极小种群野生植物梓叶槭的种实表型变异特征

doi:10.17520/biods.2019091

生物多样性 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 314-322. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019091

极小种群野生植物梓叶槭的种实表型变异特征

冯秋红^1,^2,^*(),李登峰^1,⁴,于涛³,李俊清³,马文宝^1,²,张雷⁵

^1. 四川省林业科学研究院, 四川卧龙森林生态系统定位站, 成都 610081
^2. 森林和湿地生态恢复与保育四川重点实验室, 成都 610081
^3. 北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083
^4. 四川农业大学, 成都 611130
^5. 国家林业和草原局森林培育重点实验室, 中国林业科学研究院林业研究所, 北京 100091

收稿日期:2019-03-28 接受日期:2019-09-05 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-05-08
通讯作者: 冯秋红
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0503100);“极小种群野生植物回归技术研究与示范”课题(2016YFC0503106)

Phenotypic fruit and seed variations of Acer catalpifolium, a Wild Plant with Extremely Small Populations in China

Qiuhong Feng^1,^2,^*(),Dengfeng Li^1,⁴,Tao Yu³,Junqing Li³,Wenbao Ma^1,²,Lei Zhang⁵

^1. Sichuan Academy of Forestry, Sichuan Wolong Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Chengdu 610081
^2. Ecological Restoration and Conservation on Forest and Wetland Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610081
^3. Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of MOE, Beijing 100083
^4. Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130
^5. Key Laboratory of Forest Silviculture of the State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091

Received:2019-03-28 Accepted:2019-09-05 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-05-08
Contact: Qiuhong Feng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

表型变异是植物遗传变异与环境异质性相互作用的结果, 是植物适应和进化的具体表现。为揭示极小种群植物梓叶槭(Acer catalpifolium)的种实表型在其适应环境过程中的变异特征, 明确梓叶槭优质种源地, 为该物种的保护提供基础数据, 本研究以天然分布的5个小种群的11个种实性状为研究对象, 采用巢式方差、变异系数、表型分化系数等多种指标, 探讨了其种群间和种群内的表型变异。结果表明: 梓叶槭种实表型性状在种群间和种群内均存在着显著的差异, 种群内的变异(63.11%)大于种群间的变异(23.61%), 种群间平均分化系数为27.23%, 分化程度在槭树科植物中相对较大。种子厚度的平均变异系数最高(40.64%), 其次是果柄长。翅果千粒重的平均变异系数最小(1.57%), 是最稳定的种实性状。都江堰种群的表型多样性最丰富, 平武种群的则最低; 气象因子对梓叶槭种实表型性状的影响不显著。就种实表型性状而言, 虽然雷波种群的翅果最大, 平武种群的种子最大, 同时两者均具有最大的种子厚度和质量均一度。故平武和雷波种群均可作为梓叶槭优质种质资源的候选地。

关键词: 梓叶槭, 种子, 翅果, 表型性状, 气象因子, 极小种群

Abstract

Phenotypic variation can indicate the adaptation of plant species to different environmental conditions due to long-term evolution. Acer catalpifolium is a relatively primitive species in Aceraceae family, and is a rare and endangered species in China. To understand the range of phenotypic variation of A. catalpifolium’s fruits and seeds, 11 traits for 47 individuals from five natural small populations of A. catalpifolium were measured and parameterized using coefficients of variance, variation, and correlation. The results showed significant differences in phenotypic variation among and within populations. Overall variation was greater within population (63.11%) than among populations (23.61%) while the mean phenotypic differentiation coefficient was 27.23% among populations, larger than other species in Aceraceae. The average variation coefficient of seed thickness (ST) was the highest (40.64%), followed by fruit stalk length (FSL); thousand-fruit weight (TFW) was the smallest and the most stable phenotypic trait (1.57%). The Dujiangyan population has the highest phenotypic diversity and Pingwu population the lowest. Meteorological factors were not associated to fruit and seed size variations of A. catalpifolium. The fruits of the Leibo population were largest while the seeds of Pingwu population were the biggest. These two populations also have the thickest seeds. Fruit/seed size is considered as an indicator of quality, because bigger fruit/seed could provide more nutrients for next generations, therefore, the Leibo and Pingwu populations should be the priority when collecting germplasms of A. catalpifolium.

Key words: Acer catalpifolium, seed and fruit, phenotypic traits, meteorological factors, extremely small populations

冯秋红, 李登峰, 于涛, 李俊清, 马文宝, 张雷 (2020) 极小种群野生植物梓叶槭的种实表型变异特征. 生物多样性, 28, 314-322. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019091.

Qiuhong Feng, Dengfeng Li, Tao Yu, Junqing Li, Wenbao Ma, Lei Zhang (2020) Phenotypic fruit and seed variations of Acer catalpifolium, a Wild Plant with Extremely Small Populations in China. Biodiversity Science, 28, 314-322. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019091.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2019091

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2020/V28/I3/314

图/表 10

参考文献 12

12	[ 李帅锋, 苏建荣, 刘万德, 郎学东, 张志钧, 苏磊, 贾呈鑫卓, 杨华景 ( 2013) 思茅松天然群体种实表型变异. 植物生态学报, 37, 998-1009.] DOI URL
13	Loveless MP, Hamrick JL ( 1984) Ecological determinant of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 15, 65-95. DOI URL
14	Ma WB, Xu G, Ji HJ, Liu XL ( 2014) Preliminary study on germination characteristics of the rare plant Acer catalpifolium. Seed, 33(12), 87-90. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 马文宝, 许戈, 姬慧娟, 刘兴良 ( 2014) 珍稀植物梓叶槭种子萌发特性初步研究. 种子, 33(12), 87-90.]
15	Mao JF, Li Y, Liu YJ, Li H, Wang XR ( 2007) Cone and seed characteristic of Pinus densata and their adaptive fitness implications. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 31, 291‒299. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 毛建丰, 李悦, 刘玉军, 刘灏, 王晓茹 ( 2007) 高山松种实性状与生殖适应性. 植物生态学报, 31, 291‒299.]
16	Meng C, Zheng X, Ji ZF, Lin LL, Zhang CQ, Wang YL ( 2013) Phenotypic diversity of natural populations of Acer grosseri in Shanxi. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 33, 2232-2240. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 孟超, 郑昕, 姬志峰, 林丽丽, 张翠琴, 王祎玲 ( 2013) 山西葛萝槭天然种群表型多样性研究. 西北植物学报, 33, 2232-2240.]
17	Ren H, Zhang QM, Lu HF, Liu HX, Guo QF, Wang J, Jian SG, Bao HO ( 2012) Wild plant species with extremely small populations require conservation and reintroduction in China. Ambio, 41, 913-917. DOI URL
18	Sichuan Vegetation Coordination Group(1980) Sichuan Vegetation. Sichuan People’s Publishing House, Chengdu.(in Chinese)
	[ 四川植被协作组(1980) 四川植被. 四川人民出版社, 成都.]
19	Sørensen FC, Miles RS (1978) Cone and seed weight relationship in Douglas-fir from western and central Oregon. Ecology, 59, 641-644. DOI URL
20	Wang D, Pang CH, Gao YH, Hao XJ, Wang YL ( 2010) Phenotypic diversity of Acer ginnala (Aceraceae) populations at different altitude. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 32, 117-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 王丹, 庞春华, 高亚卉, 郝晓杰, 王祎玲 ( 2010) 茶条槭不同海拔种群的表型多样性. 云南植物研究, 32, 117-125.] DOI URL
21	Xu H, Liu YH ( 2018) Relationship between diameter class structure and intraspecific and interspecific competitions of precious and endangering plant Acer catalpifolium. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 38, 1160-1170. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 许恒, 刘艳红 ( 2018) 珍稀濒危植物梓叶槭种群径级结构与种内种间竞争关系. 西北植物学报, 38, 1160-1170.]
22	Yu DP, Peng QX, Li CH, Xie KP, Zhang GZ, Li SL ( 2008) Research on the biological characters of the seeds of Acer catalpifolium Rehd. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 27(6), 30-64. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 余道平, 彭启新, 李策宏, 谢孔平, 张国珍, 李世丽 ( 2008) 梓叶槭种子生物学特性研究. 中国野生植物资源, 27(6), 30-64.]
23	Yu SL, Fang WW ( 2012) New advances in seed geography. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 36, 918-922. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 于顺利, 方伟伟 ( 2012) 种子地理学研究的新进展. 植物生态学报, 36, 918-922.] DOI URL
24	Zhang L, Liu SR, Sun PS, Wang TL ( 2011) Comparative evaluation of multiple models of the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Pinus massoniana. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 35, 1091-1105. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 张雷, 刘世荣, 孙鹏森, 王同立 ( 2011) 气候变化对马尾松潜在分布影响预估的多模型比较. 植物生态学报, 35, 1091-1105.] DOI URL
25	Zhang YY, Ma WB, Yu T, Ji HJ, Gao J, Li JQ, Gao S ( 2018) Study on population structure and community characteristics of Acer catalpifolium Rehd. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 24(4), 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 张宇阳, 马文宝, 于涛, 姬慧娟, 高健, 李俊清, 高尚 ( 2018) 梓叶槭种群结构和群落特征研究. 应用与环境生物学报, 24(4), 1-9.]
1	Chen TY, Liu ZH, Lou AR ( 2013) Phenotypic variation in populations of Solanum rostratum in different distribution areas in China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 344‒353. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 陈天翌, 刘增辉, 娄安如 ( 2013) 刺萼龙葵种群在中国不同分布地区的表型变异. 植物生态学报, 37, 344‒353.] DOI URL
2	Daly C, Gibson WP, Taylor GH, Johnson GL, Pasteris P ( 2002) A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate. Climate Research, 22, 99-113. DOI URL
3	Fang WP ( 1981) Flora Reipbublicae Popularis Sinicae, Tomus 46. Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese)
	[ 方文培 ( 1981) 中国植物志(46卷). 科学出版社, 北京.]
4	Feng QH, Shi ZM, Xu ZJR, Miao N, Tang JC, Liu XL, Zhang L ( 2017) The study on phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Cupressus chengiana populations in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 748‒756. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 冯秋红, 史作民, 徐峥静茹, 缪宁, 唐敬超, 刘兴良, 张雷 ( 2017) 岷江柏天然种群种实表型变异特征. 应用生态学报, 28, 748‒756.]
5	Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA ( 2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6	Ge S, Wang MX, Chen YW ( 1988) Study on genetic structure of Pinus massoniana populations with isozyme. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 24, 399-409. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 葛颂, 王明庥, 陈岳武 ( 1988) 用同工酶研究马尾松群体的遗传结构. 林业科学, 24, 399‒409.]
7	Gu YJ, Lou JX, Wu YW Cao XJ ( 2009) Phenotypic diversity in natural populations of Picea balfouriana in Sichuan, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 33, 291‒301. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 辜云杰, 罗建勋, 吴远伟, 曹小军 ( 2009) 川西云杉天然种群表型多样性. 植物生态学报, 33, 291‒301.] DOI URL
8	Guo Z, Zang RG ( 2013) Evaluation index system of endangered levels of the wild plants with tiny population in China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 49, 10-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	[ 国政, 臧润国 ( 2013) 中国极小种群野生植物濒危程度评价指标体系. 林业科学, 49, 10-17.] DOI URL
9	Hamrick JL, Godt MJW ( 1990) Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources (eds Brown AHD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL, Wier BS), pp. 43-63. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
10	Li B, Gu WC, Lu BM ( 2002) A study on phenotypic diversity of seeds and cones characteristics in Pinus bungeana. Biodiversity Science, 10, 181-188. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李斌, 顾万春, 卢宝明 ( 2002) 白皮松天然群体种实性状表型多样性研究. 生物多样性, 10, 181-188.]
11	Li S, Cai YL, Xu L, Zhao GF ( 2003) Morphological differentiation of samaras and seeds of Dipteronia dyeriana (Aceraceae). Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 25, 589-595. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	[ 李珊, 蔡宇良, 徐莉, 赵桂仿 ( 2003) 云南金钱槭果实、种子形态分化研究. 云南植物研究, 25, 589-595.]
12	Li SF, Su JR, Liu WD, Lang XD, Zhang ZJ, Su L, Jiang CXZ, Yang HJ ( 2013) Phenotypic variations in cones and seeds of natural Pinus kesiya var. langbianensis populations in Yunnan Province, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 37, 998-1009. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL

研究地点 Site	经纬度 Latitude and longitude	海拔 Altitude (m)	年平均气温 Mean annual temperature (℃)	年平均降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm)
都江堰 Dujiangyan	103°31′28″-103°32′50″ E, 30°51′22″-30°53′27″ N	823	14.28	1,155
平武 Pingwu	104°23′41″E, 32°14′14″ N	1,120	15.20	957
雷波 Leibo	103°39′50″-103°39′56″ E, 28°31′13″-28°31′24″ N	995	14.50	1,099
大邑 Dayi	103°15′36″-103°22′28″ E, 30°36′08″-30°42′02″ N	1,960	15.35	1,223
峨眉山 Emeishan	103°24′04″-103°26′18″ E, 29°33′45″-29°35′02″ N	718	16.07	1,376

研究地点 Site	经纬度 Latitude and longitude	海拔 Altitude (m)	年平均气温 Mean annual temperature (℃)	年平均降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm)
都江堰 Dujiangyan	103°31′28″-103°32′50″ E, 30°51′22″-30°53′27″ N	823	14.28	1,155
平武 Pingwu	104°23′41″E, 32°14′14″ N	1,120	15.20	957
雷波 Leibo	103°39′50″-103°39′56″ E, 28°31′13″-28°31′24″ N	995	14.50	1,099
大邑 Dayi	103°15′36″-103°22′28″ E, 30°36′08″-30°42′02″ N	1,960	15.35	1,223
峨眉山 Emeishan	103°24′04″-103°26′18″ E, 29°33′45″-29°35′02″ N	718	16.07	1,376

种群 Population	坡度 Slope (°)	坡向 Aspect	地貌类型 Geomorphic type	调查母树 Mother tree investigated
种群 Population	坡度 Slope (°)	坡向 Aspect	地貌类型 Geomorphic type	调查数量 Number	平均树高 Mean height (m)	平均胸径 Mean DBH (cm)	平均冠幅 Mean crown
都江堰 Dujiangyan	15	南、东南、东北、西北 South, southeast, northeast, northwest	山地 Mountain	16	14	15	7 m × 7 m
平武 Pingwu	40	西南/北 Southwest, north	沟边山地 Valley side mountain	6	15.5	34	7 m × 7 m
雷波 Leibo	20	东南 Southeast	山地 Mountain	9	7	12	5 m × 4 m
大邑 Dayi	38	南、北 South, north	山地 Mountain	6	9.5	20	6 m × 7 m
峨眉山 Emeishan	15	北、西南、南 North, southwest, south	山地 Mountain	10	13	23	12 m × 12 m

种群 Population	坡度 Slope (°)	坡向 Aspect	地貌类型 Geomorphic type	调查母树 Mother tree investigated
种群 Population	坡度 Slope (°)	坡向 Aspect	地貌类型 Geomorphic type	调查数量 Number	平均树高 Mean height (m)	平均胸径 Mean DBH (cm)	平均冠幅 Mean crown
都江堰 Dujiangyan	15	南、东南、东北、西北 South, southeast, northeast, northwest	山地 Mountain	16	14	15	7 m × 7 m
平武 Pingwu	40	西南/北 Southwest, north	沟边山地 Valley side mountain	6	15.5	34	7 m × 7 m
雷波 Leibo	20	东南 Southeast	山地 Mountain	9	7	12	5 m × 4 m
大邑 Dayi	38	南、北 South, north	山地 Mountain	6	9.5	20	6 m × 7 m
峨眉山 Emeishan	15	北、西南、南 North, southwest, south	山地 Mountain	10	13	23	12 m × 12 m

种群 Population	样本量Sample size	平均值±标准差 Mean±SD
种群 Population	样本量Sample size	翅果长 KFL (cm)	翅果宽 KFW (cm)	着生痕 BM (cm)	种子长 SL (cm)	种子宽 SW (cm)	种子厚度 ST (cm)	果柄长 FSL (cm)	翅果长宽比 KFLW	种子长宽比 SLW	翅果千粒重 TFW (g)	种子千粒重 TSW (g)
都江堰 Dujiangyan	320	3.24±0.35^c	1.11±0.15^c	0.54±0.05^b	0.77±0.12^d	0.46±0.06^e	0.11±0.04^c	1.42±0.39^d	2.93±0.32^ab	1.71±0.23^b	2.21±0.03^c	0.84±0.03^c
平武 Pingwu	120	3.38±0.27^b	1.10±0.09^c	0.68±0.05^a	0.92±0.12^a	0.56±0.05^a	0.13±0.09^a	2.10±0.49^b	3.07±0.21^ab	1.63±0.17^c	3.03±0.03^a	1.40±0.05^a
雷波 Leibo	180	3.71±0.26^a	1.22±0.10^a	0.49±0.04^c	0.89±0.12^ab	0.52±0.06^b	0.13±0.03^a	1.24±0.29^e	3.06±0.27^a	1.76±0.41^b	3.41±0.05^a	1.38±0.02^a
大邑 Dayi	120	3.21±0.32^d	1.11±0.15^c	0.48±0.06^d	0.86±0.14^b	0.49±0.05^d	0.11±0.03^c	2.21±0.65^a	3.01±1.11^ab	1.78±0.27^a	2.73±0.07^b	1.08±0.05^b
峨眉山 Emeishan	200	3.41±0.32^b	1.16±0.11^b	0.54±0.04^b	0.84±0.1^c	0.50±0.05^c	0.12±0.02^b	1.59±0.40^c	2.93±0.25^b	1.71±0.23^b	2.86±0.04^b	1.01±0.03^b

极小种群野生植物梓叶槭的种实表型变异特征

Phenotypic fruit and seed variations of Acer catalpifolium, a Wild Plant with Extremely Small Populations in China

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 12

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

表型状性 Phenotypic trait	变异系数 Variation coefficients (%)					平均值 Mean (%)
表型状性 Phenotypic trait	都江堰种群 Dujiangyan	平武种群 Pingwu	雷波种群 Leibo	大邑种群 Dayi	峨眉山种群 Emeishan	平均值 Mean (%)
翅果长 KFL	14.68	7.87	6.84	11.18	17.09	11.53
翅果宽 KFW	14.8	8.00	8.77	11.1	11.87	10.91
着生痕 BM	9.98	6.63	13.68	22.14	8.31	12.15
种子长 SL	16.76	13.17	15.7	16.21	21.12	16.59
种子宽 SW	14.99	8.35	10.91	11.09	14.69	12.01
种子厚度 ST	46.16	67.73	39.74	22.7	26.86	40.64
果柄长 FSL	28.9	23.57	25.88	30.13	34.16	28.53
翅果长宽比 KFLW	13.71	6.86	9.95	10.89	11.59	10.6
种子长宽比 SLW	13.84	10.34	28.61	19.31	15.93	17.61
翅果千粒重 TFW	1.44	0.88	1.37	2.63	1.53	1.57
种子千粒重 TSW	3.28	3.78	1.57	4.61	2.88	3.22
平均值 Mean	16.23	14.29	14.82	14.73	15.09	15.03

表型性状 Phenotypic trait	均方 Mean square			F值 F value
表型性状 Phenotypic trait	种群间 Among populations	种群内 Within population	随机误差 Random error	种群间 Among populations	种群内 Within population
翅果长 KFL	8.7860	0.2010	0.0058	43.7730^**	34.3670^**
翅果宽 KFW	0.5060	0.0190	0.0023	25.9540^**	8.3510^**
着生痕 BM	0.9340	0.0040	0.0001	245.7320^**	53.2950^**
种子长 SL	0.6890	0.0220	0.0012	31.8010^**	18.6870^**
种子宽 SW	0.2660	0.0040	0.0002	65.3130^**	20.2830^**
种子厚度 ST	0.0220	0.0020	0.0003	9.0660^**	7.7230^**
果柄长 FSL	31.9300	0.2440	0.0107	130.8680^**	22.7050^**
翅果长宽比 KFLW	0.7130	0.4630	0.1254	1.5420^**	3.6910^**
种子长宽比 SLW	1.0790	0.1050	0.0178	10.2480^**	5.9060^**

表型性状 Phenotypic trait	方差分量 Variance component			方差分量百分比 Percentage of variance portion (%)			表型分化系数 Phenotypic differentiation coefficient
表型性状 Phenotypic trait	种群间 Among populations	种群内 Within population	随机误差 Random errors	种群间 Among populations	种群内 Within population	随机误差 Random errors	表型分化系数 Phenotypic differentiation coefficient
翅果长 KFL	0.0418	0.1413	0.0066	22.06	74.48	3.46	22.85
翅果宽 KFW	0.0024	0.0053	0.0013	26.47	58.86	14.68	31.02
着生痕 BM	0.0045	0.0052	0.0013	41.28	47.29	11.43	46.60
种子长 SL	0.0033	0.0108	0.0018	20.61	67.85	11.54	23.30
种子宽 SW	0.0013	0.0024	0.0009	28.54	52.43	19.03	35.25
种子厚度 ST	0.0001	0.0006	0.0004	8.23	52.10	39.67	13.64
果柄长 FSL	0.1608	0.1852	0.0078	45.46	52.35	2.20	46.48
翅果长宽比 KFLW	0.0012	0.0495	0.0043	2.22	89.93	7.86	2.41
种子长宽比 SLW	0.0048	0.0197	0.0026	17.68	72.71	9.61	19.56
平均值 Mean	—	—	—	23.61	63.11	13.27	27.23

表型性状 Phenotypic trait	翅果长 KFL (cm)	翅果宽 KFW (cm)	着生痕 BM (cm)	种子长 SL (cm)	种子宽 SW (cm)	种子厚度 ST (cm)	果柄长 FSL (cm)	翅果长宽比 KFLW	种子长宽比 SLW
翅果长 KFL	1
翅果宽 KFW	0.572^**	1
着生痕 BM	0.217^**	0.102^**	1
种子长 SL	0.318^**	0.292^**	0.06	1
种子宽 SW	0.417^**	0.372^**	0.151^**	0.541^**	1
种子厚度 ST	0.121^**	0.089^**	0.116^**	0.418^**	0.251^**	1
果柄长 FSL	?0.160^**	?0.084^*	?0.179^**	0.154^**	0.040	0.063	1
翅果长宽比 KFLW	0.271^**	?0.310^**	0.042	0.053	0.020	0.005	0.011	1
种子长宽比 SLW	?0.016	0.000	?0.124^**	0.581^**	?0.263^**	0.216^**	0.147^**	0.036	1

表型性状 Phenotypic trait	翅果长 KFL	翅果宽 KFW	着生痕 BM	种子长 SL	种子宽 SW	种子厚度 ST	果柄长 FSL	翅果长宽比 KFLW	种子长宽比 SLW
翅果千粒重 TFW	0.715^**	0.679^*	0.040	0.924^**	0.797^**	0.713^**	0.214	0.444	0.398
种子千粒重 TSW	0.627^*	0.478	0.145	0.919^**	0.766^**	0.796^**	0.270	0.494	0.434

表型性状 Phenotypic trait	海拔 Altitude (m)	年平均温度 Mean annual temperature (℃)	年平均最暖月温度 Mean annual temperature in the warmest month (℃)	年平均最冷月温度 Mean annual temperature in the coldest month (℃)	年平均降水量 Mean annual precipitation (mm)	年平均生长季(5?9月) 降水量 Mean annual precipitation between May and September (mm)
翅果长 KFL	0.124	0.184	0.099	0.266	0.124	?0.019
翅果宽 KFW	0.145	0.182	0.101	0.226	0.384	0.191
着生痕 BM	?0.26	0.278	0.234	0.374	?0.216	?0.194
种子长 SL	0.147	0.134	0.017	0.249	?0.018	?0.12
种子宽 SW	0.187	0.153	?0.002	0.29	0.068	?0.059
种子厚度 ST	0.302	?0.059	?0.166	0.108	?0.392	?0.263
果柄长 FSL	?0.265	0.165	0.161	0.174	?0.04	?0.016
翅果长宽比 KFLW	0.013	0.138	0.098	0.192	?0.122	?0.208
种子长宽比 SLW	0.041	0.001	0.01	0.007	?0.149	?0.142
翅果千粒重 TFW	0.264	0.145	0.000	0.289	?0.003	?0.082
种子千粒重 TSW	0.388	?0.025	?0.168	0.139	?0.289	?0.341

[1]	王明慧, 陈昭铨, 李帅锋, 黄小波, 郎学东, 胡子涵, 尚瑞广, 刘万德. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林不同种子扩散方式的优势种空间点格局分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23147-.
[2]	程继铭, 何慧敏, 牛红玉, 张洪茂. 鼠类种内个性差异对种子传播影响的研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22446-.
[3]	丁炳扬, 金孝锋, 张永华, 李根有, 陈征海, 张方钢. 浙江野生种子植物的分布格局与区系分区[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22515-.
[4]	金孝锋, 鲁益飞, 丁炳扬, 李根有, 陈征海, 张方钢. 浙江种子植物物种编目[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21408-.
[5]	孙哲明, 刘亚恒, 彭秋桐, 徐芷妍, 杨予静, 欧文慧, 李中强. 湖北省极小种群野生植物在原生群落中的竞争地位及保护建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6): 21517-.
[6]	袁智勇, 陈进民, 吴云鹤, 李先琦, 车静. 云南省两栖类物种名录修订[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4): 21470-.
[7]	许玥, 臧润国. 中国极小种群野生植物保护理论与实践研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(10): 22505-.
[8]	焦振彬, 罗毅波. 群体表型性状研究揭示环境与遗传因素对霍山石斛表型及物种分类的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(8): 1073-1086.
[9]	邵晨, 李耀琪, 罗奥, 王志恒, 席祯翔, 刘建全, 徐晓婷. 不同生活型被子植物功能性状与基因组大小的关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(5): 575-585.
[10]	姚志, 郭军, 金晨钟, 刘勇波. 中国纳入一级保护的极小种群野生植物濒危机制[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(3): 394-408.
[11]	都业勤, 张迪, 王赛, 王磊, 闫兴富, 唐占辉. 湿地植物大花百合种群的性系统特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2021, 29(10): 1321-1335.
[12]	向颖, 刘素群, 黄兴龙, 刘志霄, 张佑祥, 马方舟. 湖南高望界国家级自然保护区及其周边蝶类多样性与影响因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(8): 940-949.
[13]	赵万义, 刘忠成, 叶华谷, 王蕾, 陈功锡, 刘克明, 詹选怀, 廖文波. 罗霄山脉种子植物区系及其南北分化特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(7): 842-853.
[14]	李慢如, 张玲. 桑寄生植物繁殖物候研究概述[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(7): 833-841.
[15]	杨锡福, 张洪茂, 张知彬. 植物大年结实及其与动物贮食行为之间的关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(7): 821-832.