农田节肢动物不同取样方法的综合比较
|
|
段美春, 覃如霞, 张宏斌, 陈宝雄, 金彬, 张松泊, 任少鹏, 金树权, 朱升海, 华家宁, 刘云慧, 宇振荣
|
Comprehensive comparison of different sampling methods for arthropod diversity in farmland
|
|
Meichun Duan, Ruxia Qin, Hongbin Zhang, Baoxiong Chen, Bin Jin, Songbo Zhang, Shaopeng Ren, Shuquan Jin, Shenghai Zhu, Jianing Hua, Yunhui Liu, Zhenrong Yu
|
|
表4 基于加权得分的不同取样方法的综合比较
|
Table 4 Comprehensive comparison of different sampling methods based on weighted score
|
|
| 权重 Weight | 挂盆法
Coloured pan traps | 地陷法
Surface trap cup method | 目测法 Visual counting | 扫网法
Sweeping method | 吸虫器法 Vacuum-suc-tion method | | | 蜂类 Bee | 瓢虫Ladybug | 蜘蛛Spider | 步甲Carabidae | 步甲Carabidae | 蜘蛛Spider | 瓢虫Ladybug | 蜘蛛Spider | 蜂类Bee | 蜘蛛Spider | 直翅目Orthoptera | 蜘蛛
Spider | | 捕获效率 Capture efficiency | 10% | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | | 取样经济成本 Economic cost of sampling | 10% | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 响应敏感性
Response sensitivity | 20% | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | - | 1 | - | 1 | 3 | - | | 类群经济价值 Economic value of groups | 10% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | 操作难度 Operation difficulty | 10% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | | 专家田间支持 Expert field support | 10% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | 鉴定难度 Identification difficulty | 10% | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | | 被动取样程度 Degree of passive sampling | 10% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | | 受取样人影响 Affected by sampling people | 10% | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | | 加权得分 Weighted score | - | 2.6 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.6 | | 建议入选 Recommend for inclusion | - | 是
Yes | 是
Yes | 否
No | 是
Yes | 是
Yes | 是
Yes | 否
No | 否 No | 否
No | 否 No | 否
No | 否
No |
|
|
|