Biodiversity Science ›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (6): 568-578.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09140

Special Issue: Species Diversity in Biological Communities: Patterns and Mechanisms

• Special Issue • Previous Article     Next Article

The mid-domain effect hypothesis: models, evidence and limitations

Xiangping Wang1, 2*, Jingyun Fang1, Zhiyao Tang1   

  1. 1 Department of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, and Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Proc-esses of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing 100871
    2 The Key Laboratory of Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083
  • Received:2009-06-03 Online:2009-11-20

Geographic patterns of species diversity and their underlying mechanisms have long been the focus of macro-ecology and biogeography. Recently, the mid-domain effect (MDE) hypothesis has been proposed to explain geographical diversity patterns. The hypothesis states that if the ranges of the species are randomly distributed within a bounded domain then more ranges will overlap near the middle of the domain than at the edges, and thus decreasing species richness will be observed from the mid-domain to the edges. Many studies have shown that the MDE is an important mechanism affecting geographic richness pattern. However, its relative role in such patterns differs markedly depending on many factors. In this paper, we introduced the assumptions and basic models of the hypothesis and illustrate that the models differ in their predictions as a result of different assumptions. We also review the debate on the MDE hypothesis, and discuss the limitations of present mid-domain models. Although the hypothesis has improved our understanding of the effects of geometric constraints and random process on geographic richness gradients, current MDE models are too simplistic to describe biodiversity patterns in the real world. Improvements to mid-domain models should be based on a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying species distribution.

No related articles found!
Full text



[1] Sanxiong Fu;Cunkou Qi*. Identification of Genes Differentially Expressed in Seeds of Brassica napus Planted in Nanjing and Lhasa by Arabidopsis Microarray[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2009, 44(02): 178 -184 .
[2] Hongyuan Ma, Zhengwei Liang, Haitao Wu, Lihua Huang, Zhichun Wang. Role of endogenous hormones, glumes, endosperm and temperature on germination of Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) seeds during development[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2010, 3(4): 269 -277 .
[3] LIU Hong-Tao LI Bing ZHOU Ren-Gang. Calcium_calmodulin Signal Transduction Pathway and Environment Stimulation[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2001, 18(05): 554 -559 .
[4] SUN Dong-Bao and WANG Qing-Suo. Effects of water on the photosynthetic characteristics of alfalfa (Medicago sativa)[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2012, 36(1): 72 -80 .
[5] Philippe GERRIENNE, Paul GONEZ. Early evolution of life cycles in embryophytes: A focus on the fossil evidence of gametophyte/sporophyte size and morphological complexity[J]. J Syst Evol, 2011, 49(1): 1 -16 .
[6] TIAN Xin-Zhi. On Plant Illustration and Artistic Drawing and Painting[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 1999, 16(04): 470 -476 .
[7] Xiaofen Sun;Yu Chen;Junsong Pan;Yuliang Wang;Kexing Sun;Kexuan Tang*;Run Cai*. Correlation and Path Analyses of Vindoline with Major Agronomic Traits in Catharanthus roseus[J]. Chin Bull Bot, 2009, 44(01): 96 -102 .
[8] Ping SONG, Rui ZHANG, Zhi-Chun ZHOU, Jian-She TONG, Hui WANG. Effects of localized nitrogen supply treatments on growth and root parameters in Pinus massoniana families under phosphorus deficiency[J]. Chin J Plan Ecolo, 2017, 41(6): 622 -631 .
[9] Lin Wei, Shenggui Liu, Xianwei Shi. Genetic diversity of the Xuefeng black bone chicken based on microsatel-lite markers[J]. Biodiv Sci, 2008, 16(5): 503 -508 .
[10] LIU Jie, LIU Gong-She , QI Dong-Mei, LI Fang-Fang. Construction of Genetic Fingerprints of Aneurolepidium chinensis Using Microsatellite Sequences[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2000, 42(9): 985 -987 .