Special Feature: On Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity

China and COP 15: a path for responsible environmental power

  • Zou Yueyu ,
  • Fu Yulin ,
  • Yang Lirong ,
  • Wan Xialin ,
  • Wang Ye ,
  • Liu Jixin
Expand
  • Foreign Economic Cooperation Office, Ministry of Environment Protection, Beijing 100035

Received date: 2017-09-10

  Accepted date: 2017-09-19

  Online published: 2017-11-20

Abstract

The Fifteenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP15) will be hosted by China in 2020 and could become a milestone in the history of the Convention. This article aims to identify lessons that can be learnt by China in preparation for COP15. The internal motivations and political gains of several host countries with respect to previous COPs were analyzed by looking at national environmental foreign policies against the backdrop of the country’s development and corresponding progress made in convention implementation. This case study of successful COPs indicates that host countries do not treat it as an isolated event but an action under the country’s foreign policy strategy, which provides a strong momentum for the country to contribute to the process. Additionally, by formulating host country initiatives in harmony with existing national and regional policies in the field, the host country was able to optimize marginal effects and gains at both the national and global level. China could also make use the opportunity of hosting COP15 to gradually transform its passive and inward-looking eco-environmental foreign policy into an outward-looking one featuring active engagement and work on eco-civilization along with the international community. In preparation for COP15, China should work together with international stakeholders, reinforce regional strategic coordination and synergism with developing countries, and share Chinese experiences in biodiversity conservation in order to contribute to the creation of a fair, rational, and efficient system of global biodiversity governance.

Cite this article

Zou Yueyu , Fu Yulin , Yang Lirong , Wan Xialin , Wang Ye , Liu Jixin . China and COP 15: a path for responsible environmental power[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2017 , 25(11) : 1169 -1175 . DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017246

References

[1] CBD (1992) Text of the Convention. https://www.cbd.int/con- vention/text/. (accessed on 2017-07-10)
[2] Chai LW, Cao XF, Zhang JQ, Huang Y (2015) Trends of the implementation of “Convention on Biological Diversity” after development of “Aichi Targets” and countermeasures. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 31(1), 7-11. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] [柴立伟, 曹晓峰, 张洁清, 黄艺 (2015) “爱知目标”后《生物多样性公约》履约趋势分析和对策. 生态与农村环境学报, 31(1), 7-11.]
[3] Evans JW, Davies R (2014) Too Global to Fail: The World Bank at the Intersection of National and Global Public Policy in 2025. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC.
[4] Gupta J (2010) Stepping up the fight for life (2). https://www. chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/ch/3859-Stepping-up- the-fight-for-life-2-/. (accessed on 2017-08-07)
[5] IISD Reporting Services (IISD) (2014) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.2014) Earth Negotiations Bulletin. . (accessed on 2017- 09-16
[6] IISD Reporting Services (IISD) (2016) Earth Negotiations Bulletin.2016) Earth Negotiations Bulletin. . (accessed on 2017-08-10
[7] Li BJ, Xu ZY (2006) China’s self-identity construction as a responsible power in the post-cold war era. Teaching and Research, (1), 49-56. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] [李宝俊, 徐正源 (2006) 冷战后中国负责任大国身份的建构. 教育与研究, (1), 49-56.]
[8] Lin XG (1994) Environmental diplomacy of the government of Japan. Japanese Studies, (1), 19-32. (in Chinese)
[8] [林晓光 (1994) 日本政府的环境外交. 日本学刊, (1), 19-32.]
[9] Ministry of Environment of Japan (MOEJ) (2010) Annual Report on the Environment, the Sound Material-Cycle Society and Biodiversity in Japan 2010 ..(accessed on 2017-07-20)
[10] Nye JS (1990) Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. Basic Books Inc., New York.
[11] Qin YQ (2003) National identity, strategic culture, and security interests: three hypotheses on the relationship between China and international society. World Economics and Politics, (1), 10-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] [秦亚青 (2003) 国家身份、战略文化和安全利益——关于中国与国际社会关系的三个假设. 世界经济与政治, (1), 10-15.]
[12] Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD) (2001) Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity Including Its Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.Earthscan, London.
[13] Shi YH (2011) Economy, security and ecology—three major global challenges and China. China Report, (12), 26-29. (in Chinese)
[13] [时殷弘 (2011) 经济、安全、生态: 三大全球性挑战与中国. 中国报道, (12), 26-29.]
[14] The Government of Japan (2014) Report on Activities of Japan as President and the Host Country of COP10.. (accessed on 2017-07-22)
[15] The Government of the Republic of Korea (2016) Report on Korea’s CBD Presidency of COP12. . (accessed on 2017-08-03)
[16] United Nations (UN) (2015) Sustainable development. (accessed on 2017-08-15)
[17] Yu HY (2013) International Climate Environment Diplomacy: China’s Responses. Orient Publishing Center,Shanghai. (in Chinese)
[17] [于宏源 (2013)国际气候环境外交:中国的应对. 东方出版中心, 上海.]
[18] Zhang HB (2008) Environment and International Relations: Rational Thinking on Global Environmental Issues. Shanghai People’s Publishing House,Shanghai. (in Chinese)
[18] [张海滨 (2008)环境与国际关系: 全球环境问题的理性思考. 上海人民出版社, 上海.]
[19] Zhang LR, Cheng WJ, Xue DY (2009) Progress and trends for implementation of the convention on biological diversity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29, 5636-5643. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] [张丽荣, 程文娟, 薛达元 (2009) 《生物多样性公约》国际履约的进展与趋势. 生态学报, 29, 5636-5643.]
Outlines

/