中国-喜马拉雅三种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间分布预测

doi:10.17520/biods.2020268

生物多样性 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 759-769. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020268

所属专题：传粉生物学；昆虫多样性与生态功能

• 研究报告: 动物多样性 • 上一篇下一篇

中国-喜马拉雅三种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间分布预测

施雨含¹^,², 任宗昕¹, 王维嘉¹^,², 徐鑫¹^,², 刘杰¹, 赵延会¹, 王红¹^,^*()

1.中国科学院昆明植物研究所东亚植物多样性与生物地理学重点实验室, 昆明 650201
2.中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2020-07-03 接受日期:2020-08-26 出版日期:2021-06-20 发布日期:2020-09-20
通讯作者: 王红
作者简介:* E-mail: wanghong@mail.kib.ac.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院先导专项B项目(XDB31000000);国家自然科学基金-云南省联合重点基金(U1502261)

Predicting the spatial distribution of three Astragalusspecies and their pollinating bumblebees in the Sino-Himalayas

Yuhan Shi¹^,², Zongxin Ren¹, Weijia Wang¹^,², Xin Xu¹^,², Jie Liu¹, Yanhui Zhao¹, Hong Wang¹^,^*()

1 CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received:2020-07-03 Accepted:2020-08-26 Online:2021-06-20 Published:2020-09-20
Contact: Hong Wang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

依赖于动物传粉获得繁殖成功的植物的分布与其传粉动物的地理分布有着密切联系。预测未来气候变化对植物及其传粉动物地理分布的影响对生物多样性保护具有重要意义。本文通过对中国-喜马拉雅3种黄耆属(Astragalus)植物, 即弯齿黄耆(A. camptodontus)、黑毛黄耆(A. pullus)和笔直黄耆(A. strictus), 及其传粉熊蜂(Bombus)的野外调查, 以及收集来源于数据库的黄耆和熊蜂的543个物种分布点和13个环境因子数据, 结合物种可能出现的完全扩散、不扩散和仅熊蜂扩散3种迁移模式, 利用MaxEnt模型模拟了3种黄耆属植物与2种传粉熊蜂即橘尾熊蜂(Bombus friseanus)和红束熊蜂(B. rufofasciatus)在历史阶段(1970-2000年)和2100年两种温室气体浓度情景(ssp245和ssp585)下的适宜分布区变化。结果表明: 3种黄耆属植物均主要依赖于熊蜂传粉, 黄耆与其传粉熊蜂的主要适宜分布区为中国-喜马拉雅地区, 到2100年它们的分布区呈现向西北方向扩张的趋势, 而在东南部的分布区减少。当模型中考虑与传粉熊蜂的互作后, 3种黄耆属植物的潜在地理分布范围减少了15.83%-83.98%。在温室气体中低浓度情景(ssp245)下, 3种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间匹配增加, 而在高浓度情景(ssp585)下弯齿黄耆、黑毛黄耆与橘尾熊蜂的空间匹配降低; 如果物种不扩散或仅熊蜂扩散, 笔直黄耆与红束熊蜂的空间匹配降低。气候变化和物种的扩散能力可能引起黄耆与其传粉熊蜂出现空间不匹配。同时, 模型预测显示影响黄耆和熊蜂分布的环境因子不同, 但海拔是最主要的环境因子。由于与传粉者的相互作用对许多植物物种的生命周期具有重要意义, 因而本研究可以更好地理解气候变化对植物与其传粉者空间分布的潜在影响, 特别是对那些地理范围受限制的植物。

关键词: 黄耆属, 传粉熊蜂, 空间分布, 气候变化, 最大熵模型, 环境因子

Abstract

Aims: The spatial distribution for plant species that rely on animal pollination for reproduction is influenced by the geographical distribution of their pollinators. Predicting the impact that future climate change will have on the geographical distribution of plants and their pollinators is significantly important for the conservation of biodiversity.

Methods: In this study, we conducted a field investigation to map out the distribution for three Astragalus species (A. camptodontus, A. pullus, andA. strictus) and their dominant pollinating bumblebees (Bombus). We collected 543 species distribution points for Astragalusand Bombusas well as 13 environmental factors from online database. Using the MaxEnt, we simulated suitable distribution changes for the three Astragalus species and two species of bumblebees (B. friseanusandB. rufofasciatus) under two climate change scenarios for 2100 (ssp245 and ssp585). We also combined with three possible migration situations into the models, i.e. full dispersal, no dispersal and only Bombus dispersal.

Results: We found that three Astragalusspecies are mainly pollinated by bumblebees and the most suitable distribution for Astragalus and Bombusis the Sino-Himalayas. It is predicted that by 2100, their suitable distribution will expand northwest, while distribution areas in the southeast will decrease. When the plant-pollinator interaction was included in the models, potential range size of the three Astragalusspecies was reduced by 15.83%-83.98%. Under low-emissions scenario (ssp245), the spatial match of three Astragalus species and their pollinating bumblebees is predicted to increase. However, under a high-emissions scenario (ssp585) the spatial match of A. camptodontus, A. pullusand their dominated pollinators B. friseanusis predicted to decrease. If species lack full dispersal ability or only Bombus disperse, the spatial match of A. strictusand its dominated pollinators B. rufofasciatusis predicted to decrease. Climate change and species dispersal ability may cause spatial mismatch between the Astragalusand their pollinating bumblebees. Our simulation shows that the environmental factors affecting the distribution of Astragalus and Bombus are different, but elevation is the most important factor.

Conclusion: Given the importance of pollinators for the life cycle of many plant species, our study could be used to better understand the potential effects of climate change on the spatial distribution of plants and their pollinators, particularly on species that with limited geographical range.

Key words: Astragalus, pollinating bumblebees, spatial distribution, climate change, MaxEnt model, environmental factors

施雨含, 任宗昕, 王维嘉, 徐鑫, 刘杰, 赵延会, 王红 (2021) 中国-喜马拉雅三种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间分布预测. 生物多样性, 29, 759-769. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020268.

Yuhan Shi, Zongxin Ren, Weijia Wang, Xin Xu, Jie Liu, Yanhui Zhao, Hong Wang (2021) Predicting the spatial distribution of three Astragalusspecies and their pollinating bumblebees in the Sino-Himalayas. Biodiversity Science, 29, 759-769. DOI: 10.17520/biods.2020268.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/10.17520/biods.2020268

https://www.biodiversity-science.net/CN/Y2021/V29/I6/759

图/表 7

图1 3种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的地理分布点

Fig. 1 Occurrence points of three Astragalusspecies and their pollinating bumblebees

表1 MaxEnt模型结果的受试者工作特征曲线下面积AUC值、真实技巧统计值TSS值和cloglog阈值(TH)

Table1 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), true skill statistic (TSS) and cloglog threshold (TH) of MaxEnt

物种 Species	AUC ± SD	TSS ± SD	阈值 Cloglog threshold (TH ± SD)
弯齿黄耆 Astragalus camptodontus	0.996 ± 0.001	0.93 ± 0.02	0.37 ± 0.16
黑毛黄耆 Astragalus pullus	0.992 ± 0.001	0.91 ± 0.02	0.33 ± 0.11
笔直黄耆 Astragalus strictus	0.960 ± 0.003	0.85 ± 0.01	0.34 ± 0.03
橘尾熊蜂 Bombus friseanus	0.991 ± 0.001	0.88 ± 0.01	0.39 ± 0.07
红束熊蜂 Bombus rufofasciatus	0.985 ± 0.002	0.87 ± 0.01	0.32 ± 0.06

图2 3种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂在历史阶段(1970-2000年)的适宜分布区和在2100 (2081-2100年)两种情景(ssp245和ssp585)下的分布变化

Fig. 2 Suitable distribution of three Astragalus species and their pollinating bumblebees at near current (1970-2000) and spatial change at 2100 (2081-2100) two scenarios (ssp245 and ssp585)

图3 3种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂在历史阶段(1970-2000年)和在2100 (2081-2100年)两种情景(ssp245和ssp585)下的空间匹配变化。图中黑色部分表示在黄耆分布的区域其传粉者也存在的区域, 灰色部分表示仅黄耆分布的区域。

Fig. 3 Change of spatial match of three Astragalusspecies and their pollinating bumblebees at near current (1970-2000) and at 2100 (2081-2100) two scenarios (ssp245 and ssp585). The black part indicates the area where the pollinator also exists in the plant distributions and the grey part indicates the area where only plants are distributed.

表2 在未来气候变化情景下3种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间匹配范围(SMR)变化百分比。第一列值表示在历史气候情景下(1970-2000年) 3种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的SMR。

Table 2 Percentage change in spatially matched range of three Astragalusspecies and their pollinating bumblebees in the future climate change scenario. First column values indicate the spatially matched range of three Astragalus species and their pollinating bumblebees at near current (1970-2000).

物种 Species (Astragalus × pollinators)	空间匹配范围SMR (×10⁵km²)	SMR变化百分比 Percentage change in spatially matched range (%)
	空间匹配范围SMR (×10⁵km²)	完全扩散 Full dispersal		不扩散 No dispersal		仅熊蜂扩散 OnlyBombusdispersal
	历史阶段 Near current	ssp245	ssp585	ssp245	ssp585	ssp245	ssp585
弯齿黄耆 ×橘尾熊蜂 Astragalus camptodontus ×Bombus friseanus	1.92	74.61	114.70	-12.09	-25.94	-11.53	-24.56
黑毛黄耆 ×橘尾熊蜂 Astragalus pullus × Bombus friseanus	2.96	29.70	65.46	-7.69	-0.99	4.81	5.22
笔直黄耆 ×橘尾熊蜂 Astragalus strictus × Bombus friseanus	3.28	32.98	53.50	-1.07	-3.77	225.57	294.51
笔直黄耆 ×红束熊蜂 Astragalus strictus × Bombus rufofasciatus	6.65	63.91	112.18	-7.82	-8.32	-35.54	-25.80

表3 在未来气候变化情景下3种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间匹配变化百分比。第一列值表示在历史气候情景下(1970-2000年)与其传粉熊蜂共同分布的黄耆属植物的范围所占的百分比, 即空间匹配(%)。

Table 3 Percentage change in spatial match of three Astragalusspecies and their pollinating bumblebees in the future climate change scenario. First column values indicate the percentage of the range of each Astragalus species that is shared with its pollinating bumblebees at near current (1970-2000), that is spatial match (%).

物种 Species (Astragalus × pollinators)	空间匹配 Spatial match (%)	空间匹配变化百分比 Percentage change in spatial match (%)
	空间匹配 Spatial match (%)	完全扩散 Full dispersal		不扩散 No dispersal		仅熊蜂扩散 OnlyBombusdispersal
	历史阶段 Near current	ssp245	ssp585	ssp245	ssp585	ssp245	ssp585
弯齿黄耆 ×橘尾熊蜂 Astragalus camptodontus × Bombus friseanus	78.76	6.93	-0.03	4.52	8.26	5.19	10.27
黑毛黄耆 ×橘尾熊蜂 Astragalus pullus × Bombus friseanus	57.22	13.28	-11.79	8.44	6.03	23.12	23.82
笔直黄耆 ×橘尾熊蜂 Astragalus strictus × Bombus friseanus	16.03	0.47	0.55	3.13	-1.94	239.36	301.99
笔直黄耆 ×红束熊蜂 Astragalus strictus × Bombus rufofasciatus	32.51	23.83	45.80	-7.82	-30.74	-32.81	-24.39

图4 3种黄耆属植物在历史阶段(1970-2000年)和在2100 (2081-2100年)两种情景(ssp245和ssp585)下的地理范围及考虑传粉熊蜂时的地理范围(×105 km2)。

Fig. 4 Range size (×105 km2) of three Astragalusspecies and considering the geographical distribution of pollinating bumblebees at near current (1970-2000) and at 2100 (2081-2100) two scenarios (ssp245 and ssp585).

参考文献 37

[1]	Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, Kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, 43,1223-1232. DOI URL
[2]	Bingham RA, Orthner AR (1998) Efficient pollination of alpine plants. Nature, 391,238-239. DOI URL
[3]	Burkle LA, Alarcón R (2011) The future of plant-pollinator diversity: Understanding interaction networks across time, space, and global change. American Journal of Botany, 98,528-538. DOI PMID
[4]	Byers DL (2017) Studying plant-pollinator interactions in a changing climate: A review of approaches. Applications in Plant Sciences, 5,1700012. DOI URL
[5]	Clement SL, Griswold TL, Rust RW, Hellier BC, Stout DM (2006) Bee associates of flowering Astragalus and Onobrychis genebank accessions at a Snake River site in eastern Washington . Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 79,254-260. DOI URL
[6]	Dodd ME, Silvertown J, Chase MW (1999) Phylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families. Evolution, 53,732-744. DOI URL
[7]	Duffy KJ, Johnson SD (2017) Specialized mutualisms may constrain the geographical distribution of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284,20171841.
[8]	Gorostiague P, Sajama J, Ortega-Baes P (2018) Will climate change cause spatial mismatch between plants and their pollinators? A test using Andean cactus species. Biological Conservation, 226,247-255. DOI URL
[9]	Green TW, Bohart GE (1975) The pollination ecology of Astragalus cibarius and Astragalus utahensis (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany, 62,379-386. DOI URL
[10]	He MX, Chen LX, Luo G, Gu XD, Wang G, Ran JH (2018) Suitable habitat prediction and overlap analysis of two sympatric species, giant panda ( Ailuropoda melanoleuca) and Asiatic black bear ( Ursus thibetanus) in Liangshan Mountains . Biodiversity Science, 26,1180-1189. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	和梅香, 陈俪心, 罗概, 古晓东, 王戈, 冉江洪 (2018) 凉山山系大熊猫和黑熊适宜生境预测及重叠分析. 生物多样性, 26,1180-1189.] DOI
[11]	He X, Burgess KS, Gao LM, Li DZ (2019a) Distributional responses to climate change for alpine species of Cyananthus and Primula endemic to the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains . Plant Diversity, 41,26-32. DOI URL
[12]	He X, Burgess KS, Yang XF, Ahrends A, Gao LM, Li DZ (2019b) Upward elevation and northwest range shifts for alpine Meconopsis species in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains region . Ecology and Evolution, 9,4055-4064. DOI URL
[13]	Hughes AC (2017) Mapping priorities for conservation in Southeast Asia. Biological Conservation, 209,395-405. DOI URL
[14]	Johnson DM, Büntgen U, Frank DC, Kausrud K, Haynes KJ, Liebhold AM, Esper J, Stenseth NC (2010) Climatic warming disrupts recurrent alpine insect outbreaks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107,20576-20581.
[15]	Karron JD (1987) The pollination ecology of co-occuring geographically restricted and widespread species of Astragalus (Fabaceae). Biological Conservation, 39,179-193. DOI URL
[16]	Kelly AE, Goulden ML (2008) Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105,11823-11826.
[17]	Lenoir J, Gégout JC, Marquet PAde Ruffray P, Brisse H (2008) A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century. Science, 320,1768-1771. DOI URL
[18]	Li LH, Liu HY, Lin ZS, Jia JH, Liu X (2017) Identifying priority areas for monitoring the invasion of Solidago canadensis based on MaxEnt and Zonation . Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37,3124-3132. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	李丽鹤, 刘会玉, 林振山, 贾俊鹤, 刘翔 (2017) 基于MaxEnt和Zonation的加拿大一枝黄花入侵重点监控区确定. 生态学报, 37,3124-3132.]
[19]	Li YC, Li MY, Li C, Liu ZZ (2020) Optimized MaxEnt model predictions of climate change impacts on the suitable distribution of Cunninghamia lanceolata in China . Forests, 11,302. DOI URL
[20]	Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37,637-669. DOI URL
[21]	Pearce JL, Boyce MS (2006) Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43,405-412. DOI URL
[22]	Radosavljevic A, Anderson RP (2014) Making better MaxEnt models of species distributions: Complexity, overﬁtting and evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, 41,629-643. DOI URL
[23]	Raes N, Roos MC, Slik JWF, van Loon EE, ter Steege H (2009) Botanical richness and endemicity patterns of Borneo derived from species distribution models. Ecography, 32,180-192. DOI URL
[24]	Richards KW (1987) Diversity, density, efficiency, and effectiveness of pollinators of Cicer milkvetch, Astragalus cicer L . Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65,2168-2176. DOI URL
[25]	Shi XY, Shi XG, Hu Q, Guan TP, Fu Q, Zhang J, Yao M, Li S (2019) Evaluating the potential habitat overlap and predation risk between snow leopards and free-range yaks in the Qionglai Mountains, Sichuan. Biodiversity Science, 27,951-959. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	史晓昀, 施小刚, 胡强, 官天培, 付强, 张剑, 姚蒙, 李晟 (2019) 四川邛崃山脉雪豹与散放牦牛潜在分布重叠与捕食风险评估. 生物多样性, 27,951-959.] DOI
[26]	Sosa-Pivatto M, Cosacov A, Baranzelli MC, Iglesias MR, Espíndola A, Sérsic AN (2017) Do 120,000 years of plant-pollinator interactions predict floral phenotype divergence in Calceolaria polyrhiza? A reconstruction using species distribution models . Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 11,351-361. DOI URL
[27]	Sun Y, Qin DH, Liu HB (2012) Introduction to treatment of uncertainties for IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Climate Change Research, 8,150-153. (in Chinese)
	孙颖, 秦大河, 刘洪滨 (2012) IPCC第五次评估报告不确定性处理方法的介绍. 气候变化研究进展, 8,150-153.]
[28]	Tanner DA, Clark C, Pitts JP (2013) Pollination biology of Astragalus phoenix (Fabaceae) with notes on the natural history of its pollinator, Anthophora porterae (Hymenoptera: Apidae) . Western North American Naturalist, 73,373-381. DOI URL
[29]	Tsiftsis S, Djordjević V (2020) Modelling sexually deceptive orchid species distributions under future climates: The importance of plant-pollinator interactions. Scientific Reports, 10,10623. DOI PMID
[30]	Wang YS, Xie BY, Wan FH, Xiao QM, Dai LY (2007) Application of ROC curve analysis in evaluating the performance of alien species' potential distribution models. Biodiversity Science, 15,365-372. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	王运生, 谢丙炎, 万方浩, 肖启明, 戴良英 (2007) ROC曲线分析在评价入侵物种分布模型中的应用. 生物多样性, 15,365-372.] DOI
[31]	Williams PH, Huang JX, An JD (2017) Bear wasps of the Middle Kingdom: A decade of discovering China's bumblebees. Antenna, 41,21-24.
[32]	Williams PH, Tang Y, Yao J, Cameron S (2009) The bumblebees of Sichuan (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini) . Systematics and Biodiversity, 7,101-189. DOI URL
[33]	Xin XG, Wu TW, Zhang J, Zhang F, Li WP, Zhang YW, Lu YX, Fang YJ, Jie WH, Zhang L, Dong M, Shi XL, Li JL, Chu M, Liu QX, Yan JH (2019) Introduction of BCC models and its participation in CMIP6. Climate Change Research, 15,533-539. (in Chinese with English abstract)
	辛晓歌, 吴统文, 张洁, 张芳, 李伟平, 张艳武, 路屹雄, 房永杰, 颉卫华, 张莉, 董敏, 史学丽, 李江龙, 储敏, 刘茜霞, 颜京辉 (2019) BCC模式及其开展的CMIP6试验介绍. 气候变化研究进展, 15,533-539.]
[34]	Zhang L, Jing ZN, Li ZY, Liu Y, Fang SZ (2019) Predictive modeling of suitable habitats for Cinnamomum camphora (L.) Presl using MaxEnt model under climate change in China . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16,3185. DOI URL
[35]	Zhang XL, Li YC, Wang YY, Cai HY, Zeng H, Wang ZH (2019) Influence of future climate change in suitable habitats of tea in different countries. Biodiversity Science, 27,595-606. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI URL
	张晓玲, 李亦超, 王芸芸, 蔡宏宇, 曾辉, 王志恒 (2019) 未来气候变化对不同国家茶适宜分布区的影响. 生物多样性, 27,595-606.] DOI
[36]	Zhang XQ (2018) Geographical Distribution and Climatic Suitability of Typical Eco-economical Tree Species in the Dryland of Northwest China. PhD dissertation, Research Center for Eco-Environments and Soils and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Ministry of Education, Xi'an, (in Chinese with English abstract)
	张晓芹 (2018) 西北旱区典型生态经济树种地理分布与气候适宜性研究. 博士学位论文.]
[37]	Zhang XQ, Li GQ, Du S (2018) Predicting the influence of future climate change on the suitable distribution areas of Elaeagnus angustifolia. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29,3213-3220. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI PMID
	张晓芹, 李国庆, 杜盛 (2018) 未来气候变化对沙枣适宜分布区的影响预测. 应用生态学报, 29,3213-3220.] PMID

中国-喜马拉雅三种黄耆属植物与其传粉熊蜂的空间分布预测

Predicting the spatial distribution of three Astragalusspecies and their pollinating bumblebees in the Sino-Himalayas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

补充材料

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张雅丽, 张丙昌, 赵康, 李凯凯, 刘燕晋. 毛乌素沙地不同类型生物结皮细菌群落差异及其驱动因子[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 23027-.
[2]	董廷玮, 黄美玲, 韦旭, 马硕, 岳衢, 刘文丽, 郑佳鑫, 王刚, 马蕊, 丁由中, 薄顺奇, 王正寰. 上海地区金线侧褶蛙种群的潜在空间分布格局及其景观连通性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(8): 22692-.
[3]	刘伟, 王濡格, 范天巧, 娜依曼·阿不都力江, 宋新航, 肖书平, 郭宁, 帅凌鹰. 福建省明溪县黑冠鹃隼生境适宜性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 22660-.
[4]	冯莉. 国际法视野下生物多样性和气候变化的协同治理[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23110-.
[5]	杨俊毅, 关潇, 李俊生, 刘晶晶, 郝颢晶, 王槐睿. 乌江流域生物多样性与生态系统服务的空间格局及相互关系[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(7): 23061-.
[6]	鲍虞园, 李银康, 林吴颖, 周志琴, 肖晓波, 颉晓勇. 中国南海北部近海鲎资源调查及北部湾潮间带中华鲎幼鲎潜在栖息地评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(5): 22407-.
[7]	邓昶, 郝杰威, 高德, 任明迅, 张莉娜. 海南受威胁苔藓植物适生热点区域识别与保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22580-.
[8]	姚雪, 陈星, 戴尊, 宋坤, 邢诗晨, 曹宏彧, 邹璐, 王健. 采集策略对叶附生苔类植物发现概率及物种多样性的重要性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(4): 22685-.
[9]	邵雯雯, 范国祯, 何知舟, 宋志平. 多地同质园实验揭示普通野生稻的表型可塑性与本地适应性[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22311-.
[10]	桑佳文, 宋创业, 贾宁霞, 贾元, 刘长成, 乔鲜果, 张琳, 袁伟影, 吴冬秀, 李凌浩, 郭柯. 青藏高原植被调查与制图评估[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(3): 22430-.
[11]	姚仁秀, 陈燕, 吕晓琴, 王江湖, 杨付军, 王晓月. 海拔及环境因子影响杜鹃属植物的表型特征和化学性状[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22259-.
[12]	王金洲, 徐靖. “基于自然的解决方案”应对生物多样性丧失和气候变化: 进展、挑战和建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22496-.
[13]	林木青, 张应明, 欧阳芳, 束祖飞, 朱朝东, 肖治术. 广东车八岭国家级自然保护区独栖性胡蜂多样性空间分布特征及其对环境因子的响应[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(2): 22310-.
[14]	王晓凤, 饶杰生, 杨涛, 刘文聪, 田希, 陈稀, 刘其明, 徐衍潇, 张秋雨, 张洪强, 张旭, 欧晓昆, 沈泽昊. 云南鸡足山半湿润常绿阔叶林群落木本植物多样性格局与环境解释[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(11): 23217-.
[15]	崔家鹤, 李智勇, 王宇池, 孙蔷, 莎娜, 李紫晶, 武艳涛, 史亚博, 韩瀛, 李明乐, 王立新, 赵利清, 梁存柱. 垫状驼绒藜群落特征及地理分布数据集[J]. 生物多样性, 2023, 31(10): 23172-.