strix omanensis Robb, van den Berg and Constantine, 2013. Avian Research, 7, doi: 10.1186/s40657-016-0043-4.
[29] Robb MS, van den Berg AB, Constantine M (2013) A new species of Strix owl from Oman. Dutch Birding, 35, 275-310.
[30] Rocha LA, Aleixo A, Allen G, with other 122 co-authors (2014) Specimen collection: an essential tool. Science, 344, 814-815.
[31] Santos CMD, Amorim DS, Klassa B, Fachin DA, Nihei SS, de Carvalho CJB, Falaschi RL, Mello-Patiu CA, Couri MS, Oliveira SS, Silva VC, Ribeiro GC, Capellari RS, Lamas CJE (2016) On typeless species and the perils of fast taxonomy. Systematic Entomology, 41, 511-515.
[32] Shatalkin AI, Galinskaya TV (2017) A commentary on the practice of using the so-called typeless species. ZooKeys, 693, 129-139.
[33] Skejo J, Caballero JHS (2016) A hidden pygmy devil from the Philippines: Arulenus miae sp. nov. — a new species serendipitously discovered in an amateur Facebook post (Tetrigidae: Discotettiginae). Zootaxa, 4067, 383-393.
[34] Smith EFG, Arctander P, Fjeldså J, Amir OG (1991) A new species of shrike (Laniidae: Laniarius) from Somalia, verified by DNA sequence data from the only known individual. Ibis, 133, 227-235.
[35] Timm RM, Ramey RR II, The Nomenclature Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists(2005) What constitutes a proper description? Science, 309, 2163-2164.
[36] Wakeham-Dawson A, Morris S, Tubbs P (2002) Type specimens: dead or alive? Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 59, 282-284.
[1] Jiang Zhigang. (2019) China’s key protected species lists, their criteria and management . Biodiv Sci, 27(6): 698-703.
[2] Jianmin Chu, Yifu Li, Lei Zhang, Bin Li, Mingyuan Gao, Xiaoqian Tang, Jianwei Ni, Xinqiao Xu. (2017) Potential distribution range and conservation strategies for the endangered species Amygdalus pedunculata . Biodiv Sci, 25(8): 799-806.
[3] Fei Li, Xi Zheng, Huarong Zhang, Jianhuan Yang, Bosco Pui Lok Chan. (2017) The current status and conservation of otters on the coastal islands of Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China . Biodiv Sci, 25(8): 840-846.
[4] Wenzhong Yang,Zhenyong Xiang,Shanshan Zhang,Hongmei Kang,Fuqiang Shi. (2015) Plant species with extremely small populations (PSESP) and their significance in China’s national plant conservation strategy . Biodiv Sci, 23(3): 419-425.
[5] Hongxiao Yang, Jianmin Chu, Jintun Zhang. (2011) Wild Plants Inhabiting on the Sand Fore-coasts of Shandong Peninsula . Chin Bull Bot, 46(1): 50-58.
[6] ZHANG Da-Yong, LEI Guang-Chun, ILKKA HANSKI, . (1999) Metapopulation dynamics: theory and applications . Biodiv Sci, 07(2): 81-90.
[7] He Shan'an, Hao Riming. (1999) Study on the Natural Population Dynamics and the Endangering Habitat of Liriodendron chinense in China . Chin J Plan Ecolo, 23(1): 87-95.
Full text