Biodiversity Science ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 698-703.doi: 10.17520/biods.2019089

• Forum • Previous Article    

China’s key protected species lists, their criteria and management

Jiang Zhigang1, 2, *()   

  1. 1 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
    2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • Received:2019-03-19 Accepted:2019-06-08 Online:2019-07-08
  • Jiang Zhigang

China’s key protected species lists include the List of State Key Protected Wild Animals (LSKPWA), the List of Terrestrial Wildlife with Important Ecological, Scientific and Social Values, and the lists of local key protected wild animals. After the amendment and implementation of the Wild Animal Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China in 2017, the revision of the LSKPWA is on the agenda. In order to revise the list of the state key protected species, the relationship between these lists should be delineated to reflect the priority of protection and to facilitate administration and to divide the responsibility of protection between the central and local governments. It is recommended to determine the level of key protected wildlife species according to their attributes of endangerment, endemism, rareness, preciousness and management requirement. By adopting the Principle of Clump Listing, related species or the higher taxa such as a whole genus even a whole family should be included in the lists of protected species as far as possible. It is also practical to list a subspecies or a population as a management unit on the species protection list. In addition, to reflect the new provisions of the amended Wild Animal Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China, it is necessary to distinguish domesticated and wild populations, those populations which have been artificially successfully bred with mature technology and stable production traits should be exempted from the listing. Thus, using the Principle of Splitting Listing to solve the real problems in conservation. In addition, taxonomic changes should be closely tracked and species list should be updated in time. It is also necessary to formulate criteria for protection levels, to develop guidelines for species recovery plan after their listing and to design amendment procedure for the list. It is important to formulate populations and habitats recovery plan for each key protected species. Through periodic evaluation of the listed species, the listed species are upgraded, downgraded, deleted or maintain its status for the needs of dynamic management of rare and endangered wild animals.

Key words: species conservation, protected species list, criteria of key protected species, Principle of Clump Listing, Principle of Splitting Listing

Fig. 1

The set relations of the List of State Key Protected Wild Animal Species (SKPWAS), lists of local protected wild animals, and List of Terrestrial Wildlife with Important Ecological, Scientific and Social Values. Different protected species lists are represented as different sets. The lists of local key protected species of some provinces overlap with the List of State Key Protected Species and the List of Terrestrial Wildlife with Important Ecological, Scientific and Social Values (A), while lists of local key protected species in most provinces overlap only with the List of Terrestrial Wildlife with Important Ecological, Scientific and Social Values (B). As a matter of fact, important ecological, scientific and social values are the common attributes of terrestrial wildlife, and the intersection of the three lists exists (C), despite that the three lists should be different sets (D)."

Fig. 2

The set relationship between the state and local key protection lists. Considering that important ecological, scientific and social values are common attributes of terrestrial wildlife, the lists of state and local key protected species are sufficient to distinguish the key protected species. The top point of the triangle in the figure points to the direction of increasing importance of protection."

[1] Apagow PM ( 2007) Species: Demarcation and diversity. In: Phylogeny and Conservation (eds Purvis A, Gittleman JL, Brooks T), pp. 19-56. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[2] Apagow PM, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Crandall KA, Gittleman JL, Mace GM, Marshall JC, Purvis A ( 2004) The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 161-179.
doi: 10.1086/383542
[3] Chu C ( Zhu J ) ( 1974) On the systematic position of the giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca (David). Acta Zoologica Sinica, 20, 174-183. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 朱靖 ( 1974) 关于大熊猫分类地位的讨论. 动物学报, 20, 174-183.]
[4] Frank EG, Wilcove DS ( 2019) Long delays in banning trade in threatened species. Science, 363, 686-688.
doi: 10.1126/science.aav4013
[5] Jiang ZG, Jiang JP, Wang YZ, Zhang E, Zhang YY, Li LL, Xie F, Cai B, Cao L, Zheng GM, Dong L, Zhang ZW, Ding P, Luo ZH, Ding CQ, Ma ZJ, Tang SH, Cao WX, Li CW, Hu HJ, Ma Y, Wu Y, Wang YX, Zhou KY, Liu SY, Chen YY, Li JT, Feng ZJ, Wang Y, Wang B, Li C, Song XL, Cai L, Zang CX, Zeng Y, Meng ZB, Fang HX, Ping XG ( 2016) Red List of China’s Vertebrates. Biodiversity Science, 24, 500-551. (in Chinese and in English)
[ 蒋志刚, 江建平, 王跃招, 张鹗, 张雁云, 李立立, 谢锋, 蔡波, 曹亮, 郑光美, 董路, 张正旺, 丁平, 罗振华, 丁长青, 马志军, 汤宋华, 曹文宣, 李春旺, 胡慧建, 马勇, 吴毅, 王应祥, 周开亚, 刘少英, 陈跃英, 李家堂, 冯祚建, 王燕, 王斌, 李成, 宋雪琳, 蔡蕾, 臧春鑫, 曾岩, 孟智斌, 方红霞, 平晓鸽 ( 2016) 中国脊椎动物红色名录. 生物多样性, 24, 500-551.]
[6] Jiang ZG, Liu SY, Wu Y, Jiang XL, Zhou KY ( 2017) China’s Mammal Diversity (2nd edn.) Biodiversity Science, 25, 886-895. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 蒋志刚, 刘少英, 吴毅, 蒋学龙, 周开亚 ( 2017) 中国哺乳动物多样性(第2版). 生物多样性, 25 , 886-895.]
[7] Jiang ZG ( 2016) On the similarity and dissimilarity of “Endangered Species” and “Protected Species”. Biodiversity Science, 24, 1082-1083. (in Chinese)
[ 蒋志刚 ( 2016) 论“濒危物种”与“保护物种”概念的异同. 生物多样性, 24, 1082-1083.]
[8] Liu DM, Cai L, Wang K, Li JS, Wei TZ, Yao YJ ( 2018) Threat assessments, problems and countermeasures of China’s macrofungi. Biodiversity Science, 26, 1236-1242. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 刘冬梅, 蔡蕾, 王科, 李俊生, 魏铁铮, 姚一建 ( 2018) 中国野生大型真菌受威胁程度评估、问题和对策. 生物多样性, 26, 1236-1242.]
[9] Liu J, Que PJ, Zhang ZW ( 2019) Species diversity and suggestions for adjustment of the national protection level of waterbirds in China. Wetland Science, 17, 123-136. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[ 刘金, 阙品甲, 张正旺 ( 2019) 中国水鸟的物种多样性及其国家重点保护等级调整的建议. 湿地科学, 17, 123-136.]
[10] Ma KP ( 2016) On key issues and possible solutions related to nature reserve management in China. Biodiversity Science, 24, 249-251. (in Chinese)
[ 马克平 ( 2016) 当前我国自然保护区管理中存在的问题与对策思考. 生物多样性, 24, 249-251.]
[11] Mayr E ( 1997) This is Biology: The Science of the Living World. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
[12] Qin HN, Zhao LN, Yu SX, Liu HY, Liu B, Xia NH, Peng H, Li ZY, Zhang ZX, He XJ, Yin LK, Lin YL, Liu QR, Hou YT, Liu Y, Liu QX, Cao W, Li JQ, Chen SL, Jin XH, Gao TG, Chen WL, Ma HY, Geng YY, Jin XF, Chang CY, Jiang H, Cai L, Zang CX, Wu JY, Ye JF, Lai YJ, Liu B, Lin QW, Xue NX ( 2017) Evaluating the endangerment status of China’s angiosperms through the red list assessment. Biodiversity Science, 25, 745-757. (in Chinese and in English)
[ 覃海宁, 赵莉娜, 于胜祥, 刘慧圆, 刘博, 夏念和, 彭华, 李振宇, 张志翔, 何兴金, 尹林克, 林余霖, 刘全儒, 侯元同, 刘演, 刘启新, 曹伟, 李建强, 陈世龙, 金效华, 高天刚, 陈文俐, 马海英, 耿玉英, 金孝锋, 常朝阳, 蒋宏, 蔡蕾, 臧春鑫, 武建勇, 叶建飞, 赖阳均, 刘冰, 林秦文, 薛纳新 ( 2017) 中国被子植物濒危等级的评估. 生物多样性, 25, 745-757.]
[13] Wang YX ( 2003) A Complete Checklist of Mammal Species and Subspecies in China: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese)
[ 王应祥 ( 2003) 中国哺乳动物种与亚种分类名录与分布大全. 中国林业出版社, 北京.]
[14] Wilson DE, Reeder DM ( 2005) Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd edn. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MA.
[1] Fei Li, Xi Zheng, Huarong Zhang, Jianhuan Yang, Bosco Pui Lok Chan. (2017) The current status and conservation of otters on the coastal islands of Zhuhai, Guangdong Province, China . Biodiv Sci, 25(8): 840-846.
[2] Jianmin Chu, Yifu Li, Lei Zhang, Bin Li, Mingyuan Gao, Xiaoqian Tang, Jianwei Ni, Xinqiao Xu. (2017) Potential distribution range and conservation strategies for the endangered species Amygdalus pedunculata . Biodiv Sci, 25(8): 799-806.
[3] Jun Chen. (2017) Challenges regarding the necessity of voucher specimens for naming a new animal species: the Code, species conservation and the digital age . Biodiv Sci, 25(11): 1239-1245.
[4] Wenzhong Yang,Zhenyong Xiang,Shanshan Zhang,Hongmei Kang,Fuqiang Shi. (2015) Plant species with extremely small populations (PSESP) and their significance in China’s national plant conservation strategy . Biodiv Sci, 23(3): 419-425.
[5] Hongxiao Yang, Jianmin Chu, Jintun Zhang. (2011) Wild Plants Inhabiting on the Sand Fore-coasts of Shandong Peninsula . Chin Bull Bot, 46(1): 50-58.
[6] ZHANG Da-Yong, LEI Guang-Chun, ILKKA HANSKI, . (1999) Metapopulation dynamics: theory and applications . Biodiv Sci, 07(2): 81-90.
[7] He Shan'an, Hao Riming. (1999) Study on the Natural Population Dynamics and the Endangering Habitat of Liriodendron chinense in China . Chin J Plan Ecolo, 23(1): 87-95.
Full text