[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Reviews

Bioacoustics data archives management standards and management technology progress

  • Kaiying He ,
  • Xinhui Xu ,
  • Chengyun Zhang ,
  • Zezhou Hao ,
  • Zhishu Xiao ,
  • Yingying Guo
Expand
  • 1. School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    2. Guangdong Eco-Engineering Polytechnic, Guangzhou 510520, China
    3. Research Institute of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou 510520, China
    4. State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents in Agriculture, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
    5. School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received date: 2024-06-28

  Accepted date: 2024-10-18

  Online published: 2024-12-03

Supported by

Guangdong Innovation Team for the Higher-educational Institution(2024KCXTD078);Fundamental Research Funds of Chinese Academy of Forestry(CAFYBB2023MA016);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32201338);National Natural Science Foundation of China(32171520);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52405584)

Abstract

Background & Aims: In recent years, bioacoustics monitoring has emerged as a crucial tool for biodiversity conservation, enabling a continuous, real-time, and non-invasive means to gather data on various species and their habitats. This method provides superior efficiency and coverage compared to traditional field surveys and observations. However, the vast amount of diverse bioacoustics data generated presents significant challenges in terms of storage, management, and analysis. This review aims to systematically outline the characteristics and management standards of bioacoustics data archives. It highlights the latest advancements in recording and storage technologies and explores the value and challenges of bioacoustics data archiving in practical applications. Additionally, this review also provides an overview of the current state of bioacoustics databases and data-sharing platforms, both domestically and internationally.

Progress: Bioacoustics data archives are systematic repositories dedicated to the preservation and management of bioacoustics data. These archives include raw audio recordings, metadata detailing recording times, locations, and equipment specifications, and processed data derived from species identification and classification tools. These archives are essential for biodiversity conservation efforts, as they store crucial data on species’ vocalizations, behaviors, and interactions. Standardized management protocols are essential for ensuring data integrity, accessibility, and usability. Recent technological advances have facilitated better data collection, processing, and storage methods, making bioacoustics monitoring more scalable and sophisticated.

Conclusion: The development and implementation of advanced bioacoustics data management and archiving systems are pivotal for effective biodiversity monitoring and conservation. By leveraging the latest technological advancements, bioacoustics data archives can significantly enhance automated data annotation, storage efficiency, intelligent retrieval, and real-time sharing capabilities. These improvements will help meet the increasing demands of bioacoustics monitoring, evaluation, and historical baseline establishment, thereby significantly supporting biodiversity conservation efforts.

Cite this article

Kaiying He , Xinhui Xu , Chengyun Zhang , Zezhou Hao , Zhishu Xiao , Yingying Guo . Bioacoustics data archives management standards and management technology progress[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2024 , 32(10) : 24266 . DOI: 10.17520/biods.2024266

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

References

[1] Abrahams C, Ashington B, Baker E, Bradfer-Lawrence T, Browning E, Carruthers-Jones J, Darby J, Dick J, Eldridge A, Elliott D, Heath B, Howden-Leach P, Johnston A, Lees A, Meyer C, Ruiz Arana U, Smyth S, Metcalf O (2023) Good Practice Guidelines for Long-term Ecoacoustic Monitoring in the UK. The UK Acoustics Network, https://acoustics.ac.uk/. (accessed on 2024-05-15)
[2] Bach K, Sch?fer D, Enke N, Seeger B, Gemeinholzer B, Bendix J (2012) A comparative evaluation of technical solutions for long-term data repositories in integrative biodiversity research. Ecological Informatics, 11, 16-24.
[3] Baker E, Price BW, Rycroft SD, Hill J, Smith VS (2015) BioAcoustica: A free and open repository and analysis platform for bioacoustics. Database, 2015, bav054.
[4] Berendsohn WG, Geoffroy M (2007) Networking taxonomic concepts—Uniting without “unitary-ism”. In: Biodiversity Databases:From Cottage Industry to Industrial Networks (eds Curry G, Humphries C). Systematics Association Special Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton.
[5] Brown A, Garg S, Montgomery J (2020) AcoustiCloud: A cloud-based system for managing large-scale bioacoustics processing. Environmental Modelling & Software, 131, 104778.
[6] Deng K, Wang XP, Zhu BC, Zhao LH, Yang Y, Cai YL, Sun XQ, Wang TL, Cui JG (2023) A dataset on the call characteristics of 43 anuran species in China. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22344. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  [邓可, 汪小萍, 朱弼成, 赵龙辉, 杨悦, 蔡炎林, 孙晓倩, 王同亮, 崔建国 (2023) 中国43种蛙类鸣声特征数据集. 生物多样性, 31, 22344.]
[7] Dugan PJ, Klinck H, Roch MA, Helble TA (2016) Raven X high performance data mining toolbox for bioacoustic data analysis. arXiv, 1610.03772.
[8] Fegraus EH, Andelman S, Jones MB, Schildhauer M (2005) Maximizing the value of ecological data with structured metadata: An introduction to ecological metadata language (EML) and principles for metadata creation. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 86, 158-168.
[9] Fornwall M, Gisiner R, Simmons S, Moustahfid H, Canonico G, Halpin P, Goldstein P, Fitch R, Weise M, Cyr N (2012) Expanding biological data standards development processes for US IOOS:Visual line transect observing community for mammal, bird, and turtle data. In: U.S. IOOS Report. Interagency Ocean Observation Committee, Washington.
[10] Frazao F, Padovese B, Kirsebom OS (2020) Workshop report: Detection and classification in marine bioacoustics with deep learning. arXiv, 2002.08249.
[11] Guan S, Moustahfid H, Milan A, Mize J (2014) A Metadata Convention for Passive Acoustic Recordings (Version 1.0). US Integrated Ocean Observing System, Silver Spring, MD.
[12] Kolb TL, Blukacz-Richards EA, Muir AM, Claramunt RM, Koops MA, Taylor WW, Sutton TM, Arts MT, Bissel E (2013) How to manage data to enhance their potential for synthesis, preservation, sharing, and reuse—A great lakes case study. Fisheries, 38(2), 52-64.
[13] Krein T, Hawthorne D, Hu D, Strickman L, Nelson S (2009) Raven Pro Sound Software. Bioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
[14] Midway SR, Sievert NA, Lynch AJ, Whittier JB, Pope KL (2022) Asking nicely: Best practices for requesting data. Ecological Informatics, 70, 101729.
[15] Parsons MJG, Lin TH, Mooney TA, Erbe C, Juanes F, Lammers M, Li SH, Linke S, Looby A, Nedelec SL, Van Opzeeland I, Radford C, Rice AN, Sayigh L, Stanley J, Urban E, Di Iorio L (2022) Sounding the call for a global library of underwater biological sounds. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 810156.
[16] Reichman OJ, Jones MB, Schildhauer MP (2011) Challenges and opportunities of open data in ecology. Science, 331, 703-705.
[17] Roch MA, Batchelor H, Baumann-Pickering S, Berchok CL, Cholewiak D, Fujioka E, Garland EC, Herbert S, Hildebrand JA, Oleson EM, Van Parijs S, Risch D, ?irovi? A, Soldevilla MS (2016) Management of acoustic metadata for bioacoustics. Ecological Informatics, 31, 122-136.
[18] Sedberry GR, Fautin DG, Feldman M, Fornwall MD, Goldstein RP, Guralnick R (2011) OBIS-USA: A data-sharing legacy of the census of marine life. Oceanography, 24, 166-173.
[19] Shamon H, Paraskevopoulou Z, Kitzes J, Card E, Deichmann JL, Boyce AJ, McShea WJ (2021) Using ecoacoustics metrices to track grassland bird richness across landscape gradients. Ecological Indicators, 120, 106928.
[20] Soranno PA, Bissell EG, Cheruvelil KS, Christel ST, Collins SM, Fergus CE, Filstrup CT, Lapierre JF, Lottig NR, Oliver SK, Scott CE, Smith NJ, Stopyak S, Yuan S, Bremigan MT, Downing JA, Gries C, Henry EN, Skaff NK, Stanley EH, Stow CA, Tan PN, Wagner T, Webster KE (2015) Building a multi-scaled geospatial temporal ecology database from disparate data sources: Fostering open science and data reuse. GigaScience, 4, 28.
[21] Toledo FL, Tipp C, Márquez R (2015) The value of audiovisual archives. Science, 347, 484.
[22] Towsey M, Planitz B, Nantes A, Wimmer J, Roe P (2012) A toolbox for animal call recognition. Bioacoustics, 21, 107-125.
[23] Towsey M, Wimmer J, Williamson I, Roe P (2014a) The use of acoustic indices to determine avian species richness in audio-recordings of the environment. Ecological Informatics, 21, 110-119.
[24] Towsey M, Zhang L, Cottman-Fields M, Wimmer J, Zhang JL, Roe P (2014b) Visualization of long-duration acoustic recordings of the environment. Procedia Computer Science, 29, 703-712.
[25] Wang LS (2010) Introduction to the Darwin Core, a standard for biodiversity informatics. In: Advances in Biodiversity Conservation and Research in China VIII (ed. Chinese National Committee for DIVERSITAS), pp. 105-114. China Meteorological Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)
  [王利松 (2010) 生物多样性信息学标准——Darwin Core介绍. 见: 中国生物多样性保护研究进展(国际生物多样性计划中国委员会主编), 105-114页. 气象出版社, 北京.]
[26] Wieczorek J, Bloom D, Guralnick R, Blum S, D?ring M, Giovanni R, Robertson T, Vieglais D (2012) Darwin Core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS ONE, 7, e29715.
[27] Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes AJ, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo CT, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJG, Groth P, Goble C, Grethe JS, Heringa J ’t Hoen PAC, Hooft R, Kuhn T, Kok R, Kok J, Lusher SJ, Martone ME, Mons A, Packer AL, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, van Schaik R, Sansone SA, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz MA, Thompson M, van der Lei J, van Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg P, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Mons B (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.
[28] Xiao WH, Zhou QS, Zhu CD, Wu DH, Xiao ZS (2020) Advances in techniques and methods of wildlife monitoring. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 44, 409-417. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  [肖文宏, 周青松, 朱朝东, 吴东辉, 肖治术 (2020) 野生动物监测技术和方法应用进展与展望. 植物生态学报, 44, 409-417.]
[29] Xiao ZS, Cui JG, Wang DP, Wang ZT, Luo JH, Xie J (2023) Interdisciplinary development trends of contemporary bioacoustics and the opportunities for China. Biodiversity Science, 31, 22423. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  [肖治术, 崔建国, 王代平, 王志陶, 罗金红, 谢捷 (2023) 现代生物声学的学科发展趋势及中国机遇. 生物多样性, 31, 22423.]
[30] Yang ML, Yu XW, Zhang X, Ouyang X, Hou YN, Gao JJ (2021) Design and implementation of the data management system for wild animal acoustics. Forest Resources Management, (6), 124-129. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  [杨铭伦, 于新文, 张旭, 欧阳萱, 侯亚男, 高家军 (2021) 野生动物鸣声数据管理系统设计与实现. 林业资源管理, (6), 124-129.]
[31] Zhang C, He K, Gao X, Guo Y (2024) Automatic bioacoustics noise reduction method based on a deep feature loss network. Ecological Informatics, 80, 102517.
Outlines

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]