生物多样性 ›› 2006, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 470-478.  DOI: 10.1360/biodiv.060047

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

松山自然保护区各功能区植被动态及变化格局

周睿1,2,王辉1,葛剑平1*,熊友才1,吴记贵3   

  1. 1 (北京师范大学生命科学学院, 生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室, 北京 100875)
    2 (云南大学生命科学学院生态学与地植物学研究所, 昆明 650091)
    3 (北京松山国家级自然保护区管理处, 北京 102115)
  • 收稿日期:2006-03-06 修回日期:2006-09-17 出版日期:2006-11-20 发布日期:2006-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 葛剑平

Vegetation dynamics and patterns of change in functional protection subzones in Songshan National Nature Reserve, Beijing

Rui Zhou1,2, Hui Wang1, Jianping Ge1*,Youcai Xiong1, Jigui Wu3   

  1. 1 MOE Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
    2 Institute of Ecology and Geobotany, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091
    3 The Management Office of Songshan National Nature Reserve, Beijing 102115
  • Received:2006-03-06 Revised:2006-09-17 Online:2006-11-20 Published:2006-11-20
  • Contact: Jianping Ge

摘要: 作为全球生态保育的基石, 保护区管理和设计成为研究热点。本研究旨在描述不同功能区在相应保护措施下植被的差异性变化。运用遥感和GIS技术以及景观分析手段, 利用两期Landsat 5 TM 影像提取出北京松山国家级自然保护区1987、2001年的归一化差值植被指数(Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, NDVI)信息, 对植被动态进行分析, 并按变化率分为减少、无变化和增加3种类型, 利用景观指数刻画出变化格局, 就植被动态及其变化格局在不同功能区的空间分异性进行比较。得到以下主要结论: (1) 保护区建立后植被大体稳定并有所改善, 形成核心区>缓冲区>实验区的植被覆盖梯度。(2) 在绝对保护措施下, 核心区植被稳定性高并得到进一步改善。植被稳定类型集中于区域中心, 增加类型聚集在区域边缘, 减少类型与自然植被动态特征相符呈随机分布状态。(3) 受经营、开发措施影响, 实验区稳定性低, 变化面积大、变幅大、增加与衰退共存, 植被覆盖居全保护区最低且有退化趋势。(4) 缓冲区植被动态呈现出一定的随机分布格局。

AbstractThe nature reserve, as a cornerstone of global ecological conservation, has become the focus for ecological management and design programs. The aim of this study is to describe the differentiation dynamics of vegetation in various functional subzones under relevant protection conditions. Based on remote sensing, GIS and other methods of landscape analysis, the 1987- and 2001- normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data of Songshan National Nature Reserve, Beijing were calculated using two-stage Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper images. Vegetation analysis was analyzed for trends, including three tendencies: decrease, stabiliza-tion and increase. Landscape metrics were calculated to portray the change pattern of vegetation, and spatial heterogeneities of vegetation dynamics and change pattern were compared in various functional subzones. The major results were achieved as follows: (1) Vegetation cover remained in general stable or was to some extent improved since the nature reserve had been established. The gradients of vegetation cover had already been constructed, i.e. core zone > buffer zone > experimental zone. (2) Under the strictest protection measures, vegetation in the core zone appeared to be highly stable and had been further improved. The stabi-lization-type vegetation dynamic was found in the central part of the zone and the increase-type dynamic was found on the edge of the zone. The decrease-type vegetation dynamic was consistent with natural vegetation dynamics in a randomly distributed state. (3) As a result of development and exploitation, the stabilization of vegetation in the experimental zone was low and variable, with a strong fluctuation as well as a dynamic of alternating increase and decline. Its vegetation coverage was the lowest and the vegetation tended to degrade gradually. (4) To some extent, a random distribution pattern was observed in the vegetation of the buffer zone.