开花时间与伴生种对鹤首马先蒿传粉和生殖成功的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.07044

生物多样性 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 330-336. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.07044 cstr: 32101.14.SP.J.1003.2012.07044

所属专题：传粉生物学：理论探讨与初步实践；传粉生物学

开花时间与伴生种对鹤首马先蒿传粉和生殖成功的影响

夏婧¹^,^*(), 郭友好²^,^*()

1 中南民族大学生命科学学院南方少数民族地区生物资源保护与综合利用联合工程中心, 武汉 430074
2 武汉大学生命科学学院植物系统与进化生物学研究室, 武汉 430072

收稿日期:2012-02-08 接受日期:2012-03-14 出版日期:2012-05-20 发布日期:2012-05-09
通讯作者: 夏婧,郭友好
作者简介:* E-mail: meir_xj@whu.edu.cn;
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划资助项目(G2000046804);国家青年基金(30900127)

Effects of flowering date and co-flowering species on pollination and reproduction in Pedicularis gruina

Jing Xia¹^,^*(), Youhao Guo²^,^*()

1 Engineering Research Centre for the Protection and Utilization of Bioresource in Ethnic Area of Southern China, College of Life Sciences, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074
2 Laboratory of Plant Systematics and Evolutionary Biology, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received:2012-02-08 Accepted:2012-03-14 Online:2012-05-20 Published:2012-05-09
Contact: Jing Xia,Youhao Guo

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

开花物候是物种间相互作用的重要生活史特征和适合度因子, 在全球气候变化的背景下而备受关注。为探讨开花时间如何在种内和种间水平上影响植物的传粉和生殖成功, 我们连续3年(2003-2005)对不同花期和伴生种存在情况下的鹤首马先蒿(Pedicularis gruina)的传粉者访花忠实度、受粉率、坐果率、单果种子产量和果实被啃食频率进行了比较研究。结果表明鹤首马先蒿的坐果率主要受其传粉环境的影响: 在没有伴生种时, 不同时期鹤首马先蒿的坐果率没有显著差异, 34-38%的花可以坐果; 在有伴生种存在时既可以显著提高其坐果率, 也可显著降低其坐果率, 这取决于传粉者类型以及伴生种密穗马先蒿(P. densispica)花期的差异。密穗马先蒿具有花蜜和花粉双重报酬, 在群落中可以作为主体物种吸引传粉者并间接促进与其伴生的鹤首马先蒿的传粉和生殖成功。同样无蜜的管花马先蒿(P. siphonantha)和鹤首马先蒿伴生, 则是通过提高群落水平对传粉者的吸引力进而直接促进鹤首马先蒿的传粉和生殖成功。此外, 研究结果也表明开花时间对坐果率没有显著影响, 但是显著影响单果种子产量和果实被啃食的频率。在相同的传粉条件下早花期植株单果种子产量显著高于晚花期的种子产量, 同时早花期的果实被啃食的频率显著增加。

关键词: 传粉者竞争, 开花物候, 鹤首马先蒿, 生殖成功, 传粉促进作用

Abstract

Flowering date along with interactions of other co-flowering species may be factors that determine pollination and reproductive success of a focal plant species. We investigated an alpine bumblebee-pollinated herb Pedicularis gruina to assess the effects of flowering date and co-flowering species on pollination, reproduction, and predation over a three year period (2003-2005). We analyzed pollen load of bumblebees to determine floral constancy, and calculated pollination rates of flowers, fruit set, seed production per capsule and the percentage of seed predation. We found that fruit sets did not differ significantly among years and between different flowering dates when there were no co-flowering species, with 34-38% of flowers producing fruits. However, the presence of co-flowering species could either increase or decrease the pollination and reproduction in P. gruina, which depends on pollinator type and flowering date of the co-flowering species P. densispica. Pedicularis densispica enhanced pollination and reproduction through increased floral resource diversity, whearas P. siphonantha enhanced pollination and reproduction through increased attractiveness with larger displays. Flowering date did not affect fruit set, but significantly affected seed production and seed predation. Seed production decreased significantly at later flowering dates given the same pollination condition(i.e., no co-flowering species, pollinator competition, or facilitative pollination). However, fruits produced in early flowering periods suffered more severe seed predation compared to those in later flowering periods.

Key words: facilitative pollination, flowering date, pollinator competition, Pedicularis gruina, reproductive success

夏婧, 郭友好 (2012) 开花时间与伴生种对鹤首马先蒿传粉和生殖成功的影响. 生物多样性, 20, 330-336. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.07044.

Jing Xia, Youhao Guo (2012) Effects of flowering date and co-flowering species on pollination and reproduction in Pedicularis gruina. Biodiversity Science, 20, 330-336. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.07044.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.07044

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2012/V20/I3/330

图/表 3

参考文献 35

[1]	Bell JM, Karron JD, Mitchell RJ (2005) Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens. Ecology, 86, 762-771.
[2]	Brody AK (1997) Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology, 78, 1624-1631.
[3]	Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CL, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F, Armas C, Coll L, Corcket E, Delzon S, Forey E, Kikvidze Z, Olofsson J, Pugnaire F, Quiroz CL, Saccone P, Schiffers K, Seifan M, Touzard B, Michalet R (2008) Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology, 96, 18-34.
[4]	Brookes RH, Jesson LK, Burd M (2008) A test of simultaneous resource and pollen limitation in Stylidium armeria. New Phytologist, 179, 557-565.
[5]	Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ (2001) Competition for pollination: effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia, 129, 43-49. DOI URL
[6]	Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ, Graham SA (2002) Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology, 83, 2328-2336.
[7]	Buide ML, Díaz-Peromingo JA, Guitián J (2002) Flowering phenology and female reproductive success in Silene acutifolia Link ex Rohrb. Plant Ecology, 163, 93-103.
[8]	Caruso CM (2000) Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution, 54, 1546-1557. URL PMID
[9]	Dieringer G (1991) Variation in individual flowering time and reproductive success of Agalinis strictforia (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany, 78, 497-503.
[10]	Elzinga JA, Atlan A, Biere A, Gigord L, Weis AE, Bernasconi G (2007) Time after time: flowering phenology and biotic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 432-439. URL PMID
[11]	Forrest J, Inouye DW, Thomson JD (2010) Flowering pheno- logy in subalpine meadows: does climate variation influence community co-flowering patterns? Ecology, 91, 431-440. DOI URL PMID
[12]	Fuchs EJ, Lobo JA, Quesada M (2003) Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns of the tropical dry forest tree Pachira quinata. Conservation Biology, 17, 149-157.
[13]	Galen C, Stanton ML (1991) Consequences of emergence phenology for reproductive success in Ranunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany, 78, 978-988.
[14]	Ghazoul J (2006) Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. Journal of Ecology, 94, 295-304. URL PMID
[15]	Hirao AS, Kameyama Y, Ohara M, Isagi Y, Kudo G (2006) Seasonal changes in pollinator activity influence pollen dispersal and seed production of the alpine shrub Rhododendron aureum (Ericaceae). Molecular Ecology, 15, 1165-1173. URL PMID
[16]	Huang SQ, Fenster CB (2007) Absence of long-proboscid pollinators for long-corolla-tubed Himalayan Pedicularis species: implications for the evolution of corolla length. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 168, 325-331.
[17]	Juillet N, Gonzalez MA, Page PA, Gigord LDB (2007) Pollination of the European food-deceptive Traunsteinera globosa (Orchidaceae): the importance of nectar-producing neighbouring plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 265, 123-129.
[18]	Kelly MG, Levin DA (2000) Directional selection on initial flowering date in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of Botany, 87, 382-391. URL PMID
[19]	Kimura T, Ishii HS, Sakai S (2002) Selfed-seed production depending on individual size and flowering sequence in Iris gracilipes (Iridaceae) Canadian Journal of Botany, 80, 1096-1102.
[20]	Kudo G (1991) Effects of snow-free period on the phenology of alpine plants inhabiting snow patches. Arctic and Alpine Research, 23, 436-443.
[21]	Kudo G (1993) Relationships between flowering time and fruit set of the entomophilous alpine shrub, Rhododendron aureum (Ericaceae), inhabiting snow patches. American Journal of Botany, 80, 1300-1304.
[22]	Liao K, Gituru RW, Guo YH, Wang QF (2011) The presence of co-flowering species facilitates reproductive success of co-flowering species facilitates reproductive success of Pedicularis monbeigiana (Orobanchaceae) through variation in bumble-bee foraging behaviour. Annals of Botany, 108, 877-884. URL PMID
[23]	Liu YZ, Reich PB, Li GY, Sun SC (2011) Shifting phenology and abundance under experimental warming alters trophic relationships and plant reproductive capacity. Ecology, 92, 1201-1207. DOI URL PMID
[24]	Menges ES, Waller DM, Gawler SC (1986) Seed set and seed predation in Pedicularis furbishiae, a rare endemic of the St. John River, Maine. American Journal of Botany, 73, 1168-1177.
[25]	Miller-Rushing AJ, Primack RB (2008) Global warming and flowering times in Thoreau’s concord: a community perspective. Ecology, 89, 332-341. DOI URL PMID
[26]	Mitchell RJ, Flanagan RJ, Brown BJ, Waser NM, Karron JD (2009) New frontiers in competition for pollination. Annals of Botany, 103, 1403-1413. DOI URL PMID
[27]	Moeller DA (2004) Facilitative interactions among plants via shared pollinators. Ecology, 85, 3289-3301.
[28]	Mohoro S (2002) Individual flowering schedule, fruit set, and flower and seed predation in Vaccinium hirtum Thunb. (Ericaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 80, 82-92.
[29]	Molina-Montenegro MA, Badano EI, Cavieres LA (2008) Positive interactions among plant species for pollinator service: assessing the ‘magnet species’ concept with invasive species. Oikos, 117, 1833-1839.
[30]	Morinaga SI, Tsuji K, Sakai S (2003) Consequences of differences in flowering date on seed production in Heloniopsis orientalis (Liliaceae). American Journal of Botany, 90, 1153-1158. DOI URL PMID
[31]	Pettersson MW (1991) Flower herbivory and seed predation in Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): effects of pollination and phenology. Ecography, 14, 45-50.
[32]	Waser NM (1978) Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology, 59, 934-944.
[33]	Waser NM (1983) Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: a review of evidence. In: Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology (eds Jones CE, Little RJ), pp. 277-293. Scientific and Academic Editions, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
[34]	Xia J, Sun SG, Guo YH (2007) Honeybees enhance reproduction without affecting the outcrossing rate in endemic Pedicularis densispica (Orobanchaceae). Plant Biology, 9, 713-719. DOI URL PMID
[35]	Zimmerman M, Gross RS (1984) Polemonium foliosissimum Gray. American Midland Naturalist, 111, 185-191. DOI URL

年份 Year	居群 Population	开花时间 Flowering date	伴生种 Co-flowering	物种数 Species	鹤首马先蒿花粉比例 Pedicularis gruina (%)	受粉率 Pollination rate (%)
2003	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	7.0 ± 0.5^c	31.41 ± 4.88^A	88.89
2004	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	/	/	14.29
2004	依拉 Yila	8月初 Early August	无 No	3.9 ± 0.4^a	60.86 ± 2.37^B	38.46
2005	城郊 Suburb	8月初 Early August	管花马先蒿 P. siphonantha	5.3 ± 0.5^b	80.84 ± 2.64^C	75.76

年份 Year	居群 Population	开花时间 Flowering date	伴生种 Co-flowering	物种数 Species	鹤首马先蒿花粉比例 Pedicularis gruina (%)	受粉率 Pollination rate (%)
2003	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	7.0 ± 0.5^c	31.41 ± 4.88^A	88.89
2004	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	/	/	14.29
2004	依拉 Yila	8月初 Early August	无 No	3.9 ± 0.4^a	60.86 ± 2.37^B	38.46
2005	城郊 Suburb	8月初 Early August	管花马先蒿 P. siphonantha	5.3 ± 0.5^b	80.84 ± 2.64^C	75.76

年份 Year	居群 Population	开花时间 Flowering date	伴生种 Co-flowering	坐果率 Fruit set (%)	单果种子产量 Seed production per capsule
2003	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	72.75 ± 2.80	8.5 ± 0.3
2005	城郊 Suburb	8月初 Early August	管花马先蒿 P. siphonantha	72.08 ± 6.08	6.9 ± 0.2
2005	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	无 No	33.81 ± 2.82	6.2 ± 0.7
2005	依拉 Yila	8月初 Early August	无 No	37.95 ± 2.40	4.9 ± 0.2
2004	依拉 Yila	8月初 Early August	无 No	37.24 ± 2.34	6.6 ± 0.3
2004	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	17.01 ± 5.10	5.2 ± 0.6
2005	依拉 Yila	7月下 Late July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	21.19 ± 1.46

年份 Year	居群 Population	开花时间 Flowering date	伴生种 Co-flowering	坐果率 Fruit set (%)	单果种子产量 Seed production per capsule
2003	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	72.75 ± 2.80	8.5 ± 0.3
2005	城郊 Suburb	8月初 Early August	管花马先蒿 P. siphonantha	72.08 ± 6.08	6.9 ± 0.2
2005	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	无 No	33.81 ± 2.82	6.2 ± 0.7
2005	依拉 Yila	8月初 Early August	无 No	37.95 ± 2.40	4.9 ± 0.2
2004	依拉 Yila	8月初 Early August	无 No	37.24 ± 2.34	6.6 ± 0.3
2004	依拉 Yila	7月初 Early July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	17.01 ± 5.10	5.2 ± 0.6
2005	依拉 Yila	7月下 Late July	密穗马先蒿 P. densispica	21.19 ± 1.46

来源 Source	坐果率 Fruit set (%)				单果种子产量 Seed production per capsule
来源 Source	df	MS	F	P	df	MS	F	P
年份 Year	2	6,219.198	26.891	0.000	2	226.744	21.91	0.000
开花时间 Flowering date	1	234.031	1.012	0.316	1	48.258	4.663	0.031
伴生种 Co-flowering	1	15,244.841	65.916	0.000	1	379.259	36.648	0.000
误差 Error	193	231.276			729	10.349

开花时间与伴生种对鹤首马先蒿传粉和生殖成功的影响

Effects of flowering date and co-flowering species on pollination and reproduction in Pedicularis gruina

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 35

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	胡小丽, 张杨家豪, 米湘成, 杜彦君, 常朝阳. 浙江古田山亚热带常绿阔叶林开花物候:气候因素、系统发育关系和功能性状的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(5): 601-609.
[2]	张敬丽, 张长芹, 吴之坤, 乔琴. 探讨种间传粉在杜鹃花属自然杂交物种形成中的作用[J]. 生物多样性, 2007, 15(6): 658-665.
[3]	李新蓉, 谭敦炎, 郭江. 迁地保护条件下两种沙冬青的开花物候比较研究[J]. 生物多样性, 2006, 14(3): 241-249.