人为干扰对白腹锦鸡活动节律的影响

胡远芳, 李斌强, 梁丹, 李兴权, 刘兰香, 杨家伟, 罗旭

Effect of anthropogenic disturbance on Lady Amherst’s pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae) activity

Yuanfang Hu, Binqiang Li, Dan Liang, Xingquan Li, Lanxiang Liu, Jiawei Yang, Xu Luo

图3 人为干扰和白腹锦鸡的日活动节律比较和两者间重叠度。 a-b: 全年总体人为干扰和各个类型的人为干扰与白腹锦鸡日活动节律比较; c-d: 繁殖季节总体人为干扰和各个类型的人为干扰与白腹锦鸡的日活动节律比较; e-f: 非繁殖季节总体人为干扰和各个类型人为干扰与白腹锦鸡的日活动节律比较。LA表示白腹锦鸡; AD表示总人为干扰; AD (Human)表示人类活动; AD (Grazing)表示放牧活动; AD (Domestic)表示家养动物活动。详细活动水平和重叠度见表2和表3。

Fig. 3 The activity patterns and overlaps of anthropogenic disturbance and Lady Amherst’s pheasants. The comparisons of daily activities between the Lady Amherst’s pheasant (LA) and the overall anthropogenic disturbance and the three types of anthropogenic disturbance throughout the year (a and b), as well as in the breeding (c and d) and non-breeding (e and f) seasons. Anthropogenic disturbance were classified into human activities (AD (Human)), grazing (AD (Grazing)), and domestic animals (AD (domestic)). See Table 2 and 3 for details.