北京翠湖湿地公园建园初期的步甲多样性

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.06257

生物多样性 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (3): 363-368. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.06257

所属专题：昆虫多样性与生态功能

北京翠湖湿地公园建园初期的步甲多样性

苏芝敏¹^,³, 黄顶成¹^,³, 张润志¹^,²^,^*()

1 (中国科学院动物进化与系统学重点实验室, 中国科学院动物研究所, 北京 100101)
2 (中国科学院动物研究所农业虫害鼠害综合治理研究国家重点实验室, 北京 100101)
3 (中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049)

收稿日期:2010-10-27 接受日期:2010-12-23 出版日期:2011-05-20 发布日期:2013-12-10
通讯作者: 张润志
作者简介:*E-mail:zhangrz@ioz.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院创新方向性项目(KSCX2-YW-N-042);国家基础科学人才培养基金动物分类特殊学科点项目(J0930004)

Diversity of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at Cuihu, a newly- built urban wetland park in Beijing

Zhimin Su¹^,³, Dingcheng Huang¹^,³, Runzhi Zhang¹^,²^,^*()

1 CAS Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
2 State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101
3 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2010-10-27 Accepted:2010-12-23 Online:2011-05-20 Published:2013-12-10
Contact: Runzhi Zhang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨城市湿地公园在城市化过程中对生物多样性的保育作用, 于2006-2008年采用陷阱法调查了2002年北京新建的翠湖湿地公园内杨树林、柏树林、混合林、小檗丛和芦苇荡5种植被类型中的步甲多样性。共调查到步甲18属30种441头。步甲物种数和个体数均随建园时间的增加而呈现快速增加的趋势。在5种植被类型中, 每种类型均有25%左右的步甲物种(3-4种)是其他类型中所未捕获的。杨树林中的步甲物种数和个体数最多, 且随时间的增加幅度最大, 趋势最明显。这些结果表明, 城市湿地对步甲多样性具有一定的保育功能, 可在一定程度上缓解城市化对步甲多样性的负面影响。根据上述结果, 我们建议在城市湿地公园建设之初, 可考虑先种杨树等植物; 同时适当增加植被多样性, 将有利于其步甲多样性保育功能的最大化。

关键词: 湿地公园, 步甲, 城市化, 生物多样性, 北京

Abstract

To evaluate the potential role of an urban wetland park in conserving biodiversity during urbanization, we studied ground beetle (Carabidae) diversity using pitfall traps in five vegetation types, i.e., poplar, cypress, mixed forest, barberry scrub, and reed beds, within a newly-built urban wetland park, Cuihu Wetland Park in Beijing, for three years. A total of 441 individuals representing 30 species and 18 genera of carabid beetles were captured. Carabid species richness and abundance both sharply increased with park age. For each of the five vegetation types, approximately 25% of their carabid species (3-4 species) were unique and were not detected in other types. Poplar forest exhibited the highest abundance and richness of carabid species and showed the strongest increasing trend through time. Our results suggested a significant role of urban wetland parks in the conservation of carabid beetle diversity in the process of urbanization. In order to maximize their conservation value, they should be revegetated by a diversity of plants while using poplars as pioneers.

Key words: wetland park, carabid beetles, urbanization, biodiversity, Beijing

苏芝敏, 黄顶成, 张润志 (2011) 北京翠湖湿地公园建园初期的步甲多样性. 生物多样性, 19, 363-368. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.06257.

Zhimin Su, Dingcheng Huang, Runzhi Zhang (2011) Diversity of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at Cuihu, a newly- built urban wetland park in Beijing. Biodiversity Science, 19, 363-368. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.06257.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.06257

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2011/V19/I3/363

图/表 5

参考文献 29

[1]	Ahrné K, Bengtsson J, Elmqvist T (2009) Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. PLoS ONE, 4, e5574. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005574
[2]	Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation, 80, 113-125.
[3]	Chao LM (潮洛蒙) (2002) Ecological function and social effect of Beijing urban wetland. Beijing Landscape Architecture (北京园林), 18(4), 17-20. (in Chinese)
[4]	Chao LM (潮洛蒙), Li XL (李小凌), Yu KJ (俞孔坚) (2003) The ecological function and sustainable utilization of urban wetland. Urban Problems (城市问题), (3), 9-12. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	Chen B (陈波), Bao ZY (包志毅) (2003) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity in urban and suburban parks. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 11, 169-176. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Colwell RK (2009) Estimate S 8.2 User’s Guide. http://viceroy. eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
[7]	Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. BioScience, 50, 593-601.
[8]	Denys C, Schmidt H (1998) Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient. Oecologia, 113, 269-277. DOI URL PMID
[9]	Elek Z, Lövei GL (2007) Patterns in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. Acta Oecologica, 32, 104-111.
[10]	Fattorini S (2011) Insect extinction by urbanization: a long term study in Rome. Biological Conservation, 144, 370-375.
[11]	Gao GC (高光彩), Fu BQ (付必谦) (2009) Advances of researches on carabid beetles as bioindicators. Chinese Bulletin of Entomology (昆虫知识), 46, 216-222. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Gaston K, Smith R, Thompson K, Warren P (2005) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 395-413.
[13]	Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756-760. DOI URL PMID
[14]	Harvey JA, van der Putten WH, Turin H, Wagenaar R, Bezemer TM (2008) Effects of changes in plant species richness and community traits on carabid assemblages and feeding guilds. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 127, 100-106.
[15]	He SA (贺善安), Xia B (夏冰), Qian JQ (钱俊秋) (1999) Botanical garden and biodiversity protection and utilization in cities. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment (植物资源与环境), 8, 47-51. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	Huang D, Su Z, Zhang R, Koh LP (2010) Degree of urbanization influences the persistence of Dorytomus weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidae) in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96, 163-171.
[17]	Li ZG (李志刚), Zhang BS (张碧胜), Gong PB (龚鹏博), Li J (李军), Zhai X (翟欣), Han SC (韩诗畴) (2009) Urbanization and butterfly diversity: a case study in Guangzhou, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 29, 3911-3918. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Magura T, Lövei GL, Tóthmérész B (2010) Does urbanization decrease diversity in ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblages? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 19, 16-26.
[19]	McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience, 52, 883-890.
[20]	Niemelä J (2001) Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and habitat fragmentation: a review. European Journal of Entomology, 98, 127-132.
[21]	Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence J, Hartley D, de Oca EM (2002) Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landscape Ecology, 17, 387-401.
[22]	Öckinger E, Dannestam Å, Smith HG (2009) The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93, 31-37.
[23]	Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003) Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 487-506.
[24]	Su Z, Zhang R, Qiu J (2011) Decline in the diversity of willow trunk-dwelling weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) as a result of urban expansion in Beijing, China. Journal of Insect Conservation, 15, 367-377.
[25]	Wang Y (王玉), Gao GC (高光彩), Fu BQ (付必谦), Wu Z (吴专) (2009) Composition and spatial distribution pattern of ground-dwelling beetle communities in Yeyahu Wetland, Beijing. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 17, 30-42. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	You P (尤平), Li HH (李后魂), Wang SX (王淑霞) (2006) The diversity of the moth community in the north Dagang Wetland Nature Reserve, Tianjin. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 26, 999-1004. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]	Yu XD, Luo TH, Zhou HZ (2010) Distribution of ground-dwelling beetle assemblages (Coleoptera) across ecotones between natural oak forests and mature pine plantations in North China. Journal of Insect Conservation, 14, 617-626.
[28]	Yu XD (于晓东), Luo TH (罗天宏), Zhou HZ (周红章), Yang J (杨建) (2006) Influence of edge effect on diversity of ground-dwelling beetles across a forest-grassland ecotone in Wolong Natural Reserve, Southwest China. Acta Entomologica Sinica (昆虫学报), 49, 277-286. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	Zhong YX (仲雨霞), Fu BQ (付必谦) (2007) Preliminary analysis on composition features of insect community in Baihe River Wetland, Beijing in summer. Journal of Capital Normal University (Natural Science Edition)(首都师范大学学报(自然科学版)), 104, 71-77. (in Chinese with English abstract)

物种 Species	个体数 Individual number			总个体数 Total	比例 (%)
物种 Species	2006	2007	2008	总个体数 Total	比例 (%)
普暗步甲 Amara communis	1			1	0.2
巨短胸步甲 A. gigantea			2	2	0.5
大背短胸步甲 A. macronota			1	1	0.2
小边捷步甲 Badister marginellus			4	4	0.9
光胸怠步甲 Bradycellus laevicollis	1			1	0.2
类丽步甲 Callistomimus modestus			3	3	0.7
宽边青步甲 Chlaenius circumductus		1		1	0.2
黄斑青步甲 C. micans		2	2	4	0.9
淡足青步甲 C. pallipes	1			1	0.2
黄胸丽步甲 C. pericallus	1			1	0.2
异角青步甲 C. variicornis			1	1	0.2
逗斑青步甲 C. virgulifer	2	1	2	5	1.1
赤胸步甲 Dolichus halensis	11	10	1	22	5.0
棒婪步甲 Harpalus bungii	11	13	26	50	11.3
强婪步甲 H. crates		5	5	10	2.3
毛婪步甲 H. griseus	3	3	4	10	2.3
微婪步甲 H. microdemas	1			1	0.2
黄鞘婪步甲 H. pallidipennis	11	19	29	59	13.4
长毛跗步甲 Lachnocrepis prolixa		1		1	0.2
大劫步甲 Lesticus magnus			1	1	0.2
大彩步甲 Mastax thermarum	88	1	87	176	39.9
大狭步甲 Oxycentrus melas	1		4	5	1.1
四斑偏须步甲 Panagaeus davidi	1			1	0.2
黄毛角胸步甲 Peronomerus auripilis		1		1	0.2
爪哇屁步甲 Pheropsophus javanus			1	1	0.2
耶屁步甲 P. jessoensis	1			1	0.2
小头通缘步甲 Pterostichus microcephalus	1		45	46	10.4
单齿蝼步甲 Scarites terricola	7	10	7	24	5.4
淡足曲缘步甲 Syntomus pallipes	1	2	3	6	1.4
小步甲属一种 Tachys sp.	1			1	0.2
总个体数 Total	144	69	228	441	100.0
物种数 Species number	18	13	19	30

物种 Species	个体数 Individual number			总个体数 Total	比例 (%)
物种 Species	2006	2007	2008	总个体数 Total	比例 (%)
普暗步甲 Amara communis	1			1	0.2
巨短胸步甲 A. gigantea			2	2	0.5
大背短胸步甲 A. macronota			1	1	0.2
小边捷步甲 Badister marginellus			4	4	0.9
光胸怠步甲 Bradycellus laevicollis	1			1	0.2
类丽步甲 Callistomimus modestus			3	3	0.7
宽边青步甲 Chlaenius circumductus		1		1	0.2
黄斑青步甲 C. micans		2	2	4	0.9
淡足青步甲 C. pallipes	1			1	0.2
黄胸丽步甲 C. pericallus	1			1	0.2
异角青步甲 C. variicornis			1	1	0.2
逗斑青步甲 C. virgulifer	2	1	2	5	1.1
赤胸步甲 Dolichus halensis	11	10	1	22	5.0
棒婪步甲 Harpalus bungii	11	13	26	50	11.3
强婪步甲 H. crates		5	5	10	2.3
毛婪步甲 H. griseus	3	3	4	10	2.3
微婪步甲 H. microdemas	1			1	0.2
黄鞘婪步甲 H. pallidipennis	11	19	29	59	13.4
长毛跗步甲 Lachnocrepis prolixa		1		1	0.2
大劫步甲 Lesticus magnus			1	1	0.2
大彩步甲 Mastax thermarum	88	1	87	176	39.9
大狭步甲 Oxycentrus melas	1		4	5	1.1
四斑偏须步甲 Panagaeus davidi	1			1	0.2
黄毛角胸步甲 Peronomerus auripilis		1		1	0.2
爪哇屁步甲 Pheropsophus javanus			1	1	0.2
耶屁步甲 P. jessoensis	1			1	0.2
小头通缘步甲 Pterostichus microcephalus	1		45	46	10.4
单齿蝼步甲 Scarites terricola	7	10	7	24	5.4
淡足曲缘步甲 Syntomus pallipes	1	2	3	6	1.4
小步甲属一种 Tachys sp.	1			1	0.2
总个体数 Total	144	69	228	441	100.0
物种数 Species number	18	13	19	30

植被类型 Vegetation	物种数 Species number	独有物种数^a Sole species number	个体数/50 traps Individual number per 50 traps
小檗丛 Barberry scrub	13	3	36.8
柏树林 Cypress forest	12	3	80.0
混合林 Mixed forest	11	3	22.7
杨树林 Poplar forest	15	4	126.2
芦苇荡 Reedbeds	14	4	34.4
合计 Total	30	17	300.1

植被类型 Vegetation	物种数 Species number	独有物种数^a Sole species number	个体数/50 traps Individual number per 50 traps
小檗丛 Barberry scrub	13	3	36.8
柏树林 Cypress forest	12	3	80.0
混合林 Mixed forest	11	3	22.7
杨树林 Poplar forest	15	4	126.2
芦苇荡 Reedbeds	14	4	34.4
合计 Total	30	17	300.1

物种 Species	植被类型数 Number of vegetation type	个体数/50 traps Individual number per 50 traps
棒婪步甲 Harpalus bungii	5	39.1
强婪步甲 H. crates	5	8.9
黄鞘婪步甲 H. pallidipennis	5	46.7
单齿蝼步甲 Scarites terricola	5	17.7
赤胸步甲 Dolichus halensis	4	12.7
毛婪步甲 H. griseus	4	7.0
大彩步甲 Mastax thermarum	4	98.9
小边捷步甲 Badister marginellus	3	3.4
黄斑青步甲 Chlaenius micans	3	3.5
逗斑青步甲 C. virgulifer	3	3.1
小头通缘步甲 Pterostichus microcephalus	3	37.8
淡足曲缘步甲 Syntomus pallipes	3	4.5

北京翠湖湿地公园建园初期的步甲多样性

Diversity of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at Cuihu, a newly- built urban wetland park in Beijing

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何智荣, 吴思雨, 时莹莹, 王雨婷, 江艺欣, 张春娜, 赵娜, 王苏盆. 壶菌及其感染对两栖动物种群影响的研究现状与挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23274-.
[2]	彭昀月, 靳彤, 张小全. 生物多样性信用的概念、原则、交易和挑战[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23300-.
[3]	吴相獐, 雷富民, 单壹壹, 于晶. 上海城市公园苔藓植物多样性分布格局及其环境影响因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(2): 23364-0.
[4]	张飞飞, 杨天凤, 陈莉荣, 刘冬梅, 杨柳园, 杨杜宇, 鞠鹏, 陆露. 被子植物花粉颜色多样性及应用研究进展[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23346-.
[5]	刘昱齐, 刘晶岚, 樊晓丽, 胡宜深, 郭鸿筱, 薛凡. 鸟鸣多样性感知与声景感知恢复性: 鸟鸣音频和科普的干预[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23230-.
[6]	韩丽霞, 王永健, 刘宣. 外来物种入侵与本土物种分布区扩张的异同[J]. 生物多样性, 2024, 32(1): 23396-.
[7]	陈进. 《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》与国家植物园体系建设[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23257-.
[8]	冯晨, 张洁, 黄宏文. 统筹植物就地保护与迁地保护的解决方案: 植物并地保护(parallel situ conservation)[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23184-.
[9]	陈慧妹, 李文军, 邱娟, 马占仓, 李波, 杨宗宗, 闻志彬, 孟岩, 曹秋梅, 邱东, 刘丹辉, 金光照. 新疆野生维管植物名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(9): 23124-.
[10]	罗正明, 刘晋仙, 张变华, 周妍英, 郝爱华, 杨凯, 柴宝峰. 不同退化阶段亚高山草甸土壤原生生物群落多样性特征及驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23136-.
[11]	邓晶, 李艺, 侯一蕾. 城市生物多样性保护: 基于中欧对比视角下的经验借鉴[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23070-.
[12]	董廷玮, 黄美玲, 韦旭, 马硕, 岳衢, 刘文丽, 郑佳鑫, 王刚, 马蕊, 丁由中, 薄顺奇, 王正寰. 上海地区金线侧褶蛙种群的潜在空间分布格局及其景观连通性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22692-.
[13]	杜红. “物种”与“个体”: 究竟谁是生物多样性保护的恰当对象?[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23140-.
[14]	朱旭, 李嘉奇. 全球协同落实《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》的挑战与出路: 基于SFIC模型的分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23167-.
[15]	邢超, 林依, 周智强, 赵联军, 蒋仕伟, 林蓁蓁, 徐基良, 詹祥江. 基于DNA条形码技术构建王朗国家级自然保护区陆生脊椎动物遗传资源数据库及物种鉴定[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22661-.