Criteria and methods for assessing the threat status of ecosystem
Received date: 2011-09-26
Accepted date: 2011-12-20
Online published: 2012-02-14
Assessing the threat status of ecosystems is a useful tool for understanding biodiversity loss on Earth. In 2008, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) established a working group at the fourth World Conservation Congress to develop quantitative categories and criteria for assessing ecosystem threat status. These categories and criteria were similar to those used to assess extinction risk for species. This working group strove to establish red lists of ecosystems by applying these criteria to ecosystems at local, regional, and global scales. Ecosystem red lists were designed to be complementary to species red lists for use in creating biodiversity conservation policies. The criteria used for assessment were grouped into four classes: short-term decline in distribution or ecological function, historical declines in distribution or ecological function, small current distribution with decline in distribution or ecological function, or very restricted current distribution. In this paper, we illustrate the use of these criteria for assessing ecosystem threat status; we used literature data on the areas of occupancy for four ecosystems in China’s Liaohe Delta in 1988 and 2006 to evaluate the threat status of these four ecosystems. We also discuss challenges that lie ahead for this method of assessment. Measures of ecosystem distribution and area of occupancy should be based on proper spatial scales. Appropriate quantitative methods are also needed to measure changes in ecosystem function. The final proposed assessment protocol will be presented for further discussion at the 2012 World Conservation Congress.
Key words: biodiversity conservation; critically endangered; endangered; IUCN; vulnerable
Guoke Chen , Keping Ma . Criteria and methods for assessing the threat status of ecosystem[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2012 , 20(1) : 66 -75 . DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2012.10171
[1] | Department of Environment and Conservation DEC (2010) Definitions, categories and criteria for threatened and priority ecological communities. http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/content/view/849/2017/. (accessed 2011-08-08) |
[2] | English V, Blyth J (1999) Development and application of procedures to identify and conserve threatened ecological communities in the South-west Botanical Province of WA. Pacific Conservation Biology, 5,124-138. |
[3] | Essl F, Egger G, Ellmauer T (2002) Rote Liste Gef?hrdeter Biotoptypen ?sterreichs Konzept. Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Vienna, Austria. |
[4] | Franklin JF (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosys- tems, or landscapes? Ecological Applications, 3,202-205. |
[5] | Heywood VH (1995) The Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. |
[6] | IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1. IUCN, Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland. |
[7] | IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature (2010) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. (accessed 2011-08-08) |
[8] | Ji YH (汲玉河), Zhou GS (周广胜) (2010) Transformation of vegetation structure in China’s Liaohe Delta during 1988-2006. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 34,359-367. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[9] | Keith DA, Auld TD, Ooi MKJ, Mackenzie BDE (2000) Sensitivity analyses of decision rules in World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List criteria using Australian plants. Biological Conservation, 94,311-319. |
[10] | Kirkpatrick JB (1998) Nature conservation and the Regional Forestry Agreement process. Australian Journal of Envi- ronmental Management, 5,31-37. |
[11] | Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change. Island Press, Washington,DC. |
[12] | Master L, Faber-Langendoen D, Bittman R, Hammerson GA, Heidel B, Nichols J, Ramsay L, Tomaino A (2009) Nature- Serve Conservation Status Assessments: Factors for Assess- ing Extinction Risk. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. |
[13] | Morgan JL, Gergel SE, Coops NC (2010) Aerial photography: a rapidly evolving tool for ecological management. BioScience, 60,47-59. |
[14] | Nichols JD, Williams BK (2006) Monitoring for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21,668-673. |
[15] | Nicholson E, Keith DA, Wilcove DS (2009) Assessing the threat status of ecological communities. Conservation Biology, 23,259-274. |
[16] | Noss RF (1996) Ecosystems as conservation targets. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11,351. |
[17] | Noss RF, LaRoe ET III, Scott JM (1995) Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC. |
[18] | NSW Scientific Committee (2010) Guidelines for interpreting listing criteria for species, populations and ecological communities under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/nature/listingCriteriaGuidelines.pdf. (accessed 2011-08-08) |
[19] | Paal J (1998) Rare and threatened plant communities of Estonia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7,1027-1049. |
[20] | Pereira HM, Cooper HD (2006) Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21,123-129. |
[21] | Pressey RL, Logan VS (1994) Level of geographical subdivision and its effects on assessments of reserve coverage: a review of regional studies. Conservation Biology, 8,1037-1046. |
[22] | Queensland Government (1999) Vegetation Management Act. Queensland Government, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. |
[23] | Raunio A, Schulman A, Kontula T (2008) Assessment of Threatened Habitat Types in Finland. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland. |
[24] | Reyers B, Rouget M, Jonas Z, Cowling RM, Driver A, Maze K, Desmet P (2007) Developing products for conservation decision-making: lessons from a spatial biodiversity assessment for South Africa. Diversity and Distributions, 13,608-619. |
[25] | Rodríguez JP, Balch JK, Rodríguez-Clark KM (2007) Assessing extinction risk in the absence of species-level data: quantitative criteria for terrestrial ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16,183-209. |
[26] | Rodríguez JP, Rodríguez-Clark KM, Baillie JEM, Ash N, Benson J, Boucher T, Brown C, Burgess ND, Collen B, Jennings M, Keith DA, Nicholson E, Revenga C, Reyers B, Rouget M, Smith T, Spalding M, Taber A, Walpole M, Zager I, Zamin T (2011) Establishing IUCN red list criteria for threatened ecosystems. Conservation Biology, 25,21-29. |
[27] | Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287,1770-1774. |
[28] | Sattler PS, Williams R (1999) The Conservation Status of Queensland’s Bioregional Ecosystems. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, Brisbane, Australia. |
[29] | Sayre R, Comer P, Warner H, Cress J (2009) A New Map of Standardized Terrestrial Ecosystems of the Conterminous United States. Professional paper 1768. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC. |
[30] | Walker S, Price R, Rutledge D (2008) New Zealand’s Remaining Indigenous Cover: Recent Changes and Biodiversity Protection Needs. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. |
[31] | Walker S, Price R, Rutledge D, Stephens RTT, Lee WG (2006) Recent loss of indigenous cover in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 30,169-177. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |