生物多样性 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 23384.  DOI: 10.17520/biods.2023384

• 研究报告: 微生物多样性 • 上一篇    下一篇

孑遗植物半日花叶际真菌群落的多样性与构建机制

张旋,徐颖,杨颜慈,赵艳玲,门中华,王永龙*   

  1. 包头师范学院 生态环境学院, 内蒙古包头 014030
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-15 修回日期:2024-01-04 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 王永龙

The diversity and assembly mechanism of phyllosphere fungal communities in the relict plant Helianthemum songaricum

Xuan Zhang, Ying Xu, Yangci Yang, Yanlin Zhao, Zhonghua Men, Yonglong Wang*   

  1. College of Ecology and Environment, Baotou Teacher’s College, Baotou, Inner Mongolia 014030
  • Received:2023-10-15 Revised:2024-01-04 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-01-12
  • Contact: Yonglong Wang

摘要: 叶际微生物在维持植物健康生长方面具有重要的作用, 然而, 目前我们对珍稀孑遗植物半日花(Helianthemum songaricum)叶际真菌的多样性和群落结构等知之甚少。因此, 本研究利用Illumina高通量测序技术检测西鄂尔多斯自然保护区半日花叶片表生和内生真菌的多样性, 探究其网络结构特征以及群落构建的机制。结果显示: 棋盘井地区的叶际表生真菌丰富度指数(156.38 ± 8.42)显著高于内生真菌(111.13 ± 5.57), 棋盘井叶际表生真菌丰富度指数显著高于拉僧庙(125.57 ± 7.20)和千里山(114.75 ± 10.35), 而拉僧庙的内生真菌丰富度指数(155.71 ± 15.40)显著高于棋盘井。叶际真菌以子囊菌门、毛霉菌门和担子菌门为优势门, 叶际表生真菌和内生真菌分别在3个不同地点具有显著的指示类群, 叶片部位(即叶表和叶内)和地点显著影响叶片真菌的群落组成。共存网络分析表明, 叶际表生和内生真菌主要是协同作用, 拮抗作用较小。半日花叶际表生和内生真菌群落的构建主要由随机性过程驱动。综上所述, 半日花叶际表生和内生真菌的多样性和群落组成受到叶片部位(叶表和叶内)和地点的显著影响, 随机性过程主导叶际表生和内生真菌的群落构建。研究结果可为珍稀濒危植物的保护和合理利用提供一定的科学基础和实践指导。

关键词: 半日花, 叶际真菌, 生态过程机制, 共现网络

Abstract


Aim: Phyllosphere micro-organisms are crucial to plant growth and development, but little is known about the diversity and community structure of phylloshphere fungi in Helianthemum songaricum.

Methods: In this study, Illumina high-throughput sequencing techniques were used to detect the diversity of phyllosphere epiphytic and endophytic fungi in H. songaricum collected from Qipanjing, Lasengmiao, and Qianlishan in the West Ordos Nature Reserve. In addition, we investigated the characteristics of their network structure and the mechanisms of their community assembly.

Results: For H. songaricum sampled from Qipanjing, the phyllosphere epiphytic fungal richness index (156.38 ± 8.42) was significantly higher than that of endophytic fungi (111.13 ± 5.57). Besides, the phyllosphere epiphytic fungal richness index of H. songaricum sampled from Qipanjing was significantly higher than that of those sampled from Lasengmiao (125.57 ± 7.20) and Qianlishan (114.75 ± 10.35). On the contrary, the endophytic fungal richness index of H. songaricum sampled from Lasengmiao (155.71 ± 15.40) was significantly higher than those sampled from Qipanjing. Phyllosphere fungi were dominated by Ascomycota, Mucormycota, and Basidiomycota, with significant indicator taxa for phyllosphere epiphytic and endophytic fungi at the three sampling locations, suggesting that the leaf position (leaf surface and leaf interior) and sampling site significantly influenced the community composition of phyllosphere fungi. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the phyllosphere epiphytic and endophytic fungi were mainly synergistic, with limited antagonistic effects. In addition, the assembly of phyllosphere epiphytic and endophytic fungal communities in H. songaricum was mainly driven by stochastic processes.

Conclusion: The diversity and community composition of phyllosphere epiphytic and endophytic fungi of H. songaricum are significantly influenced by leaf position (leaf surface and leaf interior) and sampling site, with stochastic processes dominating the community assembly of phyllosphere epiphytic and endophytic fungi. This research provides valuable scientific insight and practical guidance for the conservation and rational utilization of H. songaricum.


Key words: Helianthemum songaricum, phyllosphere fungi, ecological process mechanisms, co-network