生物多样性

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

云南澜沧县景迈古茶园生态系统植物多样性评价

齐丹卉1,2,郭辉军1*,崔景云1,盛才余1   

  1. 1 (中国科学院西双版纳热带植物园, 昆明 650223)
    2 (中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049)
  • 收稿日期:2004-12-01 修回日期:2005-04-25 出版日期:2005-05-20 发布日期:2005-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 郭辉军

Plant biodiversity assessment of the ancient tea garden ecosystem in Jingmai of Lancang, Yunnan

Danhui Qi1, 2, Huijun Guo1*, Jingyun Cui1, Caiyu Sheng1   

  1. 1 Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223
    2 Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • Received:2004-12-01 Revised:2005-04-25 Online:2005-05-20 Published:2005-05-20
  • Contact: Huijun Guo

摘要:

云南澜沧县境内的景迈古茶园是云南省现存面积最大的古茶园。本文应用植物学样地调查和农业生物多样性调查评价(HH-ABA)方法, 在景迈古茶园内设置了78个20 m×20 m的样方, 对植物多样性进行调查, 并就古茶园的管理及资源利用等问题进行了问卷调查和农户访谈。研究结果表明, 景迈芒景地区植物地理成分的热带性明显。在景迈古茶园中发现的珍稀濒危保护植物达15种, 其中濒危种5个, 易危种7个, 稀有种3个, 含国家三级保护植物11种。从古茶园、天然林、新式茶园3类生态系统的物种多样性分析来看, 古茶园与天然林较为接近而比新式茶园高得多, 因而在该区生物多样性的维护上起着非常重要的作用。古茶园的物种数按照生活型排序为草本>乔木>灌木>藤本>附生。与天然林相比, 古茶园内乔木和灌木种类的比例减少, 草本和附生(寄生)植物的比例大大增加, 这与古茶园内乔木郁闭度及茶树的存在密切相关。农业生物多样性分析显示, 不同村寨的物种丰富度和物种利用率均存在差异。6个村寨的农业物种丰富度指数的平均值为0.059, 高于同纬度地区旱谷地和橡胶林, 可见人们在古茶园管理中有意识地保留了可利用的物种。由于不同农户采取的管理措施不同, 影响了古茶园内的植物多样性和古茶树的更新, 因而使各农户的茶叶经济效益存在差别。古茶园生态系统是自然资源保护与利用相结合的典型例子, 建议应当传承并发展当地人民对古茶园的管理经验, 由政府、科研机构和农户共同参与, 通过示范和培训加强学习指导, 对古茶园进行保护和合理的开发利用。

Abstract

Ancient tea gardens in Lancang County, Yunnan Province are regarded as the provenance of the well-known Pu’er Tea. The ancient tea garden ecosystem is a typical example for the integration of conser-vation and utilization of natural resources. In order to understand its role in biodiversity conservation, we conducted field surveys in 78 sample plots of 20 m×20 m, and surveyed 360 households using house-hold-based agrobiodiversity assessment(HH-ABA) in two neighboring administrative villages, Mangjing and Jingmai, of Lancang County. The results showed that (1) the geobotanical components of Jingmai and Mang-jing areas are of obviously tropical characteristics; (2) a large number of important species, including five endangered, seven vulnerable and three rare, are well protected in the ancient tea gardens. Among them, 11 species are listed in Category III of the State Protection List; (3) the plant diversity of ancient tea gardens is slightly lower than that of natural forests but much higher than that of normal tea gardens; (4) the life forms of plant species in the ancient tea gardens are as follows: herbs> arbors> shrubs> vines>epiphytes (including parasites). Compared to natural forests, there are less arbors and shrubs and more herbs and epiphytes (in-cluding parasites) in the ancient tea gardens; (5) the analysis of agrobiodiversity revealed that there existed differences in species richness and resource utilization extent from different villages. The average species richness index in the 6 villages is 0.059, which is higher than that of upland rice field and rubber plantation at the same latitude. The ancient tea gardens in this area play important roles in maintaining biodiversity. We suggest that local peoples’ knowledge and experiences on resource management should be well documented and encouraged, and effective conservation and reasonable utilization of ancient tea gardens would be achieved through training and demonstration with the participation of the local government, research insti-tutions and farmers.