生物多样性 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 353-362. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.10117
陈李林1, 林胜1, 尤民生1,*(), 陈少波1, Liette Vasseur1,2, 叶树纯1
收稿日期:
2010-05-04
接受日期:
2010-09-04
出版日期:
2011-05-20
发布日期:
2013-12-10
通讯作者:
尤民生
作者简介:
*E-mail:msyou@iae.fjau.edu.cn基金资助:
Lilin Chen1, Sheng Lin1, Minsheng You1,*(), Shaobo Chen1, Liette Vasseur1,2, Shuchun Ye1
Received:
2010-05-04
Accepted:
2010-09-04
Online:
2011-05-20
Published:
2013-12-10
Contact:
Minsheng You
摘要:
螨类是茶园生态系统中重要且复杂的类群之一。为了了解不同植物间作后对茶园螨类群落的组成结构和多样性的影响, 2006年3月至2008年4月, 在武夷山市星村镇大坪洲茶园通过间作百喜草(Paspalum notatum)或圆叶决明(Cassia rotundifolia)、留养杂草和除杂草4种不同处理, 对茶园茶冠层(采用盆拍法及剪枝条法)和凋落层(采用捡取凋落物法)的螨类进行系统采样、标本鉴定和统计分析。结果表明: 与留养杂草对照相比, 间作百喜草或圆叶决明均显著增加了茶冠层和凋落层捕食螨的物种丰富度(S)、有效多样性指数(eH′)、个体数(N)和绝对丰度($\bar{n}$)。与留养杂草和除杂草这两种对照相比, 间作百喜草或圆叶决明均显著增加了茶冠层和凋落层优势种圆果大赤螨(Anystis baccarum)的个体数(N)。茶冠层植食螨和腐食螨及凋落层腐食螨的所有群落指标在不同处理茶园间均无显著差异。茶冠层和凋落层螨类群落物种丰富度(S)和个体数(N)季节性变化明显, 物种组成相似性高。间作茶园和留养杂草茶园茶冠层的螨类总个体数与其对应的凋落层螨类总个体数呈显著正相关。多样化茶园有利于保护和利用捕食螨, 从而对茶园有害生物进行生态控制, 促进有机茶叶可持续生产。
陈李林, 林胜, 尤民生, 陈少波, Liette Vasseur, 叶树纯 (2011) 间作牧草对茶园螨类群落多样性的影响. 生物多样性, 19, 353-362. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.10117.
Lilin Chen, Sheng Lin, Minsheng You, Shaobo Chen, Liette Vasseur, Shuchun Ye (2011) Effects of cover crops on mite communities in tea plantations. Biodiversity Science, 19, 353-362. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.10117.
图1 试验地小区分布图。图中5、9和12行间间作百喜草; 2、4和7行间间作圆叶决明; 1、6和10行间留养杂草; 3、8和11行间除杂草; “”为隔离带。
Fig. 1 Layout of the experimental area. 5, 9 and 12 intercropped with Paspalum notatum; 2, 4 and 7 intercropped with Cassia rotundifolia; 1, 6 and 10 with natural ground cover; 3, 8 and 11 on bare ground. “ ” are seperation zones.
食性 Food-habit | 物种 Species | 个体数 Individuals (Proportion) | |
---|---|---|---|
茶冠层 Tea canopies | 凋落层 Ground litters | ||
植食性 Herbivorous | 跗线螨科 Tarsonemidae | ||
茶跗线螨 Polyphagotarsonemus latus | 99 (0.006) | 23 (0.022) | |
跗线螨科一种 Tarsonemidae sp. | 1 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
细须螨科 Tenuipalpidae | |||
卵形短须螨 Breripalpus obovalus | 15 (0.001) | 8 (0.008) | |
叶螨科 Tetarnychidae | |||
咖啡小爪螨 Oligonychus coffeae | 39 (0.002) | 3 (0.003) | |
瘿螨科 Eriophyidae | |||
茶橙瘿螨 Acaphylla theae | 1,221 (0.071) | 21 (0.020) | |
瘿螨科一种 Eriophyidae sp. 1 | 8 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
瘿螨科一种 Eriophyidae sp. 2 | 1 (0.000) | 0 (0.000) | |
捕食性 Predatory | 大赤螨科 Anystidae | ||
圆果大赤螨 Anystis baccarum | 2,732 (0.158) | 138 (0.133) | |
大赤螨科一种 Anystidae sp. | 730 (0.042) | 10 (0.010) | |
吸螨科 Bdellidae | |||
吸螨科一种 Bdellidae sp. 1 | 2 (0.000) | 0 (0.000) | |
吸螨科一种 Bdellidae sp. 2 | 13 (0.001) | 1 (0.001) | |
腐食性 Saprophagous | 大翼甲螨科 Galumnidae | ||
大翼甲螨科一种 Galumnidae sp. | 11,889 (0.688) | 592 (0.569) | |
待定科 Unknown family | |||
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 1 | 191 (0.011) | 18 (0.017) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 2 | 211 (0.012) | 19 (0.018) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 3 | 37 (0.002) | 35 (0.034) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 4 | 0 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 5 | 1 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 6 | 0 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 7 | 0 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 8 | 9 (0.001) | 115 (0.111) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 9 | 88 (0.005) | 51 (0.049) | |
个体总数 Total individuals | 17,287 | 1,040 | |
物种数 Species number | 18 | 19 |
表1 武夷山茶园螨类群落组成(2006年3月至2008年4月)
Table 1 Composition of mite communities in tea plantations in the Wuyi Mountains, from March 2006 to April 2008
食性 Food-habit | 物种 Species | 个体数 Individuals (Proportion) | |
---|---|---|---|
茶冠层 Tea canopies | 凋落层 Ground litters | ||
植食性 Herbivorous | 跗线螨科 Tarsonemidae | ||
茶跗线螨 Polyphagotarsonemus latus | 99 (0.006) | 23 (0.022) | |
跗线螨科一种 Tarsonemidae sp. | 1 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
细须螨科 Tenuipalpidae | |||
卵形短须螨 Breripalpus obovalus | 15 (0.001) | 8 (0.008) | |
叶螨科 Tetarnychidae | |||
咖啡小爪螨 Oligonychus coffeae | 39 (0.002) | 3 (0.003) | |
瘿螨科 Eriophyidae | |||
茶橙瘿螨 Acaphylla theae | 1,221 (0.071) | 21 (0.020) | |
瘿螨科一种 Eriophyidae sp. 1 | 8 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
瘿螨科一种 Eriophyidae sp. 2 | 1 (0.000) | 0 (0.000) | |
捕食性 Predatory | 大赤螨科 Anystidae | ||
圆果大赤螨 Anystis baccarum | 2,732 (0.158) | 138 (0.133) | |
大赤螨科一种 Anystidae sp. | 730 (0.042) | 10 (0.010) | |
吸螨科 Bdellidae | |||
吸螨科一种 Bdellidae sp. 1 | 2 (0.000) | 0 (0.000) | |
吸螨科一种 Bdellidae sp. 2 | 13 (0.001) | 1 (0.001) | |
腐食性 Saprophagous | 大翼甲螨科 Galumnidae | ||
大翼甲螨科一种 Galumnidae sp. | 11,889 (0.688) | 592 (0.569) | |
待定科 Unknown family | |||
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 1 | 191 (0.011) | 18 (0.017) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 2 | 211 (0.012) | 19 (0.018) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 3 | 37 (0.002) | 35 (0.034) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 4 | 0 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 5 | 1 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 6 | 0 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 7 | 0 (0.000) | 1 (0.001) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 8 | 9 (0.001) | 115 (0.111) | |
甲螨亚目一种 Oribatida sp. 9 | 88 (0.005) | 51 (0.049) | |
个体总数 Total individuals | 17,287 | 1,040 | |
物种数 Species number | 18 | 19 |
附录I 不同处理茶园茶冠层各营养螨类物种丰富度(S)和个体数(N)的时间动态图。
Appendix I Seasonal dynamics of species richness (S) and individuals (N) of different trophic groups of mites in tea canopies against different treatments in tea plantation.
营养类群 Trophic groups | 处理 Treatments | 物种丰富度 Species richness (S) | Shannon-Wiener 多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′) | 有效多样性 指数 Effective diversity index (eH’) | 均匀度指数 Evenness index (E) | 个体数 Individuals (N) | 绝对丰度 Absolute abundance ($\bar{n}$) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茶冠层 Tea canopies | ||||||||
植食螨 Phytophagous mites | PnT | 0.86 ± 0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 1.68 ± 0.13 | 1.30 ± 0.52 | |
CrT | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.66 ± 0.06 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1.62 ± 0.13 | 1.31 ± 0.52 | ||
NGCT | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 1.74 ± 0.14 | 1.33 ± 0.52 | ||
BGT | 0.78 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.16 | 1.36 ± 0.52 | ||
捕食螨 Predatory mites | PnT | 1.85 ± 0.52ab | 1.16 ± 0.51 | 0.94 ± 0.04a | 1.17 ± 0.51 | 6.90 ± 0.15a | 1.63 ± 0.52a | |
CrT | 1.90 ± 0.52a | 1.17 ± 0.51 | 0.98 ± 0.04a | 1.18 ± 0.51 | 7.81 ± 0.15a | 1.64 ± 0.52a | ||
NGCT | 1.71 ± 0.52b | 1.15 ± 0.50 | 0.80 ± 0.05b | 1.16 ± 0.51 | 3.20 ± 0.15b | 1.44 ± 0.52b | ||
BGT | 1.82 ± 0.52ab | 1.17 ± 0.51 | 0.88 ± 0.05ab | 1.18 ± 0.51 | 5.55 ± 0.17a | 1.56 ± 0.52a | ||
腐食螨 Saprophagous mites | PnT | 1.28 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 13.12 ± 0.24 | 0.76 ± 0.07 | |
CrT | 1.29 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 12.80 ± 0.24 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | ||
NGCT | 1.21 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 10.80 ± 0.23 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | ||
BGT | 1.33 ± 0.05 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 11.39 ± 0.22 | 0.72 ± 0.07 | ||
凋落层 Ground litters | ||||||||
植食螨 Phytophagous mites | PnL | 0.19 ± 0.05ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.19 ± 0.05ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.17 ± 0.04ab | 0.02 ± 0.01 | |
CrL | 0.26 ± 0.06a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.05a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.04a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | ||
NGCL | 0.12 ± 0.04b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.04b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.08 ± 0.03b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | ||
BGL | 0.12 ± 0.04b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.11 ± 0.04b | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.03b | 0.01 ± 0.01 | ||
捕食螨 Predatory mites | PnL | 1.41 ± 0.52a | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.42 ± 0.06a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.07a | 0.07 ± 0.02a | |
CrL | 1.38 ± 0.52a | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.39 ± 0.06ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ± 0.06ab | 0.05 ± 0.01ab | ||
NGCL | 1.21 ± 0.51b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.04c | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.04c | 0.01 ± 0.01b | ||
BGL | 1.31 ± 0.52ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.28 ± 0.06b | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.05bc | 0.03 ± 0.01ab | ||
腐食螨 Saprophagous mites | PnL | 1.26 ± 0.08 | 1.22 ± 0.51 | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 1.23 ± 0.51 | 2.94 ± 0.17 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | |
CrL | 1.43 ± 0.07 | 1.24 ± 0.51 | 1.09 ± 0.07 | 1.26 ± 0.51 | 3.42 ± 0.14 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | ||
NGCL | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 1.22 ± 0.51 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 1.24 ± 0.51 | 2.69 ± 0.17 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | ||
BGL | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 1.19 ± 0.51 | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 1.21 ± 0.51 | 2.12 ± 0.17 | 0.23 ± 0.04 |
表2 不同处理茶园茶冠层和凋落层各营养螨类群落特征值(mean ± SE)
Table 2 Diversity indices of different trophic groups of mites in tea canopies and ground litters against different treatments in tea plantation (mean ± SE)
营养类群 Trophic groups | 处理 Treatments | 物种丰富度 Species richness (S) | Shannon-Wiener 多样性指数 Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′) | 有效多样性 指数 Effective diversity index (eH’) | 均匀度指数 Evenness index (E) | 个体数 Individuals (N) | 绝对丰度 Absolute abundance ($\bar{n}$) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茶冠层 Tea canopies | ||||||||
植食螨 Phytophagous mites | PnT | 0.86 ± 0.10 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 1.68 ± 0.13 | 1.30 ± 0.52 | |
CrT | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.66 ± 0.06 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1.62 ± 0.13 | 1.31 ± 0.52 | ||
NGCT | 0.72 ± 0.09 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 1.74 ± 0.14 | 1.33 ± 0.52 | ||
BGT | 0.78 ± 0.08 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 2.20 ± 0.16 | 1.36 ± 0.52 | ||
捕食螨 Predatory mites | PnT | 1.85 ± 0.52ab | 1.16 ± 0.51 | 0.94 ± 0.04a | 1.17 ± 0.51 | 6.90 ± 0.15a | 1.63 ± 0.52a | |
CrT | 1.90 ± 0.52a | 1.17 ± 0.51 | 0.98 ± 0.04a | 1.18 ± 0.51 | 7.81 ± 0.15a | 1.64 ± 0.52a | ||
NGCT | 1.71 ± 0.52b | 1.15 ± 0.50 | 0.80 ± 0.05b | 1.16 ± 0.51 | 3.20 ± 0.15b | 1.44 ± 0.52b | ||
BGT | 1.82 ± 0.52ab | 1.17 ± 0.51 | 0.88 ± 0.05ab | 1.18 ± 0.51 | 5.55 ± 0.17a | 1.56 ± 0.52a | ||
腐食螨 Saprophagous mites | PnT | 1.28 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 13.12 ± 0.24 | 0.76 ± 0.07 | |
CrT | 1.29 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 12.80 ± 0.24 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | ||
NGCT | 1.21 ± 0.05 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 10.80 ± 0.23 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | ||
BGT | 1.33 ± 0.05 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 11.39 ± 0.22 | 0.72 ± 0.07 | ||
凋落层 Ground litters | ||||||||
植食螨 Phytophagous mites | PnL | 0.19 ± 0.05ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.19 ± 0.05ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.17 ± 0.04ab | 0.02 ± 0.01 | |
CrL | 0.26 ± 0.06a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.05a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.04a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | ||
NGCL | 0.12 ± 0.04b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.12 ± 0.04b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.08 ± 0.03b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | ||
BGL | 0.12 ± 0.04b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.11 ± 0.04b | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.03b | 0.01 ± 0.01 | ||
捕食螨 Predatory mites | PnL | 1.41 ± 0.52a | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.42 ± 0.06a | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.07a | 0.07 ± 0.02a | |
CrL | 1.38 ± 0.52a | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.39 ± 0.06ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ± 0.06ab | 0.05 ± 0.01ab | ||
NGCL | 1.21 ± 0.51b | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.04c | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.13 ± 0.04c | 0.01 ± 0.01b | ||
BGL | 1.31 ± 0.52ab | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.28 ± 0.06b | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.05bc | 0.03 ± 0.01ab | ||
腐食螨 Saprophagous mites | PnL | 1.26 ± 0.08 | 1.22 ± 0.51 | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 1.23 ± 0.51 | 2.94 ± 0.17 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | |
CrL | 1.43 ± 0.07 | 1.24 ± 0.51 | 1.09 ± 0.07 | 1.26 ± 0.51 | 3.42 ± 0.14 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | ||
NGCL | 1.16 ± 0.08 | 1.22 ± 0.51 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 1.24 ± 0.51 | 2.69 ± 0.17 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | ||
BGL | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 1.19 ± 0.51 | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 1.21 ± 0.51 | 2.12 ± 0.17 | 0.23 ± 0.04 |
附录II 不同处理茶园凋落层各营养螨类物种丰富度(S)和个体数(N)的时间动态图
Appendix II Seasonal dynamics of species richness (S) and individuals (N) of different trophic groups of mites in ground litters against different treatments in tea plantation.
PnT | CrT | NGCT | BGT | PnL | CrL | NGCL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PnT | |||||||
CrT | 0.87 | ||||||
NGCT | 0.86 | 0.93 | |||||
BGT | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.89 | ||||
PnL | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.74 | |||
CrL | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.85 | ||
NGCL | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.77 | |
BGL | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
表3 不同处理茶园茶冠层和凋落层螨类群落物种组成的相似性系数
Table 3 Similarity for the species composition of mite communities among tea canopies and ground litters against different treatments in tea plantation
PnT | CrT | NGCT | BGT | PnL | CrL | NGCL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PnT | |||||||
CrT | 0.87 | ||||||
NGCT | 0.86 | 0.93 | |||||
BGT | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.89 | ||||
PnL | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.74 | |||
CrL | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.85 | ||
NGCL | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.77 | 0.77 | |
BGL | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
PnT | CrT | NGCT | BGT | PnL | CrL | NGCL | BGL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PnT | 1 | 0.704** | 0.634** | 0.590** | 0.264* | 0.126 | 0.208 | 0.143 |
CrT | 1 | 0.641** | 0.631** | 0.350** | 0.299* | 0.287* | 0.186 | |
NGCT | 1 | 0.608** | 0.404** | 0.331** | 0.437** | 0.143 | ||
BGT | 1 | 0.313** | 0.245* | 0.311** | 0.201 | |||
PnL | 1 | 0.375** | 0.349** | 0.445** | ||||
CrL | 1 | 0.508** | 0.508** | |||||
NGCL | 1 | 0.446** | ||||||
BGL | 1 |
表4 不同处理茶园茶冠层和凋落层螨类群落的相关性
Table 4 Spearman’s rank coefficients of correlation for mite communities among tea canopies and ground litters against different treatments in tea plantation
PnT | CrT | NGCT | BGT | PnL | CrL | NGCL | BGL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PnT | 1 | 0.704** | 0.634** | 0.590** | 0.264* | 0.126 | 0.208 | 0.143 |
CrT | 1 | 0.641** | 0.631** | 0.350** | 0.299* | 0.287* | 0.186 | |
NGCT | 1 | 0.608** | 0.404** | 0.331** | 0.437** | 0.143 | ||
BGT | 1 | 0.313** | 0.245* | 0.311** | 0.201 | |||
PnL | 1 | 0.375** | 0.349** | 0.445** | ||||
CrL | 1 | 0.508** | 0.508** | |||||
NGCL | 1 | 0.446** | ||||||
BGL | 1 |
图2 不同处理茶园茶冠层(A)和凋落层(B)螨类的优势种个体数。同组图后附不同字母者表示差异显著(P < 0.05); 符号代表含义同表2。
Fig. 2 Individual number of dominant mite species in tea canopies (A) or ground litters (B) against different treatments in tea plantation. Within each bar clusters, different letters show significant difference at P = 0.05 level. The meaning of symbols is given in Table 2.
[1] | Bell NL, Willoughby BE (2003) A review of the role of predatory mites in the biological control of lucerne flea, Sminthurus viridis (L.) (Collembola: Sminthuridae) and their potential use in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 46, 141-146. |
[2] |
Berger WH, Parker FL (1970) Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168, 1345-1347.
DOI URL PMID |
[3] | Chen HJ (陈汉杰), Zhang JY (张金勇), Chen DY (陈冬亚), Guo XH (郭小辉), Wei GH (韦国华), Duan CG (段成钢) (2005) Investigation on effects of growing green manure crops in an apple orchard on the population of natural enemies in spring. Journal of Fruit Science (果树学报), 22, 419-421. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[4] | Chen ZM (陈宗懋), Chen XF (陈雪芬) (1999) Plant protection in the sustainable development of tea industry. Journal of Tea Science (茶叶科学), 19, 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[5] | Czekanowski J (1913) Zarys Metod Statystycnck. Warsaw: E. Wendego. See also: (1922) Coefficient of racial likeness and durchschnittliche Differenz. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 9, 227-249. (in Polish) |
[6] | Dai X (戴轩) (2006) Investigation on soil Oribatida in tea garden of east Guizhou (Oribatida). Journal of Guizhou Tea (贵州茶叶), (4), 16-18, 26. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[7] | Dai X (戴轩) (2007) The ecological distribution of soil mites in tea garden in Guizhou. Journal of Guizhou Tea (贵州茶叶) (3), 19-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[8] | Ding YQ (丁岩钦) (1994) Mathematic Ecology in Entomology (昆虫数学生态学), pp. 442-454. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese) |
[9] | Dong CS (董成森), Xiao RL (肖润林), Peng WX (彭晚霞), Peng PQ (彭佩钦) (2006) Ecological and economic effects of tea-Chinese fir complex plantation in hilly red soil of subtropical region. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (中国生态农业学报), 14, 198-202. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[10] | Du XG (杜相革), Yan YH (严毓骅) (1995) Manipulating the ground cover of apple orchard to increase the number of Orius sauteri in apple trees. Chinese Journal of Biological Control (中国生物防治), 11, 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[11] | Hamasaki RT, Shimabuku R, Nakamoto ST (2008) Guide to Insect and Mite Pests of Tea (Camellia sinensis) in Hawai’i, pp. 1-15. University of Hawaii, Honolulu. |
[12] | Han BY (韩宝瑜) (2005) Differences in composition and dynamic of insect and mite community among three types of tea gardens. Journal of Tea Science (茶叶科学), 25, 249-254. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[13] | Han BY (韩宝瑜), Cui L (崔林), Huang CF (黄从富) (2007) A comparison of characteristics of community of arthropod in tea garden with those in chestnut and pear gardens in coastland of Ningbo. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Univer- sity (安徽农业大学学报), 34, 391-395. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[14] | Hu XN (胡学难), Li XP (李小平), Zhi JR (郅军锐) (1993) Influence of planting Ageratum conyzoides to capture mite Panonychus citri in the citrus orchard. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences (贵州农业科学), (4), 36, 30. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[15] | Jiang GZ (蒋光藻), Tan HP (谭和平), Huang P (黄苹) (2003) Relationship between tea and fruit trees inter-planting and yellow mite damage in tea fields. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences (西南农业学报), 16, 71-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[16] | Kim DI, Lee SC, Kim SS (1996) Biological characteristics of Amblyseius womersleyi Schicha (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) as a predator of Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Korean Journal of Entomology, 35, 38-44. |
[17] | Kim SY, Jung C, Lee JH (2005) Overwintering mite diversity and their habitats in apple and pear orchards of Korea with emphasis on Phytoseiidae and Tetranychidae. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 8, 87-91. |
[18] | Li LS (李隆术), Li YR (李云瑞) (1988) Acapology (蜱螨学). Chongqing Publishing House, Chongqing. (in Chinese) |
[19] | Lu XY (卢向阳), Xu J (徐筠), Li QY (李青元) (2008) Impact of Lolium perenne planted in chestnut orchards and its mowing methods on population densities of Oligonychus ununguis and its natural enemy Amblyseius castaneae. Chinese Journal of Biological Control (中国生物防治), 24, 108-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[20] | Mai XH (麦秀慧), Li SX (李树新), Xiong JJ (熊锦君), Zheng DS (郑德胜), Huang MD (黄明度), Situ J (司徒金) (1984) Studies on the relationship between the ecological factors and population of predaceous mite and its utilization for the control of citrus red mite. Journal of Plant Protection (植物保护学报), 11, 29-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[21] | Mukhopadhyay A, Khewa S, De D (2007) A report on occurrence of a new defoliator of tea Arctornis submar- ginata (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Lymentriidae) from Darjee- ling Terai with notes on its life history performance. Insect Environment, 13, 53-54. |
[22] | Mukhopadhyay A, Roy S (2009) Changing diminutions of IPM in the tea plantations of the north eastern sub Himalayan region. In: Proceedings of National Symposium on IPM Strategies to Combat Emerging Pest in the Current Scenario of Climate Change (eds Ramamurthy VV, Gupta GP), pp. 290-302. Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Aruna- chal Pradesh, India. |
[23] | Muraleedharan N, Radhakrishnan B, Devadas V (1988) Vertical distribution of three species of eriophyid mites on tea in south India. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 4, 359-364. |
[24] | Pielou EC (1977) Mathematical Ecology, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York. |
[25] | Pratt PD, Coombs EM, Croft BA (2003) Predation by phytoseiid mites on Tetranychus lintearius (Acari: Tetranychidae), an established weed biological control agent of gorse (Ulex europaeus). Biological Control 26, 40-47. |
[26] | Ricklefs RE, Miller GL (2000) Ecology, p. 822. Freeman, New York. |
[27] | Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. |
[28] | Song TQ (宋同清), Wang KL (王克林), Peng WX (彭晚霞), Wang JR (王久荣), Xiao RL (肖润林), Zeng FP (曾馥平), Tang Y (汤宇) (2006) Ecological effects of intercropping white clover on tea plantation in a subtropical hilly region. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 26, 3647-3655. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[29] | SPSS Statistics (2009) SPSS Statistics 17.0. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL. |
[30] | Wang DP (王大平) (2000) Effects of different ration of cover crop on community composition of pestmites and natural enemies in apple orchards. Journal of Southwest Nation- alities College (Nature Science Edition) (西南民族学院学报(自然科学版)), 26, 314-318. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[31] | Wang GH (王国华), Liang YF (梁远发), Tian YH (田永辉), Wang JL (王家伦), Zhou GL (周国兰) (2004) Effect of chemical insecticides on the diversity of arthropods in tea garden. Journal of Tea Science (茶叶科学), 24, 99-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[32] | Wang J (王军), Yao HY (姚海元), Mai JW (麦俊伟), Zhang WQ (张维球), Tong XL (童晓立) (2008) Community structure and its seasonal change of litter invertebrates in Changgangshan Natural Reserve of Guangzhou, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 27, 408-413. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[33] | Wang YG (汪云刚), Li LJ (李良静), Ran LX (冉隆珣), Yu XS (玉香甩), Wu WW (吴文伟), Han BY (韩宝瑜), Li ZM (李忠美) (2010) Investigation on population dynamics of Empoasca vitis (Gothe) of different planting patterns. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences (西南农业学报), 23, 413-415. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[34] | Wei DY (韦党扬), Zhao Q (赵琦), Zhu XH (朱兴辉), Zhang CP (张成萍) (1991) Observation on the effect of controlling the mite by interplanting of Huoxiangji in the orange orchard. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences (贵州农业科学), 4, 6, 13. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[35] | Yan YH (严毓骅), Duan JJ (段建军) (1986) Some obser- vations on biological control of apple tree spider mites. I. Preliminary report on the conservation and augmentation of natural enemies by cover cropping in apple orchards. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica (华北农学报), 1, 98-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[36] | Yan YH (严毓骅), Duan JJ (段建军) (1988) The effect of cover cropping in apple orchards on the predator community on the apple tree. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica (植物保护学报), 15, 23-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[37] | Yang DP (杨东鹏), Du XG (杜相革), Dong M (董民), Huang ZE (黄正恩), Huang SF (黄上芬), Ye JP (叶靖平), Wang HH (汪衡辉) (2004) Study on the occurrence regulation and control technology of the main diseases and pest in organic tea orchard in Baise. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin (中国农学通报), 20(2), 56-58. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[38] | Yang YJ (杨亚军) (2005) Tea Planting Science in China (中国茶树栽培学). Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai. (in Chinese) |
[39] | Yi L (易兰), You WH (由文辉) (2006) Influences of changes of environmental factors on soil animal community in the succession of the vegetation in Tiantong. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science) (华东师范大学学报(自然科学版)), (6), 109-116. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[40] | You MS, Vasseur L, Régnière J, Zheng YK (2009) The three dimensions of species diversity. The Open Conservation Biology Journal, 3, 82-88. |
[41] | Zhang YX (张艳璇), Lin JZ (林坚贞), Ji J (季洁), Hou AP (侯爱平) (2000) Function of predatory mite and approach of its industrialization. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences (福建农业学报), 15, 185-187. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[42] | Zhang YX, Zhang ZQ, Lin JZ, Cheng X (2001) Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a biocontrol agent against Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) on citrus in China. Systematic and Applied Acarology, (6), 35-44. |
[43] | Zhao BG (赵白鸽), Yan YH (严毓骅), Duan JJ (段建军) (1993) Analysis on the ecological effect of control of predacious complex on spider mites from vegetation diversity in apple orchard. Nature Enemies of Insects (昆虫天敌), 15, 22-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[44] | Zhao ZM (赵志模), Guo YQ (郭依泉) (1990) Principle and Method of Community Ecology (群落生态学原理与方法). Chongqing Branch of Scientific and Technical Documentation Press, Chongqing. (in Chinese) |
[45] | Zhou CA (周程爱), Zou JJ (邹建椈), Huang SD (黄绍东) (1994) The effects of Ageratum interplantation in hilly citrus orchard in Hunan Province on citrus mite and insect populations. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica (植物保护学报), 21, 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 高梅香, 林琳, 常亮, 孙新, 刘冬, 吴东辉. 土壤动物群落空间格局和构建机制研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(10): 1034-1050. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
备案号:京ICP备16067583号-7
Copyright © 2022 版权所有 《生物多样性》编辑部
地址: 北京香山南辛村20号, 邮编:100093
电话: 010-62836137, 62836665 E-mail: biodiversity@ibcas.ac.cn