Biodiversity Science ›› 2008, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6): 601-606.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2008.08122

• Editorial • Previous Article     Next Article

Effect of artificial nestboxes on the diversity of secondary cavity-nesting birds and the stability of breeding bird community

Zhen Li, Liyuan Yang, Wen Liu, Wenhong Deng*   

  1. College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2008-11-20
  • Wenhong Deng

Artificial nestboxes are widely used in ecological research and conservation practices. However, we know little about the effects of nestboxes on breeding bird communities and their actual conservation value to bird communities. We chose two sample plots with similar plant communities in Xiaolongmen National Forest Park, Beijing. Fifty artificial nest-boxes were hung in the experimental plot and the other plot as a control. From March to August in 2007, we monitored artificial nestbox use by secondary cavity-nesting birds, reproductive rates of birds in nestboxes, and breeding bird and plant communities in the two sample plots. Twenty of 50 boxes were used by secondary cavity-nesting birds, such as the songar tit (Parus songarus), yellow-rumped flycatcher (Ficedula zanthopygia), Eurasian nuthatch (Sitta europaea) and great tit (Parus major). We found that the density of yellow-rumped flycatcher was greater in experimental plot with nestboxes. Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H’) and PIE were higher in experimental plot while dominance index (λ) were lower. Indices of total breeding bird communities changed in the same way. Because secon-dary cavity-nesting bird and breeding bird communities are interrelated, these results may be attributed to the use of artificial nest-boxes. We conclude that nestboxes changed the distribution patterns of some secondary nesting birds and increased the population density and diversity of secondary nesting birds. So, in our study, artificial nest-boxes made good conservation sense for breeding bird communities.

No related articles found!
Full text



[1] Bi Ma, Yiwei Luo, Ling Jia, Xiwu Qi, Qiwei Zeng, Zhonghuai Xiang and Ningjia He. Genome-wide identification and expression analyses of cytochrome P450 genes in mulberry (Morus notabilis)[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2014, 56(9): 887 -901 .
[2] Shen Ze-hao, Jin Yi-xing. The Early Restoration of Vegetation and Soil Environment in Felling-Field of the Fagus engerliana Forest[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 1995, 19(4): 375 -383 .
[3] QI LiWang,ZHANG ShouGong,HAN SuYing,CHEN ChengBin. Karyotype Comparison of Populus SectTacamahaca[J]. Plant Diversity, 2004, 26(01): 1 -3 .
[4] Hongfang Zhang, Liqiang Li, Zhongjian Liu, Yibo Luo . The butterfly Pieris rapae resulting in the reproductive success of two transplanted orchids in a botanical garden[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2010, 18(1): 11 -18 .
[5] Weimin Li, Sifeng Li, Bin Li. Genetic Diversity in Natural Populations of Abies chensiensis Based on Nuclear Simple Sequence Repeat Markers[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2012, 47(4): 413 -421 .
[6] David J. Hearn, Margaret Evans, Ben Wolf, Michael McGinty, Jun Wen. Dispersal is associated with morphological innovation, but not increased diversification, in Cyphostemma (Vitaceae)[J]. J Syst Evol, 2018, 56(4): 340 -359 .
[7] Mark P. Simmons. Relative benefits of amino-acid, codon, degeneracy, DNA, and purine-pyrimidine character coding for phylogenetic analyses of exons[J]. J Syst Evol, 2017, 55(2): 85 -109 .
[8] Yu Shi-Chun, Xiao Pei-Gen. On the Taxonomical State of Fritillaria sulcisquamosa and F. puqiensis[J]. J Syst Evol, 1992, 30(3): 277 -278 .
[9] LIU DengYi, Lars Ericson. Studies on induced protective resistance in Geranium sylvaticum populations and interactions between pathogenic fungi[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2002, 10(1): 29 -37 .
[10] Yi-Ben PENG, Cheng ZOU, Hua-Qin GONG, Shu-Nong BAI, Zhi-Hong XU and Yi-Qin LI. Immunolocalization of Arabinogalactan Proteins and Pectins in Floral Buds of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) During Sex Determination[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2005, 47(2): .