社区为主体的保护: 对三江源国家公园生态管护公益岗位的思考
# 共同第一作者
收稿日期: 2017-11-20
录用日期: 2018-02-20
网络出版日期: 2018-05-05
An observation to the new initiative of community conservation guard posts in the pilot Three-River-Source National Park
# Co-first authors
Received date: 2017-11-20
Accepted date: 2018-02-20
Online published: 2018-05-05
社区参与是实现生物多样性保护目标的重要途径, 也是我国国家公园建设的重要组成部分。青海省三江源国家公园在前期试点中设置了16621个生态管理公益岗位, 当地牧民因此成为三江源保护的主要力量。本文通过对三江源地区已进行的生态管理公益岗位的调研发现, 由于传统文化和环保宣传的影响, 三江源当地藏族牧民具有较高的保护环境意识和参与保护行动的强烈愿望, 生态公益岗位是对这种愿望的良好回应。但在实践中, 因为需要兼顾提升生态保护成效、提升牧民收入、扶贫等多重目标, 生态管护员的选拔、管理、考核等并未按照最大化保护成效的方式进行。国家公园试点村中, 生态管护员全部由贫困户担任的方式, 实质上是将完成扶贫目标摆在了完成自然保护目标之前。这样的选择方式有着深刻的制度根源。为了进一步提升国家公园内生态公益岗位的保护成效, 我们认为应当明确生态管理公益岗位的定位, 明确提升保护成效是第一位的任务; 应当改进现有体制, 使基层政府有更多资源和空间组织管护工作, 并增加社区的参与程度。在这一过程中, 有民间机构参与的广阔空间。
赵翔 , 朱子云 , 吕植 , 肖凌云 , 梅索南措 , 王昊 . 社区为主体的保护: 对三江源国家公园生态管护公益岗位的思考[J]. 生物多样性, 2018 , 26(2) : 210 -216 . DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017311
Community-based conservation has been proven as an effective approach for biodiversity conservation, and is an important part for National Parks in China. As the first pilot of the new national park system in China, the Three-River-Source National Park initiated a new arrangement to employ 16,621 villagers from each household living in the national park to serve as conservation guards. Local Tibetan herders take the main responsibility of Sanjiangyuan conservation and in return receive payments from the national park. Such an arrangement coincides with local people’s willingness of participating in conservation, influenced by traditional Tibetan Buddhist culture. However, in addition to conservation, poverty alleviation is set as a priority target especially when guards were selected, which to certain extent compromised the effectiveness of conservation. While understanding the needs of poverty alleviation, we analyzed institutional rationales of such a selection, and made policy suggestions that conservation targets should become the first priority and more resources and space should be allocated to local governments and communities for self-governance on conservation decisions and actions. NGOs may also contribute to assist these practices.
[1] | Cetas ER, Yasué M (2017) A systematic review of motivational values and conservation success in and around protected areas. Conservation Biology, 31, 203-212. |
[2] | DeCaro D, Stokes M (2008) Social-psychological principles of community-based conservation and conservancy motivation: Attaining goals within an autonomy-supportive environment. Conservation Biology, 22, 1443-1451. |
[3] | Evans SM, Birchenough AC (2001) Community-based management of the environment: Lessons from the past and options for the future. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 11, 137-147. |
[4] | Gibson CC, Marks SA (1995) Transforming rural hunters into conservationists: An assessment of community-based wildlife management programs in Africa. World Development, 23, 941-957. |
[5] | Huang XC, Zhou LA (2017) Transition in governmental governance mechanisms and development of social organizations. Social Sciences in China, (11), 118-138, 206-207. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | [黄晓春, 周黎安 (2017) 政府治理机制转型与社会组织发展. 中国社会科学, (11), 118-138, 206-207.] |
[6] | Jin TJ, Shen CC (2012) Government ecology management, core actors in local government and political tournament, Social Sciences in Nanjing, (6), 65-70, 77. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[6] | [金太军, 沈承诚 (2012) 政府生态治理、地方政府核心行动者与政治锦标赛. 南京社会科学, (6), 65-70, 77.] |
[7] | Liu JX (2008) An analysis of Chinese political tournament. Journal of Public Management, (3), 24-29, 121-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | [刘剑雄 (2008) 中国的政治锦标赛竞争研究. 公共管理学报, (3), 24-29, 121-122.] |
[8] | Measham TG, Lumbasi JA (2013) Success factors for community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): Lessons from Kenya and Australia. Environmental Management, 52, 649. |
[9] | Songorwa AN (1999) Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are the communities interested. World Development, 27, 2061-2079. |
[10] | Wang J, Sun JP, Shi L, Li N, Ma Z, Meng XX (2016) Natural reserve system of China: Current status, problems and prospect. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26, 270-273. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | [王静, 孙军平, 石磊, 李宁, 马中, 孟秀祥 (2016) 中国自然保护区建设的现状、存在问题及展望. 中国人口资源与环境, 26, 270-273.] |
[11] | Wang QF, Yu GR, He HL, He NP, Sheng WP, Ma AN, Zheng H, Zuo Y (2015) Thinking of construction of the nature reserve system and integrated system in China. Resources Sciences, 37, 1357-1366. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | [王秋凤, 于贵瑞, 何洪林, 何念鹏, 盛文萍, 马安娜, 郑涵, 左尧 (2015) 中国自然保护区体系和综合管理体系建设的思考. 资源科学, 37, 1357-1366.] |
[12] | Yang XD (2012) A pressure system: A brief history of a concept. Journal of Social Sciences, (11), 4-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[12] | [杨雪冬 (2012) 压力型体制: 一个概念的简明史. 社会科学, (11), 4-12.] |
[13] | Zhou LA (2014) Administrative subcontract. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 34(6), 1-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | [周黎安 (2014) 行政发包制. 社会, 34(6), 1-38.] |
[14] | Zhou XG, Lian H (2012) Modes of governance in the Chinese bureaucracy: A “control rights” theory. Sociological Studies, 27(5), 69-93, 243. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | [周雪光, 练宏 (2012) 中国政府的治理模式: 一个“控制权”理论. 社会学研究, 27(5), 69-93, 243.] |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |