研究报告: 植物多样性

喜旱莲子草在青藏高原对模拟增温的可塑性: 引入地和原产地种群的比较

  • 邓铭先 ,
  • 黄河燕 ,
  • 沈诗韵 ,
  • 吴纪华 ,
  • 拉琼 ,
  • 斯确多吉 ,
  • 潘晓云
展开
  • 1.复旦大学生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室, 上海 200438
    2.西藏大学-复旦大学生物多样性与全球变化联合实验室, 拉萨 850000
    3.西藏大学生命科学系与生物多样性研究所, 拉萨 850000
    4.中国科学院青藏高原研究所青藏高原地球系统科学国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
* E-mail: xypan@fudan.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2021-03-14

  录用日期: 2021-06-13

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-16

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(41771053);国家自然科学基金(32071659);国家自然科学基金(31770524);西藏自治区教育科学研究2020年度课题(XZJYKTZD09)

Phenotypic plasticity of Alternanthera philoxeroides in response to simulated daily warming in the Tibet Plateau in introduced vs. native populations

  • Mingxian Deng ,
  • Heyan Huang ,
  • Shiyun Shen ,
  • Jihua Wu ,
  • Qiong La ,
  • Tsechoe Dorji ,
  • Xiaoyun Pan
Expand
  • 1 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438
    2 Tibet University-Fudan University Joint Laboratory for Biodiversity and Global Change, Lhasa 850000
    3 Institute of Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000
    4 State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System Science, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101

Received date: 2021-03-14

  Accepted date: 2021-06-13

  Online published: 2021-09-16

摘要

气候变暖背景下植物可通过关键性状的表型可塑性来适应环境温度的增加。表型可塑性增强进化假说预测定植到新环境中的入侵植物种群具有演化出更强表型可塑性的潜力。此前对可塑性进化的研究涵盖了外来植物性状对水分条件、光照变化、土壤养分、邻体根系以及天敌防御等的响应, 而较少有研究关注增温条件下植物重要性状的可塑性进化。已有的部分研究多集中在温带和热带地区, 而较少关注入侵植物在高寒地区对增温的响应; 且研究多集中在植物生长相关性状, 较少关注功能性状和防御性状。本研究采用同质园实验比较了喜旱莲子草6个引入地(中国)种群和6个原产地(阿根廷)种群, 在西藏拉萨模拟全天增温2℃处理下的适合度性状、功能性状和防御性状的响应差异。结果表明: (1)高寒地区模拟全天增温显著提高了喜旱莲子草总生物量(+36.4%)、地上生物量(+34.5%)、贮藏根生物量(+51.4%)和毛根生物量(+33.6%), 降低了分枝强度(-19.8%)和比茎长(-30.2%); (2)模拟全天增温使引入地种群的比叶面积和黄酮含量增加, 而原产地种群则相反。这些结果表明高寒地区全天增温2℃对喜旱莲子草可能是一种有利条件。引入地种群的适合度性状对模拟全天增温2℃的响应比原产地种群更强, 而其光能利用相关性状和防御性状的响应可能提升了其在高寒地区的适合度。因此, 在未来全球气候变暖的背景下, 高寒地区温度升高可能更有利于喜旱莲子草引入地种群的定植和扩散。

本文引用格式

邓铭先 , 黄河燕 , 沈诗韵 , 吴纪华 , 拉琼 , 斯确多吉 , 潘晓云 . 喜旱莲子草在青藏高原对模拟增温的可塑性: 引入地和原产地种群的比较[J]. 生物多样性, 2021 , 29(9) : 1198 -1205 . DOI: 10.17520/biods.2021095

Abstract

Aims: Phenotypic plasticity for key traits in plants can adapt in response increasing temperatures seen through climate change. Under the evolution of increased phenotypic plasticity hypothesis, populations of invasive species have greater phenotypic plasticity than native populations. Studies of this hypothesis have mostly focused on the plasticity of invasive plants to light, water, nutrients, neighbors, and natural enemies. Studies focusing on these key plant traits under warming conditions are mostly concentrated in temperate and tropic regions, while alpine regions are overlooked. Additionally, these studies mostly focus on plant growth-related traits, while relatively little attention has been paid to plant resistance and the secondary metabolites of defense traits in response to warming, especially in alpine region. Here, test for differences in plant fitness traits, important functional traits, and defense traits in response to daily warming between introduced and native populations of invasive plants. Specifically, we explore the following questions: (1) Will the phenotypic plasticity of fitness traits, functional traits and defense traits of the invasive plant Alternanthera philoxeroides respond to daily air warming? (2) If so, does this response differ between introduced and native populations? (3) Does this response differ between alpine regions and tropic regions?
Methods: Using 6 populations of the invasive plant A. philoxeroides from the introduced region in China and 6 populations from their native region in Argentina, we conducted a field experiment to simulate a daily warming of 2℃ in Lhasa City, Tibet Autonomous Region (Alpine region: 91.04° E, 29.64° N) from August to October 2020. We placed plants from each of the 12 populations into the control plots and the warming plots, and each treatment had three replicates. There were a total of 72 experimental units in the experiment (2 origins × 6 populations × 2 temperature treatments × 3 replicates). After 8 weeks of growth, we harvested all plants and measured the several variables. The fitness traits we measured included total biomass, ground biomass, storage root biomass and hair root biomass. The functional traits we measured included branching intensity, specific stem length, root-to-shoot ratio, and specific leaf area. The defense traits we measured included triterpenoid saponins and flavonoids.
Results: Simulated daily warming of 2℃ significantly increased the total biomass of A. philoxeroides (+36.4%), the ground biomass (+34.5%), the storage root biomass (+51.4%), the hair root biomass (+33.6%), and reduced the specific stem length (-30.2%) and branching intensity (-19.8%). Simulated daily warming of 2℃ increased the specific leaf area (+15.1%) and flavonoids (+8.9%) of the introduced populations, while the native populations showed the opposite effect (-22.9%, -30.0%).
Conclusions: These results indicate that simulated daily warming of 2℃ in alpine regions is a positive condition for the invasive plant A. philoxeroides. The fitness traits of the introduced populations have greater plasticity to simulated daily warming, and the plasticity of some plant functional traits and defense traits of the introduced populations may have greater fitness in alpine regions. As a consequence, we conclude that increasing temperatures due to global climate change may be beneficial to colonization and spread of introduced populations of A. philoxeroides in the alpine region.

参考文献

[1] Agathokleous E, Belz RG, Kitao M, Koike T, Calabrese EJ (2019) Does the root to shoot ratio show a hormetic response to stress? An ecological and environmental perspective. Journal of Forestry Research, 30, 1569-1580.
[2] Ban ZH, Wang Q (2015) Responses of the competition between Alternanthera philoxeroides and Sambucus chinensis to simulated warming. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39, 43-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] [班芷桦, 王琼 (2015) 喜旱莲子草和接骨草竞争对模拟增温的响应. 植物生态学报, 39, 43-51.]
[3] Bauerfeind SS, Fischer K (2013) Increased temperature reduces herbivore host-plant quality. Global Change Biology, 19, 3272- 3282
[4] Buckingham GR (1996) Biological control of alligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroides, the world’s first aquatic weed success story. Castanea, 61, 232-243.
[5] Chevin LM, Hoffmann AA (2017) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in extreme environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160138.
[6] DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS, Hamrick JL (2004) Biomass allocation, growth, and photosynthesis of genotypes from native and introduced ranges of the tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Oecologia, 138, 521-531.
[7] Faizal A, Geelen D (2013) Saponins and their role in biological processes in plants. Phytochemistry Reviews, 12, 877-893.
[8] Gunn S, Farrar JF, Collis BE, Nason M (1999) Specific leaf area in barley: Individual leaves versus whole plants. New Phytologist, 143, 45-51.
[9] Harvey LDD (1995) Warm days, hot nights. Nature, 377, 15-16.
[10] Hawkins NJ (2018) Digest: Plants adapt under attack: Genotypic selection and phenotypic plasticity under herbivore pressure. Evolution, 72, 1184-1185.
[11] He WM, Li JJ, Peng PH (2012) Simulated warming differentially affects the growth and competitive ability of Centaurea maculosa populations from home and introduced ranges. PLoS ONE, 7, e31170.
[12] Holm LG, Weldon LW, Blackburn RD (1969) Aquatic weeds. Science, 166, 699-709.
[13] Huang HY, Zhu ZC, Wu JH, La Q, Zhou YH, Pan XY (2021) Phenotypic plasticity of Alternanthera philoxeroides in response to simulated daily warming: Introduced vs. native populations. Biodiversity Science, 29, 419-427. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] [黄河燕, 朱政财, 吴纪华, 拉琼, 周永洪, 潘晓云 (2021) 喜旱莲子草对模拟全天增温的可塑性: 引入地和原产地种群的比较. 生物多样性, 29, 419-427.]
[14] Hyldgaard B, Brix H (2012) Intraspecies differences in phenotypic plasticity: Invasive versus non-invasive populations of Ceratophyllum demersum. Aquatic Botany, 97, 49-56.
[15] Janion-Scheepers C, Phillips L, Sgrò CM, Duffy GA, Hallas R, Chown SL (2018) Basal resistance enhances warming tolerance of alien over indigenous species across latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, USA, 115, 145-150.
[16] Llorens L, Peñuelas J, Beier C, Emmett B, Estiarte M, Tietema A (2004) Effects of an experimental increase of temperature and drought on the photosynthetic performance of two ericaceous shrub species along a north-south European gradient. Ecosystems, 7, 613-624.
[17] Lucob-Agustin N, Kawai T, Kano-Nakata M, Suralta RR, Niones JM, Hasegawa T, Inari-Ikeda M, Yamauchi A, Inukai Y (2021) Morpho-physiological and molecular mechanisms of phenotypic root plasticity for rice adaptation to water stress conditions. Breeding Science, 71, 20-29.
[18] Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U, Poot P, Purugganan MD, Richards CL, Valladares F,van Kleunen M (2010) Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 15, 684-692.
[19] Pan XY, Geng YP, Sosa A, Zhang WJ, Li B, Chen JK (2007) Invasive Alternanthera philoxeroides: Biology, ecology and management. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 45, 884-900. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] [潘晓云, 耿宇鹏, Alejandro Sosa, 张文驹, 李博, 陈家宽 (2007) 入侵植物喜旱莲子草--生物学、生态学及管理. 植物分类学报, 45, 884-900.]
[20] Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic Plasticity:Beyond Nature and Nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
[21] Ren GQ, Yang HY, Li J, Prabakaran K, Dai ZC, Wang XP, Jiang K, Zou CB, Du DL (2020) The effect of nitrogen and temperature changes on Solidago canadensis phenotypic plasticity and fitness. Plant Species Biology, 35, 283-299.
[22] Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 9, 981-993.
[23] Sainty G, McCorkelle G, Julien M (1997) Control and spread of Alligator weed Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb., in Australia: Lessons for other regions. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 5, 195-201.
[24] Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770-1774.
[25] Shabani F, Ahmadi M, Kumar L, Solhjouy-Fard S, Shafapour Tehrany M, Shabani F, Kalantar B, Esmaeili A (2020) Invasive weed species’ threats to global biodiversity: Future scenarios of changes in the number of invasive species in a changing climate. Ecological Indicators, 116, 106436.
[26] Shaw MR, Loik ME, Harte J (2000) Gas exchange and water relations of two Rocky Mountain shrub species exposed to a climate change manipulation. Plant Ecology, 146, 195-204.
[27] Sorte CJB, Ibáñez I, Blumenthal DM, Molinari NA, Miller LP, Grosholz ED, Diez JM, D’Antonio CM, Olden JD, Jones SJ, Dukes JS (2013) Poised to prosper? A cross-system comparison of climate change effects on native and non-native species performance. Ecology Letters, 16, 261-270.
[28] Tang ME, Zhang QY, Zhang YC (2020) Warming affects the invasion ability and competitiveness of the invasive plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Pratacultural Science, 37, 1047-1057.
[29] Treutter D (2005) Significance of flavonoids in plant resistance and enhancement of their biosynthesis. Plant Biology, 7, 581-591.
[30] Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin JM, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature, 416, 389-395.
[31] Winkler E, Fischer M (1999) Two fitness measures for clonal plants and the importance of spatial aspects. Plant Ecology, 141, 191-199.
[32] Yang Y, Liu M, Pan YF, Huang HY, Pan XY, Sosa A, Hou YP, Zhu ZC, Li B (2021) Rapid evolution of latitudinal clines in growth and defence of an invasive weed. New Phytologist, 230, 845-856.
[33] Yu LR, Zhu ZC, Pan XY (2020) Phenotypic plasticity of Alternanthera philoxeroides in response to root neighbors of kin: Introduced vs. native genotypes. Biodiversity Science, 28, 651-657. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] [于良瑞, 朱政财, 潘晓云 (2020) 喜旱莲子草对同基因型邻体根系的表型可塑性: 入侵地和原产地的比较. 生物多样性, 28, 651-657.]
[34] Zhang L, Qiu XY, Tu YL, Weng XM, Luo J (2018) Three alien species and one new record of wild species in Tibet. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 27, 113-114. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] [张丽, 仇晓玉, 土艳丽, 文雪梅, 罗建 (2018) 西藏外来植物3种及野生植物新纪录1种. 植物资源与环境学报, 27, 113-114.]
[35] Zhou XH, He WM (2020) Climate warming facilitates seed germination in native but not invasive Solidago canadensis populations. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8, 595214.
文章导航

/